Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > > > On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote: > >> Ate, could we get a vote on this release? >> > > Sure :-) > > >> If you look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl >> uence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we are already making >> progress

Re: Where we are and where we are going with Apache NetBeans 9.0

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > What does vc mean? Vote candidate? I know the „Problem“ behind the vote, > but if we make fixes or whatever, we have a new build, with a new build > number so the vote was for rc1-20180303 or the build number rc1-143. If the > vote fails, w

[Mentors][Windows] Updating Windows launchers

Hi, NetBeans has native Windows launchers to start on Windows, and we needed to update them. So I tried here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/573 As it is the first time we are doing this in Apache, I'd be grateful if: -mentors could check the approach is OK -Windows users would

Re: [Mentors][Windows] Updating Windows launchers

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > >... NetBeans has native Windows launchers to start on Windows, and we > needed to > > update them. So I tried here: > > https://github

Re: [Mentors][Windows] Updating Windows launchers

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > ...-the launchers include jni.h - I suspected using jni.h from (Open)JDK > might > > be troublesome; but luckily, there is Apache Harmony,

Re: AW: Microsoft buys GitHub

Hi Emilian, On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > I think we need to plan a separate contribution workflow without GitHub > (see my other thread 'How to participate in Apache NetBeans without a > GitHub account?'). > > Right now we are tied to GitHub and it's impossible to be inv

[patch] NETBEANS-889: handling lambdas in NPECheck

Hi, I'd like to ask for a review of a possible fix for NETBEANS-889 . The testcase there is: --- String value = ""; void nullDereference(){ Runnable run = ()->{ value = null; }; run.run();//false posit

Re: [patch] NETBEANS-889: handling lambdas in NPECheck

the variable2State map. Jan > > As usual, it's a pleasure to see unit test. > > --emi > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On 8 June 2018 7:08 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to ask for a review of a possible fix for

Re: How to participate in Apache NetBeans without a GitHub account?

This works, it seems: git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-netbeans.git (The URL I mentioned before is one used for viewing in a browser, not sure why the URLs are different for cloning and viewing.) Jan On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Glenn Holmer wrote: > On 06/13/2018 08

Re: How to participate in Apache NetBeans without a GitHub account?

Hi, I have nothing particular against Review Board, but a few comments: -I am a little bit concerned about having too many venues for reviewing patches. It requires "reviewers" to monitor/work with several tools (it is hard to imagine how having multiple venues could speed up reviews, which is one

Re: How to participate in Apache NetBeans without a GitHub account?

; > I agree with John that I don't see a problem with Microsoft buying GitHub, > and you that a contingency plan / being clear about what we're using that > isn't usefully mirrored is a good idea - just no more or less than it was > before! ;-) > > On Wed, 13 Jun 201

Re: How to participate in Apache NetBeans without a GitHub account?

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 18:48 Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > The content is (or should be) the same, of course. But the question was > > "how to work without GitHub", so I was providing an URL where to find the > >

Re: NetBeans Build and the binaries-list hash

Hi Josh, Do I understand correctly that you clone, and then simply run "ant"? Then I'd expect no need to update any hashes (the correct dependencies should be downloaded). Do you have an example where you had to change the hash? Thanks, Jan On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Josh Juneau wrot

Re: NetBeans Build and the binaries-list hash

Hi, Thanks for the information. I suspect this may be caused by a local build of HTML4J, which installs the artifacts into the local .m2 storage, and these are then picked up by the NB build. I think I have an idea how to fix that, need to try it. Jan On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Josh Junea

Re: Questions about contributing code and developing on top of Platform 9.0

Hi, On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Peter Steele wrote: > Is there a guide any where for building netbeans in the netbeans ide so you > can use netbeans to debug things? > To work on NetBeans itself (on a module or a set of modules from the main repository), I think this approach is used typic

Re: A round of applause for Matthias!

Great job Matthias! Thanks for working on this. Jan On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Emilian Bold < emilian.b...@protonmail.ch.invalid> wrote: > Hello, > > Maybe you haven't noticed but Matthias methodically worked on almost all > the https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > Apac

Re: How to import 2nd donation in the Git repository?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Emilian Bold < emilian.b...@protonmail.ch.invalid> wrote: > Hello, > > The 2nd donation is arriving and I wonder how to best import it. > > I think it should be a separate branch which we merge into master. > > *But* how to we preserve the full history? > > The en

Re: How to import 2nd donation in the Git repository?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Emilian Bold < emilian.b...@protonmail.ch.invalid> wrote: > No, no, no, I want to keep the existing repository. > > Actually I just looked and there's 'git checkout --orphan' to create a > branch without a parent. > > So, we create an orphan branch, add the 2nd do

Re: How do I upload new binary dependency to http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries/ ? [NETBEANS-781]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > No, you can't do that, it's something that's a temporary solution, we need > to find a replacement for it in the Apache world, and it's something that > myself or others from Oracle have access

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Release ProcessWAS: Merging back netcat@ into the dev@ mailing list

I'd personally prefer faster releases (i.e. 3 months or so). I'd suggest to try to minimize cherry-picking/backporting. One possible way is to have a window for merging features, and then only do stabilization/bugfixes in master for some time, and only then (closer to the release) do a branch, and

Re: [Mentors][Windows] Updating Windows launchers

Hi Bertrand, On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> > ...-the launch

Language Server Protocol client

Hi, Just FYI, as there have been talks about the language server protocol some time ago, I've just opened a work-in-progress PR for a client for the language server protocol: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/629 Help with that and/or feedback is sincerely welcome, Jan

Re: Language Server Protocol client

e LSP when I was writing the remote Java feature/experiment: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/558 (Although it might be possible to partially reuse LSP there, and only extend it.) Jan > > --emi > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On 8 July 2018 8:45 AM, A

Re: Language Server Protocol client

uch a support. Jan > > -Sven > > > > Jan Lahoda schrieb am So., 8. Juli 2018, 13:23: > > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Emilian Bold < > > emilian.b...@protonmail.ch.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Nice. This might be the only way to get

Re: JigSaw-ing NetBeans?

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Sven Reimers wrote: > Hi, > I think Jan had an early prototype for using jigsaw modules as modules in > NetNeans (similiar to the OSGI support) so we could skip creating wrapper > modules... > Yes, here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/JDK+M

Re: JigSaw-ing NetBeans?

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Eirik Bakke wrote: > One of the great things about the NetBeans module system is that adding a > dependency on module X does _not_ permit you to use classes from X's own > dependencies (transitive dependencies). > In Jigsaw, module X can for each of its dependenc

Re: Does Travis and/or Jenkins run the NetBeans test suite?

FWIW, I'd like to set-up testing of the java.completion module on various JDKs (and eventually other Java-related modules), but I didn't get to that yet. Jan On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:24 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > FYI: > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/ > and > https://

Re: Determine the "current" project from module code

There is org.netbeans.spi.project.ui.support.ProjectSensitiveActions.projectSensitiveAction in module projectuiapi, which may be useful (a custom performer is called with the current project when the action is invoked). Alternatively, you could look into the Lookup returned from org.openide.util.U

Re: [DISCUSS] Integration of 2nd donation

pache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > Initial+Rat+Report+for+2nd+Donation > > I believe that if I were to do a push, the Ant Rat that is run > automatically needs to be tweaked to include the new clusters. > > Jan Lahoda, I think you can tell more about this and explain what needs to

Re: Cannot perform instant rename here

I think I was able to reproduce, using: --- package javaapplication1a; public class JavaApplication1a { private void saySomething() { sayHello("world"); } private void sayHello(String name) { System.out.println("Hello " + name); } } --- Press Ctrl-R (or the equiv

Re: Pre-register 8.2 UC was: New InfoQ article on Apache NetBeans status

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Dne Pá 17. srpna 2018 07:51:34, Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a): > > I think the thinking was to not do this because it would create a false > > impression of those plugins being approved and verified for the 9.0 > release. > > I see. Then I w

Re: Heads up: #536: Per-cluster repository layout

My personal opinion: clusters are an organization we already have in place, one based on some criteria. There may be some imperfection, but it is hard to imagine an organization that would not have any. Choosing another organization means someone will need to lead a discussion, pick criteria, pick

Re: JDK requirements for building NB

Hi, While it might be OK for the Java support to require e.g. (runtime) JDK 11 (but I am not saying it is OK), I suspect it may not be so OK yet for e.g. the PHP IDE, or platform applications, as Svata says. Also changing the build scripts to support JDK 9+ is not a trivial task (it is surely not

Re: JDK requirements for building NB

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2018, 12:41 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis: > > Quite right and eloquently put, Scott. > > > > If people don't want the feature-set of JDK9 continue using NB8.2. For > > those of us who want the feature-set (in

Re: org.netbeans name prefix for artifacts and Java packages (was: [DISCUSS] NetBeans brand and domain transition to Apache)

23. srpna 2018 13:37:23 SELČ, Bertrand Delacretaz napsal: >Hi, > >On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:01 PM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: >> ...A related knock-on effect is that org.netbeans will be available >for Apache >> NetBeans Maven archetypes, since the netbeans.org domain will belong >to >> Apache.

FOSDEM 2019 devroom

Hi, I wonder if we'd like to propose a devroom about Apache NetBeans on FOSDEM 2019. For more information on the devrooms, please see: https://submission.fosdem.org/devroom.php We would need: -be positive we would have 8 hours of content (or 4, if we would ask just for a half-day). I myself migh

Re: FOSDEM 2019 devroom

e > > FOSDEM team values broader yet cohesive topics that allow for > "competition > > of minds", and I think it could very well be considered too narrow to > just > > have a devroom about one specific ecosystem. > > > > So to reiterate, I'm persona

[mentors] Including code under MIT license that is modified

Hi, I have a question about code under the MIT license that is modified. In particular, I have a sketch of a Language Server Protocol server supporting Java, based on the NetBeans' support for Java. In order to use this, one needs to bind the server to some other IDE, e.g. Visual Studio Code. For

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 11:03 AM Christian Lenz wrote: > Hey guys, > > please see my last 3 comments of this ticket. It explains, why it is > important to have public APIs instead of Friends: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1035?focusedCommentId=16574478&page=com.atlassian.jira.p

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

ibilities. But they > should also tell, if some change may make their usage of the module > impossible, of course, so the problems could be considered early. > > Kind regards > > Peter > > > > Am 23.09.18 um 12:04 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

e may be 6 months in our current scheme, this sounds neither particularly stable, nor particularly convenient for someone doing the change (creating a compatibility layer is likely to have a fairly high cost). Jan > > Kind regards > > Peter > > > Am 23.09.18 um 13:49 schr

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 5:40 PM Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > > Am 23.09.18 um 17:02 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 3:22 PM Peter Nabbefeld > > wrote: > > > >> 1) Yes, usually the API is reasonably stable in most areas after being > >>

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:23 PM Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > > Am 23.09.18 um 18:17 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > [...] > > > > I think that having a reasonable documentation was traditionally one of > the > > requirements for a public API modules. (I doubt csl

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

I guess it's all about resources/time - if folks can make better documentation for an implementation (or friend) stuff, or add feature X and Y, but not both, they choose to do something, based on some criteria. Of course, someone may agree with the choice and other may not - but the best way to ens

Re: [mentors] Including code under MIT license that is modified

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:16 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:17 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > ...I have a question about code under the MIT license that is modified... > > Do you mean that the code will be modified after being forked to the >

Re: [Mentors] Altering the Release job

FWIW, I've just changed to release job to checkout from the "release100" branch. Jan On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:32 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Follow up question for Laszlo -- what is it that you need to do there, just > so we're all on the same page and can see whether we're on the same page?

Re: [Mentors] Altering the Release job

e: > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/ > > > > > > BTW Jan, could we rename the incubating-netbeans-test-* -> > > incubating-netbeans-ide-*, then run the job again? > >

Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Hi, My personal opinion only: On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz wrote: > Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss > it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never > happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.6 (2nd attempt)

+1 I was looking at incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.6.zip, SHA1 sum 46b8679e780d2dc07927f23dba1deefd557ea7af. The hash matches, looking at the mandatory files, looks OK. Maybe NOTICE should have 2017-2018 as copyright years? I can build. I've seen the same exception as Junichi during the build, but t

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans roadmap updates

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 7:45 AM Emilian Bold wrote: > > There should be no barriers in implementing functionality as plugins. > > Everything about programming and API design is making barriers. > > Although, if you think about it there are no true barriers, you can > use reflection to hack into a

Re: JARs in platform cluster

Most of these appear to be added or re-instated accidentally while doing the move to sub-directory work. The exception is the platform/autoupdate.services/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/autoupdate/data/empty.jar, which (per my understanding) should be OK, as it is, well, empty (except for the mani

Re: JARs in platform cluster

I am afraid the patch has the same problem as the Geertjan's one (i.e.it won't compile). I am trying to work on a patch that would fix this more appropriatelly, although I am on a_very_ bad internet connection. Jan On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:43 PM Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > I'm adding a PR to remo

Re: JARs in platform cluster

Another attempt: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/1026 But there is one more check I'd like to do (compare the source zip from vc3 with the source zip produced after this patch) which I cannot do right now. Jan On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:55 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > I a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

I wonder if (when we are doing new votes) we should consider cherrypicking some other stuff, like: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/973 Jan On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:50 AM Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Dear all, > > This is our 4th voting candidate for the 10.0 release of Apache Ne

Re: NetBeans - the UI for Maven

Hi Martin, I appreciate that your are using NetBeans - thanks for that! But, as I understand Jarsolav's proposal, it only proposes to change the presentation in the "New Project" dialog, so that the (more standard) Maven projects would be ordered in front of/above the Ant projects. Users would st

Re: Gradle Support for Apache NetBeans

Hi Laszlo, It will be great to have Gradle support - thanks for that! Regarding the: groovy/gradle/netbeans-gradle-tooling/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar I don't think that can be in the source distro ("compiled code not allowed"), but it shouldn't be too problematic to download that during b

Re: Find Bugs Integration - which donation?

AFAIK, the findbugs module is part of the next donation (#4, unless I am mistaken) - the "nb.cluster.extra (3532 files)" is relevant. ("extra" cluster is everything that is not in other clusters.) Please note that SpotBugs is under LGPL, which is going to be tricky here. Jan On Tue, Jan 1, 2019

Re: How to work with optional Modules?

Sorry, I am a bit puzzled: I assumed we are talking about a project that is in the unnamed Jigsaw module, right? Then that should see java.logging even without any --add-modules? Jan On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:02 PM Scott Palmer wrote: > What about the auto-complete not working in the Ant-Based p

Re: How to work with optional Modules?

ok. Jan > > Something seems wrong to me. > > Just make a new Java Application project - with no module-info.java, and > start typing: > > import java.util. > > and see what you get for auto-complete. > > Scott > > > On Jan 7, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Jan Lahoda wro

Releasing command line tool for running NetBeans Java Hints

Hi, In the jackpot30 repository, there is (among other things) a command line tool to run NetBeans Java Hints (hardcoded or declarative/custom), called "jackpot". Given NetBeans 10 was released, I think it would be good to release jackpot 10 sometime in the near future. Any comments on that/objec

Re: Releasing command line tool for running NetBeans Java Hints

t for the main repo. Jan > > We could have a release, should probably go much faster than the > normal IDE release. > > --emi > > http://coolbeans.xyz/ - CoolBeans: An IDE for Java, JavaEE, PHP and more! > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:49 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > >

Re: About the NetBeans brand and our trademark

Frankly, I wonder if there's a chance to allow some "good" uses, like "X with Apache NetBeans N" or a "Bundle of X and Apache NetBeans N", provided some basic conditions are met, like: -the NetBeans is an officially released unmodified version -it is clear which part is Apache NetBeans and which no

Re: About the NetBeans brand and our trademark

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:32 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:44 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > ...Frankly, I wonder if there's a chance to allow some "good" uses, like > "X > > with Apache NetBeans N" or a "B

Re: SOE for embeding JS provider

Well, here is what I think happens: JsEmbeddingProvider calls: WebUtils.getResultIterator(resultIterator, "text/html") to find the HTML part of the given code. But (inside of that), it does: if (ri.getSnapshot().getMimeType().equals(mimetype)) { but the top-level mimetype (ri.getSnapshot().getMimeT

Re: About the NetBeans brand and our trademark

arks. It makes no difference if > it's a convenience binary if the trademark is being (mis)used. It could > just be the name or logo. > > --emi > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 16:32, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:

Re: About the NetBeans brand and our trademark

t; On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:42 AM Antonio wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We now say, at the bottom of each web page, that > > > > > > > > "Apache Incubator, Apache, Apache NetBeans, NetBeans, the Apa

Re: Calculating Caret Positions in Test files

Hi Sarvesh, I believe there are a few ways to do that in NetBeans, besides resorting to using an external editor. One is to use this command line option: -J-Dorg.netbeans.editor.caret.offset.level=FINE Which will add absolute character position of the caret in the file to the line:column info in

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans 11.0 Release Blockers

Hi, On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:05 PM Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Dear all, > > We have still 3 open Blocker issues: > > NETBEANS-2160 Platform project runs with JDK 11.0.1 but not with JDK > 11.0.2 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2160) > > Kind of interesting. This one seems to be the

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans 11.0 Release Blockers

Hi, On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:50 AM Matthias Bläsing wrote: [snip] > > > > > NETBEANS-1819 Incorrect License Headers in Test Sources > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1819) > > > > > > The NETBEANS-1819 could be an easy pick for anyone to take just > requires > > > insert hea

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans 11.0 Release Blockers

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:22 PM Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 09.03.2019, 13:59 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:50 AM Matthias Bläsing < > mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > > wrote: > > [snip] >

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

+1! Jan On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:48 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > After a discussion amongst the Apache NetBeans community on the dev mailing > list[1], voting on a PMC chair[2], checking the podling status page[3], and > working through the maturity model[4], I would like to call

Re: Question | Logger | NetBeans plugin

Hi Arnab, FWIW, the IDE has ways to check if source code fulfills some requirements and to add/modify code (especially for Java). This can be done either using "Declarative Java Hints": http://wiki.netbeans.org/JavaDeclarativeHintsFormat Or using a "hint" written in Java. These can then participa

Re: [MENTORS] Partial/Patch releases

Hi, My personal opinion: I think it'd be awesome if we could release updates to just some modules (and do that with less overhead than the full release). With some work, we might be able to create a source zip (i.e. a release candidate) for individual module(s). One tricky part of that is we need

Re: [MENTORS] Partial/Patch releases

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > Or is it mostly about a 'full distribution for users'? > In which case it might probably be possible to just do a svn cp from the > old version to a patch-version (e.g. netbeans-11rc4.1).svn cp does not cost > any space. It's merely a r

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP

oject; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache NetBeans Project: > > * Anton Epple > * Antonio Vieiro > * Aristides Villarreal > * Arunava Sinha > * Ate Douma &

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:03 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:01 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Overall, looks OK to me. Two comments/questions: > > -would it make sense the make the charter a little bit more general (to > >

Re: Releasing command line tool for running NetBeans Java Hints

--emi > > http://coolbeans.xyz/ - CoolBeans: An IDE for Java, JavaEE, PHP and more! > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:49 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > In the jackpot30 repository, there is (among other things) a command line > > tool to run NetBeans Java Hin

Re: Releasing command line tool for running NetBeans Java Hints

: > Most important would be how to use this -- i.e., this is a CLI for Apache > NetBeans Java Hints. So, how to use it? > > Gj > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:09 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > Getting back to this again. I guess I'd like to release this, based on > the &g

[VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

Dear all, I'd like to release the standalone Java Hints tool ("jackpot") based on Apache NetBeans 11.0. The release is here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-jackpot/incubating-netbeans-jackpot-11.0-vc1/incubating-apache-netbeans-jackpot-11.0-vc1.zip

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:24 PM Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hi Jan, > > Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2019, 11:30 +0200 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > I'd like to release the standalone Java Hints tool ("jackpot") based on > > Apache NetBeans 11.0. > > could you please

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

they are, despite being weird. Although I may be wrong here. Jan > > Greetings > > Matthias > > Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2019, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:24 PM Matthias Bläsing < > > mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > > wrote: > &

Re: Very Slow Operations with NB 11

Hi Scott, In this case, it might be useful/helpful if we had the self profiler snapshots. Possibly for one of the features, e.g. code completion: http://wiki.netbeans.org/FaqProfileMeNow (Refactoring/findusages is currently much faster with nb-javac than without it, but the difference should b

DTDs and XSDs

Hi, (As noted by a friend of mine.) Many modules in NetBeans use DTDs or XSDs to validate XMLs. The appropriate DTDs and XSDs are available not only inside the IDE, but also published on the web. Presumably with the recent change to use netbeans.apache.org instead of www.netbeans.org, (some of) th

Re: add "-notice.txt" if needed with any required notices?

ook at? Thanks, Jan > Cheers, > Antonio > > [1] https://wiki.jasig.org/display/LIC/maven-notice-plugin > > > > El 8 oct 2017, a las 11:53, Jan Lahoda escribió: > > > > Hi Antonio, > > > > (my) intent here was to include the -notice.txt file if

Re: add "-notice.txt" if needed with any required notices?

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Antonio Vieiro wrote: > > > El 17 oct 2017, a las 21:42, Jan Lahoda escribió: > > > > Hi Antonio, > > > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Antonio Vieiro > wrote: > > > >> I understand, thanks for the in

Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

Hi, I have a very crude sketch/prototype of support for pattern matching in Java (as currently prototyped in OpenJDK Amber, branch patterns): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/amber/pattern-match.html http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/305 The prototype requires that the runtime JDK is an OpenJDK

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

what we’re doing with the IP clearance), so I > > think Jan’s suggestion is in line with how it should be. > > > > Gj > > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 20:59, John McDonnell > > wrote: > > > >> No objections, but it would make sense to create a fork

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

To me, that is a TBD. But releasing from branches like amber(/patterns) is one of the possible approaches, IMO. Jan On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote: > Would we also have netbeans releases from the amber branch? > > On 10/20/17 23:50, Jan Lahoda wrote: > &

Re: add "-notice.txt" if needed with any required notices?

ents/feedback on the generated files, or on the process would be welcome! Thanks, Jan On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Sounds great and thanks for doing this. > > Gj > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 20:26, Jan Laho

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

So, if I understand the proposal correctly the code would be in the ASF repo, and the way it would get there would be: -one would commit to a branch in their own GitHub fork -then go to the GitHub UI, create a pull request from the private branch to the feature branch on the ASF repo -and since for

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

ork on that branch there when the feature is ready to be merged into > Netbeans then we keep the Netbeans ASF repo as clean as possible. > If having the repo "clean" is paramount, we can, I think, as for another repo to keep prototypes/branches (e.g. "incubator-netbeans-prototype

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Sven Reimers wrote: > Hi all.. > > the important thing for me is what this branch is about and if we want to > deliver any kind of release (and convenience binaries) for simple > consumption. If we want to have those we need branches in the NetBeans ADD > repo.. >

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

hanks, Jan On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Sven Reimers > wrote: > >> Hi all.. >> >> the important thing for me is what this branch is about and if we want to >> deliver any kind of release (and convenien

Re: Review of java.hints.declarative

empty. > > > > All the others are files with the ".test" extension. Can these have > > licenses (Jan Lahoda)? If so, I'll add them; if not, could we include > > ".test" files in the Rat exclusions? > > i looked through the test. And from my und

Re: Review of java.hints/test/unit/data/

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > There's about 230 unlicensed Java source files in > java.hints/test/unit/data. > > Before I manually add Apache licenses to all of them manually, is there a > reason why these weren't licen

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Neil C Smith < neilcsmith@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 15:41 Jan Lahoda, wrote: > > > > > I guess I could live with this (although it leaves it unclear how new > > feature branches would be created

Re: Review of java.hints/test/unit/data/

nse header ( > https://www.apache.org/legal/ > > src-headers.html). > > > > I think these should be included in the Rat report exclusions. > > > > Gj > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > >> On Mon,

[mentors] Compile-time dependencies

Hello, (When time permits,) I am trying to solve the JavaHelp problem (the javahelp module depends on JavaHelp, which is GPL2v+CPE). What I am trying to do is to allow the help system to work in a rudimentary way without JavaHelp, and allow it to work as before if JavaHelp is present (i.e. making

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

er; and an > automated build of that PR has passed all tests, so that the target > branch is always “clean”.) > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > if multiple people (can) > > contribute to a branch and the branch has a fair chance to end up in the &g

Re: Current Status & Proposed Plan for Apache NetBeans

There was a significant time between the snapshot for the donation was made and the donation actually happened. That's unfortunate, but I don't think anybody here could do anything about that (Geertjan tried, AFAIK). So, basically, during the gap, people could either work on the original repositor

  1   2   3   >