Sorry , please discard my message, the user name was wrong here ...
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 02:55 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 13:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
> > debug1: Offering public key: /home/martin/.ssh/id_rsa RSA
>
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 13:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
> debug1: Offering public key: /home/martin/.ssh/id_rsa RSA
> SHA256:bHNp1Vhqsa4aRUMuVsXdBIALgvNzDzAriQKRvNxpQos agent
> debug3: send packet: type 50
> debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:08 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Sightly related to the topic, is there an effective way to use
> pkgconfig(foo) for packages rather foo-devel? It seems very few
> packages use that method.
>
I admit I'm usually too lazy to do this when -devel works. Most of my
On 05. 02. 19 11:07, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I've just orphaned 259 packages listed below. Almost all of them are
Java packages which I will continue to maintain as part of modules.
Intent to orphan them was already announced on java-devel [1] and
devel [2] lists, with detailed reasoning.
Hi
> On 27 Mar 2019, at 12:13, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> I was wondering if UserAccount can do it , why UserAccounts cant .
>
UserAccounts is saying “here is all possible accounts in a subtree, but we only
make new ones at the root of the tree”. UserAccount is “this is a concrete,
absolute
On 2019-03-26 10:07 a.m., Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when packaging a C/C++ program, the rpm automatic dependency feature
> usually works well for shared libraries.
>
> That mean when program 'bar' needs libfoo-devel at build time it's
> sufficient to add
>
> BuildRequires:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-03-28 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-03-28 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2019-03-28
On 26/03/19 11:40 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 08:57, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
[..]
>What does this 42 means in this case? It means that during whole gcc build
>are repeated 42 times some subset of *autoconf tests*. How it was possible
>to loose that?!? 樂
>gcc is quite
Me too!
qrsBRWN writes:
> I'm in too
>
> On March 27, 2019 7:49:03 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Peeler
> wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:24 AM Till Hofmann
>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There's been ongoing discussions on BZ [1] with some people showing
>>> interest in a SIG. The main purpose of this
> On 3/27/19 7:06 AM, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> I don't see anything wrong on the server side logs here, it shows that
> it's accepting your key. Is this still happening?
>
> Feel free to drop by #fedora-admin on freenode or file a infrastructure
> ticket and we will get it working (
>
Jonathan, thanks for the tip! It works now!
How cool is that we have a lot of experts in almost every aspect of
software development around?
ср, 27 мар. 2019 г. в 17:43, Jonathan Wakely :
>
> On 27/03/19 16:37 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 27/03/19 16:13 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>On
I'm in too
On March 27, 2019 7:49:03 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Peeler wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:24 AM Till Hofmann
>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> There's been ongoing discussions on BZ [1] with some people showing
>> interest in a SIG. The main purpose of this email is to see who else
>> would be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.34-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 8:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 2/15/19 5:16 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:14 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >> This group would be for maintaining packages that are modularized in a
> >> non-module context so that it's actually usable by the
Le mercredi 27 mars 2019 à 19:13 +, David Dykstra a écrit :
Hi David,
>
> I'd like to see clarity on the guidelines for golang applications as
> opposed to golang libraries. It seems to assume from the start that
> it's talking about libraries, based on the package naming
> requirement.
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
26 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.34-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Robert,
I'd like to see clarity on the guidelines for golang applications as
opposed to golang libraries. It seems to assume from the start that
it's talking about libraries, based on the package naming requirement.
In the "Bundled or de-bundled" section I see mention of "golang projects"
and I
On 2/15/19 5:16 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:14 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> This group would be for maintaining packages that are modularized in a
>> non-module context so that it's actually usable by the broader
>> ecosystem. Modules are not usable for non-module
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:24 AM Till Hofmann
wrote:
>
> There's been ongoing discussions on BZ [1] with some people showing
> interest in a SIG. The main purpose of this email is to see who else
> would be interested in contributing to sway. If we can find enough
> people, I'd continue with
On 3/27/19 8:04 AM, Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
> Jerry James píše v St 27. 03. 2019 v 08:17 -0600:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:17 AM Miroslav Suchý
>> wrote:
>>> Hmmm, it would be nice if we can send ABRT reports from crashes,
>>> which happens during a build.
>>
>> Or a button I can push somewhere
On 3/27/19 7:06 AM, Martin Gansser wrote:
> [martin@f30 fedora-scm]$ cat -v ~/.ssh/config
> Host pkgs.fedoraproject.org
> User martinkg
> IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
>
> [martin@f30 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg clone lollypop
> Cloning into 'lollypop'...
> packet_write_wait: Connection to 209.132.181.4
I considered taking xcdroast but it needs to be patched to work with wodim
because it's only designed to be used with real cdrecord... Probably best
just to retire it. There are several other lightweight graphical CD/DVD
writer tools.
Thanks,
Richard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 18:48 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 03. 19 18:18, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:08 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > sergiomb: nodejs-array-union
> >
> > why today ;) I'm associated to nodejs-array-union , seems to me
> > thescript have a bug ...
>
>
On 27. 03. 19 18:18, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:08 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
sergiomb: nodejs-array-union
why today ;) I'm associated to nodejs-array-union , seems to me thescript have
a bug ...
What bug? Read the full report and grep your FAS name, follow the crumbs:
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:08 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> sergiomb: nodejs-array-union
why today ;) I'm associated to nodejs-array-union , seems to me thescript have
a bug ...
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:06 PM Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> [martin@f30 fedora-scm]$ cat -v ~/.ssh/config
> Host pkgs.fedoraproject.org
You can probably wildcard it to *.fedoraproject.org in case you have
to ssh somewhere else in the future.
> User martinkg
> IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
>
>
On 27/03/19 16:37 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/03/19 16:13 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:08:59PM +0100, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Jakub, thanks for the tip! Now I moved a little further. I've added
-save-temps to CXXFLAGS and indeed there is something wrong. Here is
On 27/03/19 16:13 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:08:59PM +0100, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Jakub, thanks for the tip! Now I moved a little further. I've added
-save-temps to CXXFLAGS and indeed there is something wrong. Here is
how this cstddef file was included:
===
On 27/03/19 16:54 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_OPENSSL -DPCAPPLAY -DRTP_STREAM -DUSE_SCTP
-DHAVE_EPOLL -I. -I./include -D__LINUX -I./include -Wall -pedantic
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:04:53PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > because rpm automatically adds something like:
> >
> > libfoo.so.1()(64bit)
> >
> > Of course, I could still add a superfluous
> >
> > Requires:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_OPENSSL -DPCAPPLAY -DRTP_STREAM -DUSE_SCTP
-DHAVE_EPOLL -I. -I./include -D__LINUX -I./include -Wall -pedantic
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
-grecord-gcc-switches
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 24/142 (x86_64), 3/24
Le 2019-03-27 16:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
That wasn't me. I was just asking about whether using pushd and popd
in a .spec file made sense. I think it does not, it's safer to specify
the target directory explicitly rather than rely on these tools.
The way rpm packaging works, you
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190324.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190327.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 50
Dropped packages:15
Upgraded packages: 202
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 98.57 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Not interested anymore in this package, feel free to reach me out if you'd like
to take it, I'll orphan it this week.
It will probably need a re-review to rename it to 'lektor' as it's mainly an
application.
It's sort of active on github [0]. More info [1].
[0]
Reminder: the Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 30 Beta release will be
held TOMORROW, 2019-03-28 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:32 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le 2019-03-27 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Nicolas Mailhot
> > wrote:
>
> >> POSIX is dead as a shell compatibility target. You want to replace
> >> bash
> >> with something faster, by all means
in Fedora Rawhide, rubygem-curb-0.9.9.
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:08:59PM +0100, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Jakub, thanks for the tip! Now I moved a little further. I've added
> -save-temps to CXXFLAGS and indeed there is something wrong. Here is
> how this cstddef file was included:
>
> ===
> # 1
Jakub, thanks for the tip! Now I moved a little further. I've added
-save-temps to CXXFLAGS and indeed there is something wrong. Here is
how this cstddef file was included:
===
# 1 "/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9/include/stddef.h" 1 3 4
# 51 "/usr/include/c++/9/cstddef" 2 3
# 52
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50304
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch said:
> Is there a way to do something similar to:
A case of:
pushd someplace
[do some things]
popd
can be replaced with:
cd someplace
[do some things]
cd -
If there's some more complicated stuff that has more directory changes
in between the
Ok, so just to close the loop on this thread, I gave up on trying to fix
the setuptools bug when using --root and have moved on to s straight cmake
build.
Because the packages have a dependency chain I have to do fake installs in
%build passing CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX to be somewhere in the build
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> because rpm automatically adds something like:
>
> libfoo.so.1()(64bit)
>
> Of course, I could still add a superfluous
>
> Requires: libfoo
This could pull in the 32 bit version of the package so it's wrong as
well as
Jerry James píše v St 27. 03. 2019 v 08:17 -0600:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:17 AM Miroslav Suchý
> wrote:
> > Hmmm, it would be nice if we can send ABRT reports from crashes,
> > which happens during a build.
>
> Or a button I can push somewhere that downloads the contents of
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ack-2.26-1.fc28 |ack-2.26-1.fc28
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> I cannot build SIPp anymore. It fails with a very cryptic (for me) message:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33763853
>
> ```
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_OPENSSL -DPCAPPLAY -DRTP_STREAM -DUSE_SCTP
>
Reminder: the Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 30 Beta release will be
held TOMORROW, 2019-03-28 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at:
Dne 27. 03. 19 v 10:30 Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 8:33 AM Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
>> Le 2019-03-27 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Nicolas Mailhot
>>> wrote:
POSIX is dead as a shell compatibility target. You want to
Hello All!
I cannot build SIPp anymore. It fails with a very cryptic (for me) message:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33763853
```
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_OPENSSL -DPCAPPLAY -DRTP_STREAM -DUSE_SCTP
-DHAVE_EPOLL -I. -I./include -D__LINUX -I./include -Wall -pedantic
-O2 -g
Greetings,
I am Hemant Kumar Singh, a computer science undergrad studying in NIT Warangal,
India. I am interested to work on the project "CentOS CI User Front End" with
Fedora Project under the guidance of Brian Stinson and Vipul Siddharth; this
project requires HTML5 and CSS; I have done HTML
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:17 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hmmm, it would be nice if we can send ABRT reports from crashes, which
> happens during a build.
Or a button I can push somewhere that downloads the contents of
/builddir/build/BUILD as a tarball, for a given architecture, after a
failed
[martin@f30 fedora-scm]$ cat -v ~/.ssh/config
Host pkgs.fedoraproject.org
User martinkg
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
[martin@f30 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg clone lollypop
Cloning into 'lollypop'...
packet_write_wait: Connection to 209.132.181.4 port 22: Broken pipe
fatal: Could not read from remote
Hi,
I'm trying to compile systemd in koji and mock, and I'm getting suspicious
crashes...
$ valgrind x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/test-terminal-util
/* test_default_term_for_tty */
...
/* test_read_one_char */
==21== Invalid read of size 4
==21==at 0x48C09EC: fputs (in
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 09:39, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> same error !
>
No it is a different error. Your cert was used, but you can't ssh into
that server as it has no shells for users.
debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
Authenticated to pkgs.fedoraproject.org ([209.132.181.4]:22).
Hello!
According to Non-responsive Maintainer Policy I'm asking the maintainer
to respond and resolve issues with package zimlib.
RHBZ ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690432
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
same error !
ls -ls ~/.fedora.upn
-rw-rw-r-- 1 martin martin 9 27. Mär 14:33 .fedora.upn
[martin@f30 ~]$ cat -v ~/.fedora.upn
martinkg
[martin@f30 ~]$ ssh -vvv marti...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org
OpenSSH_7.9p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1b FIPS 26 Feb 2019
debug1: Reading configuration data
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:43 AM Sayan Chowdhury wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There has been a huge backlog of the nightly Fedora AMIs. So, today I
> will be deleting kicking off the process to purge the older AMIs.
By AMIs here I mean Amazon Machine Images.
--
Sayan Chowdhury
On 27/03/2019 11:35, Martin Gansser wrote:
i get the error after copying my home folder /home/martin from a vmware with
f29 to a new vmware with f30.
Cloning into 'lollypop'...
mar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please
the permissions are:
[martin@f30 ~]$ ll ~/.ssh/
insgesamt 20
-rw---. 1 martin martin 130 1. Okt 17:59 config
-rw---. 1 martin martin 65 1. Okt 13:25 config.orig
-rw---. 1 martin martin 3434 1. Okt 10:17 id_rsa
-rw---. 1 martin martin 737 1. Okt 10:17 id_rsa.pub
-rw---.
Run ssh in debug mode:
ssh -vvv mar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org
It will show you that you probably have bad permissions or owner on one
of your private keys in ~/.ssh/. They need to be owned by you and not
readable by anyone else (mode 0600).
Jakub
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 11:35 +, Martin
Hi,
i get the error after copying my home folder /home/martin from a vmware with
f29 to a new vmware with f30.
Cloning into 'lollypop'...
mar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access
On 27. 03. 19 11:07, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On a related topic, wasn't the orphan retirement process supposed to be amended,
so that packages that still have co-maintainers will be assigned to one of those
instead of being retired directly?
No. There was a quick kick of for this but it was
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:31 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> My two cents:
>
> If there's a fallback option, and if the user selects it, they
> shouldn't end up in an unambiguous state. Right now we're seeing
> systems hanging. I'd rather see a crash than a hang where the user
> can't get to a shell,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692922
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 10:23 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 03. 19 9:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I've gone ahead with my proposal and created the Stewardship SIG.
> >
> > This includes the SIGs/Stewardship wiki page [0], the @stewardship-sig
> > FAS group [1], to which high-priority orphaned
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.34-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e5da251c0c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.34-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d01410d628
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.34-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-dc9a6dd692
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693012
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 8:33 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le 2019-03-27 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Nicolas Mailhot
> > wrote:
>
> >> POSIX is dead as a shell compatibility target. You want to replace
> >> bash
> >> with something faster, by all means
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert-André Mauchin"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "nicolas mailhot" ,
> gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, jca...@redhat.com, "Discussion
> of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 7:46:23 PM
>
On 20. 03. 19 9:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I've gone ahead with my proposal and created the Stewardship SIG.
This includes the SIGs/Stewardship wiki page [0], the @stewardship-sig
FAS group [1], to which high-priority orphaned packages can be
assigned, and the stewardship-sig mailing list [2].
On 27/03/19 09:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:16:24PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
On 3/26/19 5:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
On 25/03/19 21:23, Jeremy Cline wrote:
On 3/25/19 1:55 PM, Jason L
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:16:24PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> On 3/26/19 5:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25/03/19 21:23, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > > On 3/25/19 1:55 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >
On 26/03/19 20:16, Jeremy Cline wrote:
On 3/26/19 5:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
On 25/03/19 21:23, Jeremy Cline wrote:
On 3/25/19 1:55 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
KF> Well, I find it
Le 2019-03-26 16:51, Japheth Cleaver a écrit :
The tooling around the original ecosystem seemed to have no rhyme or
reason with it, JPackage efforts never *fully* went anywhere,
JPackage certainly went somewhere, and this somewhere is Fedora/Red Hat.
To recap, JPackage existed because the
Le 2019-03-27 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
POSIX is dead as a shell compatibility target. You want to replace
bash
with something faster, by all means do it. With something that
includes
the GNU extensions like pushd/popd that
Dne 26. 03. 19 v 18:38 Tomasz Kłoczko napsal(a):
> If yes I can propose simpler solution like create .post_build_preserve.lst
> file in source build root and whatever will
> be added to that file should be archived in some
> --.tar.xz file to be accessible over koji
> web interface.
> If such
Dne 27. 03. 19 v 4:33 Jerry James napsal(a):
> Thanks for confirming. I am really puzzled. I can consistently get
> good builds in mock, across all arches I am able to test, and
> consistently get segfaults on every single arch when building in koji.
> I'm going to have to do the trick of
Hi,
There has been a huge backlog of the nightly Fedora AMIs. So, today I
will be deleting kicking off the process to purge the older AMIs.
The process that I would be following to delete the AMIs is:
- The launch permission of the AMIs will be removed.
- I'll wait for 20 days. This is the time
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
26 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
13
85 matches
Mail list logo
