Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018/02/15 13:49:01, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* > > confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least > > structurally correct and matche

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >>> As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* >>> confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> Side note, the slotmem fix seems like a showstopper, right? I'd want to see >> that in before a T&R. > > +1 Done in r1824333.

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
++1 on you RMing! > On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* > confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least > structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releas

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* >> confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least >> structurally correct and

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* > confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least > structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releases of > source are

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releases of source are one of the few things the version control time machine cannot un

T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
I propose a T&R of 2.4.30 on Feb 19th. I offer to RM unless someone else would like to do so.