On 2011-06-16 12:56:46, Alan Conway wrote:
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/windows/Thread.cpp, line 85
https://reviews.apache.org/r/904/diff/1/?file=21139#file21139line85
Why the pointer? Just declare
std::mapunsigned, ThreadPrivate::shared_ptr pQpidThreads;
---
On 2011-07-01 03:08:08, Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/987/
---
(Updated 2011-07-01 03:08:08
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/987/
---
(Updated 2011-07-05 17:54:17.154114)
Review request for qpid.
Changes
---
Also related to QPID-2905 problems is QPID-3338. I am trying to do a
test mingw build on Linux to test the patch (all new to me). It works
in the case of Windows CMake and the Visual Studio toolchain.
Cliff
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Chuck, would you
I have tested the patch for QPID-3338 against qpid-0.12-beta on Linux
and it appears to do the right thing for mingw and cmake.
I would like to request approval for this patch.
cliff
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging
The WCF client builds and runs fine also. This also required building
and using C++ broker and client components too (on Windows).
Cliff
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings, everyone. Today I produced RC1 from revision 1146605:
Huston, Andrew Stitcher, and
Cliff Jansen.
Summary
---
QPID-2643 Building QPID with Visual Studio 2010
This patch changes:
List.h - add a typedef from the original post
IntegerTypes.h - adds 'signed' to int_8 to avoid MSVC complaint
SessionState.cpp, qpid-perftest.cpp - adds
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Howdy, all. The last-minute blocker, QPID-3394, has been fixed, and there
are no open blocker jiras against 0.12. The proposed final RC, from
revision 1154981 of the 0.12 release branch, is available here:
Welcome Keith!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:22:29PM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Keith has been nominated and voted onto Qpid as a committer and has
accepted. Please welcome him
Congrats. :)
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr.
+1
An additional sub-task would be to rework the separate powershell and
sh scripts within cmake/ctest to a single base (python is a likely
candidate), so that contributers don't need to wear multiple hats.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri,
message --
From: Cliff Jansen cliffjan...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/11/15
Subject: Re: C++ broker compilation on Sparc Solaris 10
To: MartiN Beneš martinben...@gmail.com
Hi Martin,
Your timing is excellent. I have been active at my end, mainly
running the client code. I will post my changes
False alarm. My apologies to all. This TR1 feature was added after
VS 2008 shipped, and I am missing the later feature pack from
Microsoft on my usual test box.
Cliff
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Cliff Jansen cliffjan...@gmail.com wrote:
The Windows build fails tripping over qpid/sys
Stitcher, Gordon Sim, Ted Ross, Steve Huston,
and Cliff Jansen.
Summary
---
QPID-3193 .NET Binding - proper handling of disposed objects.
This addresses bug QPID-3193.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3193
Diffs
-
trunk/qpid/cpp/bindings/qpid/dotnet/src
---
On 2012-01-04 20:12:57, Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3386
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4383/
---
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher, Ted Ross, Chug Rolke, and Steve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4383/
---
(Updated 2012-03-26 18:26:34.827957)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4383/
---
(Updated 2012-04-11 02:57:20.281375)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4383/
---
(Updated 2012-04-19 06:52:43.361572)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher,
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
Andrew:
Note that there are pending changes to client side SSL on Windows in
QPID-3914. I haven't examined it, but it seems related to some of the
expanded functionality you are looking for.
Cliff
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote:
-Original
[X] Yes, create a JIRA project for Proton.
[ ] No, bah, humbug, Proton can suck it.
Cliff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
[ X] Yes, create pro...@qpid.apache.org
[ ] No, people who don't follow dev@qpid.apache.org shouldn't get a say.
Cliff
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Rafael Schloming rafa...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There's been a lot of good discussion about proton on the dev list,
however,
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/6302/#review9728
---
On Aug. 1, 2012, 9:23 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/
Testing
---
Fedora, Windows
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/trunk/tests/proton_tests/messenger.py
1369190
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/
Testing
---
Fedora, Windows
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
---
On Aug. 6, 2012, 8:16 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/
---
(Updated Aug. 6
://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/#review10122
---
On Aug. 6, 2012, 8:16 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302
+1
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
I had planned to close the vote last week, but so far I've receieved only
four votes. Anyone else care to cast his or her ballot?
Justin
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
Hi, folks. It's time again to vote on
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/windows/SystemInfo.cpp
1387463
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/windows/Thread.cpp
1387463
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7179/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
to get wrong.
- Cliff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7179/#review11717
---
On Sept. 19, 2012, 8:32 p.m., Cliff Jansen
.
- Cliff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7179/#review11796
---
On Sept. 19, 2012, 8:32 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote
()/process(), waiting to reacquire the lock after line 152.
I think the explanation is more likely that differences in the poller
implementations expose a different scheduling opportunity for the bug on
Windows compared to Linux.
- Cliff Jansen
On Nov. 15, 2012, 3:05 a.m., Steve Huston wrote
On Nov. 15, 2012, 9:17 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
I am going to disagree (with the proposed patch, and agree with Andrew). I
managed to reproduce (took closer to 15 minutes on my laptop) and get a
similar stack trace.
I see a shared_ptr with non-null value and use_count of 3. impl
a.m.)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher, Chug Rolke, and Cliff Jansen.
Description
---
This change prevents multiple threads from processing events at the same
time. They can be enqueued by multiple threads but not dispatched.
This addresses bug QPID-4424.
https
, send/recv.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8147/#review13748
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Cliff Jansen
On Nov. 23, 2012, 11:43 p.m
cpp tree.
The volume of these changes (including going forward) is probably much less
than in the qpid/cpp tree, so I do not foresee unamanageble nested ifdef hell
in this approach. Since you are more ready for a commit, I can adjust if the
chosen path is to go the ifdef route.
- Cliff Jansen
On Dec. 3, 2012, 8:01 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
The changes in platform.h and platform.c will be multiplied for mingw and
Visual Studio. In https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302, a separate sys
directory was proposed with uuid.h and time.h (and eventually driver
components). Instead
-c/src/ssl/openssl.c
1417563
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/util.h 1417563
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8223/diff/
Testing
---
RHEL 6.3 (64 bit) gcc and g++ each in Release and Debug cmake builds.
proton-test, send/recv.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
a
performance penalty on big endian hardware, though I can't quantify the amount.
Are these functions not available on some platform?
- Cliff Jansen
On Dec. 6, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8385/#review14171
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Cliff Jansen
On Dec. 6, 2012, 11:10 p.m
+1. Welcome!
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote:
Phil was nominated for committer and has accepted. Please join me in
welcoming him.
Phil, you will need to recheck out using https, and if you have any
issues let me know.
more info on committership
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/ssl/ssl_stub.c
1423094
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/windows/driver.c
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/
Testing
---
Fedora, Windows
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
Hi Jeremy,
Several people have worked towards completing a port of Qpid to
Solaris, including myself, but no one yet has followed through
completely. I have found that the client code is in good shape
talking to a Linux C++ broker, but the broker code is largely
untested.
You should be able to
/trunk/proton-c/src/proton.c
1425672
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/windows/driver.c
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/
Testing
---
Fedora, Windows
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/util.h 1435762
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8223/diff/
Testing
---
RHEL 6.3 (64 bit) gcc and g++ each in Release and Debug cmake builds.
proton-test, send/recv.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
and runs proton test. Along with other patches, also
compiles in Visual Studio.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/util.c 1435762
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9086/diff/
Testing
---
compiles on linux and runs proton test. Along with other patches, also
compiles in Visual Studio.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/util.c 1435762
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9088/diff/
Testing
---
compiles on linux and runs proton test. Along with other patches, also
compiles in Visual Studio.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/src/sasl/sasl.c
1435762
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/util.c 1435762
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9088/diff/
Testing
---
compiles on linux and runs proton test. Along with other patches, also
compiles in Visual Studio.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/src/sasl/sasl.c
1435762
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/util.c 1435762
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9088/diff/
Testing
---
compiles on linux and runs proton test. Along with other patches, also
compiles in Visual Studio.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9088/#review15669
---
On Jan. 24, 2013, 8:49 a.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/types.c
1439550
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9124/diff/
Testing
---
This compiles and runs, but only if you stitch the previous 4 related patches
together. It does not work standalone.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
. 24, 2013, 8:24 a.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9085/
---
(Updated Jan. 24, 2013, 8:24 a.m
---
code compiles on gcc/linux, gcc/mingw, Visual Studio
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
, and Visual Studio on Windows
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
and
Solaris VMs.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
1445761
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/CMakeLists.txt
1445761
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9433/diff/
Testing
---
linux only so far. Minimally the PYTHONPATH will require a ';' separator in
Windows.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
:
1 - proton-c (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
I tried the python line substituting a ';' for the ':' in the PYTHONPATH, but
same results.
Not sure what is missing.
- Mary Hinton
On Feb. 13, 2013, 7:41 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9489/diff/
Testing
---
Tested on rhel6 and VS2008
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
on rhel6 and VS2008
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
Welcome Fraser!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote:
Fraser Adams has been nominated for committer for qpid and has accepted.
Please join me in welcoming him to the project!.
Fraser, we are watching to see your first commit!
kind regards
Carl.
Not that this speaks directly to the issue of instant deletion versus
a more dignified old-folks home retirement, but I would point out that
CMake is the sole build mechanism for AMQP 1.0 support in C/C++. You
can't avoid it going forward for at least part of your build.
Also since a lot of the
I am guilty for its inclusion and can't find a specific reason (from
memory, or trying to force a failure) for its need.
Note that there is no FindMaven.cmake equivalent available, so I
cooked up a heuristic. I relied on maven being in the PATH. Also,
based on my unfamiliarity with maven, I
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/tools/cmake/Modules/ProtonUseJavaSourceFileList.cmake
1459606
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10076/diff/
Testing
---
rhel 6 and windows 8
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/windows/uuid.cpp
1477707
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10863/diff/
Testing
---
Windows, uuids received from and sent to Linux, spout drain
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
I volunteer for the WCF version. I'll get to it as soon as I get
QPID-2501 out of the way. I also plan to do some work on the WCF
documentation side as soon as I can as well.
I am going to be on vacation next week so I will try to squeeze in what I can.
Cliff
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:27 AM,
Perhaps it would be useful for somebody to assist this debate by
introducing the messaging API in the .NET context and addressing why,
for example, .NET programmers need this API, but Java programmers
don't. Or why a developer who might be inclined to use WCF should use
this messaging API
Why would a user chose to use this binding instead
of the WCF client - I guess thats the key question ?
If I understand the previous posts in this thread, the answer is that
people who are comfortable with WCF paradigms will use WCF, and people
who like to think a little closer to AMQP on the
I'm working on enhancing the WCF channel stack to make it easier to
program with the binary binding and improve the interoperability with
other clients.
Cliff
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:
Hi Chuck,
I haven't seen that exact problem, but for me, 9 times out of 10 mysterious
problems between debug and release versions boiled down to build issues.
While the following rules of thumb can probably be relaxed in some
situations, I tried to always make sure:
Never mix debug and release
Hi Steve,
What version of Qpid are you using? There's no reference to
boost_date_time in the interop project today.
The boost include libraries contain fancy #pragmas to force linking
against the (correct) library version.
Daniel:
Since you built the cpp tree first, it also needs the same
Hi Daniel,
To confirm, I can build qpid/wcf libraries on Windows 7 and using VS 2008.
I need to set BOOST_ROOT and BOOST_VERSION and QPID_BUILD_ROOT in my
environment before building.
At runtime, I need to make sure that all of the following are
available from the PATH of subdirectories (often
which directory must be set for
QPID_BUILD_ROOT
Br, Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Jansen [mailto:cliffjan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 04. Oktober 2010 18:36
To: Daniel Sack
Cc: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building WCF Channel
In your case, BOOST_VERSION=104000
Hi Adam,
In case it helps, note that the documentation in 0.7 for the WCF
client also applies for the 0.6 version, with the exception of the
section on security (SSL and SASL plain, new for 0.7). See
http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.7/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch04.html.
Cliff
On Tue, Nov
In CMake, there is a checkbox labeled BUILD_SSL that is selected by
default. Presumably deselecting that and rebuilding (i.e. full clean
and regenerate visual studio project files) should do it. I've never
tried it though...
Cliff
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Daniel Sack
[X ] Yes, release RC3 as Qpid 0.8
[ ] No, I have an issue which I'll discuss in a new thread.
Cliff
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
As RC3 has now been out for a week without call for blocking changes to be
made, it seems like it is time for a
Gordon Sim wrote in the JIRA:
fwiw: I see no risk in including this in 0.10 providing there is still time
to do so.
+1
Cliff
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
This is a potentially bad bug that would be hard to find if we ran into
it.
+1
Cliff
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello, everyone. The blocker issue raised earlier this week has been
resolved. There's more information, including release notes, at the release
page[1].
The proposed final distribution of Qpid 0.10 is available
QPID:
Yes [ X ]
No [ ]
PROTON:
Yes [ X ]
No [ ]
Cliff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
+1
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Justin Ross jr...@apache.org wrote:
RC6 contains the proposed final bits for Qpid 0.22.
If you favor making the RC6 bits into our official release, vote +1.
If you have reason to believe RC6 is not ready for release, vote -1.
Thanks!
Justin
[X] Yes, replace the existing site with the proposed site
Cliff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
[X] * When 0.25 opens after the 0.24 beta branch remove the C++
Cliff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/tests/tools/apps/c/msgr-common.h
1499652
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/tests/tools/apps/c/msgr-common.c
1499652
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12275/diff/
Testing
---
windows, rhel6
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/#review22782
---
On July 5, 2013, 6:17 a.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12275
/Modules/WindowsC99SymbolCheck.py
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10363/diff/
Testing
---
windows and rhel 6
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
and dumpbin.
- Cliff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10363/#review23086
---
On July 12, 2013, 12:20 a.m., Cliff Jansen wrote
These patches look good. I am in favour.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Chuck Rolke cro...@redhat.com wrote:
The following are all small, windows, installation-related fixes:
QPID-5017: WinSDK build leaves release executables stranded in \bin directory
http://svn.apache.org/r1509016
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14408/#review26524
---
Ship it!
- Cliff Jansen
On Sept. 30, 2013, 6:56 p.m., Chug Rolke
/
Testing
---
Windows 7: Personal/MY store, user created store, pkcs#12 file. Self signed,
chained certs.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/windows/util.cpp
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14570/diff/
Testing
---
Windows 7: Personal/MY store, user created store, pkcs#12 file. Self signed,
chained certs.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
or not requiring client
certificates, SASL mechanisms EXTERNAL, PLAIN, ANONYMOUS.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/proton-c/src/dispatcher/dispatcher.c
1561193
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/sasl/sasl.c
1561193
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17418/diff/
Testing
---
64 bit, windows and linux
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/
Testing
---
Linux.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
correct to
me. Sadly, I was not able to get ctest to cooperate on my system to run
simplest tests, let alone the CLFS-specific tests. However, I believe the
patch is useful and does no harm on the Windows side.
- Cliff Jansen
On Feb. 1, 2014, 2:47 p.m., Pavel Moravec wrote
/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/messaging/amqp/TransportContext.h
1564226
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17521/diff/
Testing
---
Linux.
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/windows/selector.c
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18893/diff/
Testing
---
rhel 6, Win7, all 64 bit for now
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
PRE-CREATION
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/windows/selector.c
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18893/diff/
Testing
---
rhel 6, Win7, all 64 bit for now
Thanks,
Cliff Jansen
1 - 100 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
