Re: about dnf installonlypks

On 7/26/22 19:27, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, after searching a lot still can't find how installonlypks package list is generated I found these 2 references : https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e05ac11f9b openssl11-1.1.1k-4.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing bgpq4-1.5-1.el7 tio-1.46-1.el7 Details about

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971 chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing bgpq4-1.5-1.el8 tio-1.46-1.el8 Details

[Bug 2107867] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991-1. |perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991-1.

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Chris Murphy wrote: > cryptsetup does have Bitlocker support, so long as you have the recovery > key you can unlock and get access to your data, I've tested this. But you need a recovery key to begin with, because the main key is sealed in the TPM and not visible from anything other than

[Bug 2107867] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991-1. |perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991-1.

[Bug 2109440] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220720 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109440 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2107867] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Could someone sign systemd-boot please? That EFI boot seems simple to use and very minimal especially for both x64 arch based desktop and laptop. On 2022-07-26 16:14, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:42 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Jul 26,

about dnf installonlypks

Hi, after searching a lot still can't find how installonlypks package list is generated I found these 2 references : https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html

[Bug 2110575] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.082 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110575 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 7:18 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: >> a. Fix GRUB by giving it the ability to modify UEFI NRAM "bootnext" value, >> so that instead of chainloading the Windows bootloader from GRUB, GRUB will >> modify the system NVRAM such that the

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 9:15 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> Summary: Windows 10/11 increasingly enables Bitlocker (full disk >> encryption) out of the box with the encryption key sealed in the TPM. > […] >> The Bitlocker encryption key is unsealed only if the boot

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Chris Murphy wrote: > Summary: Windows 10/11 increasingly enables Bitlocker (full disk > encryption) out of the box with the encryption key sealed in the TPM. […] > The Bitlocker encryption key is unsealed only if the boot chain > measurement by the TPM matches the expected values in a TPM PCR.

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Chris Murphy wrote: > It's a Rube Goldberg machine way of doing this. Isn't that the Unix Way? Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Why is there antlr4-project package?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 5:18 AM Marián Konček wrote: > I would still do something about the manually expanded %mvn_install macro. > > Is it a big problem to have the java artifacts placed into a > "anrlt4-project" directory? > > If nothing else, maybe you could rpm --eval %%mvn_install | sed '-n

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:59 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:43 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: >> >> Chris Murphy wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> >> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, >> >>

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > a. Fix GRUB by giving it the ability to modify UEFI NRAM "bootnext" value, so > that instead of chainloading the Windows bootloader from GRUB, GRUB will > modify the system NVRAM such that the next boot (only) will directly boot the > Windows bootloader.

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:42 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >>> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, >>> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a

Heads up for Rawhide users of Evolution with Google accounts

Hey folks! If you're running Rawhide and using Evolution - or anything else backed by evolution-data-server - with a Google account, you may have noticed that it doesn't work with evolution-data-server-3.45.1. The GOA and Google support in Evolution was turned off with the 3.45.1 build, I think

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:43 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > >> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, > >> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, >> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot >> configured to always bootnext to Windows? > > Pretty sure shim

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, > > instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot > > configured to always

[Bug 2104259] adapt perl to removal of java on i686

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104259 Bug 2104259 depends on bug 2104097, which changed state. Bug 2104097 Summary: native R depends on to be removed i686 java-openjdk packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104097 What|Removed

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۳ ۴:۵۴ قبل‌ازظهر, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: <...> Use (Close: rhbz#1438205) instead of (rhbz#1438205) or Closes: rhbz#1438205, Fix: rhbz#1438205, Fixes: rhbz#1438205 to automatically close the related nug Thanks for the tip. On

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۲ ۸:۳۵ بعدازظهر, Kalev Lember wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: Hi all, As part of

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, > instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot > configured to always bootnext to Windows? Pretty sure shim still hard codes the

Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Chris Murphy wrote: > a. Fix GRUB by giving it the ability to modify UEFI NRAM "bootnext" value, > so that instead of chainloading the Windows bootloader from GRUB, GRUB > will modify the system NVRAM such that the next boot (only) will directly > boot the Windows bootloader. Thus far there's no

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring - bug report

On 22/07/26 09:54AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > If you want to watch activity on a package you want The little 'watch' > pulldown under The package description. You can set there if you want to > watch bugs, commits, both, etc. If you only wanted to watch koji builds, > you would need to set that in FMN

future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

Summary: Windows 10/11 increasingly enables Bitlocker (full disk encryption) out of the box with the encryption key sealed in the TPM. Two different issues result: 1. Fedora's installer, Anaconda, can't resize Bitlocker volumes. We could use better documentation to help the user perform the

Re: Some spins/labs to be dropped from F37

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:25:25AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > * Games Spin — https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games_Spin > Unless someone more experienced comes along, I'd be willing > to take a shot at maintaining the games spin. This is how someone becomes experienced. :) --

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring - bug report

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > Ah, It's a bit more tangled than I thought: > > I've somehow got an impression that the upstream release monitoring is > not related to Fedora, but I expected the BZ bot should be. > So I've looked for a place to report issues other

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

> On 26. 07. 22 17:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > I don't think so: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/1926c37598951ae307... > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1968550 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-925c18db47 Indeed. It

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

Kevin Fenzi writes: > Failures can be seen > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f37-failures.html dotnet-build-reference-packages and dotnet3.1 have a cyclic build dependency on each other. dotnet3.1 was intentionally retired. This package should have been retired along with it.

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

On 26. 07. 22 17:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: The %java_arches macro mentioned in the change proposal is available on F36 and up only I don't think so: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/1926c37598951ae30749eb212b2412973a0300e5?branch=f35

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK 3.2.0 in Rawhide

On 7/26/22 10:07 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into Rawhide.  This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable). NOTE: users of wxWidgets

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

> Next failure is portmidi due to "Drop_i686_JDKs" > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs > > I don't know how I missed that change proposal. I cannot even make sense of > the > English in those template mails (never got any myself). This is going to be a > lot of fun > ...

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40: On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK 3.2.0 in Rawhide

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into Rawhide.  This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable). NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly

[Bug 2110816] perl-File-Share-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110816 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On 26. 07. 22 15:40, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK 3.2.0 in Rawhide

On 7/25/22 10:18 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into Rawhide.  This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable). NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022). Policy:

[Bug 2110816] perl-File-Share-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110816 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 2110575] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.082 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110575 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a6671de59a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a6671de59a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages

Automated reports redirected into a new mailing list: test-reports

Hello testers and developers, please note that we've set up a new mailing list called test-reports [1] and we've redirected all automated compose/updates/test/etc reports into it. These reports were previously sent to the test list and devel list and created a lot of visual noise among regular

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK 3.2.0 in Rawhide

Hey! Sure I'll rebuild it soon вт, 26 июл. 2022 г. в 04:18, Scott Talbert : > > At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into > Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one > as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable). > > NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022). Policy:

Re: Is `/etc/sysconfig/desktop` still used?

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:09:39 +0100 Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > While updating this quick-doc, I came across the last section where > `/etc/sysconfig/desktop` is mentioned as a config file to change default > desktop environment etc. > >

[Bug 2110575] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.082 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110575 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.082-1.fc37

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages

Re: KOJI Rawhide error: "Empty %files file ...../debugsourcefiles.list"

Looks like it's caused by /usr/bin/file crashing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110622 -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Why is there antlr4-project package?

There is no right or wrong, I just saw this as unusual. I see this is a complex package and you went through some decision process when deciding on this. I would still do something about the manually expanded %mvn_install macro. Is it a big problem to have the java artifacts placed into a

Re: KOJI Rawhide error: "Empty %files file ...../debugsourcefiles.list"

Hi, We have noticed the same issue when we wanted to do a scratch build of Ruby https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90003939 . If someone manages to reproduce it, my colleague created this patch for the script that could be worth trying out:

Re: KOJI Rawhide error: "Empty %files file ...../debugsourcefiles.list"

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:49 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > Hi, > I've just started (scratch-)building MySQL 8.0.30. (package > 'community-mysql'). > And the build on Rawhide failed with an error message, I haven't seen > before: > > " > Processing files:

Re: Need to rename package? libphidget -> libphidget22

Richard Shaw wrote: > I am trying to update the libphidget package which has not been updated in > Fedora since 2014. > > Apparently in 2017 the name was changed to "libphidget22" I'm guessing the > soversion being embedded in the library name, seems awfully Debian > centric. > > The bigger

KOJI Rawhide error: "Empty %files file ...../debugsourcefiles.list"

Hi, I've just started (scratch-)building MySQL 8.0.30. (package 'community-mysql'). And the build on Rawhide failed with an error message, I haven't seen before: " Processing files: community-mysql-debugsource-8.0.30-1.fc37.x86_64 error: Empty %files file

Re: Why is there antlr4-project package?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:08 AM Marián Konček wrote: > > I used a wrong mailing list, I meant to send it here. > > I still see this approach as wrong. You can change the archfulness of > the main package. You can add a -java subpackage which is noarch and > provides the main package name for

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

Due to static linking, not all functions will be included in the executable and therefore some simple "hello world" binaries will not need sysprof-capture-static. However, anything that used the .pc file will need it. Technically, you could also use glib's static library without dependent .a

Is `/etc/sysconfig/desktop` still used?

Hi folks, While updating this quick-doc, I came across the last section where `/etc/sysconfig/desktop` is mentioned as a config file to change default desktop environment etc. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/switching-desktop-environments/ I haven't been able to find any

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:59 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:10:15AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > > On 7/26/22 07:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 7/24/22 15:42, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini > > >

Re: Why is there antlr4-project package?

I used a wrong mailing list, I meant to send it here. I still see this approach as wrong. You can change the archfulness of the main package. You can add a -java subpackage which is noarch and provides the main package name for example. In the .spec I see you manually invoke expanded

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:10:15AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 7/26/22 07:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 7/24/22 15:42, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >     Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 11:09:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > virt-p2v-1:1.42.1-1.fc37.src > > This is a real one. virt-p2v uses a small library called "miniexpect" > which is based on pcre but needs to be ported to pcre2. Fixed upstream now, I'll put it into Fedora after the next

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:58:18AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson ha > scritto: > > > This of course begs a question: did qemu also have a non-static pcre > > requirement at the time? But it seems not: > > > > [adamw@xps13k qemu (f36 %)]$ git show

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:19:55AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:10 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > Does this look right to you? Do you want me to add them in other > > branches as well or is rawhide sufficient for now? > > Rawhide is enough, for other branches QEMU is

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:10 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > Does this look right to you? Do you want me to add them in other > branches as well or is rawhide sufficient for now? Rawhide is enough, for other branches QEMU is working around it by requiring pcre-static. Thanks! I'm now debugging the

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

V Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:47:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 25. 07. 22 23:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 08:57:39AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora > > > 37 on 2022/07/20.

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On 7/25/22 10:23, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/25 0:45: Those both sound a lot like regressions in g_regex_match() to me. If you have time, any chance you could create smaller reproducers and file issues for these upstream at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib ? For

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On 7/26/22 07:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 7/24/22 15:42, Kalev Lember wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini > wrote:     Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson     mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> ha     scritto:     This of course begs

default network attack surface, networkmanager stands out

Hi, I've been looking at Fedora's default --after installation-- attack surface in terms of servers running, and I see chrony, and NetworkManager running. NetworkManager runs as root, while chrony runs as a dedicated user. NetworkManager according to lsof listens at the bootpc and dhcpv6-client

Re: F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Dan Čermák wrote: After the Emacs 28 PR got merged, I went ahead, built Emacs in Fedora 36 as well and submitted it as an update Why, by the way? This isn’t intended to be a veiled criticism, I’m genuinely interested. -- Peter

Re: F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Sat, 23 Jul 2022, Marcus Müller wrote: On 23.07.22 01:37, Peter Oliver wrote: The emacs developers discourage use of the GTK-only build on X11. Perhaps we will want a wrapper to select the most suitable binary. Oh, I wasn't aware of that, is there somewhere I can read up on that? See

[Test-Announce] Automated reports redirected into a new mailing list: test-reports

Hello testers and developers, please note that we've set up a new mailing list called test-reports [1] and we've redirected all automated compose/updates/test/etc reports into it. These reports were previously sent to the test list and devel list and created a lot of visual noise among regular

[Bug 2110575] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.082 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110575 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED