Fedora-Rawhide-20220408.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 17/231 (x86_64), 16/161 (aarch64) New failures

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 12:07, Jared Dominguez wrote: If the experience is buggy with Windows too, HP probably has addressed that as previously stated, which is why I asked about how up-to-date Samuel's BIOS is. On several occasions I've seen complaints about firmware issues that are solved by updating.

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:31 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > Chris Murphy wrote: > > Is there a possibility of dropping MBR? i.e. use GPT containing both a > > biosboot partition type, and EFI System partition type? > > I am not aware that legacy BIOS would hop directly on any GPT partition >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220408.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220407.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220408.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:10 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 179 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 32.25 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, Chris Murphy wrote: > Is there a possibility of dropping MBR? i.e. use GPT containing both a > biosboot partition type, and EFI System partition type? I am not aware that legacy BIOS would hop directly on any GPT partition or any MBR partition table partition. The convention for

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:00 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:08 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:46 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an > > >

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:29 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > The lines, which will need changes for using GRUB, are at least: > > -isohybrid-mbr /usr/share/syslinux/isohdpfx.bin > [...] > -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table -no-emul-boot > -b isolinux/isolinux.bin > > grub-mkrescue (on Debian)

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:08 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:46 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an > > > > incompatible > > > > upgrade.  It must follow the

Re: Heads-up: updating python-versioningit to 1.1.1 in Rawhide

Correction: of course, 2022-04-08 is today, and 2022-04-15 is one week from today. On 4/8/22 17:07, Ben Beasley wrote: In one week (2022-04-08), or slightly later, I plan to build python-versioningit 1.1.1 in Rawhide[1]. There are breaking API changes[2] in the 1.x series, but

Heads-up: updating python-versioningit to 1.1.1 in Rawhide

In one week (2022-04-08), or slightly later, I plan to build python-versioningit 1.1.1 in Rawhide[1]. There are breaking API changes[2] in the 1.x series, but python-versioningit appears to be a leaf package at the moment, so this should not affect any other packages in the distribution. [1]

[Bug 2061468] perl-Text-ASCIITable: please provide epel9 package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061468 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

Re: Revisiting ROCm packaging

> Nice work! Thanks :) > The only x86 32-bit use I can think of would be wine if it supports ROCm. Yeah I looked into it, and it looks like rocm-runtime fails on 32bit due to some assumptions for 64bit in the code. I don't think there's too much value to 32bit, so it's not really worth trying

[Bug 2069285] perl-HTML-Parser-3.78 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-Parser-3.78-1.fc3 |perl-HTML-Parser-3.78-1.fc3

Re: GNOME Online Accounts "Fedora" - Pre-authentication failed

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 1:29 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7 2022 at 12:30:42 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > Well, it *could* grow an interface to some of the password wallet > > > services that support TOTP or HOTP codes (like Bitwarden,

[Bug 2069285] perl-HTML-Parser-3.78 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:46 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an > > > incompatible > > > upgrade. It must follow the EPEL incompatible upgrades policy [0]. > > > This email can count as

Re: F36 Final blocker status summary

We are currently targeting the early target date (2022-04-19), which means we'd want to have blockers fixed by 11 April in order to provide time for validation testing prior to the Go/No-go meeting on 14 April. We can do it! Action summary Accepted blockers -

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an > > incompatible > > upgrade.  It must follow the EPEL incompatible upgrades policy [0]. > > This email can count as step 1 once you reply with the specific > > CVEs > > this will

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:54:02PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 08/04/2022 19:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We actually had IMA signing all up and running last year from jan 15th > > to jan 22nd. As luck would have it, there was a chromium build in that > > time: > > Now try with

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 11:52 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:47 AM Jared Dominguez wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> > >> On 4/7/22 14:51, Jared Dominguez wrote: > >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Samuel Sieb >> >

[Bug 2072835] perl-Encode-3.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote: We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs. Can you try signing the breeze-icon-theme and distribution-gpg-keys packages and post %time output? -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 08/04/2022 19:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We actually had IMA signing all up and running last year from jan 15th to jan 22nd. As luck would have it, there was a chromium build in that time: Now try with texlive. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:39:04PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > > > - as I stated, there are offers to help with getting syslinux replaced > > with GRUB > > More generally, I'm concerned that folks think this'll help a lot more > than it actually will.

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > - as I stated, there are offers to help with getting syslinux replaced > with GRUB More generally, I'm concerned that folks think this'll help a lot more than it actually will. There's a tendency to think in terms of packages - they're contained units and

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hans de Goede wrote: > On 4/8/22 13:18, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> Still, I remain worried about the details, such as: >> * that, if VESA is needed, the VESA mode has to be configured through the >> kernel CLI, >> * that, as far as I can see, switching to another mode with kernel VESA >>

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 08:46, Jared Dominguez wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb > wrote: This is not comparable to the 32-bit removal where it was only a few really old systems.  This is going to affect decent systems that are less than 10 years old.  I have a

[EPEL-devel] Re: Dependency issue hwinfo/libx86emu

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:23 AM Nick Howitt via epel-devel wrote: > > > > On 08/04/2022 04:38, Carl George wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:33 PM Gemneye via epel-devel > > wrote: > >> > > Error: Package: hwinfo-21.68-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) > Requires:

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 10:14:19PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote: > > > Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad > experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1 > system that works fine with UEFI. And my parents' laptop was purchased 2 > years ago

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, i'm the developer of xorriso. Please CC me with replies just in case that i unsubscribe because of too much traffic. Further: Sorry for my reply-id pointing to the predecessor of the message which i quote. I found it at https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg299915.html Chris

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > - as I stated, there are offers to help with getting syslinux replaced > with GRUB. what I've not stated originally is Chris Murphy brought up > protective MBR and switching all new installs to inst.gpt, which let > us future proof new installations for

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:41:22PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > > > I sympathize with the change owners' position that detractors need > > to assume their good intentions, but I feel like the same needs to be > > assumed for community contributions, > > That's

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 1:50 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > On 4/8/22 19:14, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > > > So like I said yesterday, I'll look into switching to use grub2 for > > Fedora 37, assuming grub2 continues to support BIOS. > > Thank you for looking into switching to using

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi Brian, On 4/8/22 19:14, Brian C. Lane wrote: > So like I said yesterday, I'll look into switching to use grub2 for > Fedora 37, assuming grub2 continues to support BIOS. Thank you for looking into switching to using GRUB for the livecds. If you have some test livecd img using grub instead

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:14 AM Brian C. Lane wrote: > The reason I wrote the PR was because, as I understand it, syslinux is > going away soon. It was an easy patch to write, and I find it easier to > discuss things when there is code present (or absent as in this case). > > My *personal*

Re: GNOME Online Accounts "Fedora" - Pre-authentication failed

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > If Fedora's kinit will start asking for an OTP code in a separate field, > it would technically be possible to store the password in Gnome Keyring > and just ask for an OTP code once a week. It should ask for an OTP when the user does something that requires

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:20:00AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:51 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > There are plenty of things in an RPM build that already inherently take > > > > O(N) time in the number of files or the total size of the files, even > > > >

Re: GNOME Online Accounts "Fedora" - Pre-authentication failed

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7 2022 at 12:30:42 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > Well, it *could* grow an interface to some of the password wallet > > services that support TOTP or HOTP codes (like Bitwarden, Lastpass, > > 1password, etc.) and configure it to query that service

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 06:46:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > The pull request to delete the code for BIOS support in lorax means > > that we can't produce media with BIOS support at all once that's > > merged. They've tied dropping syslinux to dropping BIOS

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

=== #fedora-meeting: ELN SIG 2022-04-08 === Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:00:30 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-04-08/eln.2022-04-08-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:41 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > > > Would using Grub for legacy boot be more, or less work than continuing > > to support syslinux, assuming people step up to do the development and > > validation? > > syslinux is by default only used on

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > Would using Grub for legacy boot be more, or less work than continuing > to support syslinux, assuming people step up to do the development and > validation? syslinux is by default only used on the live media. Legacy installs today provision grub2. So moving

[Bug 2073511] New: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073511 Bug ID: 2073511 Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.34 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Locale Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:46:50AM -0400, Jared Dominguez wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > I don't understand why we're still using syslinux instead of grub for > > legacy boots, especially since I think now you can use the same grub.cfg > > file for both. > > >

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:47 AM Jared Dominguez wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >> On 4/7/22 14:51, Jared Dominguez wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Samuel Sieb > > > wrote: >> > >> > On 4/7/22 08:02, Jared Dominguez wrote:

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/7/22 14:51, Jared Dominguez wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Samuel Sieb > > wrote: > > > > On 4/7/22 08:02, Jared Dominguez wrote: > > > This is a proposal. Nothing has changed yet. The choice is now

Fedora-36-20220408.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/229 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220407.n.0): ID: 1216641 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1216641 ID: 1216651 Test:

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 00:48 Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > The pull request to delete the code for BIOS support in lorax means > > that we can't produce media with BIOS support at all once that's > > merged. They've tied dropping syslinux to

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 08. 04. 22 v 6:46 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a): Neal Gompa wrote: The pull request to delete the code for BIOS support in lorax means that we can't produce media with BIOS support at all once that's merged. They've tied dropping syslinux to dropping BIOS support entirely. It is also

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On 4/8/22 13:18, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> So most hw will either be new enough to offer an efifb which >> simpledrm will turn into a drm/kms /dev/dri/card0 device. Or it >> will be old enough that it almost certainly will have >> a drm/kms driver. >> >> And

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

Dne 07. 04. 22 v 16:13 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:12 AM Kamil Dudka wrote: On Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:45:45 PM CEST Stephen Gallagher wrote: Sorry for keeping asking naive questions, but is there a chance to do some mass rebuild prior this lands, to asses the

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/5/22 22:52, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS == Summary == Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on platforms that support it (x86_64). Legacy BIOS support is not removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes: > On 07/04/2022 18:10, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> While we do maintain a large set of patches downstream, due to upstream >> being inactive for a while, today upstream is alive and very much not >> abandoned: > > Why not upstream all those patches then? I resent

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:07 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 07/04/2022 18:10, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > While we do maintain a large set of patches downstream, due to upstream > > being inactive for a while, today upstream is alive and very much not > > abandoned: > > Why not upstream

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:02:53AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Note that for Fedora 36 we have already dropped efifb and replaced it > with simpledrm: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers > > So this means that in our default configs we no longer have any > fbdev

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220408.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220407.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220408.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 07/04/2022 23:50, Peter Robinson wrote: Why do you classify that slow down being due to signing? Because all build packages are stuck in the "signing pending" status. You can't do anything with them until the sign process is complete. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: GNOME Online Accounts "Fedora" - Pre-authentication failed

On 07/04/2022 18:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Well, it*could* grow an interface to some of the password wallet services that support TOTP or HOTP codes (like Bitwarden, Lastpass, 1password, etc.) and configure it to query that service and append the code to the password. Password+OTP is the

Re: GNOME Online Accounts "Fedora" - Pre-authentication failed

On 07/04/2022 16:58, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Well the whole point of gnome-online-accounts is to keep you authenticated permanently. That just does not work if your kerberos password is an OTP. I'm not sure what we could possibly change. Kerberos ticket renewal doesn't require you to enter

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 07/04/2022 18:10, Robbie Harwood wrote: While we do maintain a large set of patches downstream, due to upstream being inactive for a while, today upstream is alive and very much not abandoned: Why not upstream all those patches then? -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 05:02, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 4/8/22 07:01, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> Ben Cotton wrote: >>> == Owner == >>> * Name: [[User:ajax|Adam Jackson]] >>> * Email: a...@redhat.com >>> >>> == Detailed Description == >>> >>> Fedora's primary desktop environments are moving away

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 01:01, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Ben Cotton wrote: >> == Owner == >> * Name: [[User:ajax|Adam Jackson]] >> * Email: a...@redhat.com >> >> == Detailed Description == >> >> Fedora's primary desktop environments are moving away from being X11 >> sessions, to being Wayland servers in

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 07/04/2022 22:04, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: *Virtual* hardware is another matter entirely. All popular hypervisors (KVM/qemu, VirtualBox and VMWare) have full UEFI boot support. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 08/04/2022 09:54, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: I already did. Isn't that what I wrote? Can you post their answer? -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

CPE Weekly Update – Week of April 4th – 8th

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hans de Goede wrote: > So most hw will either be new enough to offer an efifb which > simpledrm will turn into a drm/kms /dev/dri/card0 device. Or it > will be old enough that it almost certainly will have > a drm/kms driver. > > And for the really odd duck out a vesa mode can be set on the

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:34 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 4/8/22 12:16, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton napsal(a): > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18 > >> > >> == Summary == > >> Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0

[Bug 2072835] perl-Encode-3.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072835 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-e2fe680f4e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e2fe680f4e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2072835] perl-Encode-3.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072835 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 08. 04. 22 v 10:56 Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 4/7/22 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18 * New interactive shell for working with macros (`rpmspec --shell`) and embedded

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 12:16, Petr Pisar wrote: V Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton napsal(a): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18 == Summary == Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 4.18] release. [...] * New `%conf` spec section for build configuration

[rpms/perl-Encode] PR #2: Tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Test-Announce] [Now Playing] Fedora 36 Test Days

Hey Fedorans, As most of you might know, we have Fedora testing events happening where you all can participate. As of today, we are running 3 events in parallel. 1. Kernel 5.17 Test Week [0] 2. Fedora 36 CoreOS [1] 3. Fedora Cloud Test Day [2] These are events that are easy to start off if you

[rpms/perl-Encode] PR #2: Tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220408.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220407.0): ID: 1216505 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 07.04.22 um 18:14 schrieb Robbie Harwood: Robert Marcano via devel writes: Is this change only related to install media support for booting with BIOS only? Would I be able to install newer Fedora releases using Legacy PXE on BIOS only machines? The intent is to indicate that new legacy

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

V Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton napsal(a): > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18 > > == Summary == > Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 4.18] release. [...] > * New `%conf` spec section for build configuration RPM documenation reads:

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:06 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:34:49PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:12:47PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > > > > > "You know these lights in the theaters that go out gradually? > > > When the guy

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyXorgDriverRemoval > > == Summary == > > This change will remove the `xorg-x11-drv-vesa` and > `xorg-x11-drv-fbdev` driver packages, and associated support code from > the `xorg-x11-server-Xorg`

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On 4/8/22 07:01, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Ben Cotton wrote: >> == Owner == >> * Name: [[User:ajax|Adam Jackson]] >> * Email: a...@redhat.com >> >> == Detailed Description == >> >> Fedora's primary desktop environments are moving away from being X11 >> sessions, to being Wayland servers

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220408.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220407.0): ID: 1216489 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18 * New interactive shell for working with macros (`rpmspec --shell`) and embedded Lua (`rpmlua`) That sounds cool. Can this be used

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thursday, 07 April 2022 at 18:42, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Michael Catanzaro writes: > > > On Wed, Apr 6 2022 at 03:35:38 PM -0400, Jared Dominguez > > wrote: > >> This seems like a strong assumption to me considering that aside from > >> the largest cloud providers (with whom Red Hat is

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 19:47, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18 == Summary == Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 4.18] release. == Owner == * Name: [[User:pmatilai|Panu Matilainen]] * Email:

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 08:57, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/7/22 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:21 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > > > > syslinux (really isolinux) is only used on installation media. > > > > > > It's commonly

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 04:37, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:05 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Clover is described here: > > > https://github.com/CloverHackyColor/CloverBootloader > > > > This

Mock v3.0 release, mock-core-configs v37.3

Hello maintainers! I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.0. Even though we bumped the major version here, this is just a normal update that brings a few new features and shouldn't bring any troubles or backward incompatibilities. The reason we bumped the version this way

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thursday, 07 April 2022 at 14:54, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 07/04/2022 09:59, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > OVH is another big provider and they don't offer UEFI boot with their > > VPS range. I've just confirmed it with their support. > > You should contact their

Re: Revisiting ROCm packaging

On Thursday, 07 April 2022 at 06:40, Jeremy Newton wrote: > I made a thread late last year inquirying about interest in ROCm > packaging; in that time I've introduced a few packages amd updated a > few existing packages to the latest version. Right now, Fedora is > just short of making good use

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 07.04.2022 um 21:56 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > == Detailed Description == > > In particular the `vesa` and `fbdev` > drivers can find themselves pressed into use when accelerated graphics > is unavailable. I miss or probably don’t understand what will happen when "accelerated graphics

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 03:56:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyXorgDriverRemoval > > > == Summary == > > This change will remove the `xorg-x11-drv-vesa` and > `xorg-x11-drv-fbdev` driver packages, and associated support code from > the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Dependency issue hwinfo/libx86emu

On 08/04/2022 04:38, Carl George wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:33 PM Gemneye via epel-devel wrote: Error: Package: hwinfo-21.68-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libx86emu.so.1()(64bit) Removing: libx86emu-1.1-2.1.x86_64 (@/libx86emu-1.1-2.1.x86_64)

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:21 PM Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: syslinux (really isolinux) is only used on installation media. It's commonly used for BIOS PXE booting as well. *shudders at the memories of dealing with pxelinux*