Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-07 Thread Marcus
Am 07.01.21 um 19:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 07.01.21 um 19:14 schrieb Marcus: Am 07.01.21 um 15:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 04.01.21 um 22:29 schrieb Marcus: Am 04.01.21 um 19:44 schrieb Dave Fisher: I think that the new link would look better if were directly below the buttons and

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus, Am 07.01.21 um 19:14 schrieb Marcus: > Am 07.01.21 um 15:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 04.01.21 um 22:29 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 04.01.21 um 19:44 schrieb Dave Fisher: I think that the new link would look better if were directly below the buttons and not to the right.

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-07 Thread Marcus
Am 07.01.21 um 15:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 04.01.21 um 22:29 schrieb Marcus: Am 04.01.21 um 19:44 schrieb Dave Fisher: I think that the new link would look better if were directly below the buttons and not to the right. One reason is that on my window the link is too wide and “choose?”

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus, Am 04.01.21 um 22:29 schrieb Marcus: > Am 04.01.21 um 19:44 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> I think that the new link would look better if were directly below >> the buttons and not to the right. >> >> One reason is that on my window the link is too wide and “choose?” Is >> wrapped to below

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Marcus
Am 04.01.21 um 19:44 schrieb Dave Fisher: I think that the new link would look better if were directly below the buttons and not to the right. One reason is that on my window the link is too wide and “choose?” Is wrapped to below the buttons anyway. interesting. I'm working with a large

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Marcus, I think that the new link would look better if were directly below the buttons and not to the right. One reason is that on my window the link is too wide and “choose?” Is wrapped to below the buttons anyway. Regards, Dave > On Jan 4, 2021, at 8:49 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Czesław Wolański
Hi Marcus, > I've updated the page a bit but don't know if I hit the typo you have > seen. Please have a look: > https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.org/product/windows.html Thanks for updating the page and fixing the typo. Regards, Czesław

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Marcus
Am 04.01.21 um 17:05 schrieb CzesXXaw WolaXXski: Just my 2¢ I have reread the post "Zusammenarbeit Programme von Apache OO-Base und Java-JRE" http://de.openoffice.info/viewtopic.php?p=293070#p293070 A user was surprised to find out that (1) AOO hadn't not been installed in 64-bit folder and

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Marcus
Am 04.01.21 um 16:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Marcus, Am 04.01.21 um 12:35 schrieb Marcus: Am 03.01.21 um 21:28 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 21:24:06 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 03.01.21 um 20:07 schrieb Marcus: I've added a bit more magic:

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Czesław Wolański
Hi Matthias, Just my 2¢ I have reread the post "Zusammenarbeit Programme von Apache OO-Base und Java-JRE" http://de.openoffice.info/viewtopic.php?p=293070#p293070 A user was surprised to find out that (1) AOO hadn't not been installed in 64-bit folder and (2) that there is no easily

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus, Am 04.01.21 um 12:35 schrieb Marcus: > Am 03.01.21 um 21:28 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: >> On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 21:24:06 +0100 >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 03.01.21 um 20:07 schrieb Marcus: I've added a bit more magic:

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:35:07 +0100 Marcus wrote: > Am 03.01.21 um 21:28 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > > On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 21:24:06 +0100 > > Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Am 03.01.21 um 20:07 schrieb Marcus: > >>> > >>> I've added a bit more magic: > >>> > >>>

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-04 Thread Marcus
Am 03.01.21 um 21:28 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 21:24:06 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 03.01.21 um 20:07 schrieb Marcus: I've added a bit more magic: https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.org/download/index.html Now we can show a different text when Windows, Mac or Linux

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-03 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 21:24:06 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > Am 03.01.21 um 20:07 schrieb Marcus: > > > > I've added a bit more magic: > > > > https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.org/download/index.html > > > > Now we can show a different text when Windows, Mac or Linux install >

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-03 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus, Am 03.01.21 um 20:07 schrieb Marcus: > > I've added a bit more magic: > > https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.org/download/index.html > > Now we can show a different text when Windows, Mac or Linux install > files are selected. It's a short title with more text as mouse-over. > > For

Re: Proposed change for download page

2021-01-03 Thread Marcus
iginal Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. +1 Don't you care if users can't find their way around

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-31 Thread Matthias Seidel
might pick out the proper adoptopenjdk. >>>> >>>> Even this is possible. But it takes time as the download style and >>>> JavaScript magic needs to be extended. >>>> >>>> Until then the simple "Windows 32-bit (x86) (EXE)" drop-down-

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-31 Thread Marcus
ginal Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. +1 Don't you care if users can't find their way ar

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-30 Thread Matthias Seidel
could even add a button to the download page that >>>>> might pick out the proper adoptopenjdk. >>>> Even this is possible. But it takes time as the download style and >>>> JavaScript magic needs to be extended. >>>> >>>> Until then the si

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-30 Thread Dave Fisher
;> Even this is possible. But it takes time as the download style and >>> JavaScript magic needs to be extended. >>> >>> Until then the simple "Windows 32-bit (x86) (EXE)" drop-down-item is >>> a good and clear statement to separate from 64-bit. >>> >>> I

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-30 Thread Matthias Seidel
ment to separate from 64-bit. >> >> I can also add a 64-bit item with a hint text that AOO 32-bit will >> run also on Windows 64-bit and I can also add a Java hint. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >>>> Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 19:02 Uhr schrieb Dave Fish

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-30 Thread Marcus
o...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. +1 Don't you care if users can't find their way around and therefore stop using AOO? That was exactly

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:02 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >>> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that &

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 6:52 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Leonardo Fog
Windows 64-bit and I can also add a Java hint. > > Marcus > > > > >> Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 19:02 Uhr schrieb Dave Fisher >: > >>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 9:47 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:31:23 +0100 > >>>

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Marcus
sher wrote: On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
t; Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>  >>>>>> >>>>>>> -Original Message- >>>>>>> From: Bidouille

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Czesław Wolański
te: > > > >> > >>> On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>  > >>>

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
t; >>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >>>> >>>>  >>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM >>>>&

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
al Message- >>>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM >>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page >>>> >>>> >>>>

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Rory O'Farrell
Message- > >>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM > >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >>> > >>> > >>&

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 6:25 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: ooofo...@free.fr > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > > > > Sent from my iPhone >

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:  -Original Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> -Original Message- >> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subj

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > > > > Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 ve

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Bidouille
> Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 5:31 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >>>> > >>>>> Please note

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Original Message- >>>>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>>>> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:00 PM >>>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page >>>>> >&

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Marcus
: Re: Proposed change for download page Am 28.12.20 um 15:48 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: there was currently in the forum the case of a user who believed AOO was also available for Windows as 64Bit. The user points out that he got this impression because on our download page the Linux versions

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:58 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > > Hi Marcus, > > Am 28.12.20 um 16:23 schrieb Marcu

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus, Am 28.12.20 um 16:23 schrieb Marcus: > Am 28.12.20 um 16:09 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> Hello, >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:00 PM >>> To: dev@ope

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:42 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > I've prepared the update: > https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.or

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Marcus
Am 28.12.20 um 16:23 schrieb Marcus: Am 28.12.20 um 16:09 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:00 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page Am 28.12.20 um 15:48

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Marcus
Am 28.12.20 um 16:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: https://www.openoffice.org/download/ also refers to OS X <=10.6 versions, which we do not provide. That should be removed as well, IMO. when you select this item, then you get a hint what you can do instead. IMHO we have agreed in the past that

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
https://www.openoffice.org/download/ also refers to OS X <=10.6 versions, which we do not provide. That should be removed as well, IMO. > On Dec 28, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Hello, > > there was currently in the forum the case of a user who believed AOO was also > available

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Marcus
Am 28.12.20 um 16:09 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: Hello, -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:00 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page Am 28.12.20 um 15:48 schrieb Jörg Schmidt

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 4:00 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > > Am 28.12.20 um 15:48 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > > there

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-28 Thread Marcus
Am 28.12.20 um 15:48 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: there was currently in the forum the case of a user who believed AOO was also available for Windows as 64Bit. The user points out that he got this impression because on our download page the Linux versions are marked, but not the Windows version. I