Re: [Discussion]Add two Success/Failed and Rest/Highway Dimensions for Metrics

we want to know invocations of success/failed or different transport, their composition of time usage, average time of fiters/handlers/queue in threadPool/business executin, and so on not for when a invocation in queue, if it is success or failed. 2018-01-11 9:03 GMT+08:00 郑扬勇 : > Sorry,seems tab

license of RestBodyHandler.java

io.servicecomb.transport.rest.vertx.RestBodyHandler is copied from io.vertx.ext.web.handler.impl.BodyHandlerImpl, and do some modify because we cannot extend io.vertx.ext.web.handler.impl.BodyHandlerImpl to change the behavior. We will try our best to submit the PR to the Vertx Community. But now

Re: [TO ALL]About Metrics publish style

1.min is usless, and spectator already removed min support 2.here statistic mixed statistic and stage, why? 3.we will publish common raw data like spring cloud from maybe by /metrics 4.we will publish our metrics model maybe by /metrics/servicecomb 2018-02-03 10:12 GMT+08:00 郑扬勇 : > Hello everyon

discussion: about performance metrics local log output format.

1.output will be group by transport and statusCode for consumer and producer operation is empty means this line is summary for this group 2.will add cpu/memory/gc output in the furture. cpu is only about this process, not about os level because jvm did not provide api to get os level cpu u

Re: discussion: about performance metrics local log output format.

e normal system > administration work? > > [1]https://git-scm.com/docs/git-log > > > Willem Jiang > > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Fifth Attempt

+1 run tests and passed. 2018-03-28 14:44 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > +1 binding > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - hashes and signatures is good > - DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists > - ran RAT tool > - can make release kit from source > - checked for archive matching git tag > -

Re: Proposal for holding a Apache ServiceComb(incubating) mini meetupas a Co-Located Event in LC3 2018

+1 2018-04-03 9:43 GMT+08:00 Sure : > +1 > > > > > -- Original -- > From: Willem Jiang > Date: Mon,Apr 2,2018 9:18 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: Proposal for holding a Apache ServiceComb(incubating) mini > meetupas a Co-Located Event in LC3 2018 > > > > +1 for hold

Re: [Discussion]Provider a project fully show all features of ServiceComb(also can use as a scaffold)

AB test supported by DarkLaunchFilter in CSE not ServiceComb 2018-04-08 22:29 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > I just went through the documents, it looks good. > Here are some comments for the edge service part. > For the canary test, we need to make sure the new version of service is > available to s

Re: [Discussion]Provider a project fully show all features ofServiceComb(also can use as a scaffold)

we already have some projects like this(houseApp or something else). so my question is: design some new projects or make the exists better. 2018-04-09 11:02 GMT+08:00 bismy : > This is a good idea, and the features is good too. > Here are some works done that you can refer to >https://java.hu

Re: [VOTE] Holding Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Meetup Hosted byHuawei Cloud as a Co-located Event in LC3 2018 Aisa

+1 2018-04-09 18:24 GMT+08:00 郑扬勇 : > +1 > > Yangyong Zheng > Best Regards! > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "Zen Lin"; > 发送时间: 2018年4月8日(星期天) 下午3:40 > 收件人: "dev"; > > 主题: [VOTE] Holding Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Meetup Hosted byHuawei > Cloud as a Co-located Ev

Re: [Discuss]Feature list for next releases.

4. Support custom handling of messages while marshaling/unmarshaling. (373) description is not good. all version support customize Serializer/Deserializer, but now developers have chances to provide a thread local context for customize Serializer/Deserializer 9. Asynchronous programming m

Re: [Discuss]Feature list for next releases.

i'm enhancing model capability to support: 1.class A{ A a; } 2.class A{ B b; } class B{ A a; } 2018-05-03 10:51 GMT+08:00 Yang Bo : > Yes rxJava observable is not implemented yet. We will need to implement it > in this release. > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:02 AM, wjm wjm

Re: [Discussion]What Java Chassis need to do for support Gracefully Shutdown

we already have this mechanism, but listener depend on spring bean. so we can improve it: 1.allow listener registered by SPI 2.modules should register listener to do their clean up works 3.clean up maybe must ordered, so listener add getOrder method. 2018-05-08 14:56 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > My

Re: [Discussion]What Java Chassis need to do for support Gracefully Shutdown

//4.Raise an ShutdownEvent in EventBus in order to notify > > components do clean works > >//eventBus.post(new ShutdownEvent()); > > > >triggerEvent(EventType.AFTER_CLOSE); > > isInit = false; > > } > > > > > > And I thi

Re: [Discussion]What Java Chassis need to do for support Gracefully Shutdown

> I think its better to have one place to handle the shutdown work. > > > Willem Jiang > > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:36 PM, wjm

Re: [Discussion]Reorganize 'demo' and 'integration-tests' modules in Java Chassis

good maybe we can discuss based on issue 221/JAV-507 2018-05-09 16:46 GMT+08:00 郑扬勇 : > Hi all: >In java chassis there are two set of modules 'demo' and > 'integration-tests' for integration test, I think we can reorganize them > and merge into 'integration-tests' because: >1.'demo' has c

Re: [VOTE] Move github notifications to maillist "comm...@servicecomb.apache.org"

+1 2018-05-11 17:52 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > +1 , it could make the dev discuss more focused. > > > Willem Jiang > > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 4:51 PM, kirin wa

[Discussion] about publish invocation event

currently we publish invocation start/startProcess/finish event for every invocation now event based on guava EventBus it's easy to use. but EventBus based on reflection, performance is not the best. in the furture maybe we will add more invocaiton event, and more module will subscribe invocation

Re: [Discussion] about publish invocation event

logspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 4:31 PM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > currently we publish invocation start/startProcess/finish event for every > > invocation > > now event b

Re: [Discussion] about publish invocation event

p://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:25 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > class XxxListener implements AListener,BListener...{ > > } > > > > All listener interfaces extends from a center type > >

Re: [Discussion]About service instances discovery reliable problems

" When service center restarted" that means one instance of SC cluster, or whole SC cluster? even one instance restart will clear all information? 2018-05-14 12:03 GMT+08:00 bismy : > Hi All, > > > Now we meet a reliable problem. When service center restarted, It will > clear all service instanc

Re: [Discussion]About service instances discovery reliable problems

it's a problem, but why business use gray release, but we reject to the solution? 2018年5月14日星期一，bismy 写道： > When service center all instances stoped and then started. This is normal > when we are doing maintenance. e.g. upgrading > > > > > -- 原始邮件 ----

Re: [Discussion] about publish invocation event

reflect:322 lambda:261 Round 4: direct:255 reflect:325 lambda:259 2018-05-14 11:00 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > no instanceOf, no reflection during invoke > only get all interfaces from class when register a listener instance > > 2018-05-14 10:43 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > >> We need

Re: [VOTE]create a new project incubator-servicecomb-docs to host documentations for servicecomb components

+1 binding 2018-05-18 9:23 GMT+08:00 Zen Lin : > +1 non-binding > And an idea to suggest here, we can invite people from our community > wechat group to jion in the document work,something like what jimisong is > doing in promoting istio in China. > > Best Regards, > --- > Zen Lin > zenlintechn

Re: [VOTE] Decide which scheme to be used in the T-shirt that used in community promotion

+B binding 2018-05-21 10:49 GMT+08:00 Yang Bo : > +A > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:44 AM, bismy wrote: > > > +B scheme B > > > > > > -- Original -- > > From: "DeanLee"<82529...@qq.com>; > > Date: Mon, May 21, 2018 10:39 AM > > To: "dev"; > > Cc: "Willem Jiang

Re: Submit a PR without JIRA for documents

+1 2018-05-25 14:42 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > +1 > We just need to make sure the PR message describes the changes in the > document properly. > > Regards > Asif > > On 2018/05/25 04:03:57, "bismy" wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am creating PR's for ServiceComb documents, and found it th

what's happened about shutdown graceful in tomcat

our shutdown hook works good in standalone mode but when package as a war to run with tomcat, shutdown hook will not be invoked, must invoke manually by subscribe spring ContextClosedEvent anybody know what's happened?

Re: what's happened about shutdown graceful in tomcat

oh, i see standalone tomcat shutdown by receive shutdown command from shutdown port after everything prepared, then do real shutdown action, so our shutdown hook will not be invoked. 2018-05-26 14:34 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > our shutdown hook works good in standalone mode > but when packag

Re: what's happened about shutdown graceful in tomcat

e drive and past a link here. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:34 PM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > our shutdown hook works good in standalone mode > > but when package as a war to run with tomcat, shutd

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Zheng Yangyong (郑扬勇）

Congratulations! 2018-06-08 9:57 GMT+08:00 Eric Lee : > Congratulations! > > 2018-06-08 9:39 GMT+08:00 Kirin Wang : > > > Congratulations! > > > > Zen Lin 于2018年6月8日周五 上午9:38写道： > > > > > Congratulations to Zheng Yangyong. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > --- > > > Zen Lin > > > zenlintechnof

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Eric Lee (李达港）

Congratulations ~ 2018-06-10 15:31 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > Please join me and the rest of the ServiceComb PPMC members in welcoming > our > new ServiceComb committer: Eric Lee (李达港). > > Eric Lee contribute the ServiceComb since last Jun, he is active > contributor on saga, java-chassis and w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.2.0

+1 binding Checks Done: - release notes is correct - source & binary release candidate is ok - repository is ok - licenses and notices are ok 2018-06-11 21:55 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > Hi Liubao， > > As you are in the PPMC, your vote is the binding one. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemji

Re: [DISCUSSION] How to migrate configurations from cse to servicecomb prefix

we copy servicecomb.* to cse.*, read some configuration items by cse.*, and read others by servicecomb.* i think, it's not a good idea. if we copy cse.* to servicecomb.*, then we can do: 1.read all configuration items by servicecomb.* 2.compatible to old versions 2018-06-13 11:08 GMT+08:00 bism

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (Incubating) version 1.0.0-m2 - (RC-02)

+1 binding Hash and Signature Checked Passed; Build source code download from Release Candidate Passed; 2018-06-18 13:41 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > +1 (binding) > > Checks Done : > - incubating in name > - hashes and signatures is good > - DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists > - ran RAT

Re: integrate the authority authenticate in the gateway

try this: https://huaweicse.github.io/servicecomb-java-chassis-doc/zh_CN/edge/by-servicecomb-sdk.html the demo and document is a little old you can change Auth interface to reactive mode, so that edge can work in high performance mode: public interface Auth { CompletableFuture<...> auth(...); }

about protobuf codec switch from protoStuff to jackson

protoStuff support all protobuf v3 features and very fast but protoStuff: 1.must based on java class, can not construct from idl, this is not good in edge. 2.can not support customize generic class jackson protobuf plugin is good in other feature, but : only support protobuf v2 features some scene

Re: 答复: about protobuf codec switch from protoStuff to jackson

rder > to support this. > > > Best Regards! > YangYongZheng > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: wjm wjm [mailto:zzz...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2018年6月28日 16:46 > 收件人: dev@servicecomb.apache.org > 主题: about protobuf codec switch from protoStuff to jackson > > protoStuff suppo

Re: about protobuf codec switch from protoStuff to jackson

o/springmvc/jaxrs) > > > > if we use protoStuff, for highway should be: > protobuffer -> args -> HttpServletRequestExt > > > and jackson: >protobuffer -> idl -> HttpServletRequestExt > > > I think we can still use protoStuff to solve the problem.

Re: about protobuf codec switch from protoStuff to jackson

we use protoStuff, for highway should be: > protobuffer -> args -> HttpServletRequestExt > > > and jackson: >protobuffer -> idl -> HttpServletRequestExt > > > I think we can still use protoStuff to solve the problem. The above > understanding may be not quite

[DISCUSS] about integration test

currently we embed integration test with PR CI but: 1.we will add more and more integration test case 2.test time will be more and more longer 3.integration test should include work with multiple SC versions 4... so, maybe it's better that make integration test to be a independent project, an

Re: [DISCUSS] about integration test

on test in a separated project we may need to find a > way to let the integration test looks up the latest snap short artifact for > running the test. > > Any thought? > > > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018

Re: [DISCUSS] about integration test

m/apache/incubator-servicecomb-saga/ > blob/master/.travis.yml#L28 > [3]https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-servicecomb-saga > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 8:56 PM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > yes >

Re: [DISCUSS] about integration test

er day. > > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:45 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > multiple SC is no problem, infact, not all test case should be run for > > multiple SC > > > > the problem is Travis i

Re: [DISCUSS]Shall Java Chassis support random port

+1 when cse project start, i implement this feature, but teams said that is not safe.. at last we delete the feature. 2018-07-13 9:23 GMT+08:00 郑扬勇 : > Hi: > Like spring-boot server.port=0, Java Chassis can support random port: > > servicecomb: > rest: > address: 0.0.0.0:0 > highw

Re: [DISCUSS]Shall Java Chassis support random port

@wjm Could you provide more information about the safety issue? that > is > > a interesting topic. > > > > wjm wjm 于2018年7月13日周五 上午9:30写道： > > > > > +1 > > > > > > when cse project start, i implement this feature, but teams said th

Re: [DISCUSS]Shall Java Chassis support random port

MT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > The "not safety" explain doesn't make sense. > With the help of service-center, we can find out the port finally. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:11 AM, wjm wjm wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

maybe it's a subset of: https://console.huaweicloud.com/servicestage/?region=cn-south-1&locale=en-us#/cse/tools cse are planning to make console open source 2018-07-13 19:54 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > Hi All, > > As we have continously put an effort to improve the Service-Center UI to

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

as i said that, Proposal of new SC frontend seems to be a subset of ServiceComb-UI if that's true, i think we no need to spend time to do one thing with two way. 2018-07-16 11:58 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > Hi Sure, > > If this new ServiceComb-UI(as per your mail) is opensourced then wil

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

maybe we can change our mind to: make sure new feathers all in ServiceComb-UI, not design a new one. 2018-07-16 12:41 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > as i said that, Proposal of new SC frontend seems to be a subset of > ServiceComb-UI > if that's true, i think we no need to spend time to do

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

lling > > to > > > keep on developing and maintaining a servicenter UI, will will have two > > UI > > > in future, I think that is allowed with a opensource project also. > > > > > > Therefore, to my opinion, I think we can focused on

Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

+1 2018-07-18 10:05 GMT+08:00 Yang Bo : > +1 for this. And I also suggest to run both the service-center and frontend > in the docker image. > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:25 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > There was an issue raised in github[1] o

Discussion about java chassis roadmap

we need to plan roadmap for the next stage i create below issues to trace what i think is important. please feel free to add your opinions/new isses/ and so on [SCB-719 ] automated integration testing support complex processes [SCB-748

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

for the new release. > Jimin, I think 719 and 758 are very big task, I think we may need to > create some small tasks to break down them a bit. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:34 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > &g

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

SCB-758>] extract core engine not depend on spring 2018-07-19 16:20 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > infact all of them are very very big task > once we decided to start them, we must create subtasks. > > now, we just need to decide what tasks will be start? > > 2018-07-19 15:44 GM

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

SCB-758>] extract core engine not depend on spring 2018-07-19 16:20 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > infact all of them are very very big task > once we decided to start them, we must create subtasks. > > now, we just need to decide what tasks will be start? > > 2018-07-19 15:44 GM

Re: [DISCUSS]Shall we upgrade Java-chassis to support Spring Boot2

not enough, must exclude old spring also 2018-07-20 6:44 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > How about let user override the version of Spring Boot in their application > and give it a try. > Just like what we do with JDK9 here[1] > If there is any issue comes out, we can keep digging it. > > [1]https://g

Re: Re: [DISCUSS]Shall we upgrade Java-chassis to support Spring Boot2

t; ``` > Because AbstractConfigurableEmbeddedServletContainer is removed in > SpringBoot2, and our RestServletInitializer is extended from this class, > maybe we cannot upgrade to SpringBoot2 by simply change the maven > dependency. > And once we refactor our RestServletInitialize

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

B-756 is related, should take most > priority. > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "wjm wjm"; > 发送时间: 2018年7月19日(星期四) 下午4:29 > 收件人: "dev"; > > 主题: Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap > > > > Sort by importance: > >

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

ese epic issues in release 1.0.0, or other later > release. > Or we will break these epic issues into smaller one ,and then mark which > part of the issues will be fixed in release 1.0.0? > > Best Regards, > --- > Zen Lin > zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com > Focused on Micro S

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Feng Zheng (冯征)

Congratulations~ Welcome~~ 2018-07-24 9:38 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > Congratulations Feng Zheng ! Welcome! > > Regards > Asif > > On 2018/07/23 14:16:35, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Please join me and the rest of the ServiceComb PPMC members in welcoming > our > > new ServiceComb committ

Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

you write a local registry.yaml, but missed some important data a easy way to fix: do not write the registry.yaml because you test case is self invoke self, ServiceComb engine can generate informations dynamiclly change: org.apache.servicecomb.saga.discovery.service.center.ServiceCenterDiscoveryR

Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

gt; > > > > > > > Hi, jimin, > > > > Changed the System property fix the issue, but it looks like we have some > > undocument information need to updated. > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > >

Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

document updated 2018-07-25 15:45 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > i'm updating the document. > > 2018-07-25 14:30 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > >> It could handy for the user to write the test without starting the >> service-center, >> we could add it into the section of

Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

> schemaId payment-endpoint > > service-center> 2018-07-25 08:00:43.089 +00:00 INFO service/schema.go:518 > > modify schema successfully: serviceId d435f3f78fe011e89bc30242ac110002, > > schemaId payment-endpoint. > > service-center> 2018-07-25 08:00:43.089 +00:00 I

Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

ice instance success. microserviceId=327ca84d8fe411e8a8b70242ac110002 instanceId=329b2c168fe411e8a8b70242ac110002 2018-07-25 20:28 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > 1.saga-spring project, some classes import io.servicecomb packages, should > update to org.apache.servicecomb > 2.org.apache.servicecomb.s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (Incubating) version 1.0.0

some issue status is 'won't fix', but appear in bug fix, eg: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-629 2018-07-25 17:11 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui : > Minor Typo Correction in the Commit ID. > > Commit ID : 2d8645355febc215b33818770ae18468aba6146a > > > > On 2018/07/25 09:09:52, Mohamm

Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

ang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:28 PM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > 1.saga-spring project, some classes import io.servicecomb packages, > should > > update to org.apache.servicecomb > > 2.org.apache.servicecomb.saga.spring.SagaServiceDiscoveryTest# &g

Re: Spring Session Support in Java Chassis

by ClusteredSessionStore, vertx can also do this but currently, there is no a official IMPL: https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/issues/890 2018-07-26 15:31 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > Hi team, > > Today I had a quick talk with the custom who is quite interested about take > the session out from

Re: [DISCUSS] Swagger parameter default values while generating theschema file

" e. when generating swagger, generate defalutValue only when explicitly specified." add another point: for primitive type, even there is no @DefaultValue annotation, should have it's default value 2018-07-26 19:42 GMT+08:00 bismy : > My suggestions are as follows > 1. Encourage providers to spe

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for holding an ServiceComb Meetup inBangalore, India

对英语停用 +1, it's great help to promote ServiceComb 2018-07-26 20:48 GMT+08:00 bismy : > +1, it's great help to promote ServiceComb > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "willem.jiang"; > 发送时间: 2018年7月26日(星期四) 晚上8:43 > 收件人: "dev"; > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for holding an

Re: Spring Session Support in Java Chassis

on Support in Java Chassis > > > > After went through the code, it looks like the PR[1] was not merged into > master branch. > > [1]https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/pull/950 > > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On

Re: Spring Session Support in Java Chassis

f we can still support spring session out of box. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03 PM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > java chassis invocation context is easier than session > > but in edge, if we provide a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0 (RC-03)

+1 binding 1. check release notes and binaries. [OK] 2. run test case using windows version. [OK] 2018-07-26 22:32 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > +1 binding > > I checked： > - hashes and signatures looks good > - DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE looks good > - can make build the kit from source > - checke

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (Incubating) version 1.0.0

SCB-592 also have won't fix problem it's better everybody check their own issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (Incubating) version 1.0.0

SCB-575 still in OPEN status 2018-07-27 8:55 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > SCB-592 also have won't fix problem > > it's better everybody check their own issues >

Re: [DISCUSS] Swagger parameter default values while generatingtheschema file

in jaxrs mode, required default to false, if primitive type not annotated by @DefaultValue, should generated defaultValue to swagger in springmvc mode, not support standard jaxrs behavior, so we no need to process it. (if not consider compatible to standard springmvc, i feel that standard jaxrs be

Re: [DISCUSS] Swagger parameter default values while generatingtheschema file

if unify to jaxrs behavior, i feel that's very good. 2018-07-27 11:17 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > in jaxrs mode, required default to false, if primitive type not annotated > by @DefaultValue, should generated defaultValue to swagger > in springmvc mode, not support standard jaxrs beha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (Incubating) version 1.0.0

+1 binding 1. check the release notes. 2. check the binaries and sources. 2018-07-27 18:07 GMT+08:00 Bin Ma : > +1 non binding, my show cases are working fine. > > Best Wishes & Regards > --- > Mabin > > > > wjm wjm 于2018年7月27日周五 上

Re: Spring Session Support in Java Chassis

> > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:52 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > infact, in springboot2 reactive stack, it's also not compatible: > > > >- can not use servlet request and response, must switch to new class > >

help: problem with maven-jar-plugin

1.there is no problem run unit test, and start spring applicationContext, by "mvn install" 2.add maven-jar-plugin in pom, set outputDirectory, and run "mvn install" again spring will load duplicated libraries in different directory, that cause spring start failed. (target/lib is my " outputDirector

Re: help: problem with maven-jar-plugin

/integration-tests/target/${project.artifactId} simple true ../lib/ ${it.main} . .. 2018-07-28 9:33 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > 1.there is no problem run unit test, and start spring applicationContext, > by "mvn inst

Re: help: problem with maven-jar-plugin

to the classpath. > Can you exclude them[1] in the maven jar plugin ? > > [1] > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/ > examples/include-exclude.html > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 9:33

Re: help: problem with maven-jar-plugin

ingboot", no problem. 2018-07-29 2:41 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > infact classpath data in MANIFEST.MF is no problem, "java -jar xx.jar" is > no problem. > just only classpath for "mvn install" have problem, exclude is not > a solution for this. > > 2018-07-2

Re: help: problem with maven-jar-plugin

} . .. 2018-07-30 15:58 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > must run "mvn install" in parent level, that will cause problem. > > eg: > integration tests > springmvc-tests > springmvc-tests-general-with-springboot > > run in " integration tests" or " springmv

Re: [VOTE] Proposal for holding an Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Meetup in Bangalore, India

+1 binding. 2018-08-01 10:18 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > +1 binding. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > This is a call for a Vote to hold Apache ServiceC

[DISCUSS] about extend jackson

i had already extend jackson protobuf to support protobuf3 map feature. based on jackson 2.9.6, because we are using 2.9.6 but jackson 2.9.6 already released. even i raise a PR for this and jackson will merge it, we can not use it directly or must wait for next release. but we must start new task

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

another information: jackson master version is 3.x modification for 2.9.6 is different to 3.x, many jackson base class changed 2018-08-15 2:33 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > i had already extend jackson protobuf to support protobuf3 map feature. > > based on jackson 2.9.6, because we are us

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:06 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > another information: > > jackson master version is 3.x > > modification for 2.9.6 is different to 3.x, many jackson base class > changed > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

ere are third party code was add to the repo, we need to keep the old > license header. > Please go through this document[1] for more information. > > [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem &g

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

way then. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:37 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > > > seems that: > > 1.base code not change license > > 2.new class " should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis by the PMC "

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Lin Zhinan (林志南）

Congratulations ~ 2018-08-20 17:09 GMT+08:00 bismy : > Congratulations & welcome to join ServiceComb > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "willem.jiang"; > 发送时间: 2018年8月20日(星期一) 下午4:11 > 收件人: "dev"; > > 主题: [ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Lin Zhinan (林志南） > > > > Please join

Re: About introduce Lombok to service comb

in fact, getter / setter and so on can be generated by IDE(IntelliJ / Eclipse) simply 2018-08-21 22:34 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > Hi Cherry, > > Thanks for proposal, it can save us lot of time when we write the java bean > class. > As lombok is using MIT license, I don't think we could have the l

Re: About introduce Lombok to service comb

> > > Lombok would not package into our service-comb jar, so there is no > license > > issue. > > We can set the maven scope is “provide”, it just enhance the java code > > byte in compile step. > > > > > > > > > On 21 Aug 2018, at 10:57 PM

Re: [DISCUSS]add The Sources Panel In Schema Test

+1 just like swagger IDE 2018-08-23 11:48 GMT+08:00 Sure : > Now, shema test in the sc frontend does not contain the schema source, > then the developer can not debug it coveniently. > So, I suggest add a source panel to shema test

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Yang Bo (杨波)

Congratulations ~ 2018-08-24 15:47 GMT+08:00 Zheng Feng : > Congratulations ! > > Willem Ning Jiang 于2018年8月24日周五 上午11:27写道： > > > Please join me and the rest of the ServiceComb PPMC members in welcoming > > our > > new ServiceComb committer: Yang Bo (杨波). > > > > Yang Bo starts to contribute o

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Holding an Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Meetup as a Co-located Event in HC 2018 Shanghai, China, OCT 12.

+1 binding 2018-08-25 10:53 GMT+08:00 YangYongZheng <342906...@qq.com>: > That's Great! > +1 non-binding. > > Best Regards! > YangYongZheng > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Zen Lin [mailto:zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2018年8月23日 20:41 > 收件人: dev > 主题: [VOTE] Holding an Apache ServiceComb (incub

Re: About introduce Lombok to service comb

etters, users can > > > include it very easily to their projects. > > > >> 2. For framework, I'd prefer our class do not use Lombok > annotations. > > > Because write getters/setters is very potable to very runtime,and quite > > > easy with an IDE.

Re: [DISCUSS] Heading to graduation

Great. we will add more useful features. 2018-08-21 17:41 GMT+08:00 Lance Ju : > Inspiring! I see the user list includes giant commercial groups from > banking, manufacturing, insurance, and startup or small companies that > provide information service, smart devices, and even healthcare, great

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb PPMC: Feng Zheng (冯征）

Congratulations~ bismy 于2018年9月4日周二 上午9:19写道： > Congratulations to Feng Zheng. > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "willem.jiang"; > 发送时间: 2018年8月31日(星期五) 晚上10:53 > 收件人: "dev"; > > 主题: [ANN] New ServiceComb PPMC: Feng Zheng (冯征） > > > > Please join me and the rest of the

Re: [ANN] New ServiceComb PPMC: Zheng Yangyong (郑扬勇）

Congratulations~ bismy 于2018年9月4日周二 上午9:20写道： > Congratulations to Zheng Yangyong. > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "willem.jiang"; > 发送时间: 2018年8月31日(星期五) 晚上10:58 > 收件人: "dev"; > > 主题: [ANN] New ServiceComb PPMC: Zheng Yangyong (郑扬勇） > > > > Please join me and the res

  1   2   3   >