Re: Fedora 30 Not Working on Omen with nVidia

2019-05-28 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 28 May 2019 18:09:50 - "Personalized Marketing Inc" wrote: > Hello, I have tried to install Fedora 28, 29, and 30 on my HP Omen > with nVidia Graphics. Fedora 28 and 29 had issues with the Keyboard, > Fedora 30 tested just fine from the USB drive however after > installing it, the

Procedure to get keytable included in official console and X and wayland keytables.

2019-06-09 Thread stan via devel
I use a custom keymapping that I developed to save my hands, and because it is very efficient. It's strength is that the most used keys are under the strongest fingers, and that for my typing about 80% of what I type is on the home row. The problem is that whenever I have issues with my

Re: Procedure to get keytable included in official console and X and wayland keytables.

2019-06-10 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:22:02 +0200 Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Over the years I have resorted to different hacks to have my extra > mouse and keyboard keys mapped to either other keys or key > combinations, especially on laptops. With the changes on the stack, > I've had to abandon most of

Re: Procedure to get keytable included in official console and X and wayland keytables.

2019-06-10 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:24:21 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Keyboard mappings are managed by the kbd project [1, 2], > but actual non-legacy keymaps are converted from xkeyboard mappings > [3, 4]. (The idea is that it is best if the same mapping is available > in the graphical

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

2019-05-23 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 20 May 2019 14:33:57 -0400 Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > Right, but it's just a stepping stone to a world with universal > authentication, and granular authorization based on credentials from > that universal authentication. I hope that world never arrives. That would be

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-05-17)

2019-05-17 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 17 May 2019 22:56:37 +0200 Omar Diaa wrote: > PLEASE I DO NOT WANT THESE MAILS BLOCK ME FEDORA I AM NOT IN GSoC > ANYMORE, I UNSUBSCRIBEd +10 TIMES PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE MY GMAIL FROM > THIS PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Enable dmarc mitigations

2019-05-05 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 5 May 2019 14:19:59 +0200 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Hello, qrsBRWN. > > Sun, 05 May 2019 10:57:06 +0200 you wrote: > > > Exactly what platform did you have in mind? > > Discourse[1] for example. GTK developers already testing it[2] as > mailing lists replacement. > > 1:

Re: Upgrade to F30 gone wrong

2019-05-05 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 05 May 2019 12:45:00 -0400 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > It's been sitting in the grub menu ever since. > > I have a /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-f0fe67c2a80d43d2947358968ab5277e with > a 2013 timestamp. No idea which kernel it is. It appears to be immune > to installonly_limit. From an old

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

2019-06-27 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:32:26 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 06. 19 20:07, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 13:57 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3 > >> > >> == Summary == > >> In package and command names, "Python"

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

2019-06-27 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:09:07 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > No, we keep everything called python3, we just provide the "python" > name. With python2 -> python3, one of the problems was that > everything was just called "python" before. We are not proposing to > start doing that again. All packages

Re: adding speech installation to fedora network installation image

2019-06-27 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:26:23 +0200 Mmobilea wrote: > But I have tried fedora workstation net inst image, not server image. > I pressed alt+super+s, and orca doesn’t run on net installer. Next, I > thought, that I must to have wired internet connection. I created a > USB hodspot with my mobile

Re: adding speech installation to fedora network installation image

2019-06-26 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:26:14 +0200 Mmobilea wrote: > Hello, > I’m new blind user of fedora 30. I couldn’t find where to post this > request. I have small pendrive, and I must use network installer. > Howewer orca or speakup doesn’t run on it. Could you add speech to > the installer? Sorry for my

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

2019-09-12 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:32:45 +0100 "Ryan Walklin" wrote: > Thanks for the clarification, I hadn't realised the LV2 versions of > the plugins weren't working. I've managed to get the F29 version as > you suggest, and patched (attached) the scripts to force Python 2 so > I can run the GUI from

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

2019-09-10 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:06:39 +0300 Vascom wrote: > It is not dependency for pulseeffects. It's a dependency for pulseaudio-equalizer. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

2019-09-11 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:50:32 +0100 "Ryan Walklin" wrote: > I built pulseaudio-equalizer directly from github today and it > doesn't seem to be able to parse it's own config files? Which is a > pain because I'd prefer something lighter than pulseeffects for a > simple EQ. I built it on f31 from

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-11 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:41:14 -0400 Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > Wait---so you are using 32-bit Gnome on a 64-bit capable CPU running > 64-bit kernel? If the reason is to save 200MB of memory, you should > definitely try one of the memory-thrifty desktop environments like > xfce. > >

Re: adding speech installation to fedora network installation image

2019-06-28 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:01:23 +0200 Mmobilea wrote: > OK. If you can, open a new bug. Because of the response of mcatanzaro, Only the live image runs in a GNOME session where GNOME session services like orca are expected to be working. The netinstall image only runs anaconda, it doesn't run

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

2019-11-07 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:20:50 +0100 David Sommerseth wrote: > Please just watch the talk by Paul Vixie (who is one of the really > big DNS gurus these days, even ISC BIND maintainer for quite some > years). And you will see that DoH is pointless when you have DoT. > But DoT can also go much

Re: Something wrong with kernel-headers on fedora 30?

2019-11-07 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:31:23 -0500 "James Cassell" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > > I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have > > kernel-headers-5.3.6-200.fc30.x86_64, which hasn't updated. > > > > Is there a reason a new kernel-headers package hasn't been > >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Drop Optical Media Release Criterion

2019-12-13 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:34:29 -0500 Mike Pinkerton wrote: > I would say that the Everything netinstall image is more useful than > the Workstation Live image: > > * netinstall is smaller > * netinstall can be used to install servers > * netinstall with updates repo enabled yields current

Re: GNU IceCat Updates

2019-10-25 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 01:25:10 +0330 Alireza Hayati wrote: > Hello. I don't know if I'm right to ask this in this mailing list and > if I should post this elsewhere, please forgive me bothering you. > > I believe GNU IceCat updates are not shipped to Fedora repositories > and we're still using

Re: orphaning bleachbit

2019-12-22 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 21:57:01 +0100 Alessio wrote: > As I wrote in another e-mail, upstream is working to port the program > to python3. There is a related branch on github. Apologies for the noise. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: orphaning bleachbit

2019-12-22 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 19 May 2019 11:05:46 +0200 Silvia Sánchez wrote: > Yes, I know Python 2 will be soon removed, but I can't just let > Bleachbit die. It's too useful for that. > Finding a sponsor seems to be the hard bit. I've been looking for > one for ages. I have never used bleachbit, but I took a

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-04 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:58 +0100 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or against > fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 32. Please check existing reports

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-04 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:22:12 -0700 stan via devel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:58 +0100 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > > please report it against the appropriate package. Or against > &g

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

2020-02-16 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 10:57:26 -0700 "John M. Harris Jr" wrote: > On Monday, February 10, 2020 10:53:45 AM MST Jared K. Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:30 AM John M. Harris Jr > > > > > > wrote: > > > As for the software available, that's called choice. I know > > > it's a relative

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-04-14 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:18:02 -0500 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > NetworkManager has three DNS backends: default (nss-dns, what we use > currently), dnsmasq, and systemd-resolved. The default backend just > does the wrong thing and cannot be fixed. When either dnsmasq or > systemd-resolved is in

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-04-14 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:39:05 -0500 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:52 pm, stan via devel > wrote: > > Will the ability to turn off NetworkManager involvement in DNS in > > the configuration file (None) still remain? I use a local caching > > D

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-04-14 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:52:55 -0700 stan via devel wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:18:02 -0500 > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > NetworkManager has three DNS backends: default (nss-dns, what we > > use currently), dnsmasq, and systemd-resolved. The default backend > >

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-17 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:49:48 - "Leigh Scott" wrote: > If there any plan to fix them? > > https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202020-04-17%2013-32-22.png As a contrasting opinion, I accept, and am indifferent to, whatever wallpaper the Fedora release

Re: Self Introdction: nick black

2020-04-06 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:03:54 -0400 Nick Black wrote: > Now, a "notcurses-noffmpeg" version in Core and a > "notcurses+ffmpeg" in Fusion seems reasonable. Is this kind of > thing ever done? I think this is still true for audacity, mplayer, and chromium so they get patented video codec support.

