RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-12 Thread Zhao, Patric 
Update, the issue is fixed and the new patch release is out MKL-DNN 0.17.4.

Tao filed a PR to update the MKLDNN version in the release 1.4.X
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14141

Thanks all of your helps :)

--Patric


> -Original Message-
> From: Zhao, Patric [mailto:patric.z...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 11:53 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Lv, Tao A ; Ye, Jason Y 
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2
> 
> Hi Sheng,
> 
> Thanks to raise this important issues. Sorry for the lack of validation since 
> we
> don't have mac machine with earlier OS version in house.
> 
> I will contact with MKL-DNN team for the supports of earlier versions of OSX
> but I'm a little afraid the fix needs some extra-time.
> 
> Alternatively, several workarounds in my thoughts (I know it's not the perfect
> solution):
> 
> * using LLVM which can work crossing HW/OS generation
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-
> mxnet/blob/master/MKLDNN_README.md#2
> 
> * provide the binary build for different HW/OS like cuda, mxnet-cu90/92
> 
> * disable MKLDNN supports for earlier versions of HW/OS in MAC, only
> mxnet build.
> 
> I will update the status when get the feedback and schedule from MKL-DNN
> team.
> 
> Feel free to let us know if anything we can help.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Patric
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sheng Zha [mailto:szha@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:33 AM
> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > 1.4.0.rc2
> >
> > Also, recent MKLDNN upgrade prevents us from offering binary
> > distribution for earlier versions of OSX, as it now requires OSX
> > 10.13. This means we would need to drop the binary distribution
> > support for OSX 10.11 and 10.12 if we are to keep mkldnn as a
> > dependency for mxnet-mkl. I'm inquiring whether Intel could extend the
> > compatibility to earlier OSX [1], but even if this is solved upstream it 
> > would
> require an update on the mkldnn submodule.
> >
> > -sz
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/issues/405
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:47 PM Anirudh Subramanian
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > -0
> > >
> > > Thanks Steffen for your release efforts !
> > >
> > > Build from source works with make but fails with cmake for me.
> > >
> > >  cd build && cmake VERBOSE=1 -DUSE_CUDA=ON -DUSE_CUDNN=ON
> > > -DUSE_OPENMP=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -
> > DUSE_DIST_KVSTORE=0
> > > -DUSE_OPENCV=1 -GNinja .. && ninja -v
> > >
> > > FAILED: : && /usr/bin/c++   -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas -fPIC -g -O0 -
> > msse2
> > > -std=c++11 -fopenmp -g  -pthread
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_lockfree.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_param.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_parser.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_array_view.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_any.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_config.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_threaditer.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_serializer.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_threaditer_exc_handling.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_inputsplit.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_logging.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
> > > te
> > > st_json.cc.o
> > >
> > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unit
&g

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Zhao, Patric 
Hi Sheng,

Thanks to raise this important issues. Sorry for the lack of validation since 
we don't have mac machine with earlier OS version in house.

I will contact with MKL-DNN team for the supports of earlier versions of OSX 
but I'm a little afraid the fix needs some extra-time.

Alternatively, several workarounds in my thoughts (I know it's not the perfect 
solution):

* using LLVM which can work crossing HW/OS generation 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/MKLDNN_README.md#2

* provide the binary build for different HW/OS like cuda, mxnet-cu90/92

* disable MKLDNN supports for earlier versions of HW/OS in MAC, only mxnet 
build.

I will update the status when get the feedback and schedule from MKL-DNN team.

Feel free to let us know if anything we can help.

