Re: SVN Reorg

2013-01-30 Thread David Blevins
Another trunk is good. If it sits there for too long, then off to the sandbox. -David On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: if nobody shouts before next week i'll move karafee over sandbox or another trunk any objection? *Romain Manni-Bucau*

Re: groupId?

2013-02-11 Thread David Blevins
We don't need to but we might want to do that where applicable on 1.6 (not 1.5.x). -David On Feb 10, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, we are now tomee and no more openejb (i mean as TLP), do we *need* to change our groupId to tomee too? if yes can

Re: groupId?

2013-02-11 Thread David Blevins
. -dain On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:12 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: We don't need to but we might want to do that where applicable on 1.6 (not 1.5.x). -David On Feb 10, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, we are now tomee

Re: trunk = 1.6.0?

2013-02-13 Thread David Blevins
In terms of branching from the 1.5.1 tag, not sure that is a good idea. Branching from the trunk code right before we replaced the jaxb code and before we did the tld changes is probably most realistic. That or branch from now and revert those two changes from the branch. -David On Feb 13,

Re: Good validation candidates: SubTask 39, 48

2013-03-21 Thread David Blevins
Thank you so much. You can thank Karan Malhi for a good chunk of that. He did an amazing job creating a framework for testing the validations and ensuring each message key is used properly and supports all three levels we expect. I agree, it's some of the better code I've seen. -David On

1.6.0

2013-03-25 Thread David Blevins
2 notes. There needs to be some communication on the list before starting a release. On 1.6.0 specifically, I'd like to finish getting the xml stuff switched over before we release 1.6.0 Not the kind of thing I think we should be doing in a maintenance branch or we would have done it in

Re: 1.6.0

2013-03-25 Thread David Blevins
I'd also like to get the raspberry pi support in better condition and make a huge splash... -David On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:46 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: 2 notes. There needs to be some communication on the list before starting a release. On 1.6.0 specifically, I'd

Re: 1.6.0

2013-03-25 Thread David Blevins
://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/raspberrypi-1704896.html [2] http://ninjablocks.com/ Cheers Daniel On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:48 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: I'd also like to get the raspberry pi support in better condition and make a huge splash... -David

Re: 1.6.0

2013-03-25 Thread David Blevins
of things device, where TomEE as well would make great sense. [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/raspberrypi-1704896.html [2] http://ninjablocks.com/ Cheers Daniel On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:48 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: I'd also like to get

Re: 1.6.0

2013-03-26 Thread David Blevins
Model B. -David On Mar 26, 2013, at 2:15 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: Which Raspberry Pi model do you use? On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:30 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Right. It runs on a Raspberry PI now and runs significantly faster with the xml

Re: KeepAlive

2013-03-27 Thread David Blevins
Our http implementation is fine for test, but should probably never be used in any production server. Better to use Tomcat's or add Jetty -- we can handle either. -David On Mar 27, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, why our keep alive logic is in ejbd

[RESULT] Release javaee-api 6.0-5

2013-03-31 Thread David Blevins
A +1 from me of course. Vote passes with 10 +1 votes and no other votes. +1s: Alan Cabrera Andy Gumbrecht Daniel Haischt David Blevins Jean-Louis Monteiro Jeff Genender Jonathan Gallimore Romain Manni-Bucau Thiago Veronezi Vishwanath Krishnamurthi -David On Mar 17, 2013, at 8:33 PM, David

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

2013-04-06 Thread David Blevins
Some release notes created, still more work needed there. Binaries published: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/tomee-1.5.2/ Should hit the mirrors soon. -David On Mar 31, 2013, at 7:18 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Vote passes with 8 +1s and 1 +0. +1s

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

2013-04-08 Thread David Blevins
still be accessible in Previous releases section? Thanks, Alex On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Some release notes created, still more work needed there. Binaries published: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/tomee-1.5.2

Re: [jira] [Updated] (TOMEE-662) Support aliases on resources

2013-04-14 Thread David Blevins
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/4/14 David Blevins (JIRA) j...@apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

2013-04-14 Thread David Blevins
that someone else could stand in for you while you are unavailable? I suppose your are some kind of a bottleneck if it gets to sorting all these things out... Cheers Daniel On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Hello from the Vienna airport! Right