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-06 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400 Christopher wrote: > I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora > crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save, > so I couldn't figure out how to get it to work with v4l2loopback. I You are using obs in a

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-06 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:47:53 -0400 Christopher wrote: > I actually got it working with v4l2loopback. It normally works quite That's great! > well. But, changing settings still crashes. That's not. > Literally, all I have to do is: File -> Settings -> toggle any setting > (just to make "Apply"

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-05 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400 Christopher wrote: > Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like > to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I > keep running into problems with SecureBoot. I don't really know what > I'm doing with mokutil or

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-04-15 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:46:02 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > resolved has three modes: [Snipped for brevity.] Thanks. Saved for future reference. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

2020-05-15 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200 Michal Srb wrote: > > I realize that this is technically possible to achieve, but that is > > not how people use it. If you want to distribute your Java app, you > > just bundle it with all its dependencies into a beefy tarball and > > ship it. And if Java apps

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

2020-05-16 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 16 May 2020 11:23:03 +0200 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit : > > On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200 > > Michal Srb wrote: > > > > An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that all Java apps

Re: Bugzilla signal/noise ratio

2020-03-23 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:13:05 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' > Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > [...] > > > The bottom line is that these tools need to support our > > > workflows, not try

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

2020-09-09 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:30 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:35:11PM -0700, stan via devel wrote: > > Does it now have support for custom keymappings? That is, does it > > have a way to set a user keymap as the default? X has a very mature > > system

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

2020-09-08 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:28:20 -0400 Ben Cotton wrote: > Is Wayland ready? > Wayland has been used by default for Fedora Workstation (which uses > GNOME) since Fedora 25. And while it was somewhat immature initially, > today it is a very rock-solid experience on virtually everything >

Re: RPM package for gql

2020-10-06 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 02:30:10 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Why not look into the "pyprpm" tool to build a source RPM to start > with, to see if it has the dependency stack of doom common to some > other python modules? I think you meant "pyp2rpm".

System no longer distributes load to multiple cores for long running task

2020-09-21 Thread stan via devel
Hi, It's been a while (6 months?) since I ran a python program that uses a 100% cpu core for hours. The last time I ran it, the task would migrate from core to core to core, every second or so. I could see it doing so in the various tops. Now, it runs on only one core, and doesn't move. This

Problem building kernel 5.9 rc6 from src.rpm when perf enabled, looks to be a script error, a typo

2020-09-28 Thread stan via devel
Hi, When building the kernel with perf enabled from the src.rpm kernel-5.9.0-0.rc6.20200925git171d4ff79f96.17.fc34.src.rpm I get an error. There seems to be an error in one of the build scripts. This was not a problem in src.rpm for kernel-5.9.0-0.rc4.20200911git581cb3a26baf.8.fc34.src.rpm The

Re: Does the installer detects when a distro have already created BLS?

2020-05-24 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 24 May 2020 14:56:34 -0400 Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > I have installed the May 22 Rawhide on a disk today, and I am now > realizing that the installer did not helped me enough to create valid > Boot Loader Specification partitions. > > So I wanted (still want) to make this disk

Re: Problem signing custom kernel package

2020-10-25 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 06:20:16 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm following the directions here[1] on building a custom kernel to > test some patches[2] related to suspend[3] on my new HP ENVY X360 AMD > laptop without S3 support. > > The directions could be updated to include which commands need to

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

2020-07-09 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:07:39 +0300 nick...@gmail.com wrote: > Yes, that's why "secure boot" should only be an option and the user > must have the option to turn it off. Otherwise, it wouldn't be > possible to do any kernel development on that computer. For my edification. I build custom

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

2020-07-09 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 23:10:46 +0300 nick...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 11:17 -0700, stan via devel wrote: > > That is, isn't this only an issue if the person doing the kernel > > development hasn't generated their own key, and isn't signing their >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-07 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400 Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > An obvious example is Firefox. Upstream, the Firefox project builds > primarily with Clang/LLVM. Yet we force the Fedora package owner to > find and fix issues building with GCC then

Re: Increasing the packaging team: regular workshops/vFADs/classroom sessions on packaging

2020-06-06 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 06:40:43 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Mender > wrote: > > As someone who just recently started out with packaging and has a > > fresh view on the problem, I would be more than happy to help out > > with the docs :). > > > > YES PLEASE.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:29:27 -0600 Jeff Law wrote: > On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 13:07 -0700, stan via devel wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400 > > Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > > > A

Re: Supporting hibernation in Workstation ed., draft 1

2020-06-04 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:01:37 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > > Just following the conversation for information purposes, but I have > > questions. If systemd-boot were to be used as boot service, could > > the hibernate image be written to /boot/efi in place of the kernel > > and initramfs, or in

Re: Supporting hibernation in Workstation ed., draft 1

2020-06-04 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:13:59 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > Also, as it relates to authenticated encrypted hibernation images, the > upstream proposal is that since hibernation images can exist anywhere, > they should always be encrypted independently from swap, and therefore > not depend on whether

Re: Building kernel rpms with KASAN enabled

2020-07-16 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:02:02 -0400 Steve Grubb wrote: > What is the best way to build an official Fedora kernel SRPM with > KASAN=y? This is the official documentation for building a custom kernel. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel It might already be set in the stock

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-07-28 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:07 -0400 Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM > How can it be disabled? > > Immediately: > swapoff /dev/zram0 > > Permanently: > rm /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf I realize this is a really late reply, but I wanted to

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-07-29 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:51:00 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > That information is stale. The feature page has been updated. > > man page contains: > >To disable a configuration file supplied by the vendor, the > recommended way is to place a symlink to /dev/null in the > configuration

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

2020-11-23 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:47:04 +0100 Andy Mender wrote: > Is ALSA still a valid use case? I thought ALSA support was phased out > from most relevant software? It is for me. I run some audio software that I do not want interrupted while it is running. So, I use pavucontrol to turn it off to

Re: Dell XPS 13 9310 Fingerprint Driver

2020-12-01 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:16:35 - "Ondra Kalousek" wrote: > Hello. I want to buy myself Dell XPS 13 9310 (2020). The unit will > arrive in few weeks, so I used the time to ask this questio. It has a > fingerprint sensor Goodix 27c6:533c. But official driver is for > Ubuntu and no RPM. There is

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-12 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:28:57 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > I'm strongly against change master to main , just because master > suggest that is a racist word as master/slave, is like change chess > and play not with black and white pieces but maybe with green and > blue . This change will deprecate

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-12 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:09:46 -0700 stan wrote: > Is this really the best use of resources to combat > that? What if all the money dedicated to implementing this across the tech industry was dedicated instead to a stem scholarship fund. Students who qualify to a stem program at a certified

Re: Problems upgrading to f33 cloud edition

2020-12-18 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:25:30 +0100 Guido Aulisi wrote: > Hi, sorry for posting here if this is not correct. Probably more appropriate for the user list. > I'm upgraing a f32 cloud edition to f33 and I found this problem which > I can't solve: > > $ sudo dnf system-upgrade --releasever 33

Re: Problem signing custom kernel package

2020-10-29 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:13:03 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM stan via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Convert the private key and pem certificate to a pk12 structure. > > openssl pkcs12 -export -out kernel_key.p

Re: Fedora Account Migration & Production Deployment Update: COMPLETE!

2021-03-28 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 23:02:58 +0100 Björn Persson wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'd like us to add security query/respond pairs. > There's a limited supply of such personal secrets that I can be sure > I'll remember, so I can't do that for too many sites. It also requires > a not too public

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

2021-03-10 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:26:55 +0100 Björn Persson wrote: > It's better to give the whole distribution its own name, and not name > it after any of its components. Fedora is a software distribution. It > contains Linux, many GNU components, RPM, MariaDB, Libreoffice and > lots of other things, but

Re: Building custom kernels

2021-03-03 Thread stan via devel
Thanks for doing the work and posting the result / solution. On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:19:14 +0100 Julian Sikorski wrote: > I did actually manage to get this working, big thanks go to > chenxiaolong for their guide [1]. I did mix-and-match some of the > info from Fedora docs [2][3], mainly

Re: Building custom kernels

2021-03-03 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:27:16 +0100 Julian Sikorski wrote: > Am 03.03.21 um 14:00 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: > > > > There seems to be some documentation on the wiki: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BuildingUpstreamKernel#Sign_the_kernel_for_Secure_Boot > > > > Regards, > >

Re: Where has the kernel-doc package gone?

2021-08-31 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:07:21 - "Nils K" wrote: > I recently had to perform a bit of development/research where I often > had to take a look in the kernel documentation. > > Most of the time was spend offline so I wanted to download the > `kernel-doc` package however it does not seem to

Re: FF builds

2021-09-10 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:42:09 -0400 Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Just being devil's advocate for a second here... > > > > Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the > > builds that slow? > > > > :-) > > This is also a

Re: Mic recording issues from browsers

2022-01-02 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 02:00:34 +0100 Pawel Veselov wrote: > Greetings! > > I've been banging my head against this wall for a while now, and would > really appreciate some pointers. > > I can no longer record Google Meet meetings using RecordRTC > (https://www.webrtc-experiment.com/RecordRTC/).

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

2021-11-07 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:58:56 - "Leigh Scott" wrote: > I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm. > [snip] > > I've found nothing provides /usr/lib64/dri/simpledrm_dri.so I don't have that file (on rawhide) and my system boots fine with my custom compiled

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-11-30 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:49:24 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: > I think it would be more constructive if you enumerated pros/cons of > sudo to support your argument then the tradition. Not the original poster, but I find that I like the separation of roles into two. When I do things as root, I

Re: glibc 2.34 vs firefox in rawhide vs mass build rebuild

2021-07-20 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 12:17:34 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > Firefox in rawhide hasn't been built successfully since > firefox-89.0-1.fc35 (built 2021-06-02). Unfortunately that version > does not treat the clone3 system call correctly in its sandbox, so it > won't work with future glibc 2.34

Re: "rescue" boot entry files are not updated on OS upgrades

2022-03-01 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:37:38 -0700 Chris Murphy wrote: > Summary-- > Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry > containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never > updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become > stale as a

Re: RFI/RFC: Fedora Linux graphical recovery environment

2022-04-05 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 15:58:14 -0500 Gregory Bartholomew wrote: > > Of topic but related: I wish there was supported option to remove > > the current rescue kernel, > > Is echo "dracut_rescue_image=no" > /etc/dracut.conf.d/rescue.conf not > sufficient? That is an interesting option. It isn't

Re: RFI/RFC: Fedora Linux graphical recovery environment

2022-04-06 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:35:16 -0500 Gregory Bartholomew wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 9:40 PM Gordon Messmer > wrote: > > > The ticket mentions Boot Repair, which is the first thing that > > comes to mind: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Boot-Repair > > > Boot repair is obviously tricky

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-06 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 06:28:59 +0200 majid hussain wrote: > could someone kindly tell me if my toshiba l750 machine has EFI > support? i'm blind and efi/bios screens are in accessible. This question is better suited to the user list rather than this thread, but if your laptop came with windows 8

Re: RFI/RFC: Fedora Linux graphical recovery environment

2022-04-06 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:26:35 -0500 Gregory Bartholomew wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM stan via devel > wrote: > > I just manually remove the rescue vmlinuz and initramfs and > > then run > > /usr/lib/kernel/install.d/51-dracut-rescue.install add $(uname

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

2023-10-31 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:23:41 +0100 Petr Pisar wrote: > I would would like to hear your opinion: Should DNF5 start verifying > all packages? Should DNF5 keep ignoring signatures for > out-of-repository packages? Or should rather narrow the verification > skip to packages from a local file system?

Re: Help running centpkg

2023-10-07 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:05:25 - "Michael Dawson" wrote: > I'm trying to build > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs using centpkg but > am running into errors. > > I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild > --with=bundled in the directory where I've

Re: Fedora 37: Add kernel parameters that help prevent local exploits

2022-05-20 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 20 May 2022 13:26:14 +0100 Simon Farnsworth via devel wrote: > On Thursday, 19 May 2022 04:15:16 BST Hellosway Here via devel wrote: > > Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 > > page_alloc.shuffle=1 pti=on randomize_kstack_offset=on > > vsyscall=none ` as default kernel

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

2022-05-27 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 26 May 2022 15:52:06 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > > Did you run the command

OT: triggered Re: You can't be serious! you want to remove mesa-libGL.i686 support?

2022-07-06 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:59:08 -0400 Stephen Smoogen wrote: > Thank you for your pointers. I have reflected on my original email and > agree I made several mistakes in that email: > I did not know the size of the bug problem. > I did not investigate why the bugs were filed. > I approached this as a

Re: PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36

2022-04-16 Thread stan via devel
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:23:45 -0400 Mark Bidewell wrote: > I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. Well, it's a gray area. It is still in beta, final decision is next week. So, you are more likely to get action on the test list. This doesn't seem egregious enough

Re: Failed RPM database migrations

2022-10-28 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:59:54 - "Sergey Mende" wrote: > thank you, I got the recipe from the previous conversations. I just > asked if I could help with logs analysis or somehow else before I fix > the issue. Sorry for the misunderstanding. ___

Re: Failed RPM database migrations

2022-10-28 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:08:19 - "Sergey Mende" wrote: > I upgraded from 35 to 36 in the beginning of Sept this year. The > migration failed. May I help somehow? I used the advice from Tom Hughes in his earlier message to complete my failed migration. # systemctl enable rpmdb-migrate #

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:06:29 - "Richard Myers" wrote: > This is for F35 -> F37 ... > > I sure > would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which > shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or > 4 Fedora revisions, maybe more): > > Traceback

Re: I made a new Fedora Apps page, do you want it?

2022-09-08 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:38:49 +0200 Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello, > > I am reimplementing the current https://apps.fedoraproject.org > page. It is not finished yet, but I wanted to share a demo with you: > https://fedora-apps.netlify.app > > The upstream is here:

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-16 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:06:42 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of > lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 [snip list of lv2-devel conflicts]

Aside: Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

2022-09-16 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:57:53 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > We have "critical path" groups for lots of desktops, including ones > that aren't release-blocking: deepin, lxde, lxqt, and xfce. The logic > here is approximately: things that are critical to those desktops are > indeed critical to

Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1

2022-10-01 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:19:44 +0200 Björn Persson wrote: > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Considering that we have been shipping these hardware codec > > interfaces for years without any legal trouble, I find this > > absolutely ridiculous. > > The entire codec patent business is absolutely

Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1

2022-09-29 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:24:34 +0200 Julian Sikorski wrote: > Wasn't this being used by firefox? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration I don't know if it is used, but I received messages from firefox nightly that VA-API support was missing when I ran it in the terminal

Re: Macro expanded on comment?

2022-12-28 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 12:29:21 -0600 Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > I commented out a SOURCES line in a spec file to test something and > got an interesting warning: “Macro expanded in comment on line …”. I > assume it’s just that, a warning, but was kinda surprised to see a > commented-out line

Re: firefox glxtest: VA-API test failed: no supported VAAPI profile found.

2023-01-28 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:31:21 - Reon Beon via devel wrote: > It seems to be this bug: > https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/fedy/issues/110 Strictly speaking, it is not a bug. The fedora mesa rpm was deliberately changed to remove some va-api and vdpau support because of patent issues. When

Re: New machine - no virtual terminals

2023-03-23 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:12:42 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > I read through the motherboard manual and while I don't see a way to > turn off the on-board VGA hardware from the BIOS, there is a physical > switch on the motherboard to disable it completely. > > I tried that, and it worked. Now

Re: New machine - no virtual terminals

2023-03-21 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:25:36 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > I recently put a new machine together using an AMD Radeon PRO W6600 > Graphics Card. CPU is a threadripper pro. Motherboard is an ASUS > Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI II sWRX8 E-ATX. Software is the KDE spin > of Fedora 37. > > It

Re: New machine - no virtual terminals

2023-03-22 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:14:44 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > I think I'm finally getting somewhere with this problem. > > My motherboard has a built-in VGA interface, which shows up as > "astdrmfb" on fb0. My AMD video card is "amdgpudrmfb" on fb1. > > For some reason, the kernel uses fb1

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

2023-04-12 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a): > > > > I have the following defined in .bashrc: > > > > # this logs the history explicitly before exiting a shell > > hx () > > { > >hi

Re: Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38?

2023-04-25 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 + (UTC) Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade > from F37 and so I was wondering about it. As near as I can tell, there is no package in fedora called texlive-was-9. There is a package

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-25 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:47:07 +0200 Kamil Paral wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:21 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > I propose that we transition devel list, and eventually most of our > > mailing lists, to Fedora Discussion (our Discourse-powered forum). > project is going to die

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-27 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:01:15 -0400 Stephen Smoogen wrote: > I am NOT a proponent of this proposal. I don't want to go to > Discourse. Web interfaces like that cause me cognitive pain and > grumpiness to use longer than a few minutes. As such I know my > involvement with Fedora will go down

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

2023-04-11 Thread stan via devel
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:48:11 -0400 "Chris Murphy" wrote: > Hi, > > For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal > tab/windows. It seems like the last tab or window to close is the > history that gets written to .bash_history, and everything else is > just lost. > > Somehow

  1   2   >