Re: svn commit: r1519953 - in /openoffice/branches/l10n40/main/languages/source: af/ ar/ as/ ast/ be-BY/ bg/ bn/ bo/ br/ brx/ bs/ ca-XV/ ca/ cs/ cy/ da/ de/ dgo/ dz/ el/ en-AU/ en-GB/ en-ZA/ eo/ es/ e

On 5 September 2013 08:14, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 9/4/13 6:53 PM, janI wrote: > > On 4 September 2013 18:13, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > >> On 9/4/13 5:56 PM, janI wrote: > >>> On 4 September 2013 17:10, Herbert Duerr wrote: > >>> > >&g

Re: svn commit: r1519953 - in /openoffice/branches/l10n40/main/languages/source: af/ ar/ as/ ast/ be-BY/ bg/ bn/ bo/ br/ brx/ bs/ ca-XV/ ca/ cs/ cy/ da/ de/ dgo/ dz/ el/ en-AU/ en-GB/ en-ZA/ eo/ es/ e

On 5 September 2013 10:28, Herbert Duerr wrote: > Hi Jan, > > [...] >> >> I have to ask very clearly; is the opinion of the community, that .po >> files >> is not to be considered a vital/integrated part of our source tree and >> should be moved away ? >> > > I believe they are as important as t

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On 5 September 2013 22:14, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:36 AM, janI wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > We have had some longer discussions on different ML/IRC about how a > > vm-admin should behave and which level of service we expect for our > > ser

Question to all developers and translators: How integrated should translation be ?

Hi I am copying this mail to the l10n list, in order to involve the translators that do not follow dev@. But lets please keep the discussion on dev@. As its hopefully known, I have been working on a new workflow for the whole translation process for quite a long time. Now I have released the fir

Re: Question to all developers and translators: How integrated should translation be ?

On 6 September 2013 16:53, Dick Groskamp wrote: > Op 6-9-2013 14:30, janI schreef: > > Hi >> >> I am copying this mail to the l10n list, in order to involve the >> translators that do not follow dev@. But lets please keep the discussion >> on >> dev@. &g

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On 6 September 2013 15:27, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > On 9/4/13 10:17 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:36 PM, janI wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> We have had some

Re: [CONF] Apache OpenOffice Community > Louis Vuitton Evora 100% Authentic 80% Off Free Shipping

On 6 September 2013 19:00, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:54 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 6 September 2013 18:48, sebb wrote: > > > > > On 6 September 2013 17:07, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > > We are getting some spam at

Re: [CONF] Apache OpenOffice Community > Louis Vuitton Evora 100% Authentic 80% Off Free Shipping

On 6 September 2013 18:48, sebb wrote: > On 6 September 2013 17:07, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > We are getting some spam attacks on the cWiki, wonder if we can do > > some scanning to detect similar pages, and also remove this nick. > > On the Moin Wikis, anyone can create a Wiki account, but

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On 6 September 2013 19:49, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, janI wrote: > > On 6 September 2013 15:27, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> > >> On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> > On 9/4/13 10:17 PM, R

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On Sep 7, 2013 10:28 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > > > On Sep 7, 2013, at 2:24 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 6 September 2013 19:49, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, janI wrote: > >>> On 6 September 2013 15:27, Dave Fisher

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On 8 September 2013 00:01, janI wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2013 10:28 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2013, at 2:24 AM, janI wrote: > > > > > On 6 September 2013 19:49, Rob Weir wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, Sep 6,

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On 8 September 2013 14:29, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:24 AM, janI wrote: > > On 6 September 2013 19:49, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, janI wrote: > >> > On 6 September 2013 15:27, Dave Fisher wrote: > >&g

Re: requirements for vm-admins of forum/translate/wiki

On 8 September 2013 23:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/09/2013 Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:36 PM, janI wrote: >> >> I assume we want well-maintained servers that help us get our >> project-related tasks done, and also help serve our user

Re: [PROPOSAL] Admin mailing list

On Sep 9, 2013 6:17 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote: > > Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 22:14:13 -0400: > > On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > > Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 21:42:17 -0400: > > >> I'd like to propose a new mailing list: ad...@openoffice.apache.

Re: [announce] genLang extract is ready.

On 14 September 2013 21:32, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 31/08/2013 janI wrote: > >> I am pleased to inform you, that I have reached a major milestone with >> genLang. >> > > Thanks a lot for the achievement. I'm quite enthusiastic about it, but I > waited to

Re: [announce] genLang extract is ready.

On 15 September 2013 00:35, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 15/09/2013 janI wrote: > >> Thanks for trying it, please suply more information about your setup so I >> can determine the problem. >> > > Sure. That particular build is done on a Fedora 19 Linux system that

Re: [announce] genLang extract is ready.

On 15 September 2013 00:49, janI wrote: > > > > On 15 September 2013 00:35, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 15/09/2013 janI wrote: >> >>> Thanks for trying it, please suply more information about your setup so I >>> can determine the problem. >&

Re: [announce] genLang extract is ready.

On 16 September 2013 00:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 03:28:06PM +0200, janI wrote: > > I have investigated a bit further: > > > > At the top of gCon.cxx you find: > > > > #ifdef _WIN32 #include #include #define > > OS_ACCE

Re: [announce] genLang extract is ready.

On 16 September 2013 00:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 15/09/2013 janI wrote: > > On 15 September 2013 00:49, janI wrote: >> >>> Please correct me, but fedora 19 is not part of our product release ? my >>> aim is to support what AOO supports. >>&g

Re: [URGENT] Re: Issues with languages in 4.0.1-RC

On 16 September 2013 09:23, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 9/16/13 8:27 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 9/14/13 11:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> A quick status of 4.0.1-RC and languages since mail delivery from > >> Bugzilla is temporarily blocked: > >> > >> - Serbian Cyrillic (sr) and Russian

Re: [PROPOSAL] Admin mailing list

On 16 September 2013 14:07, Siva wrote: > Hope I could do this job but have a little expertise with moderation. > Probably Listing down what are the jobs to do would be good. > > > On September 16, 2013 at 7:59 AM Rob Weir wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Admin mailing list

On 16 September 2013 15:26, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:21 AM, janI wrote: > > > > > > > > On 16 September 2013 14:07, Siva wrote: > >> > >> Hope I could do this job but have a little expertise with moderation. > >> Proba

Re: Student - Mwiki Cleanup

On 21 September 2013 07:29, Nikita Fernandez wrote: > Hi, > > ** ** > > I am currently a uni student wishing to contribute to an open source > project. > > ** ** > > Would love to assist in cleaning up and improving the overall navigation > of MWiki. > Hi. you have written to me in perso

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RC3)

On Sep 22, 2013 10:06 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: > > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the RC3 release candidate as > Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1. This will be an important update release for > Apache OpenOffice 4.0 to fix some serious regressions and to introduce > some new languages

Re: [RELEASE]: available RC3 for AOO 4.0.1

On Sep 22, 2013 9:55 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: > > On 9/20/13 11:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose a further RC3 for AOO 4.0.1 based on branch AOO401 rev. 1524958. > > > > I have fixed 2 further serious issues that are important for office > > automation tasks. The fixes are

Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows

On 22 September 2013 14:11, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote: > >> Did we reach a consensus on this one? >> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7? >> Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7 for >> building with no problem

Re: bug 107063 (needs update)

On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hello bugreporter > > Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com: > > That's awesome Andrea, many thanks. >> >> Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not >> work on AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and

Re: bug 107063 (needs update)

Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035that bug deals with this specific issue. rgds jan I. On 23 September 2013 18:54, janI wrote: > > > > On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher wrote: > >> Hello bugreporter >> &g

Re: bug 107063 (needs update)

It would be cool if you did the unassignment, so we can get an overview of how many issues are actually being worked on. rgds jan I. > > > On 23.09.2013 at 7:46 PM, "janI" wrote: > > > >Please have a look at > >https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: bug 107063 (needs update)

us/i/a5vl.png/ > Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru, I am just a user, so he can hopefully give you more precise ideas. "was modified" is in my opinion is new comment and/or status. Without actually having tried it, I think you need to use "search by change history". rg

Re: bug 107063 (needs update)

>seeing this and just has too much work to do? > > > >>I think you need to use "search by change history". > >But in "search by change history" one only can search for changes > >(at least that's what I was thinking). > >But I wa

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RC3)

On 25 September 2013 17:35, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > 2013/9/25 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann > > > Hi, > > > > resending as my "reply to list" goes only to qa@o.a.o > > > > > > On 25.09.2013 12:17, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > > > >> -1: > >> > >> I vote -1 for RC3 because of these 3 issues, the first two are func

Re: Reminder: Time to update your entry in the Directory of Volunteers

On 27 September 2013 08:32, Herbert Duerr wrote: > Николай Нинков wrote: > > Because the translation of Bulgarian is almost ready, please do for me a > dev > > snapshot with the Bulgarian translation to carry out the necessary tests. > > I do not want to promise but I will try to handle the tests

Re: Reminder: Time to update your entry in the Directory of Volunteers

on, we do not go that way, we use the po file directory on the vm, because we also have the utilitites on the vm. rgds jan I. > On 9/27/13, janI wrote: > > On 27 September 2013 08:32, Herbert Duerr wrote: > > > >> Николай Нинков wrote: > >> > Because the t

Re: New localizations (was: Reminder: Time to update your entry in the Directory of Volunteers)

On 27 September 2013 12:33, Herbert Duerr wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 27.09.2013 10:27, janI wrote: > >> On 27 September 2013 08:32, Herbert Duerr wrote: >> >> Николай Нинков wrote: >>> >>>> Because the translation of Bulgarian is almost ready

Re: svn commit: r1526917 - /openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/bg/localize.sdf

Please make these changes in pootle instead, otherwise we loose them next time someone generates the sdf file, like I just did. rgds jan I. On 27 September 2013 16:42, wrote: > Author: hdu > Date: Fri Sep 27 14:42:36 2013 > New Revision: 1526917 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1526917 > Log:

File needed, Kid for 4.0.1 (trunk)

Hi Does anybody have a kid sdf file or .po files for 4.0.1 ? if so please mail me a zip copy In order to avoid confusion with the "kid" language code, I will rename the language to "aoo-kid" in l10n40, any objections ? rgds jan I.

Re: File needed, Kid for 4.0.1 (trunk)

On 28 September 2013 14:50, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > janI wrote: > >> Does anybody have a kid sdf file or .po files for 4.0.1 ? >> > > You can find a SDF file built for the approved 4.0.1 at > http://people.apache.org/~**pescetti/tmp/2013-09-keyid/<http://people.ap

Re: svn commit: r1526917 - /openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/bg/localize.sdf

On 30 September 2013 13:25, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 27.09.2013 16:59, janI wrote: > >> Please make these changes in pootle instead, otherwise we loose them >> next time someone generates the sdf file, like I just did. >> > > > I just wanted to give buildbot

Re: New localizations for testing (Danish and Bulgarian)

On 30 September 2013 21:56, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 30/09/2013 Herbert Duerr wrote: > >> The first test builds are available now for Bulgarian [1] and Danish >> [2]. >> > > Thank you! It would still be helpful for translators to have the keyid > ("kid") builds available too. I can't find vali

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

er > > > > The following 3 are pending since they have no real name in CWiki. Just > > confirm you use this username and I'll enable you. > > > > imacat Yang Shih-Ching > > jim Jim Jagielski > > marcus Marcus Lange > > > > The

Re: [Discuss-proposal]Admin mail box for NLs forum

On 2 October 2013 22:18, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > New forum users with registration problems do not have an easy way to > communicate their problems to the board. In the past there was an email > address that sent an automated message to a particular forum thread on the > private forum area. Thi

Re: [FOSDEM-Devrooms] FOSDEM 2014 devroom proposal: Apache OpenOffice

On 3 October 2013 09:30, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 02/10/2013 Philip Paeps wrote: > >> We received a broadly similar proposal to yours from the LibreOffice >> crowd and decided to merge both of you into an "open document editors" >> developer room, where you can collaborate and share ideas. >>

Re: [Discuss-proposal]Admin mail box for NLs forum

On 6 October 2013 01:25, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > 2013/10/2 janI > > > On 2 October 2013 22:18, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > > > > > New forum users with registration problems do not have an easy way to > > > communicate their problems to the board. In the p

Re: File needed, Kid for 4.0.1 (trunk)

On 5 October 2013 23:36, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 28/09/2013 janI wrote: > >> I will use "keyid". >> Do you know if I need to change somewhere in the code itself also ? >> > > I don't know. For a normal language it would probably make sen

Re: [Discuss-proposal]Admin mail box for NLs forum

On 6 October 2013 17:42, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:09 AM, janI wrote: > > On 6 October 2013 01:25, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > > > >> 2013/10/2 janI > >> > >> > On 2 October 2013 22:18, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > >> > &

Re: [Discuss-proposal]Admin mail box for NLs forum

On 6 October 2013 19:30, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > 2013/10/6 Rob Weir > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:09 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 6 October 2013 01:25, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > > > > > >> 2013/10/2 janI > > >> >

Re: Crowdfunding for Apache OpenOffice

On 7 October 2013 01:28, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi all > > Am 05.10.13 13:30, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> >>> Apache could for example give hints/weblinks how to encrypt emails (that >>> would >>> help people in dictatorships), but that is not the real object of Apache

Re: Reopening the Vietnamese Forum

On 7 October 2013 19:10, imacat wrote: > So is it OK to reopen the VN forum? > > I thought it was Drew that told me that the VN forum has too many > spam without management. If there is any volunteer administrator I > would be more than happy for reopening it. > Before reopening, the us

Re: Reopening the Vietnamese Forum

On 7 October 2013 20:55, Hagar Delest wrote: > Le 07/10/2013 19:22, janI a écrit : > > Before reopening, the user base should be cleaned (preferable deleted), >> and >> all spam pages should be removed. If this cleanup is not done before >> reopening the forum, all

Source tree and multiple configs.

Hi. Has anyone been successfull in having 1 source tree and multiple configs ? I now have: - windows7 - windows7 debug - ubuntu 12.04 - ubuntu 12.04 debug - centOS (experimental) And I am getting seriously tired of having to synchronize the source files everytime I cross compile. Is it not poss

Re: [INFRA] Forums down

On 8 October 2013 09:16, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > 2013/10/8 FR web forum > > > Error displayed: Can't connect to local MySQL server > > > > Anybody can restart mysqld deamon? > > > > > It seems forums are working now. > yes mysql is running without errors. I cannot imidiatly see that there ha

Re: Source tree and multiple configs.

On 8 October 2013 17:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 10/7/13 9:54 PM, janI wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Has anyone been successfull in having 1 source tree and multiple configs > ? > > > > I now have: > > - windows7 > > - windows7 debug > >

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On 8 October 2013 21:38, Tal Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > [...] > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ > > This page has many problems: > I am not a mac specialist, but I just read the http://www.openoffice.org/porting

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On 8 October 2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > janI wrote: >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... >> >> So my first question is >> - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a supported platform, not >> third party ? >> - why does the

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

On 10 October 2013 13:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi Jan, > > as promised I tried to build the l10n40 branch on MacOS. I started with > my normal config settings and included some languages (keyid bg da de > en-US). > > The first error I got was in l10ntools, makedepend was missing which is > buil

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

On 10 October 2013 15:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 10/10/13 3:05 PM, janI wrote: >> On 10 October 2013 13:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> as promised I tried to build the l10n40 branch on MacOS. I started with >>> my normal config sett

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

On 10 October 2013 15:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > after solving some further dependency problems ... I get now this error > > /usr/bin/g++-4.0 -fsigned-char -fmessage-length=0 -malign-natural -c > -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0 > -DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -I. -I../unxmacxi.pro/m

Re: New Record Download Day

On 10 October 2013 16:33, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > > On 2013-10-10, at 10:01 , Rob Weir wrote: > >> No, this is not a duplicate message. >> >> We hit another new download record yesterday, of 241,987 downloads, >> beating the record previously set on Monday of 233,070 downloads. >> >> -Rob > >

Re: Reopening the Vietnamese Forum

it does not make a lot of sense to >> leave >> the account laying around dormant, as I already said :). >> >> *laughing* just give me marching orders and I'll carry them out In my world, the "marching orders" would be "clean what should be cleaned". Th

Re: New Record Download Day

On 10 October 2013 21:21, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:07 AM, janI wrote: >> On 10 October 2013 16:33, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >>> >>> On 2013-10-10, at 10:01 , Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>>> No, this is not a duplicate messa

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

n i. On 10 October 2013 16:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 10/10/13 3:56 PM, janI wrote: >> On 10 October 2013 15:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> after solving some further dependency problems ... I get now this error >>> >>> /usr/bin/g++-4.0 -fsigned-char -

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

--with-lang="da en-US es" \ --with-package-format="rpm deb" \ --with-vendor="jani local build" rgds jan I. > > Juergen > > > > > > > > >

Mentor a new build system.

Hi. FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU capstone. The project has been selected, so we will have 4 students working the next months to achieve the following: http://eecs.oregonstate.edu/capstone/viewproposal2013.php?id=16 extract from above: motivation: "Apache Op

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 12 October 2013 17:55, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, janI wrote: > > Hi. > > > > FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU > capstone. > > > > The project has been selected, so we will have 4 students working

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

On 11 October 2013 10:20, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 10/11/13 9:46 AM, janI wrote: > > On 11 October 2013 09:39, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> Hi Jan, > >> > >> I will change my config setting to continue but you should take a look > >> on --genPO swti

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 12 October 2013 23:33, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2013, at 9:23 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 12 October 2013 17:55, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, janI wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> FYI: as I inf

Re: Mentor a new build system.

Sorry for top posting. There seems to be some confusion, about the project. The goal is not to replace the current system (this is only a potential long time goal). The goal is to make a parallel build system suited for windows developers, and then in a second phase generate makefiles for linux.

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 14 October 2013 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 11.10.2013 18:10, janI wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU >> capstone. >> >> The project has been selected, so we will have 4 students working t

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 14 October 2013 10:00, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 14.10.2013 09:38, janI wrote: > >> Sorry for top posting. >> >> There seems to be some confusion, about the project. >> >> The goal is not to replace the current system (this is only a potential >&

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 14 October 2013 11:55, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 14.10.2013 10:12, janI wrote: > >> On 14 October 2013 10:00, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> On 14.10.2013 09:38, janI wrote: >>> >>> Sorry for top posting. >>>> >>>> There seems

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 14 October 2013 19:44, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > > > On 11.10.2013 18:10, janI wrote: > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU > >> capston

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 14 October 2013 23:34, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM, janI wrote: > > > On 14 October 2013 19:44, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Andre Fischer > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Forum Privilege Check

On Oct 15, 2013 8:01 AM, "imacat" wrote: > > Dear all, > > As Drew requested to resign from the administrators in all forums, > and TerryE's account will be removed from administrators, too, I'm > planning to check the privileged accounts on all the 10 forums, and > remove inactive administrat

Re: Mentor a new build system.

On 15 October 2013 10:02, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 14.10.2013 23:40, janI wrote: > >> On 14 October 2013 23:34, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM, janI wrote: >>> >>> On 14 October 2013 19:44, Kay Schenk wrote: >>

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

On 16 October 2013 08:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 11/10/2013 janI wrote: > >> I think I have corrected the flex issue, with r1531149, thanks to the >> flex generated file I got from juergen. >> @andrea, @jsc, when you have time please give it a shoot. >> pl

Re: Problem with building branch l10n40 on MacOS

On 16 October 2013 10:11, janI wrote: > > > > On 16 October 2013 08:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 11/10/2013 janI wrote: >> >>> I think I have corrected the flex issue, with r1531149, thanks to the >>> flex generated file I got from juergen.

[proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

Hi. due to the discussion in thread "Mentor a new build system", I have made a proposal for a central Makefile located in main. It has been roughly tested it, thanks to a clever utility from andre. As discussed build.pl contains a lot of options, which need to be considered in a makefile. My su

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

sd On 18 October 2013 13:36, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 18.10.2013 11:32, janI wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> due to the discussion in thread "Mentor a new build system", I have made a >> proposal for a central Makefile located in main. >> > Hi Jan, &

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 18.10.2013 14:02, janI wrote: > >> sd >> >> >> On 18 October 2013 13:36, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> On 18.10.2013 11:32, janI wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>>> >>>

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

On 18 October 2013 16:52, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote: > >> On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> On 18.10.2013 14:02, janI wrote: >>> >>> sd >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18 October

Re: easy task

On 19 October 2013 20:28, akshika akalanka wrote: > Good idea :-) > On Oct 19, 2013 10:53 PM, "Vladislav Stevanovic" < > stevanovicvladis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Does exist some list of easy tasks that some potential developer for AOO > > can see? Idea is that this sort of list

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

On 19 October 2013 19:20, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > > > On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote: > > > >> On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote: > >> > >> On 18.10.2013 14:02, janI wrote: > >&

wiki.o.o and copyright.

Hi due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration First page refers to oracle, and second page does not even mention the apache license. Is that really how we want it ? I am not a leg

Re: wiki.o.o and copyright.

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: > > > Hi > > > > due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages: > > > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights > > > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration > > > >

Re: wiki.o.o and copyright.

On 20 October 2013 19:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, janI wrote: > > > On 20 October 2013 19:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > > > Probably out of date, why not commiting the change? > > > > > > > Committi

Re: wiki.o.o and copyright.

On 20 October 2013 20:59, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:03 PM, janI wrote: > > Hi > > > > due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages: > > > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights > > > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Aut

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

On 21 October 2013 10:50, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 18.10.2013 19:54, janI wrote: > >> On 18 October 2013 16:52, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote: >>> >>> On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote: >>>> &

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

On 21 October 2013 10:58, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 20.10.2013 12:40, janI wrote: > >> On 19 October 2013 19:20, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Andre Fischer >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote:

Re: General ASF question

On 21 October 2013 12:59, Siva wrote: > Which means we can only > contribute to " Projects " but > not " Foundation Projects" > Is that so ? ( I am not able > to understand what is > "internal" for apache ) > "internal" are projects, that do not deliver a product in form of releases available to

Re: [proposal] replace build.pl with a central Makefile.

On 21 October 2013 15:52, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 21.10.2013 12:35, janI wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I have the following plan: >> a) rename all Makefile to Makefile.gb, and correct prj/makefile.mk to the >> new name >> > > prj/makefile.mk usuall

Re: Service Maintenance for pootle and AOO wiki

On 21 October 2013 17:22, Tony Stevenson wrote: > Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200: > > Tony Stevenson wrote: > > >We expect to start the downtime at 15:00 UTC. Apologies for the short > > >notice > > > > It is indeed a very, very short notice! Thanks at least for s

Re: Service Maintenance for pootle and AOO wiki

On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote: > Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200: > > Tony Stevenson wrote: > > >Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200: > > >>Please tell us when the migration is complete so that we can remove > > >>the warn

Re: Service Maintenance for pootle and AOO wiki

On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote: > 於 2013年10月22日 02:37, janI 提到: > > On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote: > > > >> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200: > >>> Tony Stevenson wrote: > >>>> Andrea Pesc

Test of VI forum

Hi Phan. We (infra) are going the move the forum database to a central server, in order to that we need some preparation work done. Currently the VI forum is the one with the lowest load (ref. imacat), so we would like to test the changes on the VI forum, before changing all forums. The changes

Re: [proposal] Patches on Windows

On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote: > Hello everybody, > > At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for > all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size of > roughly 150MB. The size of the actual changes is typically much smaller. >

Re: Service Maintenance for pootle and AOO wiki

On 22 October 2013 12:47, imacat wrote: > On 2013/10/22 16:10, imacat said: > > On 2013/10/22 15:42, janI said: > >> On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote: > >>> On 2013/10/22 02:37, janI said: > >>>> On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:

Re: [proposal] Patches on Windows

On 22 October 2013 13:10, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote: > >> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> Hello everybody, >>> >>> At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for >>>

Re: [proposal] Patches on Windows

On 22 October 2013 13:31, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 22.10.2013 13:08, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:20 AM, janI wrote: >> >>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote: >>> >>> Hello everybody, >>>> >>>&

Re: AOO Security Features without Mozilla

On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote: > About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years > wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient) version > of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with its security > features enabled such a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >