[EPEL-devel] Re: How to retire/delete an EPEL branch?

- Original Message - > On 10 January 2018 at 01:53, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > > I received a bug[1] asking to remove EPEL7 branch, as the package > > LibRaw, is already in RHEL. > > > > How should I do that? > > > > Regards, > > > > We do not remove branches as much as

Fedora Rawhide-20180110.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 15/129 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180108.n.0): ID: 185174 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/185174 ID: 185175 Test:

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:26:24AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >> Am 10.01.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Jan Kurik: > >> >On existing

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:21:32AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:46:13AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > > Use "nobody:nobody" as the names for the kernel overflow UID:GID pair, > > and retire the old "nfsnobody" name and the old "nobody:nogroup" pair > > with 99:99 numbers >

Re: provenpackager request: Re: [HEADS UP] opencv 3.3.1 is going to rawhide

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:35:16PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 22:27 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 08:27:51PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 18:28 +0100, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > > > > > On 01/09/2018 05:53

Re: F28 System Wide Change: IBus Unicode Typing

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: IBus Unicode Typing = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_Unicode_Typing > > Change owner(s): > * Takao Fujiwara > > IBus core provides an Emoji dialog which users can type emoji > annotations

[389-devel] Please review: purge sasl maps before gssapi test

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49474 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/e6743de00abbe45f0d776fd62 6db5544b8154575ddd506d183f7e215ea09e6bc-0001-Ticket-49474-purge- saslmaps-before-gssapi-test.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

January 2018 Elections: Interview period is open

Today we are starting the Interview period during which we will prepare interviews with candidates to the following teams: * FESCo (Engineering) [1] * Fedora Council [2] * Mindshare [3] This period is open until 2018-Jan-15 at 23:59:59 UTC. The questions for candidates can be found in the

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: updates to address today's CPU/kernel vulnerability

On 01/03/2018 06:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > * The most useful feedback is just whether the kernel boots and works > correctly on all systems you have access to (assuming they worked OK > with the previous kernel, of course). If it does, please leave positive > karma on the relevant update.

Re: provenpackager request: Re: [HEADS UP] opencv 3.3.1 is going to rawhide

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 22:27 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 08:27:51PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 18:28 +0100, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > > > On 01/09/2018 05:53 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Packages remaining to rebuild: > > > >

[Bug 1522691] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.31-1.fc

Re: provenpackager request: Re: [HEADS UP] opencv 3.3.1 is going to rawhide

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 08:27:51PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 18:28 +0100, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > On 01/09/2018 05:53 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Packages remaining to rebuild: > > > digikam > > > fawkes > > > kf5-libkface > > > nomacs > > > player > > > simon > > >

[Bug 1522691] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[389-devel] Re: Do aci's work in nested groups?

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 10:44 +0100, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > On 01/10/2018 07:03 AM, William Brown wrote: > > If I have: > > > > (targetattr=x)(version 3.0; allow(read, > > search)(groupdn=cn=x);) > > > > If cn=x has member cn=y, and cn=y member uid=z > > > > Does uid=z have permission to

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 12:17 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > On 01/10/2018 10:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > So you could do a filter like this for your example above: > > > > "(|(sn=*brown")(sn=*brown west"))" > > So the case I'm thinking of for the front end is a directory listing, > in  >

Re: Changelog between OS states (ie: VMs)

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > https://pagure.io/compose-utils > > that may be of interest to the original poster. Bingo. https://pagure.io/compose-utils/blob/master/f/compose_utils/changelog.py thank you! martin --

subscription-manager & related packages naming

Hi, I am working on a PR to get subscription-manager and related packages packaged for python 3 for Fedora (see https://github.com/candlepin/subscription-manager/pull/1744), and we're aware we've made some naming decisions in the past that aren't quite up to the python package naming

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 01/09/2018 02:09 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: BTW, are there technical reasons why the metadata is updated en bloc and not incrementally like for example delta RPMs, or is it just that nobody bothered to implement something like that yet for metadata? This has been discussed for a very long

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 10 January 2018 at 14:46, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > >> > >> On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew

Re: Get stubby into Fedora to provide safe DNS resolution via DNS-over-TLS

Il giorno mer, 10/01/2018 alle 17.18 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto: > Maybe you could suggest the package maintainer to add a "Provides: > stubby" so it can be found directly. CCing Paul Wouters in that > regard. [lesca@dodo ~]$ dnf whatprovides stubby -C Last metadata

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 10 January 2018 at 14:46, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: >> >> On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > >>> On 01/08/2018 10:53 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> Kevin Fenzi

Re: scotch: packaging a version with 64bit integers

Sorry for the top post, on my phone... Telling third party software to link against a different soname suffixed with 64 would be pkg-config's job, usually. Dridi On Jan 10, 2018 14:59, "Sandro Mani" wrote: Hi I've received a request to package a version of scotch with

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >>> On 01/08/2018 10:53 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Kevin Fenzi wrote: Well, if this firefox update was urgent, shouldn't it have been marked

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 01/08/2018 10:53 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Well, if this firefox update was urgent, shouldn't it have been marked >>> urgent? >> >> Urgency is always in the eye of the beholder. I as a user consider

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 10:45 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:51:03 PM CET David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > > Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during > > the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes > > are not

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Removal of Sun RPC Interfaces From glibc

Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > https://github.com/cygwinports/kde-runtime/blob/master/15.04.3-libtirpc.patch FYI, this patch does not work: -- Looking for include file rpc/rpc.h -- Looking for include file rpc/rpc.h - not found … -- The following features have been disabled: * NFS kioslave, The RPC

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On 01/10/2018 12:17 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > On 01/10/2018 10:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> So you could do a filter like this for your example above: >> >> "(|(sn=*brown")(sn=*brown west"))" > > So the case I'm thinking of for the front end is a directory listing, > in which case you

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On 01/10/2018 10:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: So you could do a filter like this for your example above: "(|(sn=*brown")(sn=*brown west"))" So the case I'm thinking of for the front end is a directory listing, in which case you wouldn't be so specific to know to add the West. or "(|(sn=*

Re: Get stubby into Fedora to provide safe DNS resolution via DNS-over-TLS

> > > > Maybe you could suggest the package maintainer to add a "Provides: > stubby" so > > it can be found directly. CCing Paul Wouters in that regard. > > That's a good idea! I'll fire of some new builds with that later today > when I fixup > the libidn2 handling as well. > > If people are

Re: Get stubby into Fedora to provide safe DNS resolution via DNS-over-TLS

On 01/10/2018 11:18 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On mercredi 10 janvier 2018 00:07:11 CET rugk wrote: >> Providing privacy and security for DNS! (especially after dnscrypt is >> discontinued now). >> It would be nice to have this in Fedora. >> >>

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes: MH> This sounds good to me. It didn't occur to me that we can actually MH> set a dedicated env vars for our builds (which is even better). Well, doing so requires that we change an rpm macro to export this new env var in the same place

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1038 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 801 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 383

Re: Get stubby into Fedora to provide safe DNS resolution via DNS-over-TLS

On mercredi 10 janvier 2018 00:07:11 CET rugk wrote: > Providing privacy and security for DNS! (especially after dnscrypt is > discontinued now). > It would be nice to have this in Fedora. > > https://dnsprivacy.org/wiki/display/DP/DNS+Privacy+Daemon+-+Stubby > GitHub:

[Bug 1532539] [PATCH] Invalid definitions in macros.perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532539 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1532914] perl-Socket-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532914 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket-2.025-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On 10 January 2018 at 08:50, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> The new mapping for nobody:nobody would be implemented in two redundant ways: >> * as a static allocation in /etc/passwd and /etc/group managed by

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 01/10/2018 04:01 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > So, if there ARE updates to be pushed (marked urgent?) and we update > metadata > ANYWAY, this is a good point to flush everything from batched in this push. We could yeah. We could also only ever push when there are urgent updates... kevin

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 01/09/2018 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> You also don't want updates-testing to even exist right? > > That is not true. I want to leave the decision whether and for how long an > update needs to be tested to the package maintainer instead of enforcing > minimum

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 01/09/2018 02:09 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> […] > > I really don't understand why we do this "batched" thing to begin with. > To reduce the constant flow of updates that are very minor or affect very few mixed in with the major

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On 01/10/2018 10:53 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > On 01/10/2018 10:20 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >>> Would this miss someone who had two surnames, say Sally Brown West, >>> who chooses not to hyphenate? >> "(sn=*brown*)" > > Wouldn't that also match Brownwyn James and Brown West Smith? Yes it

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > If the content of "ghostscript-core" is now part of "ghostscript", you > can do the following: > > Obsoletes: ghostscript-core < 9.22-5 > Provides: ghostscript-core = %{version}-%{release} > > In addition, packages that

[Bug 1532914] perl-Socket-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On 01/10/2018 10:20 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: Would this miss someone who had two surnames, say Sally Brown West, who chooses not to hyphenate? "(sn=*brown*)" Wouldn't that also match Brownwyn James and Brown West Smith? ~m ___ 389-devel mailing

[EPEL-devel] Re: How to retire/delete an EPEL branch?

On 10 January 2018 at 01:53, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > I received a bug[1] asking to remove EPEL7 branch, as the package > LibRaw, is already in RHEL. > > How should I do that? > > Regards, > We do not remove branches as much as retire the package.

Re: Package Question

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different > upstream tar balls? Basically have > > Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar > Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar > > Then I

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 10.01.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Jan Kurik: >> >On existing systems, to make upgrades easier: >> >* if nfsnobody was defined, keep it in

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:46:13AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > Use "nobody:nobody" as the names for the kernel overflow UID:GID pair, > and retire the old "nfsnobody" name and the old "nobody:nogroup" pair > with 99:99 numbers See previous thread on this proposal from two years ago:

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On 01/09/2018 07:25 PM, William Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > It's time that I'm looking at: > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49425 +1 for 1.4.0! > > There are some great reasons to freshen up the default objects we > install. The current design isn't really reflective of modern directory >

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On 01/10/2018 10:08 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Hi William, > >>  With displayname you can only sort by "order of the displaynames". >> So we can at least consistently sort this given the scenario above! > > Imagine a phone book sorted this way. In the US in any given town > there would be 50

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Removal of Sun RPC Interfaces From glibc

On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 12:25 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/09/2018 11:00 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2018-01-05, Florian Weimer wrote: > > >perl-PDL-2.18.0-4.fc27.src.rpm > > > > [...] > > > This is based on relatively current Fedora rawhide/x86_64 and reflects > >

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

Hi William, With displayname you can only sort by "order of the displaynames". So we can at least consistently sort this given the scenario above! Imagine a phone book sorted this way. In the US in any given town there would be 50 pages of Johns, making wayfinding really difficult. Is

[Bug 1532539] [PATCH] Invalid definitions in macros.perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532539 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.1-402.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f8f01f1e83 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:30 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> Is there a specific bug that forces us to require we have transitional >> packages like this? RPM's Conflicts+Obsoletes logic is

Re: Package Question

Thanks for all the input... very interesting. But I decide to go a head can create a new package which eliminates all the questions about lifecycles dependencies, licenses, etc Again, thanks for all the input! steved. On 01/08/2018 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Is it a

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:30 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > I hope I didn't forget to mention something important... :D If something > is unclear, lay it on me! ;) > ​ Yeah, I forgot one more small thing to mention... :D For now I'm waiting for 'google-droid-fonts' to be

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Is there a specific bug that forces us to require we have transitional > packages like this? RPM's Conflicts+Obsoletes logic is powerful enough > to allow us to avoid this. > ​I'm not aware of any BZ/Fedora wiki page that

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1038 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 800 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 383

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 910 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 800 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 772

[Bug 1532539] [PATCH] Invalid definitions in macros.perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532539 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

scotch: packaging a version with 64bit integers

Hi I've received a request to package a version of scotch with 64bit integers (as opposed to 32bit). I suppose the details are less important, the bottom line is scotch 32bit: typedef int32_t SCOTCH_Num; scotch 64bit: typedef int64_t SCOTCH_Num; where SCOTCH_Num affects the public ABI and

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RenameNobodyUser > > Change owner(s): > *Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > * Lennart Poettering > > Use "nobody:nobody" as the names for the

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:51 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello guys! :) > > Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during > the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes are > not so significant to create

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig

On 01/09/2018 10:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:30:56PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: On 01/05/2018 05:21 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:50:45PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: = System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 01/08/2018 01:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi all, within the whole Meltdown and Spectre story I realized that Koji pushes even security updates to batched only, not directly to stable. In The critera for bypassing batched is if the update is

[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-Message-3.005-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d4b2798525 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1532539] [PATCH] Invalid definitions in macros.perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532539 --- Comment #1 from Panu Matilainen --- BTW, the way deltarpm is designed makes this otherwise fairly harmless thing rather, ehm, conspicuous :) --- Transaction Summary

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

January 9, 2018 9:59 PM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> To save all the Fedora users in the world from having to update metadata >> for minor changes. Since there's a hourly dnf makecache every user in >> the world pulls down new metadata ever time we

[Bug 1528627] Upgrade perl-Mail-DKIM to 0.50

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528627 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1531969] perl-DBIx-Class-DeploymentHandler-0.002222 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531969 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 10.01.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Jan Kurik: > >On existing systems, to make upgrades easier: > >* if nfsnobody was defined, keep it in /etc/passwd *after* the new > >line for nobody:nobody, so that both the old name and the new

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

On 10.1.2018 11:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:33:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10.1.2018 03:16, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 10 January 2018 at 11:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: In the end I just can't shake the notion that it's bad to

F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

= System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RenameNobodyUser Change owner(s): *Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek * Lennart Poettering Use "nobody:nobody" as the names for the kernel overflow UID:GID pair, and retire the old "nfsnobody" name and the old

F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

= System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RenameNobodyUser Change owner(s): *Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek * Lennart Poettering Use "nobody:nobody" as the names for the kernel overflow UID:GID pair, and retire the old "nfsnobody" name and the old

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

On 10.1.2018 10:28, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 01/10/2018 09:33 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10.1.2018 03:16, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 10 January 2018 at 11:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: In the end I just can't shake the notion that it's bad to have some random

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:33:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10.1.2018 03:16, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >On 10 January 2018 at 11:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>In the end I just can't shake the notion that it's bad to have some > >>random non-python-related environment

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mail-Message (f27). "3.005 bump"

From c650a175ca28e5585744fc13f26a4244787fc1d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jan 10 2018 09:49:26 + Subject: 3.005 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 95e52e4..3053447 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@

[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mail-Message (master). "3.005 bump"

From c650a175ca28e5585744fc13f26a4244787fc1d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jan 10 2018 09:49:26 + Subject: 3.005 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 95e52e4..3053447 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:51:03 PM CET David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during > the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes > are not so significant to create "self-contained change" wiki page

[389-devel] Re: Do aci's work in nested groups?

On 01/10/2018 07:03 AM, William Brown wrote: If I have: (targetattr=x)(version 3.0; allow(read, search)(groupdn=cn=x);) If cn=x has member cn=y, and cn=y member uid=z Does uid=z have permission to the targetattr here? IE do our aci's work through nested groups? yes, they should, but

[Bug 1528630] Upgrade perl-Net-Appliance-Session to 4.300001

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528630 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

On 01/10/2018 09:33 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10.1.2018 03:16, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 10 January 2018 at 11:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: In the end I just can't shake the notion that it's bad to have some random non-python-related environment variable basically breaking

Re: Disable a package for Fedora 26

On 01/09/2018 10:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jonny Heggheim wrote: >> I think the best solution, based on my knowledge and available time, is >> to upgrade Fedora 26 to the latest upstream. > So please do that then. The sooner, the better. I agree, pushed updates to bodhi yesterday, it would be

[Bug 1532914] perl-Socket-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532914 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket-2.025-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-36ebfbdf9d -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1532914] perl-Socket-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532914 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket-2.025-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2ae4888a92 -- You are receiving this mail

[EPEL-devel] Re: How to retire/delete an EPEL branch?

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:53 AM Ding Yi Chen wrote: > I received a bug[1] asking to remove EPEL7 branch, as the package > LibRaw, is already in RHEL. > > How should I do that? > > Would (warning: this will lose history) `git push --delete origin epel7` work? It'd be a shame to

[Bug 1532914] perl-Socket-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532914 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

On 10.1.2018 00:56, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jan Kurik wrote: Currently in Fedora (package names, executable names, etc.), python means Python 2. We would like to change it to mean Python 3, but to do that, we need to free it of the current meaning. This means explicitly using either "python2" or

Re: Intent to retire jenkins.fedorainfracloud.org

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:25:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 11:03 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > The Fedora Infrastructure team has had a jenkins instance running at > > jenkins.fedorainfracloud.org for a little while now. This instance was > >

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Avoid /usr/bin/python in RPM build

On 10.1.2018 03:16, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 10 January 2018 at 11:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: In the end I just can't shake the notion that it's bad to have some random non-python-related environment variable basically breaking python. Aye, I think you've hit on the

[Bug 1532908] perl-SQL-Translator-0.11024 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532908 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed