On 3 August 2017 at 04:55, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> This looks like a trend: sqlite started doing this and now python :). I
> dislike being forced to specify versions after I've been on my best behavior
> and made sure that my tools work with up-to-date software. If
On 07/28/2017 02:21 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28.7.2017 20:11, Colin Walters wrote:
That's actually something I hadn't even considered; is it proposed
here to actually have a flag day where all (or even some) of the
python3 executables
start using /usr/bin/python and everything else is
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:29:30AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
>
> MH> I just had a discussion with Tomáš Orsava and Petr Viktorin on
> MH> #fedora-python. Rather than asking FESCo now to allow mass
> MH> fully-automated spec
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:29:30AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
>
> MH> I just had a discussion with Tomáš Orsava and Petr Viktorin on
> MH> #fedora-python. Rather than asking FESCo now to allow mass
> MH> fully-automated spec
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> I just had a discussion with Tomáš Orsava and Petr Viktorin on
MH> #fedora-python. Rather than asking FESCo now to allow mass
MH> fully-automated spec changing, we'll open bugs as planned, but we'll
MH> attach patches generated by your
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> I just had a discussion with Tomáš Orsava and Petr Viktorin on
MH> #fedora-python. Rather than asking FESCo now to allow mass
MH> fully-automated spec changing, we'll open bugs as planned, but we'll
MH> attach patches generated by your
On 29.7.2017 01:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 31 July 2017 at 05:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> If I am writing it as /bin/sh I am expecting that bash, zsh, etc are going
> to fall into POSIX conformant mode outlined many years ago. Then the script
> I run should work on everything from that SunOS-4.1.1 box needed for
On 31 July 2017 at 05:40, Björn Persson wrote:
> Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:06:45 +0200, you wrote:
>> >Why is not providing /usr/bin/python more use hostile? Why is it better
>> >for any script to use /usr/bin/python instead of
On 31 July 2017 at 05:19, Björn Persson wrote:
> Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 00:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > So that's effectively a hard design constraint for me: folks
>> > targeting EL6 and EL7 *are* going to have to use
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:06:45 +0200, you wrote:
> >Why is not providing /usr/bin/python more use hostile? Why is it better
> >for any script to use /usr/bin/python instead of /usr/bin/python3?
>
> Because any user of Fedora trying to learn Python
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 00:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > So that's effectively a hard design constraint for me: folks
> > targeting EL6 and EL7 *are* going to have to use "/usr/bin/python" in
> > their shebang lines (since they can't even assume
On 30 July 2017 at 10:02, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > Providing
> > an unversioned "python" serves only to lure incautious programmers into
> > using it where they should use a versioned name.
>
> My aim is for folks to start thinking of a "/usr/bin/python" shebang
> as being
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:11:56 -0400, you wrote:
>> One of Fedora's stated goals is to remain close to the upstream.
>> Upstream Python is going to change /usr/bin/python to mean Python 3. If
>> AH keeps it on Python 2, it will be confusing for Python programmers
>> using AH. It will be especially
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:06:45 +0200, you wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:29:12PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> It's only /usr/bin/python itself that still presents an unsolved
>> problem, since the status quo (not providing it at all) is even more
>> user hostile than pointing it at a modern
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 00:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 30 July 2017 at 07:57, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > > To be honest, given how much energy is spent on this migration
> > > for a very low gain, it makes me feel like
On 30 July 2017 at 07:57, Björn Persson wrote:
> Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> To be honest, given how much energy is spent on this migration for a
>> very low gain, it makes me feel like having an unversioned "python"
>> (whether as package or executable
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> To be honest, given how much energy is spent on this migration for a
> very low gain, it makes me feel like having an unversioned "python"
> (whether as package or executable names) was a mistake we should let
> disappear with Python 2.
I agree.
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
The most important step would be to *NOT* change /usr/bin/python to
/usr/bin/python3, but have it provided by a separate (non-default) package. For
Fedora and RHEL, this would mean the separate package does not get installed
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:44:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:44:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >>On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>wrote:
> >>>Do you think it'd
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >>On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>wrote:
> >>>Do you think it'd
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 21:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:29:12PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > It's only /usr/bin/python itself that still presents an unsolved
> > problem, since the status quo (not providing it at all) is even
> > more user hostile than pointing it at
So excited to see this coming along so well!
o/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then
On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> > renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
> >
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> > renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
> >
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 14:11 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> First, I don't see a need for even mild pejoratives; instead of
> "normal" you could say
> for example "other editions".
My apologies - I was just struggling with terminology. No offense
intended.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:29:12PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> It's only /usr/bin/python itself that still presents an unsolved
> problem, since the status quo (not providing it at all) is even more
> user hostile than pointing it at a modern version of Python 3 that
Why is not providing
On 28.7.2017 20:11, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 01:53 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH
anytime soon. It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is
quite
On 28.7.2017 20:11, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 01:53 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH
anytime soon. It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is
quite
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 01:53 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH
> > anytime soon. It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is
> > quite
> > low.
>
> One of Fedora's
On 28.7.2017 18:38, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok > wrote:
On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
I made this comment previously but because I think it's
important I'm going to repeat
On 28.7.2017 18:41, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
It's up to the maintainers of Atomic Host to decide what's there. I
don't see how that relates to this thread. We have never said anything
about what is supposed to be or not to be in the Atomic
On 28.7.2017 18:41, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
It's up to the maintainers of Atomic Host to decide what's there. I
don't see how that relates to this thread. We have never said anything
about what is supposed to be or not to be in the Atomic
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH
> anytime soon. It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is
> quite
> low.
One of Fedora's stated goals is to remain close to the upstream.
Upstream Python is
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> It's up to the maintainers of Atomic Host to decide what's there. I
> don't see how that relates to this thread. We have never said anything
> about what is supposed to be or not to be in the Atomic Host.
I'm opposed to switching the
On 28 July 2017 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
>
>> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
>> going to repeat it.
>>
>
> Yes, we hear you.
>
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated
On 28 July 2017 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
>
>> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
>> going to repeat it.
>>
>
> Yes, we hear you.
>
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated
On 28 July 2017 at 08:29, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 28 July 2017 at 20:48, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python
> upstream.
> >
> > That
On 28.7.2017 17:51, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The change has to
start somewhere and even though I cannot really speak about RHEL,
I would think that changing it in Fedora first makes more sense.
There hasn't been a single "Fedora" since we
On 28.7.2017 17:51, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The change has to
start somewhere and even though I cannot really speak about RHEL,
I would think that changing it in Fedora first makes more sense.
There hasn't been a single "Fedora" since we
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The change has to
> start somewhere and even though I cannot really speak about RHEL,
> I would think that changing it in Fedora first makes more sense.
There hasn't been a single "Fedora" since we landed the editions,
although that's
On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
going to repeat it.
Yes, we hear you.
Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
It is. However it is hard to coordinate a future change with RHEL7 that
On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
going to repeat it.
Yes, we hear you.
Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
It is. However it is hard to coordinate a future change with RHEL7 that
On 28.7.2017 16:17, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 07:47 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with
On 28.7.2017 16:17, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 07:47 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with
On 28.7.2017 14:29, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
On 28.7.2017 14:29, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
On 28.7.2017 12:48, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again?
Seems like a never ending story, right? :(
> That really seems like a nonstarter; previous> discussion
On 28.7.2017 12:48, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again?
Seems like a never ending story, right? :(
> That really seems like a nonstarter; previous> discussion
On 28.7.2017 12:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming?
May be possible but given the variety in
On 28.7.2017 09:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
do it in rawhide now and get the
On 28.7.2017 09:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
do it in rawhide now and get the
On 29 July 2017 at 00:25, John Dennis wrote:
> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going
> to repeat it.
>
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
>
> Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but
On 29 July 2017 at 00:25, John Dennis wrote:
> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going
> to repeat it.
>
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
>
> Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but
I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
going to repeat it.
Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but the real
world reality is spec files are shared between both. At the
I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
going to repeat it.
Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but the real
world reality is spec files are shared between both. At the
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 07:47 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
> >
> > That
On 28 July 2017 at 22:29, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> Plus just breaking everyone's random old scripts. Now, I
>> don't know if this has been discussed upstream
>
> This is a statement born of ignorance, but ...
>
> Would it
On 07/28/2017 11:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> So instead of taking this slowly, I'd rather go through FESCo
> and public announcement on fedora-devel, and then just apply the change
> to as many packages as possible at once.
I concur. I think this is one of the cases where we should
On 28 July 2017 at 20:48, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
>
> That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
> discussion specifically
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
>
> That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
> discussion specifically around
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
>
> That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
> discussion
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
discussion specifically around Atomic Host + Ansible:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> >renaming?
>
> May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't
> think it would be
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> >renaming?
>
> May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't
> think it would be
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
> do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with? That should
>
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
> do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with? That should
>
On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming?
May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't think
it would be easy. IMHO taking a bunch of provenpackagers and updating
the packages
On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming?
May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't think
it would be easy. IMHO taking a bunch of provenpackagers and updating
the packages
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with? That should
significantly cut down on the number of misnamed packages and let
packagers spend their
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with? That should
significantly cut down on the number of misnamed packages and let
packagers spend their
Hello fellow Fedora contributors,
We've created a page on Fedora wiki [1] that's something like a Change
proposal*.
The document is called "Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3" and it
describes steps needed in order to:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation w
Hello fellow Fedora contributors,
We've created a page on Fedora wiki [1] that's something like a Change
proposal*.
The document is called "Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3" and it
describes steps needed in order to:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation w
77 matches
Mail list logo