Snapshot and build pages

2013-04-21 Thread David Blevins
Spent some effort to get better pages together for snapshot builds. For current branches: - http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-1.6.0-snapshot.html - http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-1.5.3-snapshot.html Each page has a nice big disclaimer and full release notes (provided we file

Re: Adding missing stuff to our website

2013-04-22 Thread David Blevins
Thanks for responding to the trademarks thing. The layout looks a little broken in Chrome, but the drop down menu item is a great idea. Will see if I can tweak to get things to layout properly again. -David On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,

Blog post - 1.5.2

2013-04-22 Thread David Blevins
Crafted up this post for announcing the 1.5.2 release: - http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomee/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_5_2 States that 1.5.2 is a maintenance release and gives a slight teaser for the 1.6.0 release. Hope to publish it in the early afternoon Pacific time unless there are

Re: Why people don't try snapshots: missing link to http://tomee.apache.org/builds.html

2013-04-23 Thread David Blevins
FYI, that all this should be implemented now. The downloads.html links to an index with all current and previous releases as well as snapshots. -David On Apr 6, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I often see in the users mailing list posts being replied

Re: Thank you Gerhard!

2013-04-25 Thread David Blevins
: - what will learn with the example - what is CODI - maybe a couple key code snippets Then I think it'd be awesome to tweet it to the 800+ TomEE followers and maybe get it up on DZone. -David 2013/4/25 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com A very big thanks to Gerhard Petracek on his first

HA DataSource

2013-04-26 Thread David Blevins
Noticed the work going on with TOMEE-912 and wanted to make sure it hit the dev list. Anish, if you have any insight on this feature request that'd be wonderful. Some questions: - Is this feature intended for use involving database writes and transactions? - Is this really load balancing

Re: HA DataSource

2013-04-27 Thread David Blevins
jboss behavior by.default. concretely: if getconnection fails then try next db. I added strategy for read only cases (rdbms have an issue with write case by design) Le 27 avr. 2013 02:02, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : Noticed the work going on with TOMEE-912 and wanted

Re: HA DataSource

2013-04-27 Thread David Blevins
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/4/27 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Had a quick look through the code and, definitely, it could only be used for read-only cases where no JTA transaction or transaction of any

Re: HA DataSource

2013-04-28 Thread David Blevins
...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have a test showing it is not the case? Le 28 avr. 2013 01:22, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : In the JTA case, the getConnection method must return the same connection associated with the transaction. No failing over. -David On Apr 27, 2013, at 1:20

Coordinates in Provisioning (was Re: svn commit: r1480535)

2013-05-09 Thread David Blevins
Seems like there's a simple solution, let's not use 'mvn:' as the prefix if we aren't using the Maven coordinate system. Any ideas on a better prefix? 'karaf:' or 'aether:' As well, do you have any reference to Aether that shows this alternate coordinates? -David On May 9, 2013, at 12:38

Re: Coordinates in Provisioning (was Re: svn commit: r1480535)

2013-05-09 Thread David Blevins
* 2013/5/9 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Seems like there's a simple solution, let's not use 'mvn:' as the prefix if we aren't using the Maven coordinate system. Any ideas on a better prefix? 'karaf:' or 'aether:' As well, do you have any reference to Aether that shows this alternate

Re: Coordinates in Provisioning (was Re: svn commit: r1480535)

2013-05-09 Thread David Blevins
Looks to be a Karaf reference (OPS4j). You mentioned Aether. Any info on that? -David On May 9, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxurl/Mvn+Protocol Le 9 mai 2013 21:38, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit

Re: Coordinates in Provisioning (was Re: svn commit: r1480535)

2013-05-09 Thread David Blevins
) *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/5/9 David Blevins david.blev

Re: current failing test

2013-05-11 Thread David Blevins
Fixed on the OWB side. Was a bug in the passivation checking. -David On May 9, 2013, at 10:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, the currently failing test doesn't follow cdi spec (cdi-140), i can't commit the patch ATM but here it is if anyone wants to do it (it

Re: failling tests

2013-05-12 Thread David Blevins
: I already fixed it David... Le 12 mai 2013 02:14, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : On May 3, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org wrote: The pool ones are weird and i never have it locally :( I have a theory: clock issues. It seems that the clock runs

Re: tomee next classloading

2013-05-13 Thread David Blevins
/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/5/13 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com In a similar boat. I think #1 is a feature we need regardless, though I agree with JL that the default should be as it is now. I have a small hope

Re: Release?