Thanks,

--Patric


> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Zha [mailto:szha@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:33 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2
> 
> Also, recent MKLDNN upgrade prevents us from offering binary distribution
> for earlier versions of OSX, as it now requires OSX 10.13. This means we
> would need to drop the binary distribution support for OSX 10.11 and 10.12
> if we are to keep mkldnn as a dependency for mxnet-mkl. I'm inquiring
> whether Intel could extend the compatibility to earlier OSX [1], but even if
> this is solved upstream it would require an update on the mkldnn submodule.
> 
> -sz
> 
> [1] https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/issues/405
> 
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:47 PM Anirudh Subramanian
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > -0
> >
> > Thanks Steffen for your release efforts !
> >
> > Build from source works with make but fails with cmake for me.
> >
> >  cd build && cmake VERBOSE=1 -DUSE_CUDA=ON -DUSE_CUDNN=ON
> > -DUSE_OPENMP=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -
> DUSE_DIST_KVSTORE=0
> > -DUSE_OPENCV=1 -GNinja .. && ninja -v
> >
> > FAILED: : && /usr/bin/c++   -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas -fPIC -g -O0 -
> msse2
> > -std=c++11 -fopenmp -g  -pthread
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_lockfree.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_param.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_parser.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_array_view.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_any.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_config.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_threaditer.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_serializer.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_threaditer_exc_handling.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_inputsplit.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_logging.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_json.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_optional.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_main.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_env.cc.o
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unitte
> > st_thread_group.cc.o -o
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest/dmlc_unit_tests  -rdynamic
> > lib/libgtestd.a 3rdparty/dmlc-core/libdmlc.a -lpthread && :
> >
> > 3rdparty/dmlc-
> core/test/unittest/CMakeFiles/dmlc_unit_tests.dir/unittest_logging.cc.o:
> > In function `Logging_basics_Test::TestBody()':
> >
> > /home/ubuntu/experimentals/1.4_release/build/../3rdparty/dmlc-
> core/test/unittest/unittest_logging.cc:19:
> > undefined reference to `testing::internal::DeathTest::Create(char
> > const*, testing::internal::RE const*, char const*, int,
> > testing::internal::DeathTest**)'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> >
> > Anirudh
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:09 PM Haibin Lin 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 built from source on Linux an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Sheng Zha 
; > Yuxi)
> > > > who
> > > > > tested and provided feedback - we have five +1 votes.
> > > > > As of today, Friday Feb 1st 2019 6pm PST we have two binding votes,
> > one
> > > > +1
> > > > > (Carin), one +0 (Sheng). The vote continues be open waiting for
> > > feedback
> > > > > from PMC members.
> > > > > Hope you can spare some time over the weekend to provide feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Steffen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:44 AM Marco de Abreu <
> > > marco.g.ab...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Considering the release process has been started last year and
> the
> > > code
> > > > > tag
> > > > > > has also been based on last year, I'd say that it is not really a
> > big
> > > > > deal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Marco
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 09:33 hat Sheng Zha 
> > > > > > geschrieben:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm
> > > using
> > > > it
> > > > > > > here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > > > > > -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not
> > finish
> > > > > > > checking)
> > > > > > > -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > > > > > -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in
> > > LICENSE
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> > > > > > > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > > > > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If
> so:
> > > > > > > -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in
> > > LICENSE?
> > > > > > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files?
> > If
> > > > so:
> > > > > > > -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to
> this
> > > > > NOTICE
> > > > > > > file?
> > > > > > > TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to
> > > > MXNet's
> > > > > > > NOTICE file.
> > > > > > > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by
> > license
> > > > > > > checker)
> > > > > > > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in
> > > > version
> > > > > > > control?
> > > > > > > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > > > > > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is the issue minor?
> > > > > > > - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is
> > > > missing
> > > > > > > from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> > > > > > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> > > > > > > - Yes
> > > > > > > I vote with:
> > > > > > > +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if
> we
> > > > should
> > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > them before release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Anirudh Subramanian 
 geschrieben:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm
> > using
> > > it
> > > > > > here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> > > > > > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > > > > > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > > > > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > > > > > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > > > > -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not
> finish
> > > > > > checking)
> > > > > > -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > > > > -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in
> > LICENSE
> > > > or
> > > > > > NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> > > > > > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > > > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > > > > > -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > > > > > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > > > > > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in
> > LICENSE?
> > > > > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files?
> If
> > > so:
> > > > > > -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this
> > > > NOTICE
> > > > > > file?
> > > > > > TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to
> > > MXNet's
> > > > > > NOTICE file.
> > > > > > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by
> license
> > > > > > checker)
> > > > > > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in
> > > version
> > > > > > control?
> > > > > > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > > > > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is the issue minor?
> > > > > > - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is
> > > missing
> > > > > > from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> > > > > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> > > > > > - Yes
> > > > > > I vote with:
> > > > > > +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we
> > > should
> > > > > fix
> > > > > > them before release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1. Verified below items:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend
> > > > > successfully
> > > > > > > on both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas
> > > > > > > 2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and
> > > > > throughput
> > > > > > > 3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1
> > > > > > > 4. ResNet50v1 INT8 model accuracy looks good
> > > > > > > 5. ResNet50v1 INT8 model performance speedup looks good for
> both
> > > > > latency
> > > > > > > and throughput
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 11:45 AM
> > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > > 1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that
> > > one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 from me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:35 AM Steffen Rochel <
> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Haibin Lin 
+1 built from source on Linux and passed dist sync kvstore test.

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:54 AM Lin Yuan  wrote:

> +1 build from source on MacOS 10.13.6 and tested mxnet-to-coreml converter.
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:03 AM Indhu  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Build from source and tested few examples from the examples folder.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Indu
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:21 PM Steffen Rochel 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sheng - thanks for the feedback.
> > > TVM notice  file is missing as the 1.4.x branch/v1.4.0 release is using
> > TVM
> > > commit 0f053c8
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/commit/0f053c82a747b4dcdf49570ec87c17e0067b7439
> > > >
> > >  from Oct 8, 2018, which didn't have the NOTICE file. IMHO, MXNet
> NOTICE
> > > file is consistent with release content.
> > > As the release started in 2018 I do think it is ok to move forward w/o
> > > update to 2019 IMHO.
> > >
> > > All -
> > > thanks to the committers/contributors (Tao, Aaron, Kellen, Aston, Yuxi)
> > who
> > > tested and provided feedback - we have five +1 votes.
> > > As of today, Friday Feb 1st 2019 6pm PST we have two binding votes, one
> > +1
> > > (Carin), one +0 (Sheng). The vote continues be open waiting for
> feedback
> > > from PMC members.
> > > Hope you can spare some time over the weekend to provide feedback.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:44 AM Marco de Abreu <
> marco.g.ab...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Considering the release process has been started last year and the
> code
> > > tag
> > > > has also been based on last year, I'd say that it is not really a big
> > > deal.
> > > >
> > > > -Marco
> > > >
> > > > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 09:33 hat Sheng Zha 
> > > > geschrieben:
> > > >
> > > > > I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm
> using
> > it
> > > > > here:
> > > > >
> > > > > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> > > > > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > > > > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > > > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > > > > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > > > -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not finish
> > > > > checking)
> > > > > -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > > > -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in
> LICENSE
> > > or
> > > > > NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> > > > > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > > > > -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > > > > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > > > > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in
> LICENSE?
> > > > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If
> > so:
> > > > > -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this
> > > NOTICE
> > > > > file?
> > > > > TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to
> > MXNet's
> > > > > NOTICE file.
> > > > > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by license
> > > > > checker)
> > > > > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in
> > version
> > > > > control?
> > > > > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > > > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is the issue minor?
> > > > > - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is
> > missing
> > > > > from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> > > > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> > > > > - Yes
> > > > > I vote with:
> > > > > +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we
> > should
> > > > fix
> > > > > them before release?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Lin Yuan 
+1 build from source on MacOS 10.13.6 and tested mxnet-to-coreml converter.

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:03 AM Indhu  wrote:

> +1
>
> Build from source and tested few examples from the examples folder.
>
> Thanks,
> Indu
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:21 PM Steffen Rochel 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sheng - thanks for the feedback.
> > TVM notice  file is missing as the 1.4.x branch/v1.4.0 release is using
> TVM
> > commit 0f053c8
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/commit/0f053c82a747b4dcdf49570ec87c17e0067b7439
> > >
> >  from Oct 8, 2018, which didn't have the NOTICE file. IMHO, MXNet NOTICE
> > file is consistent with release content.
> > As the release started in 2018 I do think it is ok to move forward w/o
> > update to 2019 IMHO.
> >
> > All -
> > thanks to the committers/contributors (Tao, Aaron, Kellen, Aston, Yuxi)
> who
> > tested and provided feedback - we have five +1 votes.
> > As of today, Friday Feb 1st 2019 6pm PST we have two binding votes, one
> +1
> > (Carin), one +0 (Sheng). The vote continues be open waiting for feedback
> > from PMC members.
> > Hope you can spare some time over the weekend to provide feedback.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:44 AM Marco de Abreu 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Considering the release process has been started last year and the code
> > tag
> > > has also been based on last year, I'd say that it is not really a big
> > deal.
> > >
> > > -Marco
> > >
> > > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 09:33 hat Sheng Zha 
> > > geschrieben:
> > >
> > > > I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm using
> it
> > > > here:
> > > >
> > > > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> > > > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > > > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > > > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > > -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not finish
> > > > checking)
> > > > -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > > -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE
> > or
> > > > NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> > > > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > > > -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > > > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > > > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If
> so:
> > > > -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this
> > NOTICE
> > > > file?
> > > > TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to
> MXNet's
> > > > NOTICE file.
> > > > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by license
> > > > checker)
> > > > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in
> version
> > > > control?
> > > > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > > >
> > > > Is the issue minor?
> > > > - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is
> missing
> > > > from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> > > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> > > > - Yes
> > > > I vote with:
> > > > +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we
> should
> > > fix
> > > > them before release?
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1. Verified below items:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend
> > > successfully
> > > > > on both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas
> > > > > 2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and
> > > throughput
> > > > > 3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1
> > > > > 4. ResNet5

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-04 Thread Indhu 
+1

Build from source and tested few examples from the examples folder.

Thanks,
Indu



On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:21 PM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Hi Sheng - thanks for the feedback.
> TVM notice  file is missing as the 1.4.x branch/v1.4.0 release is using TVM
> commit 0f053c8
> <
> https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/commit/0f053c82a747b4dcdf49570ec87c17e0067b7439
> >
>  from Oct 8, 2018, which didn't have the NOTICE file. IMHO, MXNet NOTICE
> file is consistent with release content.
> As the release started in 2018 I do think it is ok to move forward w/o
> update to 2019 IMHO.
>
> All -
> thanks to the committers/contributors (Tao, Aaron, Kellen, Aston, Yuxi) who
> tested and provided feedback - we have five +1 votes.
> As of today, Friday Feb 1st 2019 6pm PST we have two binding votes, one +1
> (Carin), one +0 (Sheng). The vote continues be open waiting for feedback
> from PMC members.
> Hope you can spare some time over the weekend to provide feedback.
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:44 AM Marco de Abreu 
> wrote:
>
> > Considering the release process has been started last year and the code
> tag
> > has also been based on last year, I'd say that it is not really a big
> deal.
> >
> > -Marco
> >
> > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 09:33 hat Sheng Zha 
> > geschrieben:
> >
> > > I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm using it
> > > here:
> > >
> > > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> > > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not finish
> > > checking)
> > > -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE
> or
> > > NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> > > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > > -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> > > -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this
> NOTICE
> > > file?
> > > TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to MXNet's
> > > NOTICE file.
> > > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by license
> > > checker)
> > > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > > control?
> > > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > >
> > > Is the issue minor?
> > > - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is missing
> > > from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> > > - Yes
> > > I vote with:
> > > +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we should
> > fix
> > > them before release?
> > >
> > > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A  wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > +1. Verified below items:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend
> > successfully
> > > > on both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas
> > > > 2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and
> > throughput
> > > > 3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1
> > > > 4. ResNet50v1 INT8 model accuracy looks good
> > > > 5. ResNet50v1 INT8 model performance speedup looks good for both
> > latency
> > > > and throughput
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 11:45 AM
> > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> 1.4.0.rc2
> > > >
> > > > Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that one.
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-01 Thread Steffen Rochel 
Hi Sheng - thanks for the feedback.
TVM notice  file is missing as the 1.4.x branch/v1.4.0 release is using TVM
commit 0f053c8
<https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/commit/0f053c82a747b4dcdf49570ec87c17e0067b7439>
 from Oct 8, 2018, which didn't have the NOTICE file. IMHO, MXNet NOTICE
file is consistent with release content.
As the release started in 2018 I do think it is ok to move forward w/o
update to 2019 IMHO.

All -
thanks to the committers/contributors (Tao, Aaron, Kellen, Aston, Yuxi) who
tested and provided feedback - we have five +1 votes.
As of today, Friday Feb 1st 2019 6pm PST we have two binding votes, one +1
(Carin), one +0 (Sheng). The vote continues be open waiting for feedback
from PMC members.
Hope you can spare some time over the weekend to provide feedback.

Regards,
Steffen

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:44 AM Marco de Abreu 
wrote:

> Considering the release process has been started last year and the code tag
> has also been based on last year, I'd say that it is not really a big deal.
>
> -Marco
>
> Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 09:33 hat Sheng Zha 
> geschrieben:
>
> > I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm using it
> > here:
> >
> > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not finish
> > checking)
> > -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> > NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> > -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> > file?
> > TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to MXNet's
> > NOTICE file.
> > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by license
> > checker)
> > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > control?
> > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> >
> > Is the issue minor?
> > - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is missing
> > from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> > - Yes
> > I vote with:
> > +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we should
> fix
> > them before release?
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > +1. Verified below items:
> > >
> > > 1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend
> successfully
> > > on both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas
> > > 2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and
> throughput
> > > 3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1
> > > 4. ResNet50v1 INT8 model accuracy looks good
> > > 5. ResNet50v1 INT8 model performance speedup looks good for both
> latency
> > > and throughput
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 11:45 AM
> > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2
> > >
> > > Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that one.
> > >
> > > +1 from me.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:35 AM Steffen Rochel <
> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Kellen - Sergey, the 1.4.0 release co-manager signed the tar file.
> > > > Please use his public key to validate the asc.
> > > > I was able to validate:
> > > >
> > > > curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS -o
> > > > KEYS
> > > >
> > > > gpg --import KEYS
> > > >
> > > > gpg --verify apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz.asc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-01 Thread Marco de Abreu 
Considering the release process has been started last year and the code tag
has also been based on last year, I'd say that it is not really a big deal.

-Marco

Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 09:33 hat Sheng Zha  geschrieben:

> I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm using it
> here:
>
> -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
> -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> -[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not finish
> checking)
> -[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> -[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
> -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> -[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
> -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> -[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> file?
> TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to MXNet's
> NOTICE file.
> -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by license
> checker)
> -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> control?
> -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
>
> Is the issue minor?
> - Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is missing
> from MXNet's NOTICE file.
> Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
> - Yes
> I vote with:
> +0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we should fix
> them before release?
>
> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A  wrote:
>
> >
> > +1. Verified below items:
> >
> > 1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend successfully
> > on both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas
> > 2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and throughput
> > 3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1
> > 4. ResNet50v1 INT8 model accuracy looks good
> > 5. ResNet50v1 INT8 model performance speedup looks good for both latency
> > and throughput
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 11:45 AM
> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2
> >
> > Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that one.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:35 AM Steffen Rochel 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Kellen - Sergey, the 1.4.0 release co-manager signed the tar file.
> > > Please use his public key to validate the asc.
> > > I was able to validate:
> > >
> > > curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS -o
> > > KEYS
> > >
> > > gpg --import KEYS
> > >
> > > gpg --verify apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz.asc
> > >
> > >
> > > output:
> > >
> > > gpg: assuming signed data in
> > 'apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz'
> > >
> > > gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 26 16:25:41 2019 PST
> > >
> > > gpg:using RSA key
> > BD52136E76B7BD68E7843B0B591C06669F740FD7
> > >
> > > gpg: Good signature from "Sergey Kolychev "
> > > [unknown]
> > >
> > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > >
> > > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > > owner.
> > >
> > > Primary key fingerprint: BD52 136E 76B7 BD68 E784  3B0B 591C 0666 9F74
> > > 0FD7
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:39 PM kellen sunderland <
> > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +0
> > > >
> > > > Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but
> > > > so
> > > far
> > > > not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature:
> > > > No public key".  I've added the keys

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-01 Thread Sheng Zha 
I found an awesome checklist for incubator releases [1] so I'm using it
here:

-[Y] Are release files in correct location?
-[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
-[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
-[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
-[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
-[N/A] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? (sz: did not finish checking)
-[N] Is the NOTICE year correct?
-[N/A] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
NOTICE? (sz: did not finish checking)
-[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
-[Y] Does the software have a compatible license?
-[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
-[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
-[N] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
file?
TVM has Apache 2.0 license and its NOTICE hasn't been added to MXNet's
NOTICE file.
-[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers? (sz: enforced by license checker)
-[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
control?
-[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
-[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?

Is the issue minor?
- Unsure. NOTICE year is wrong (it's 2019 now). TVM's NOTICE is missing
from MXNet's NOTICE file.
Could it possibly be fixed in the next release?
- Yes
I vote with:
+0 not sure if it should be released. Could mentors advise if we should fix
them before release?

