EJB lookup in JNDI?

Hi Folks, With Gianny's fix for EJB deployment (thanks!) I can now run the deploy tool on modules/j2ee/target/test-ejb-jar.jar and start up the server and everything looks good, i.e. no stack traces. Now I'm trying to call the EJB from a unit test outside Geronimo but I'm stuck looking it up. I

Re: Testing Maven 1.0 (success on linux/1.4.2)

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:32:51AM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Would appreciate it if people can confirm if geronimo builds on different platforms with the new release of maven 1.0 BUILD SUCCESSFUL on Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) java version 1.4.2_04 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment,

Re: Testing Maven 1.0

Lynch, Peter wrote: OK, after deleting my maven repository, then figuring out what NTLM authentication was and how to configure it behind my firewall, I finally got... BUILD SUCCESSFUL on Windows NT4 SP6 java version 1.4.2_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02)

Re: EJB lookup in JNDI?

toby cabot wrote: I guess I should ask first if this functionality (i.e. remote JNDI and EJB calls) is even implemented, maybe I'm trying something that's not built yet. If it's supposed to work I'd welcome any tips people can offer. I don't believe it's there yet. -- Jeremy

RE: Testing Maven 1.0

I'm sorry I don't have any idea about how my company's firewall is set up. Here are the two test reports for the failed tests. TEST-org.apache.geronimo.jetty.ApplicationTest.txt TEST-org.apache.geronimo.jetty.deployment.WebAppDConfigTest.txt If anyone has suggestions, that would be much

Re: EJB lookup in JNDI?

On Jul 14, 2004, at 5:03 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: toby cabot wrote: I guess I should ask first if this functionality (i.e. remote JNDI and EJB calls) is even implemented, maybe I'm trying something that's not built yet. If it's supposed to work I'd welcome any tips people can offer. I don't

RE: Testing Maven 1.0

Maven 1.0 works using clean and a straight (complete) build on the following: C:\ java -version java version 1.4.2_04 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_04-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_04-b05, mixed mode) C:\ ver Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version

Re: problem starting jetty as GBean stanalone

In the future can you start with a fresh email message instead of replying to an existing message on the mailing list. On most email clients if you reply to a message and change the subject it still groups the response with the original thread. BTW this is called thread hijacking. thanks

Re: problem starting jetty as GBean stanalone

Anyway, I took a peek at the HTTPConnector code an what you have should work. Can you try hooking up a debugger to see what is in GBeanMBean attributes map? I will try (not still sure how yet , but will find out) any way if there is a bug as I claimed the other peoples build of the maven

Re: Testing Maven 1.0

Build Successful with maven 1.0 Windows 2000 5.00.2195 SP 3 java version 1.4.1_02 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition(build 1.4.1_02-b06) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_02-b06, mixed mode) Thanks, Dev At 11:32 AM 7/14/2004, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Would appreciate it if people

Re: Javamail license

--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snipped Does the ASF allow us to ship software from ASF servers that contain dependencies that have this kind of language? Jakarta Tomcat still ships the javamail jar. -dain -- Sriram __ Do

Re: Testing Maven 1.0

Hi Jeremy Boynes wrote: Yes. But from what I remember, these come from restrictions on the firewall on your machine. Given the point of the test is to check that we can connect to the local server over the network suggestions on how to make it work in your environment would be appreciated. The

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

On 15/07/2004 3:10 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:47 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: Sorry; indeed, this is perhaps not the right approach. However, I was pretty confident that this new behavior was more correct: As far as I understand, the JMX GBeanInvokers are used only when the

Anyone working on EJB 2.1 Timer support

Is anyone working on EJB 2.1 Timer support? Would it be ok to develop this feature for Geronimo? Thanks, Dev

Re: EJB lookup in JNDI? (that works)

On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:47:58AM -0500, David Blevins wrote: Is it complaining when they are not there or just when they are specified in the system properties? It complains if they're not there; and if they're set in system properties it doesn't see them (and complains). It works if they're

Re: Anyone working on EJB 2.1 Timer support

I've been working on 2.1 timer support at the OpenEJB level [since the EJB stuff is all at that level] on and off over the last ~3 months. I've unfortunately been in and out of the hospital over the last 2 months so my work hasn't progressed as I'd like it to. If you're interested, we could

Re: build broken (assembly module)?

Can you check that your openejb copy is up to date? I've been trying to fix these case problems in both projects while doing actual development work and I think but am not entirely sure that at least this problem is fixed. These attribute names should start with lower case as in cvs. thanks

Re: Thread pool strategy

On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Is it really now as in if you don't have to wait for a thread, do it - otherwise return w/ a status indicating now wasn't possible or now as in wait until there's a thread, do it,

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

Message: The following issue has been closed. Resolver: Gianny DAMOUR Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 3:58 PM A temporary fix has been applied in order to be backward compatible with the previous attribute name conventions.