[Bug 1298628] New: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.48-2.fc24 FTBFS: t/virtual_table/21_perldata_charinfo.t test fails with sqlite 3.10.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298628 Bug ID: 1298628 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.48-2.fc24 FTBFS: t/virtual_table/21_perldata_charinfo.t test fails with sqlite 3.10.0 Product: Fedora Version: 23

[Bug 1297527] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-API - Accessing Twilio's REST API with Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

Re: ZFS on linux

I understand. My thought was, that there seems to be a push to add support in Debian and Ubuntu. Would it now be possible/make sense to create maybe a nodebug kernel package based on a stable kernel supported by ZFS and zfs/spl packages maybe even as a copr repo? On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:04 AM,

Re: kmods and Fedora

Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa: I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module packages in Fedora since Fedora 8. I've tried searching through our wiki and the mailing list, but I haven't come up with any concrete reasons for why we disallow them. If it is perhaps

kmods and Fedora

Hello all, I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module packages in Fedora since Fedora 8. I've tried searching through our wiki and the mailing list, but I haven't come up with any concrete reasons for why we disallow them. If it is perhaps the issue of keeping things in

Re: Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

On 01/14/2016 09:51 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I needed an update to OpenImageIO (new patch version) which I just submitted. > I assume I waited long enough for the new hdf5 build. > > Thanks, > Richard > Nope, still waiting for the arm build to complete... -- Orion Poplawski Technical

Re: ZFS on linux

On 14 January 2016 at 08:58, Zach Villers wrote: > I understand. My thought was, that there seems to be a push to add support > in Debian and Ubuntu. Would it now be possible/make sense to create maybe a > nodebug kernel package based on a stable kernel supported by ZFS and

Re: ZFS on linux

Thanks Smooge/Florian. I respect your opinions, thoughts, and explanations. Regards. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 08:58, Zach Villers wrote: > > I understand. My thought was, that there seems to

Re: Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

On 14/01/16 09:53 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 01/14/2016 09:51 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: I needed an update to OpenImageIO (new patch version) which I just submitted. I assume I waited long enough for the new hdf5 build. Thanks, Richard Nope, still waiting for the arm build to

Re: kmods and Fedora

Am 14.01.2016 um 18:05 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa: We have two tools that can help us in this regard: akmod and Koschei, both came after our policy change to disallow kernel

Re: kmods and Fedora

2016-01-14 18:05 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa : > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa: > >> > >> I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module > >> packages in Fedora

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 22:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:59:09AM +0100, Jiří Konečný wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 23:36 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:33:01 +0100, > > >   Jiří Konečný wrote: > > >

corsepiu pushed to perl-File-Remove (f23). "Upstream update. (..more)"

From 5717bdf840a3ca1bdaa9c0aa64e4d26127641633 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:36:40 +0100 Subject: Upstream update. - Reflect upstream URL-having changed. - Update BRs. - Spec cosmetics. - Introduce %license.

corsepiu pushed to perl-File-Remove (f22). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 1a4d1d6e47fbe1ba28380d5169c4d9bd7d666f6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:55:37 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-File-Remove.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

corsepiu pushed to perl-File-Remove (f22). "Upstream update. (..more)"

From 5717bdf840a3ca1bdaa9c0aa64e4d26127641633 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:36:40 +0100 Subject: Upstream update. - Reflect upstream URL-having changed. - Update BRs. - Spec cosmetics. - Introduce %license.

corsepiu pushed to perl-File-Remove (f22). "Cleanup merger"

From e549eb3e919befbc72bb0c30f1441568c8e08167 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:16:05 +0100 Subject: Cleanup merger --- perl-File-Remove.spec | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git

corsepiu pushed to perl-File-Remove (f22). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From b10fd5705c5ad17ad7615363ea2549c8b5f9748e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:11:16 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-File-Remove.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

[Bug 1297455] CVE-2015-8607: File::Spec::canonpath() loses taint

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297455 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1297455] CVE-2015-8607: File::Spec::canonpath() loses taint

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297455 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PathTools-3.60-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1297598] perl-PathTools-3.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297598 Bug 1297598 depends on bug 1297455, which changed state. Bug 1297455 Summary: CVE-2015-8607: File::Spec::canonpath() loses taint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297455 What|Removed |Added

corsepiu pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch (master). "Update to 2.52. (..more)"

From 1651fa48939ecb955739a0485cc96104d5c1f957 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:31:10 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.52. - Add BR: perl(JSON::PP). - Remove BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s). --- .gitignore |

corsepiu uploaded Log-Dispatch-2.52.tar.gz for perl-Log-Dispatch

d81ac0427ef4415b667154d0d92e7ece Log-Dispatch-2.52.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Log-Dispatch/Log-Dispatch-2.52.tar.gz/md5/d81ac0427ef4415b667154d0d92e7ece/Log-Dispatch-2.52.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1298397] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298397 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (master). "1.63 bump (..more)"

From 6526fa5187d95c7006f721ecc7567879856808e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:14:30 +0100 Subject: 1.63 bump - Modernize the SPEC file --- perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime.spec | 27 +++ sources

[Bug 1295759] perl-Dist-Zilla-5.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295759 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-5.043-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1292989] perl-App-cpm-0.112 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292989 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1292989] perl-App-cpm-0.112 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292989 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-App-cpm-0.112-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1295759] perl-Dist-Zilla-5.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295759 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1295049] perl-CPAN-Uploader-0.103012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295049 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Uploader-0.103012-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

ppisar pushed to perl-PathTools (f23). "3.62 bump"

From c161d7d7375798dbd0cc3e174cd7bfe3e5ad1b2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:19 +0100 Subject: 3.62 bump --- .gitignore | 1 +

Re[2]: Debugging practices and hardened packages

> Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:50 AM +01:00 from Florian Weimer : > > How it is supposed to be debugged by upstream developers? > > With GDB? Yes, for C/C++ packages. > Fedora provides debugging information for most of its packages, and you > can extract them from RPMs and

Re: Bug 917362: poco rpms, maintener not responding

I am the upstream maintener/packager of this Poco library: http://pocoproject.org and would like to see the latest official release of poco-1.6.1 become an official rpms of Fedora. I have updated this issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917362 but the official maintener Maxim

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 207 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 189 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 183

rawhide report: 20160114 changes

Compose started at Thu Jan 14 05:15:02 UTC 2016 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 311 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 103 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-925e9374c9 python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el7 73

psabata uploaded DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.63.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime

daa40cdf6650034c853a1783ff41c346 DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.63.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.63.tar.gz/md5/daa40cdf6650034c853a1783ff41c346/DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.63.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Re: Debugging practices and hardened packages

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:39:23 +0100, Roman Tsisyk wrote: > -debuginfo should be for the same build version as a binary itself. > Most users never install -debuginfo. GDB instructs them they should: $ gdb -q xvinfo Reading symbols from xvinfo...Reading symbols from /root/xvinfo...(no debugging

Bug 917362: poco rpms, maintener not responding

Hi As mentioned by the Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I am asking if anyone knows how to contact the poco rpms maintener udushlivy since the issue 917362 has been opended more than 2 years ago without any response.

[Bug 1295049] perl-CPAN-Uploader-0.103012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Bug 917362: poco rpms, maintener not responding

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:47:55 +0100, zosrothko wrote: > As mentioned by the Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I am > asking if anyone knows how to contact the poco rpms maintener > udushlivy > since the issue 917362 has been

[Bug 1297598] perl-PathTools-3.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297598 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PathTools-3.62-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ac4b0aa0da -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Unreachable Developer

Dne 13.1.2016 v 17:41 Greg Hellings napsal(a): > I've been trying to reach jstribny( > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/jstribny) for a few > weeks regarding commit privileges on EPEL7 to several packages in > pkgdb. Most notable among those are: > rubygem-minitest > rubygem-i18n

corsepiu pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch (f23). "Update to 2.52. (..more)"

From 1651fa48939ecb955739a0485cc96104d5c1f957 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:31:10 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.52. - Add BR: perl(JSON::PP). - Remove BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s). --- .gitignore |

corsepiu pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch (f22). "Update to 2.52. (..more)"

From 1651fa48939ecb955739a0485cc96104d5c1f957 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:31:10 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.52. - Add BR: perl(JSON::PP). - Remove BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s). --- .gitignore |

Re: Boost 1.60?

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today? > > I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2 > this morning in the main f24 tag? There's been no request on the rel-eng ticket to tag it

[Bug 1297527] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-API - Accessing Twilio's REST API with Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527 --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata --- Hrm, okay. perl-libwww-perl's packaging in EL6 could be improved, it seems. Anyhow, the package is mostly fine. Just... * You could add the version constraint to that EL6 runtime

Re: Boost 1.60?

On 14/01/16 13:23 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote: Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today? I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag? Obviously that has triggered a bunch

Boost 1.60?

Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today? I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag? Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/

Re: Issue with undefined reference with assembler in rr

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:00:08PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > I was working on packaging rr [1] and one of the tests [2] fails to build > when optimizations are turned on. I've reduced it to the following and > still been able to reproduce the issue: > > static const float xmm0 = 10; > > int

Re: Boost 1.60?

There is an approved Change for F24 to upgrade boost: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160 Perhaps someone started to work on it. Regards, Jan On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes

Re: Boost 1.60?

Jan Kurik wrote: > There is an approved Change for F24 to upgrade boost: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160 > Perhaps someone started to work on it. > > Regards, > Jan > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016

Re: Boost 1.60?

On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote: Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today? I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag? Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei. Argh! Sorry,

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 07:50:05AM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote: > On 13.1.2016 13:48, Florian Festi wrote: > > On 01/11/2016 03:57 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:46:27 +0100 > >> Jan Kurik wrote: > >> > >>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name

Re: Rules regarding whitespace inside .spec files

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:35:08PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "AT" == Andrew Toskin writes: > > AT> Is there a way to convert tags like "BuildRequires:" into %macros so > AT> that they *can* be indented? > > Sure there is, but please don't actually try to do

Re: Package name for EPEL7 branch

Hello: Greg Hellings wrote on 01/14/2016 01:30 PM: I'm working with a package (rubygem-minitest) which already exists in the core EL packages on the 4.x series. In order to enable a whole slew of new packages to be created in EPEL7, it will be necessary to package the 5.x series. However, since

Re: Boost 1.60?

On 14/01/16 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/01/16 13:23 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote: Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today? I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24

corsepiu uploaded Regexp-Common-2016010801.tar.gz for perl-Regexp-Common

a7a86d2d4ec05b77898823f7b36ff59e Regexp-Common-2016010801.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Regexp-Common/Regexp-Common-2016010801.tar.gz/md5/a7a86d2d4ec05b77898823f7b36ff59e/Regexp-Common-2016010801.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

corsepiu pushed to perl-Regexp-Common (master). "Upstream update. (..more)"

From d5d9ebff7ea121b80f004ee1a7df165dbc4360a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:01:31 +0100 Subject: Upstream update. - Expand BR:s. - Modernize spec. --- .gitignore | 2 +-

corsepiu pushed to perl-Regexp-Common (f23). "Upstream update. (..more)"

From d5d9ebff7ea121b80f004ee1a7df165dbc4360a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:01:31 +0100 Subject: Upstream update. - Expand BR:s. - Modernize spec. --- .gitignore | 2 +-

[389-devel] Re: Prereview for ticket #48402 , required by ticket #48380 SynRepl does not handle database re-initialization properly

On 01/13/2016 11:59 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 01/13/2016 02:34 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 01/13/2016 10:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Ticket 48380 requires that sync repl handles database reinitializations properly, to be able to determine if cookies are presented are valid. To achieve

Re: ELF arch question

On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 16:03 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > rpm flags shared libraries of ELFCLASS64 with '(64bit)' on all architectures > except Alpha (which thankfully we don't support).  My question is, are > ELFCLASS64 libraries always installed in /usr/lib64 on all Fedora platforms, > or am I

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Readonly-XS (perl-Readonly-XS-1.05-22.fc24). "Spec clean-up (..more)"

From 2a518b974ebb7576764abafa8e94d5c9d449ee25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:13 + Subject: Spec clean-up - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 - Prefer %global over %%define - Drop obsoletes/provides for old -tests sub-package -

ZFS on linux

Now that Debian has added zfs support to their experimental branch; https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/zfs-linux_0.6.4.2-1.html is there a possibility that Fedora could add support/packages as well? Regards, Zach #aikidouke -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Readonly-XS (master). "Spec clean-up (..more)"

From 2a518b974ebb7576764abafa8e94d5c9d449ee25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:13 + Subject: Spec clean-up - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 - Prefer %global over %%define - Drop obsoletes/provides for old -tests sub-package -

corsepiu pushed to perl-Regexp-Common (f22). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 0d50b084f6fe1b7f4fa3da5b54dd52ebc18de5da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:05:44 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-Regexp-Common.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

corsepiu pushed to perl-Regexp-Common (f22). "Upstream update. (..more)"

From d5d9ebff7ea121b80f004ee1a7df165dbc4360a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:01:31 +0100 Subject: Upstream update. - Expand BR:s. - Modernize spec. --- .gitignore | 2 +-

corsepiu pushed to perl-Regexp-Common (f22). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From 5f0efd665c74784248b52dab08a10af936c810ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 05:44:27 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Regexp-Common.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),

corsepiu pushed to perl-Regexp-Common (f22). "Cleanup merger."

From a6011e120e1ba9d68b824b2826ba1899e9aa30ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:11:10 +0100 Subject: Cleanup merger. --- perl-Regexp-Common.spec | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:15:38AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 10/05/2015 05:27 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > I guess glibc and getaddrinfo() will be the most problematic part in > > the chrony seccomp support. Is there a precedent in Fedora of a > > package using a seccomp filter and

Re: Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > Nope, still waiting for the arm build to complete... Ok, I killed the build. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Re[2]: Debugging practices and hardened packages

You can use ABRT to manage your core dumps, but it's not as nice as coredumpctl. I recommend disabling ABRT ('systemctl disable abrtd' and 'systemctl stop abrtd') so that your core dumps will appear in coredumpctl. The ABRT developers are working on better coredumpctl integration. On Thu,

Re: Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

I needed an update to OpenImageIO (new patch version) which I just submitted. I assume I waited long enough for the new hdf5 build. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module >> packages in Fedora since Fedora 8. I've tried searching through our >> wiki and the mailing

Re: Cannot add dependency job for unit dnf-makecache.timer, ignoring: Unit dnf-makecache.timer is masked

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:17:54PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > WHO defines that "dependency" and WHY? > > when i say "mask, i want it refreshed when it is used" than *i mean* > that and there is no business to spit my logs on all machines al day > long full with "you have masked it" > > Jan 14

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Zach Villers wrote: > Well - If there was to be a plan, it would have to start with RH legal > making that determination would it not? > > Could FESCO or the other council (sorry it escapes me ATM) take this up as a > meeting item? Is it

Re: kmods and Fedora

On 14 January 2016 at 19:29, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2016 9:34 AM, "Nicolas Chauvet" wrote: >> >> 2016-01-14 18:05 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa : >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald >>>

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.01.2016 um 00:36 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: >> >> If, for example, it simply installed into >> /lib/modules/VERSION/akmod/path/to/driver.ko, then rpm could be taught >> to delete /lib/modules/VERSION when

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Zach Villers wrote: > Well - If there was to be a plan, it would have to start with RH legal > making that determination would it not? > > Could FESCO or the other council (sorry it escapes me ATM) take this up as a > meeting item? Is it

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 15.01.2016 um 01:07 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 14 January 2016 at 12:20, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: who is "Lawrence

Re: kmods and Fedora

Am 15.01.2016 um 01:07 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.01.2016 um 00:36 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: If, for example, it simply installed into /lib/modules/VERSION/akmod/path/to/driver.ko, then rpm could be taught

Re: Issue with undefined reference with assembler in rr

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:00:08PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > I was working on packaging rr [1] and one of the tests [2] fails to build > > when optimizations are turned on. I've reduced it to the following and

[389-devel] Re: design review: don't call plugins for retro changelog

On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 15:42 +0100, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > We had many issues with the retro changelog plugin. The main reason > is  > that the retro CL is a separate backend and if there is more than > one  > regular backend it is easy to run into deadlocks, eg a change in > backend  > A

[389-devel] Re: Prereview for ticket #48402 , required by ticket #48380 SynRepl does not handle database re-initialization properly

On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 15:07 +0100, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > On 01/13/2016 11:51 PM, William Brown wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 17:34 -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > On 01/13/2016 10:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > > > Ticket 48380 requires that sync repl handles database > > > >

Re: ZFS on linux

On 14 January 2016 at 12:20, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham >>

Re: ZFS on linux

Reindl Harald writes: >>> who is "Lawrence Livermore"? >> >> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is an organization founded by >> the University of California to do research and development for >> academic and government purposes. The US Department of Energy >>

Example Suggestions for Automation Workshop

I'm preparing for an automation workshop at DevConf in February and I'm trying to think of good example cases to show off what Taskotron can do. At the moment, I figure that I'll do at least 1 easy task and 1 not so easy but not crazy task. Rpmlint is usually my go-to for a trivial/example task

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 19:29, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> 2. Assuming that shipping an out-of-tree module is okay, is akmod a good >> mechanism? >> >> I would argue strongly that akmod is *not* a good

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 12:20, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:

Re: Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

On 11/20/2015 02:39 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'll be updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide in the next few days. This > includes a soname bump for the C++ wrapper libs, but as usual I'll be > rebuilding all deps due to run-time version checking by the library. > Well, the arm build is hanging

Re: ZFS on linux

Gerald B. Cox (gb...@bzb.us) said: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > Here is a simple if then for figuring out how ZFS support may ever get > > into Fedora: > > > I originally believed it was simply a licensing issue that was

Re: kmods and Fedora

Am 14.01.2016 um 19:54 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 01/14/2016 07:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Aside from the DNF issue, is there anything else I'm missing in relation to kmods in Fedora? If you have secure boot, you have to go

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 01/14/2016 07:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> >>> Aside from the DNF issue, is there anything else I'm missing in >>> relation to kmods in Fedora? >>>

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> On 01/14/2016 07:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Aside from the

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 14.01.2016 um 20:20 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham > wrote: As a rule, I

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 20:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > likely i did much more research than you can even imagine long > before  > that thread started I find this challenging to believe. > CDDL is incompatible with GPLv2 - period Did you read the web site at all? The argument is that it can

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Here is a simple if then for figuring out how ZFS support may ever get > into Fedora: I originally believed it was simply a licensing issue that was preventing the inclusion in Fedora, but apparently that isn't

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing interpretations from a CTO > who's trying to sell me the thing they're talking about the licensing of. > > We certainly could send that interpretation of CDDL/GPL and the

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hello all, > > I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module > packages in Fedora since Fedora 8. I've tried searching through our > wiki and the mailing list, but I haven't come up with any concrete >

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham > wrote: As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing interpretations from a CTO who's trying to sell me the thing they're talking about the

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 14.01.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Gerald B. Cox > wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham > wrote: As a rule, I try not to take legal

  1   2   >