Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

On 01/23/2015 10:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folk, There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode for it. There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3]. ma.

Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

Folk, There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode for it. There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3]. ma. [1] https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Flash+0-Day+Exploit+Used+by+Angler+Ex

Re: firefox/vimeo

Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com ma. On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos with Firefox without Flash plugin. Same is not true if I use the Firefox build from upstream. Do we disable something on our build that may be respon

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

On 12/15/2014 03:25 PM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi, the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec which was disabled in Fedora Firefox, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155499 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1359 If you'd li

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

On 12/15/2014 10:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 12/15/2014 09:12 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec Are you sure? I've always assumed that Mozilla was more in the WebM/VP8 camp. Yes, I may be wrong here. But it seems to be necessary for the Mozilla

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

There's also a good page about it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenH264 ma. On 12/15/2014 09:12 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi, the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec which was disabled in Fedora Firefox, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155499 https://fedorahoste

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

Hi, the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec which was disabled in Fedora Firefox, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155499 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1359 If you'd like to use the WebRTC (and Mozilla Hello service) in Fedora Firefox, go to about:config and set those

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/23/2014 05:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: The tiles are coming from Mozilla. So yes please explain how the advertisers can track me through them if I don't click them. Much depends on what's in the tile. For example an embedded 1 pixel transparent gif, commonly known as a "web bug", and

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/20/2014 03:28 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote: It's not about tracking per se – I'm fine with e.g. opt-in usage reports that feed into research for making a better browser – that benefits me (in a very indirect and miniscule way, but in the end the purpose is for the *user's* benefit). Ads are a fe

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/17/2014 02:15 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: Well, how to put it ... Mozilla.com's role in fedora has many times been subject to controvercies, but doubts have always been ruled ;) They always get special exceptions for any and all Fedora policies that upstream does not wa

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Hi, It looks like the recent Firefox "Adds" does not break any Fedora rules so it's perfectly ok to ship it "as is". The H264 codec download feature break the Fedora law and has been removed from Fedora. When Fedora rules the Adds out of the apps it will be removed from FF immediately. Until

Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

Hi Folks, as you may know [0] Firefox in Fedora [1] is using Mozilla Location service [2] as a location provider instead of the Google one. I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler application [3] and help to improve the location accuracy. Thanks! ma. p.s.: Yes

Re: Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

On 11/06/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - Hi Folks, as you may know [0] Firefox in Fedora [1] is using Mozilla Location service [2] as a location provider instead of the Google one. I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler applica

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

IMO It would be great if anyone can step in, rebuild the gtk3 package for other Fedora's and maintain the copr repo. I can help with any issues with that so feel free to ask. ma. On 11/04/2014 12:37 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

. On 01/13/2014 04:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview. I'll provide Fedora builds and repo l

Re: Bodhi-Problem? -> Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1

On 09/08/2014 08:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 12:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stabl

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 09/03/2014 09:58 AM, Kẏra wrote: Testing has been great! I still really appreciate this repo. There have been a few firefox releases plus Fedora 21 is no longer rawhide so that could use its own repo. Any plans to update soon? I've been able to find these two bugs (though I haven't been able

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 06/09/2014 09:04 PM, Kẏra wrote: On that note, I haven't seen a new build in a while! When can we hope for an update? There are some patches waiting upstream for review so when those are done. I'd like also update the firefox-gtk3 build to Firefox 31. cool! can you link to bugs / review p

Re: Firefox 29.0.1

On 05/14/2014 12:37 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On May 14, 2014 7:57:25 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but only in an upcoming Firefox 30. Sure works in Windows with 29.0.1. Actually it works because of backout bug 991767

Re: Firefox 29.0.1

On 05/14/2014 10:20 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:59 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/2

Re: Firefox 29.0.1

Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). ma. On 05/13/2014 11:34 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: Could someone please build that. The blank PDF print thing is a bit annoying with 29. Thanks, -- devel

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote: First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is stunning. The difference is huge. Thanks! It also seems to be the only browser that has supported my HiDPI display (perhaps that's thanks to gtk3?). That's a great news, I was not aware

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

From the original post at [1]: "Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic location, and some will be sponsored content from hand-picked

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/28/2014 10:59 AM, Maros Zatko wrote: On 01/16/2014 12:54 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people. There's absolutel

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/16/2014 08:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3 contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there. Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/16/2014 01:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky: On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwi

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure QT firefox to get ri

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people. There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer. Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/14/2014 06:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Is it possible to split the NSAPI components out into a sub package and hence remove the dependence on gtk2 for those people that don't use NSAPI plugins? You can build your own package at copr. We can add some config flags to firefox spec to make

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

ansky/FirefoxGtk3/ On 01/13/2014 04:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview. I'll provide Fedora b

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 04:16 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 09:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: [...] It's the same as the gtk2 package, gstreamer support does not depend on toolkit. IIRC the test package has gstreamer enabled as well as the latest official Fedora Firefox builds. It was said in bug [1] comment 9 that it wouldn't be enabled un

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 09:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Martin Stransky: On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It&

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if you're not interested. Ok, I'll rephrase. I&#

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 04:55 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100 Martin Stransky wrote: Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if you're not interested. Ok, I'll rephrase. I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different from every other Firefox build that Fedora provides. Could you elaborate on the ch

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may work as

Firefox Gtk3 test package

Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview. I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

On 12/16/2013 09:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from git/cvs) Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache for koji to find them later. I'

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

On 12/15/2013 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:42:11PM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/patchcheck

Re: Firefox in Rawhide is out of date

Yes, that's it. But it looks like a rpm bug to me. Or we need to fix the nspr package to provide a correct modversion...no not a xulrunner/firefox issue after all. ma. On 27.6.2013 12:26, Sandro Mani wrote: The issue seems to be that the minimum-required nspr version in xulrunner is determine

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

On 09/24/2012 11:21 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: On 24/09/12 07:33, Martin Stransky wrote: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/thunderbird-testers/2012-September/94.html - Thunderbird 17ESR may be the last release created by mozilla thunderbird developers, all next ones may be driven

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

On 09/22/2012 01:02 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 21.09.2012 15:33, Martin Stransky pisze: Hi guys, as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from you (the 17ESR line is going to

Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

Hi guys, as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from you (the 17ESR line is going to be a background for the future ones) so it would be great if you can install it, run it and report any issues

Re: F17 Alpha and VMWare Fusion

Try i686 iso, the x86_64 is broken. On 03/06/2012 03:43 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote: Last night I attempted an install of F17 Alpha on VMWare Fusion. 1) My first attempt was using the install DVD. I was redirected into a text installer, I was not prompted to select packages. The resulting install

Re: Packaging a Firefox extension

On 10/30/2011 06:37 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: > Hi, > > I'm maintaining the Finnish spell checking extension for Firefox called > Mozvoikko. Upstream recently released a Javascript-based version of the > extension, which I've now packaged in Rawhide. Spec file here: >

Heads up - firefox desktop file change

Firefox desktop file name has been changed in rawhide, from mozilla-firefox.desktop to firefox.desktop. See bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736558. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Seeking for package review - Berusky 2 game

Hi, Berusky2 is a 3D sequel of Berusky and former commercial project: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200 project homepage: http://anakreon.cz/en/Berusky2.htm I promise the spec file is tinny and reviewer friendly :) Thnaks, ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Firefox 5 for Fedora 15?

On 06/22/2011 10:56 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 06/22/2011 02:55 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Hi, >> will Fedora 15's version of Firefox (currently 4.0.1) be updated to >> Firefox 5? >> >> The following koji builds let me asume it: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=249788

Re: GNOME 3 Fallback Mode

On 04/27/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > Lots of things are unfortunate. This is software, after all. I regret > not working on this earlier, since it would probably have saved the > effort invested in fallback mode entirely. I think the fallback mode is a great idea, not everyone is excite

Heads Up - New Firefox update

Hi, there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222). Bodhi links: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

On 10/04/2010 10:50 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2010/10/4 Martin Stransky: >> On 10/04/2010 10:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >>> Anyway, the situation is worser then people believe, because no matter >>> how many maintainers MoFo apps have in Fedora - they just can'

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

On 09/30/2010 08:54 PM, Sven Lankes wrote: > 2. The combination of the Mozilla Trademark issue combined with the > strict handling of patches by (corporate|distro)-maintainers (I don't > think that this is a RH/Fedora issue - same with Canonical/Ubuntu) > makes me feel uneasy about ff b

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

On 10/04/2010 10:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Anyway, the situation is worser then people believe, because no matter > how many maintainers MoFo apps have in Fedora - they just can't fix > bugs and close tickets, even ones with clean and sane patches > attached. Unfortunately you forget to attac

Heads Up - xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15)

There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration and so on, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634596#c3 https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_4_for_developers https://developer.mozill

Re: FF 3.6.9 update for F-13

On 09/21/2010 01:45 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:50 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: >> Isn't that a security related >> update? > > Ping... > I'm working on it, recently it's delayed in rel-eng: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4125 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Re: playing flash regression in f13-beta

On 04/24/2010 12:13 PM, Luming Yu wrote: > Hi there, > > I came across a really weird problem with flash player on playing > these video on http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/index.html > > For those featured videos like Bacteria-size Babies Among Ocean's Smallest > Life: > Linux (f12) i686

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

On 04/23/2010 11:11 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > On Friday 23 of April 2010 09:03:37 Martin Stransky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because >> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

On 04/23/2010 09:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/23/2010 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because >> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla &

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because >> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla &

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

Hi, we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'. I've asked for inclusion at upstream bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550455, if y

Re: F-13 xulrunner/firefox security update: need to rebuild dependents

Thanks. I've submitted missing packages here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Miro-3.0-2.fc13,mozvoikko-1.0-10.fc13,galeon-2.0.7-28.fc13,gnome-web-photo-0.9-8.fc13,gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-18.fc13 On 04/10/2010 02:51 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:18 AM,

Re: [SECURITY] Fedora 13 Update: xulrunner-1.9.2.3-1.fc13

On 04/10/2010 01:47 AM, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > Thank you for breaking every explicit gecko-libs dependency out there in > a branch close to release. :/ > > You know gecko-libs provides/requires are there exactly to avoid this > sort of thing, right? Both callion and xhorak can probably share some >

<    1   2