[1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist


On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:56 PM Lv, Tao A  wrote:

>
> +1. Verified below items:
>
> 1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend successfully
> on both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas
> 2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and throughput
> 3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1
> 4. ResNet50v1 INT8 model accuracy looks good
> 5. ResNet50v1 INT8 model performance speedup looks good for both latency
> and throughput
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 11:45 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2
>
> Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that one.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:35 AM Steffen Rochel 
> wrote:
>
> > Kellen - Sergey, the 1.4.0 release co-manager signed the tar file.
> > Please use his public key to validate the asc.
> > I was able to validate:
> >
> > curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS -o
> > KEYS
> >
> > gpg --import KEYS
> >
> > gpg --verify apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz.asc
> >
> >
> > output:
> >
> > gpg: assuming signed data in
> 'apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz'
> >
> > gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 26 16:25:41 2019 PST
> >
> > gpg:using RSA key
> BD52136E76B7BD68E7843B0B591C06669F740FD7
> >
> > gpg: Good signature from "Sergey Kolychev "
> > [unknown]
> >
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >
> > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> >
> > Primary key fingerprint: BD52 136E 76B7 BD68 E784  3B0B 591C 0666 9F74
> > 0FD7
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:39 PM kellen sunderland <
> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +0
> > >
> > > Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but
> > > so
> > far
> > > not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature:
> > > No public key".  I've added the keys from GitHub and the release
> > > folder, and also added your public key "40C9346904DFCE37" from the
> > > MIT key server Steffen.  Is there another key I'm missing?
> > >
> > > 1. sha512 look good.
> > > 2. Compile from source successfully
> > > 3. TensorRT build succeeds and runs inference for demo models 4.
> > > License, notice and disclaimer exist.
> > >
> > > -Kellen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:58 PM Steffen Rochel
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > > we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
> > > > As the vote did not reach the necessary number of b

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-31 Thread Lv, Tao A 

+1. Verified below items:

1. Checkout code from tag 1.4.0rc2 and build mkldnn backend successfully on 
both cpu and gpu w/ mkl and openblas 
2. ResNet50v1 FP32 performance looks good for both latency and throughput 
3. Quantization script works well with ResNet50v1 
4. ResNet50v1 INT8 model accuracy looks good 
5. ResNet50v1 INT8 model performance speedup looks good for both latency and 
throughput 


-Original Message-
From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 11:45 AM
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that one.

+1 from me.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:35 AM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Kellen - Sergey, the 1.4.0 release co-manager signed the tar file. 
> Please use his public key to validate the asc.
> I was able to validate:
>
> curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS -o 
> KEYS
>
> gpg --import KEYS
>
> gpg --verify apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz.asc
>
>
> output:
>
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz'
>
> gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 26 16:25:41 2019 PST
>
> gpg:using RSA key BD52136E76B7BD68E7843B0B591C06669F740FD7
>
> gpg: Good signature from "Sergey Kolychev "
> [unknown]
>
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>
> gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
>
> Primary key fingerprint: BD52 136E 76B7 BD68 E784  3B0B 591C 0666 9F74 
> 0FD7
>
>
> Best,
> Steffen
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:39 PM kellen sunderland < 
> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +0
> >
> > Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but 
> > so
> far
> > not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature: 
> > No public key".  I've added the keys from GitHub and the release 
> > folder, and also added your public key "40C9346904DFCE37" from the 
> > MIT key server Steffen.  Is there another key I'm missing?
> >
> > 1. sha512 look good.
> > 2. Compile from source successfully
> > 3. TensorRT build succeeds and runs inference for demo models 4. 
> > License, notice and disclaimer exist.
> >
> > -Kellen
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:58 PM Steffen Rochel 
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
> > > As the vote did not reach the necessary number of binding votes 
> > > I'm extending voting.
> > >
> > > I'm calling on all PMC member, please test and vote.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aston Zhang 
> > > 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
> > > > >
> > > > > Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to
> > release
> > > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Steffen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu 
> > > > > 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks 
> > > > > > normal
> > > compared
> > > > to
> > > > > > 1.3.1 release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier <
> carinme...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> > > > > Scala/Clojure
> > > > > > > package.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > > > >
> > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-31 Thread kellen sunderland 
Great, thanks Steffen!  I added a few key files but missed that one.

+1 from me.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:35 AM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Kellen - Sergey, the 1.4.0 release co-manager signed the tar file. Please
> use his public key to validate the asc.
> I was able to validate:
>
> curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS -o KEYS
>
> gpg --import KEYS
>
> gpg --verify apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz.asc
>
>
> output:
>
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz'
>
> gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 26 16:25:41 2019 PST
>
> gpg:using RSA key BD52136E76B7BD68E7843B0B591C06669F740FD7
>
> gpg: Good signature from "Sergey Kolychev "
> [unknown]
>
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>
> gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
>
> Primary key fingerprint: BD52 136E 76B7 BD68 E784  3B0B 591C 0666 9F74 0FD7
>
>
> Best,
> Steffen
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:39 PM kellen sunderland <
> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +0
> >
> > Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but so
> far
> > not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature: No
> > public key".  I've added the keys from GitHub and the release folder, and
> > also added your public key "40C9346904DFCE37" from the MIT key server
> > Steffen.  Is there another key I'm missing?
> >
> > 1. sha512 look good.
> > 2. Compile from source successfully
> > 3. TensorRT build succeeds and runs inference for demo models
> > 4. License, notice and disclaimer exist.
> >
> > -Kellen
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:58 PM Steffen Rochel 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
> > > As the vote did not reach the necessary number of binding votes I'm
> > > extending voting.
> > >
> > > I'm calling on all PMC member, please test and vote.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aston Zhang 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
> > > > >
> > > > > Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to
> > release
> > > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Steffen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal
> > > compared
> > > > to
> > > > > > 1.3.1 release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier <
> carinme...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> > > > > Scala/Clojure
> > > > > > > package.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > > v1.4.0.
> > > > > > > > Voting will
> > > > > > > > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on
> > > > > Wednesday,
> > > > > > > > January 30th 7pm PST.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Link to release notes:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > > > > > > > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > > > > > > <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > > >1.4.0.rc
> > > > > > > > <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc1
> > > > >2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > Steffen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > > > > > Software Development Engineer
> > > > > > Amazon Web Services
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-31 Thread Steffen Rochel 
Kellen - Sergey, the 1.4.0 release co-manager signed the tar file. Please
use his public key to validate the asc.
I was able to validate:

curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS -o KEYS

gpg --import KEYS

gpg --verify apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz.asc


output:

gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc2-incubating.tar.gz'

gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 26 16:25:41 2019 PST

gpg:using RSA key BD52136E76B7BD68E7843B0B591C06669F740FD7

gpg: Good signature from "Sergey Kolychev "
[unknown]

gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!

gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.

Primary key fingerprint: BD52 136E 76B7 BD68 E784  3B0B 591C 0666 9F74 0FD7


Best,
Steffen

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:39 PM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +0
>
> Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but so far
> not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature: No
> public key".  I've added the keys from GitHub and the release folder, and
> also added your public key "40C9346904DFCE37" from the MIT key server
> Steffen.  Is there another key I'm missing?
>
> 1. sha512 look good.
> 2. Compile from source successfully
> 3. TensorRT build succeeds and runs inference for demo models
> 4. License, notice and disclaimer exist.
>
> -Kellen
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:58 PM Steffen Rochel 
> wrote:
>
> > Dear MXNet community -
> > we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
> > As the vote did not reach the necessary number of binding votes I'm
> > extending voting.
> >
> > I'm calling on all PMC member, please test and vote.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aston Zhang 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel <
> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
> > > >
> > > > Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to
> release
> > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Steffen
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal
> > compared
> > > to
> > > > > 1.3.1 release
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> > > > Scala/Clojure
> > > > > > package.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > v1.4.0.
> > > > > > > Voting will
> > > > > > > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on
> > > > Wednesday,
> > > > > > > January 30th 7pm PST.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to release notes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > > > > > > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > > > > > <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > >1.4.0.rc
> > > > > > > <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc1
> > > >2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > Steffen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > > > > Software Development Engineer
> > > > > Amazon Web Services
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-31 Thread Aaron Markham 
+1 I built the full website including the branch and it was fine.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 22:39 kellen sunderland  +0
>
> Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but so far
> not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature: No
> public key".  I've added the keys from GitHub and the release folder, and
> also added your public key "40C9346904DFCE37" from the MIT key server
> Steffen.  Is there another key I'm missing?
>
> 1. sha512 look good.
> 2. Compile from source successfully
> 3. TensorRT build succeeds and runs inference for demo models
> 4. License, notice and disclaimer exist.
>
> -Kellen
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:58 PM Steffen Rochel 
> wrote:
>
> > Dear MXNet community -
> > we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
> > As the vote did not reach the necessary number of binding votes I'm
> > extending voting.
> >
> > I'm calling on all PMC member, please test and vote.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aston Zhang 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel <
> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
> > > >
> > > > Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to
> release
> > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Steffen
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal
> > compared
> > > to
> > > > > 1.3.1 release
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> > > > Scala/Clojure
> > > > > > package.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > v1.4.0.
> > > > > > > Voting will
> > > > > > > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on
> > > > Wednesday,
> > > > > > > January 30th 7pm PST.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to release notes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > > > > > > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > > > > > <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > >1.4.0.rc
> > > > > > > <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc1
> > > >2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > Steffen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > > > > Software Development Engineer
> > > > > Amazon Web Services
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-30 Thread kellen sunderland 
+0

Overall release looks good.  Probably something I'm doing wrong, but so far
not able to validate the .asc.  I'm getting "Can't check signature: No
public key".  I've added the keys from GitHub and the release folder, and
also added your public key "40C9346904DFCE37" from the MIT key server
Steffen.  Is there another key I'm missing?

1. sha512 look good.
2. Compile from source successfully
3. TensorRT build succeeds and runs inference for demo models
4. License, notice and disclaimer exist.

-Kellen

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:58 PM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Dear MXNet community -
> we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
> As the vote did not reach the necessary number of binding votes I'm
> extending voting.
>
> I'm calling on all PMC member, please test and vote.
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aston Zhang  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
> > >
> > > Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to release
> > > Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal
> compared
> > to
> > > > 1.3.1 release
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> > > Scala/Clojure
> > > > > package.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > v1.4.0.
> > > > > > Voting will
> > > > > > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on
> > > Wednesday,
> > > > > > January 30th 7pm PST.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Link to release notes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > > > > > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > > > > <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > >1.4.0.rc
> > > > > > <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc1
> > >2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Steffen
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > > > Software Development Engineer
> > > > Amazon Web Services
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-30 Thread Steffen Rochel 
Dear MXNet community -
we currently have three +1 votes, one binding.
As the vote did not reach the necessary number of binding votes I'm
extending voting.

I'm calling on all PMC member, please test and vote.

Regards,
Steffen

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aston Zhang  wrote:

> +1
>
> Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
> >
> > Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to release
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu  wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal compared
> to
> > > 1.3.1 release
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> > Scala/Clojure
> > > > package.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> v1.4.0.
> > > > > Voting will
> > > > > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on
> > Wednesday,
> > > > > January 30th 7pm PST.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link to release notes:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > > > > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > >
> > > > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > > >  > > > >1.4.0.rc
> > > > >  >2
> > > > >
> > > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Steffen
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > > Software Development Engineer
> > > Amazon Web Services
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-30 Thread Aston Zhang 
+1

Tested with the Dive into Deep Learning book.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Thanks Carin and Yuxi.
>
> Committers and PMC members - please test and send your vote to release
> Apache MXNet (incubating) v1.4.0.
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:55 AM Yuxi Hu  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal compared to
> > 1.3.1 release
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested
> Scala/Clojure
> > > package.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel <
> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > >
> > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version v1.4.0.
> > > > Voting will
> > > > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on
> Wednesday,
> > > > January 30th 7pm PST.
> > > >
> > > > Link to release notes:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > > > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > >
> > > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> > > >  > > >1.4.0.rc
> > > > 2
> > > >
> > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > +1 = approve
> > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Steffen
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > Software Development Engineer
> > Amazon Web Services
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-30 Thread Yuxi Hu 
+1

verified the training throughput for resnet50_v1 looks normal compared to
1.3.1 release

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Carin Meier  wrote:

> +1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested Scala/Clojure
> package.
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel 
> wrote:
>
> > Dear MXNet community,
> >
> > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version v1.4.0.
> > Voting will
> > start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on Wednesday,
> > January 30th 7pm PST.
> >
> > Link to release notes:
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> > 1.4.0+Release+Notes
> >
> > Link to release candidate:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> >  >1.4.0.rc
> > 2
> >
> > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
> >
> >
> > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > +1 = approve
> > +0 = no opinion
> > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Steffen
> >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
Software Development Engineer
Amazon Web Services

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-01-29 Thread Carin Meier 
+1 - checked out from the release tag and built and tested Scala/Clojure
package.

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:53 PM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Dear MXNet community,
>
> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version v1.4.0.
> Voting will
> start today, Saturday January 26th 6pm PST and will close on Wednesday,
> January 30th 7pm PST.
>
> Link to release notes:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+
> 1.4.0+Release+Notes
>
> Link to release candidate:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/
> 1.4.0.rc
> 2
>
> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc2
>
>
> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> +1 = approve
> +0 = no opinion
> -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Steffen
>
> >
>