Of Course, thx for the ticket That will help to see the Progress 😊
I hat some ideas in my mind, but I think they didn’t worked out. Atm I don’t
know much about lexer/Parser stuff. Only used JavaCC and ANTLR to generate
stuff, bringing Syntax highlighting for C# to netbeans, works ok but not
perf
Isn't Language Server Protocol the simpliest way to get that ?
--
Emmanuel Hugonnet
http://www.ehsavoie.com
http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
I think LSP can be an other Option too.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: ehsavoie
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Juni 2017 09:44
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Provide basic editor features for more file types out of
thebox[WAS: Re: AW: Introductory Email]
Isn't Language Server
For the LSP you Need the Server which will provide the language, but those
files are already there for years.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: ehsavoie
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Juni 2017 09:44
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Provide basic editor features for more file types
I don't believe so.
For simple editors (syntax highlighting, braces matching, keywords
completion) we can write easily a generic editor that loads the
keywords from a definition file that's already available on the links
mentioned.
LSP makes sense for full-blown support (eg. Typescript) but then
LSP is an API so you would 'only' have to start a process and connect to it
(through input/output stream mostly).
>From my point of view a LSP editor is the generic editor you are talking
about, and the LSP server is the file you are loading from.
The advantage is that you have a quick more advanc
In theory adding LSP support should be just as easy since the server does all
the heavy lifting.
But if we want to have for example Erlang syntax highlighting, etc. in the
first case we just add another 10kb configuration file. In the second case we
have to find and ship an Erlang LSP server.
Who can remember Schliemann Project in NetBeans?
Sven
Am 19.06.2017 1:08 nachm. schrieb "Emilian Bold" :
> In theory adding LSP support should be just as easy since the server does
> all the heavy lifting.
>
> But if we want to have for example Erlang syntax highlighting, etc. in the
> first cas
Nice, I scanned the document and it describes exact that what I requested How
and why: http://wiki.netbeans.org/Schliemann
And here is a proposal how:
http://wiki.netbeans.org/SchliemannNBSLanguageDescription
But unfortunately it was not implemented, right? I think to create a new file
Format
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:06 PM Christian Lenz
wrote:
> But unfortunately it was not implemented, right?
>
Implemented, deprecated and removed IIRC!
Best wishes,
Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net
Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive
I do. I wrote both of my editors in Schliemann, and then re-wrote them when it
was abandoned. There was some discussion at the time about why it was
unsupportable, or perhaps just obsolete but I don't remember the details.
However, that experience is part of why I am proposing an "editor gener
The Problem is, what I think, to find or create such files by my self. I
searched for months to find a C# grammar file for JavaCC. There isn’t so I used
the Java and changed some stuff. Very error related because I don’t know much
about grammar stuff.
Now I will rewrite my Plugin to ANTLR, beca
Yes, I do remember Schliemann from long ago...
Although this is not about bringing back .NBS files as much as
integrating what already is out there ("word files" and such), even if
it doesn't cover all the NetBeans features.
> We really need such simpler method to bring a new language to NetBeans
In terms of NetBeans being an IDE for editing text files, I have mostly been
thinking about editors for languages like mine that aren't in the mainstream,
so the artifacts that you're referring to don't typically don't exist. This is
what I mean when I say that the user community is probably sm
> We may be talking about two different kinds of editor generators. One to
> create editors that recreate other editors, and one that generates a
> different kind of editor.
I did start a separate thread specifically to talk about Chris'
suggestion. What you are talking about seems a bit differe
For me sounds a bit like a meta language which will understandable from
everyone. It sounds like BPML or smth like that, where the diagram can also
generates Code. Only guessing.
Von: Peter Blemel
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Juni 2017 18:45
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Provide b
Hi there,
Is it possible to grant me permissions to be able to update the "Who's Who"
page with my info as "Interested" to be committer ?
Kind regards,
Djamel
Hi folks,
Given that there are a lot of balls in the air with regard to apache transition
and Netbeans 9 release schedule, what is the correct process for submitting a
patch, and what chance of getting it into Netbeans 9?
Specifically:
1. Do I create a bug/feature in Jira or in Bugzilla?
2. I
Done.
Gj
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:49 AM, djamel torche
wrote:
> Hi there,
> Is it possible to grant me permissions to be able to update the "Who's Who"
> page with my info as "Interested" to be committer ?
>
> Kind regards,
> Djamel
>
Here's how to participate:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
Yes, please create bug/feature requests in Apache NetBens Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS/issues/NETBEANS-7?filter=allopenissues
No, an Oracle Contributor Agreement is irrel
For small contributions an ICLA is not mandatory but since you want to
work on a bigger feature it would certainly help. There's only one
ICLA but signing one won't make you a committer without a vote.
While your patch may be slim it seems to introduce a SPI so it would
require an API Review (http
This page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
should be rewritten more in line with
https://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
Since the code donation is almost here we should mention something
about patches and code contributions.
--emi
Yes, good point. If you'd like to take on that task, would be great.
Gj
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> This page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/
> How+to+Participate
> should be rewritten more in line with
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvo
On https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Who%27s+Who we
have a 'Status' column where we instruct people to add 'Need Vote' if
they want to become a committer.
This goes against my understanding of the current Apache process where
people should first get involved and show contributio
I've done a fist edit or
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
, it looks a bit better to me now.
--emi
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Yes, good point. If you'd like to take on that task, would be great.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2
Yup.
Gj
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Emilian Bold wrote:
> On https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Who%27s+Who we
> have a 'Status' column where we instruct people to add 'Need Vote' if
> they want to become a committer.
>
> This goes against my understanding of the current Apache
Big improvement, I think. Hope our mentors will take a look as well and
provide input.
Thanks a lot for doing this.
Gj
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Emilian Bold wrote:
> I've done a fist edit or
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
> , it looks a bit better t
Yes, it's misleading. The page "How to Participate" says to put "Need vote"
there, but someone from Apache changed it to "Interested". Now we have a mix,
but none of the values is really useful (apart from committers of course). I
like the Emilian's idea to replace it with the suggested values.
28 matches
Mail list logo