2013-08-12 Thread David Blevins
We've got JavaOne in another month and it'd be great to be able to demo the cool new stuff. I suspect if we get something up before then we'll be in good shape. -David On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:19 AM, Chris.Christo chris.chri...@mail.com wrote: Hi guys, any idea of a release timeline for x.6.0

Re: Deployment on nexus broken?

2013-08-12 Thread David Blevins
Will check it out tomorrow. Finally got our EC2 instance back up -- took some time with Amazon support. -David On Aug 10, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anyone know why tomee-trunk-deploy buildbot job doesnt work anymore?

TOMEE-1040 - Abstract Dynamic Beans

2013-09-21 Thread David Blevins
Implemented an experimental feature in the spirit of the @Proxy concept where an interface can be given along with an InvocationHandler implementation. When the bean is created we'd create the InvocationHandler, create a proxy using the interface, then use the proxy as the bean instance. Took

Re: TOMEE-1040 - Abstract Dynamic Beans

2013-09-21 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 21, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: I think we already have it through cdi and decorators but it doesnt hurt to get it this way ;). Similar to decorators, yes. Just as the @Proxy+InvocationHandler concept is similar to interceptors. Big difference in

Re: TOMEE-1040 - Abstract Dynamic Beans

2013-09-21 Thread David Blevins
(with scope handling for handler) Le 21 sept. 2013 22:56, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit : Works for me Le 21 sept. 2013 22:51, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : My phrasing might have been off -- I was agreeing with you on all points :) I was just thinking about

Re: TomEE next version number thought

2013-10-30 Thread David Blevins
I'd opt for simply going with TomEE 2.0 and OpenEJB 5.0. We tried keeping OpenEJB locked to the EJB version number and it got very hard and they eventually fell out of synch. There's only a new Java EE version every 3.5 years and I suspect the next one will be more like 4. I think we'll

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

2013-11-03 Thread David Blevins
Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something people can beat on. In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using 2.2.2? -David On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

2013-11-07 Thread David Blevins
: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: dev@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25 Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something people can

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

2013-11-07 Thread David Blevins
Le 8 nov. 2013 07:43, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : Note, wait-and-talk-to-mark is essentially option C as Mark isn't back from JAX till next week. So far option B seems the dominant choice. I'll get started with that and try and get some binaries up for tire-kicking

Branching for 1.6.0 and possibly 1.6.1

2013-11-07 Thread David Blevins
Heads up, making the branch for 1.6.0. As sort of a crazy idea, I thought it might be interesting to branch for 1.6.1 now as well. Our intention would be to get this out *immediately* after 1.6.0 and I think it might help confidence that this will actually occur if we effectively start that

Re: Branching for 1.6.0 and possibly 1.6.1

2013-11-07 Thread David Blevins
Not ideal, but at this point I'm willing to try anything at least once. I'm more curious to see if it works than anything. -David On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Mens well have 2 trunks with same code...im not in love Le 8 nov. 2013 08:02, David

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

2013-11-08 Thread David Blevins
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom. See OPENJPA-2335 I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn. It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have

Re: [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)

2013-11-08 Thread David Blevins
Ignore. The upload failed. On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:15 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote: [generated email] SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/openejb-4.6.0/ Maven Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-092 Binaries Source:

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

2013-11-08 Thread David Blevins
the shaded OpenJPA jar. Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to fail, so determination is required. Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get non-bloated zips up. -David On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-108)

2013-11-08 Thread David Blevins
The release tools need work, but this build is good and running the TCK now. Maven Repository: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-108/ Staged Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-108/tomee-1.6.0/ Source Branch: -

Re: [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-108)

2013-11-11 Thread David Blevins
Had 12 TCK failures in this build I think due to my OpenJPA build. Mark is now publishing OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries to Nexus for an vote. I'll try rerolling with that version. If that works and TCK is clear, I'll put the vote. -David On Nov 9, 2013, at 6:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev

[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

2013-11-11 Thread David Blevins
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go. Maven Repo: -

[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

2013-11-11 Thread David Blevins
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go. Maven Repo: -

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

2013-11-16 Thread David Blevins
updated my test suite - works fine -Matthias On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 LieGrue, strub From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: dev@tomee.apache.org dev@tomee.apache.org Sent

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120) -- CANCELLED

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
are up and TCK us running. If all looks good, I'll put them up for a vote. Thanks to everyone who took the time to review these binaries. We've never had so many +1 votes from non-committers before. Really very awesome. -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 12:04 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com

[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ Tag: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ The vote will go for 72 hours.

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
...@toolazydogs.com wrote: There seems to be a number of license failures after I run ant -f rat.xml scan On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
17, 2013, at 8:17 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Digging in. A gentle note to late feedback like this; we're 2 weeks and several all-nighters into this release :) This is a very big part of our long release cycles. The feedback is excellent, the timing could be improved

Re: classloading documentation

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
Thanks for the note, Karl! Adding to your point, I suspect it's a good time to start publishing JavaDoc as well. -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Karl-Philipp Richter krichter...@aol.de wrote: Hi together, I'm new to mailing list and hope this is the right place to address to. I

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread David Blevins
Ok, my +1 -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0

[RESULT] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-20 Thread David Blevins
Ok, vote passes with 11 +1s and no other votes. +1s: Alex the Rocker Bjorn Danielsson Dain Sundstrom Daniel S. Haischt David Blevins Jean-Louis Monteiro Jeff Genender Jonathan Gallimore Matthias Wessendorf Romain Manni-Bucau Thiago Veronezi Will push the binaries. It will take a few hours

Re: next version?

2013-11-22 Thread David Blevins
My gut says we'd be wise to see 1.6.x through to stability before we start a new major version. Past evidence would suggest that absolutely no one would commit to the stable branch if there was a more fun trunk to work on. -David On Nov 21, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: next version?

2013-11-24 Thread David Blevins
More a note to Romain as I've not seen anyone else propose changing the version number to match OpenEJB. To be honest, I'm not sure what this would give us. It wouldn't make releases any easier or harder. -David On Nov 24, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Bjorn Danielsson bjorn-apa...@lists.cuspycode.com

Arquillian Java EE Test Initiative

2013-12-02 Thread David Blevins
Pinging everyone who has shown interest in this online and offline. Some time ago I proposed an initiative to collect all the various test in Apache's Java EE related projects and convert and collect them here. It would no doubt be a great contribution to TomEE, but to Java EE in general. The

Re: Arquillian Java EE Test Initiative

2013-12-03 Thread David Blevins
Lots of good feedback! Going to respond to just dev@tomee.apache.org as to not bug people. Subscribe to the list or follow along via Nabble: - http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Arquillian-Java-EE-Test-Initiative-td4666503.html -David On Dec 2, 2013, at 7:47 PM, David Blevins david.blev

Re: Arquillian Java EE Test Initiative

2013-12-03 Thread David Blevins
adding all these tests to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/trunk/arquillian or something else ? If you could direct me or elaborate on a few next steps, I'll get started with this right away :) -Vishwa On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:17 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote

Re: Quartz, next

2013-12-04 Thread David Blevins
Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting. There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and test the heck out of it. -David On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in

Re: Preparing 1.6.1 maintenance release

2013-12-08 Thread David Blevins
I suspect we'd be wise to see how the quartz change weathers in the snapshots for a while before releasing it. -David On Dec 6, 2013, at 5:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: since we use a shade of quartz (some real life validation would be great) shouldn't we set 1.7.0?

Re: Quartz, next

2013-12-08 Thread David Blevins
with a fixed name. LieGrue, strub From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: dev@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013, 2:38 Subject: Re: Quartz, next Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting. There's a lot

1.6.0 writeup

2013-12-09 Thread David Blevins
I want to crank out the announcement for the 1.6.0 release so we can get that on the wire. Here is an initial list of note-worthy new features (no particular order): JSR 356 WebSockets - Java EE 7 Connector/MDB - Java EE 7 * JSON config Abstract Beans Raspberry PI performance

Re: Quartz, next

2013-12-10 Thread David Blevins
I suspect what Romain is pointing out is we already have things like openejb-derby, openejb-hsql and openejb-cxf. No way at this point to use openejb-cxf to imply a shaded or patched version of CXF without it conflicting with the existing openejb-cxf module where the CXF integration code

Re: OpenEJB Client incompatibility between 3.1.x and 4.x

2013-12-10 Thread David Blevins
Adding some notes as the person who made this mess :) What we had there was very much the case of someday we can use this, but someday never came till Andy finished it. We've historically told users the exact server and client version needed to match. Didn't say it at the time, but *huge*

Re: Quartz, next

2013-12-11 Thread David Blevins
On Dec 10, 2013, at 2:40 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: As far as where the shaded project lives, I'm cool with whatever as long as it doesn't: - break Intellij so we can still compile with a plain Intellij import and not having to go through any magic to compile/run

Re: Quartz, next

2013-12-12 Thread David Blevins
Yep, that's how I do it. Only difference is I don't enable automatic imports as it fires off while I'm still hacking on the pom which I find annoying. I prefer to click the Import now link. Minor preference. I'll see if I can get some time today to hack on the poms and switch us to an

Re: Hello

2014-01-16 Thread David Blevins
Hi Jarek! Really great you're interested in contributing and welcome aboard :) If you want to submit a small test we can check in for OPENEJB-1358, I'll commit it and then we can close that JIRA as Cannot Reproduce confident that at least that bug will not show up in the future -- if it ever

Re: Hi

2014-01-16 Thread David Blevins
Hi Chris! Would love to see if we can fit that deb package into the build. As well an openejb-maven-plugin sounds great. Let's get started with the plugin. We can check that in next to the tomee-maven-plugin. If you want to attach a zip of it to a new JIRA item, that'd be a fantastic

Re: [REPORT] TomEE - January 2014

2014-01-17 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi David, On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:39 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: ...We are also wondering why it's been

Re: Mojarra and EclipseLink bundle?

2014-01-24 Thread David Blevins
Best answer is it's business as usual with regards to the three other bundles we offer. Would simply add a fourth choice. The main goal would be to TCK test this setup and flush out any issues. There are some annoyingly strict rules around packaging of anything that's to be labeled Java EE

Re: Mojarra and EclipseLink bundle?

2014-01-24 Thread David Blevins
Checked in something, but no love on the TCK after this last change -- just swapping jars out. Verified it before the lib change and the setup was good and TCK ran against this new bundle. Not exactly sure how complete our Mojarra integration really is. -David

Re: Mojarra and EclipseLink bundle?

2014-01-25 Thread David Blevins
seriously, or are only partially embracing them as users. -David On Jan 25, 2014, at 12:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Plume is too apache btw, at least in fresh, tomee-red maybe :p Le samedi 25 janvier 2014, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : Checked

Re: Workflow on the contributions to the documentation

2014-01-26 Thread David Blevins
Hi Martin! You did everything great. Thanks for the documentation update! These little tweeks go a long way when it comes to not wasting people's time. They're very appreciated! Committed it and it's now up on staging: - http://tomee.staging.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.html

Main page change

2014-01-29 Thread David Blevins
Since our blog hasn't seen a ton of action and the twitter widget died months and months ago, I switched up our front page so that it lists the downloads. We can probably automate that or restore the news or any other options :) As always, suggestions welcome. -David

Re: [tomee-dev] github ?

2014-02-12 Thread David Blevins
Wow. Absolutely, that looks like some *really* great advancements. Looks like we'll have to buy the Infra guys/gals a round of beer at ApacheCon this April. So fantastic. Filed a JIRA to get us hooked up: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7315 Really great. -David On Feb 12,

Re: [tomee-dev] github ?

2014-02-13 Thread David Blevins
://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-13 3:48 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: Wow. Absolutely, that looks like some *really* great advancements. Looks like we'll have to buy the Infra guys/gals a round of beer at ApacheCon this April. So fantastic. Filed a JIRA to get us hooked

Re: LazyStopWebappClassLoader LinkageError

2014-02-19 Thread David Blevins
These happen from time to time. Seems to be some sort of synchronization bug in the VM classloader. Only real cure is to try/catch(LinkageError) fairly early and simply retry. It always seems to work the second time. Around org.apache.tomee.catalina.LazyStopWebappClassLoader.loadClass would

Re: LazyStopWebappClassLoader LinkageError

2014-02-19 Thread David Blevins
Synchronization issues rarely are :) -David On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:01 AM, agumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: OK, I'll dig in a bit later - And yes, it's not an 'always' thing? Andy. -- View this message in context:

Re: Adding a security page to TomEE website

2014-02-19 Thread David Blevins
Looks great so far. Filling in some details on 1.6.x and 1.5.x now. -David On Feb 19, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, In regards to the discussion opened here http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Security-reporting-requirements-td4667859.html

Security releases

2014-02-19 Thread David Blevins
So as I mentioned in the security reporting thread, although we do always use the most recent versions of everything in our releases, we should probably address our timing. Over the lifetime of TomEE we average 4.14 months between releases. Also in the lifetime of TomEE, there've been about

Re: Connecting to EJB Deployed on Websphere from TomEE server

2014-02-27 Thread David Blevins
You've got the right idea. Definitely make sure you use the WebSphere's InitialContextFactory instead of TomEE's. Think of the `java.naming.factory.initial` like a JDBC driver. Connecting to an Oracle DB requires an Oracle driver in TomEE, connecting to WebSphere for EJB requires the

Moderation tip

2014-02-27 Thread David Blevins
Tip to fellow list moderators, if you use the allow address instead of or in addition to the accept address, the email address in question will not need moderation again. This unfortunately doesn't work if someone else responds first and just uses accept. We regularly have 100+ emails hit

Re: svn commit: r1579678 - in /tomee/tomee/trunk/server: openejb-cxf-rs/ openejb-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/rest/AfterServicesDeployed.java openejb-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/open

2014-03-21 Thread David Blevins
FYI, definitely the wrong license header on that file :) -David On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi maybe last event should be AfterServiceCall(service, appInfo) for all services or renamed to AfterRESTService Side note: please don't add a

Connector Logging

2014-03-21 Thread David Blevins
Some many releases ago, this started popping up in our logs. Eternal gratitude to anyone who might have time to investigate and eliminate :) INFO - Removing non-required WorkContextHandler with no context: org.apache.geronimo.connector.work.TransactionContextHandler@8822a0 INFO - Removing

Re: Connector Logging

2014-03-21 Thread David Blevins
it? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-21 18:02 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: Some many releases ago, this started popping up

Observer Ordering

2014-03-21 Thread David Blevins
For Observers maybe we can find another way to achieve OPENEJB-2082 without binding one observer directly to another: public void observe(final @Observes(after = SimpleObserver.class) SimpleEvent event) I can see that creating just as much of a mess as having too many events. Having to

Re: Observer Ordering

2014-03-21 Thread David Blevins
is the index case. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-21 20:02 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: For Observers maybe we can find another

Re: Observer Ordering

2014-03-22 Thread David Blevins
On Mar 22, 2014, at 4:15 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: removed after and replaced all the boilerplate we added with AfterEventEvent. Love it. Looks very elegant. Added a BeforeEvent to round it out. Have some ideas to optimize. Ideally before/after could be zero

Moving examples

2014-03-28 Thread David Blevins
Was chatting with Gerhard at JavaLand and he mentioned moving examples to its own section of the repository. In our github mirror, we actually have quite a few people looking (110 forks, 34 stars) - https://github.com/apache/tomee If we move the examples out to their own repo and mirrored it

Re: [build] TomEE build times

2014-03-28 Thread David Blevins
Very valid. In fact you reminded me of another topic of potentially moving the examples out to their own repo. Posted on that in another thread. We were at around an hour and twenty minutes just a year ago, now we're up to 2 hours. Getting pretty heavy even for CI standards. -David On Mar

Java 8 and possible TomEE 1.7.0

2014-03-31 Thread David Blevins
Romain had pinged me offline about the idea of upgrading our ASM dependencies to v5 so we could support Java 8 (code compiled in Java 8 can't be read by ASM v4 or earlier). This combined with the Mojarra and EclipseLink / Plume distribution seem like good features for a 1.7.0 We also have the

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0.1/OpenEJB 4.6.0.1 (staging-1014) Round 3

2014-04-15 Thread David Blevins
+1 for staging-1014 -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: [generated email] SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0.1/ Maven Repo: https

Growing number of pull requests

2014-04-18 Thread David Blevins
in a JIRA with a few thousand items. An actual queue of patch TODOs can really do us some good. -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Growing number of pull requests

2014-04-20 Thread David Blevins
, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: This is probably not the full list of patches yet to be applied, but a definite good start: - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pulls Andy or anyone else, possible to get some of these cleared out? The ASF-Github integration now puts full details

Re: Growing number of pull requests

2014-04-20 Thread David Blevins
on git it would be nice. Le 20 avr. 2014 20:44, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : I think when you submitted your patch the asf hadn't yet improved the github integration. Daniel Gruno (@Humbedooh) has put a lot of work into and would probably do more if we had more ideas for him

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >