RE: #7689 NORM 8.2.0 (: Addition of Bislama Language for Vanuatu

2010-04-12 Thread john herd
Yes -Original Message- From: Zarro Boogs per Child [mailto:bugtrac...@laptop.org] Sent: Mon 12/04/2010 11:40 AM Cc: b...@lists.laptop.org Subject: Re: #7689 NORM 8.2.0 (: Addition of Bislama Language for Vanuatu #7689: Addition of Bislama Language for Vanuatu

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 17:57 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Finally, I guess you have thought of it, but by the time 10.2 will be out F11 repositories will be down and thus the builds totally frozen software-wise. I think it would have been better to rebase on F12 6 months ago. Now it's

olpc-os-builder config tweaks

2010-04-12 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Chris, I added a mechanism so that we can keep separate the OLPC-specific configuration from the sample config that can be reused by deployments, and I stripped out the OLPC-specific bits from those default configs. So you'll want to create a cjb-specific config file somewhere with this

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread James Zaki
I'm guilty of spending more time than I probably should at newgrounds.com, their slogan being Everything, by Everyone. Its a melting pot of free content, and what really impresses me are the absolute gems of creativity that one finds from time to time. I dont see flash as the main XO education

Re: olpc-os-builder config tweaks

2010-04-12 Thread Daniel Drake
I also fixed a small issue in the configuration where public_rpm packages were not overriding F11 updates...be sure to double-check the list of package changes in the next build. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
Sorry, guys, but I just don't see why the content is somehow corrupted or limited by deployment on the Flash platform.The FlashPlayer implements a virtual machine that is customized by Adobe to run on various hardware and OSs. They're extending it now to ARM-processor-based devices (cell

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Stanley Sokolow overb...@earthlink.net wrote: So, please explain why constructionist educational models can't be Nobody has stated that it can't be done. But experience shows the opposite correlation (and I have worked in many edu projects using Flash myself,

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
You can see the Xubuntu system running on our XO-1 at: Internet Math Tutoring / OLPC Project http://internetmathtutoring.com/olpc/static.php?page=static090711-100100. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Stanley Sokolow overb...@earthlink.netwrote: Sorry, guys, but I just don't see why the content

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Paul Fox
stanley wrote: You can see the Xubuntu system running on our XO-1 at: Internet Math Tutoring / OLPC Project http://internetmathtutoring.com/olpc/static.php?page=static090711-100100. what does this have to do with flash? On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Stanley Sokolow

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, has a free-open-source IDE (FlashDevelop) from a community, does this run on the XO? Nope. We're to believe that Flash is appropriate for constructionism on the XO even though it doesn't allow XO users to construct anything. - Chris. -- Chris Ball c...@laptop.org One Laptop Per

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
Hey Chris, On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os119 Compressed image size: 678.36mb (+0.01mb since build 118) Description of changes in this build:  * kernel: allow negotiation of

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
That page shows Vyew.com running on Xubuntu on the XO-1. In my experience, Vyew.com is something outstanding for learning with low barriers of entry and no ceiling that Martin asked to see built with Flash. (Stanford University uses Vyew for its Stanford Engineering

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Daniel Drake
On 12 April 2010 14:51, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I've got some more time and have finally had a chance to look at these further. From an initial looks it looks like your getting exim due to the cronie deps on /usr/bin/sendmail. If you add an explicit 'ssmtp' into the .ks that

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 12 April 2010 14:51, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I've got some more time and have finally had a chance to look at these further. From an initial looks it looks like your getting exim due to the cronie deps

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
I guess I don't understand constructionism. Is it reasonable to require that the development system run on the target machine?If Apple had this requirement, all of the iPhone/iPod/iPad applications would be gone. We wouldn't have any of the millions of devices (mp3 players, routers, modems,

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Richard A. Smith
On 04/12/2010 02:10 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Which burnin package are you referring to? olpc-runin-tests-0.9.15-1.noarch? I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give you the answer. The runin scripts are all bash. Not sure why perl would be a dependency. Perhaps

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
Nobody has stated that it can't be done. But experience shows the opposite correlation (and I have worked in many edu projects using Flash myself, some huge such as TLF's SOCCI). Maybe it's a cultural problem (ie: people who get excited with Flash things singing and dancing tend to build

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Paul Fox
stanley wrote: I guess I don't understand constructionism. i think that's right. Is it reasonable to require that the development system run on the target machine? yes. it's one of the reasons most activities, and many of the system, is coded in python. If Apple had this

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Paul Fox
smith wrote: On 04/12/2010 02:10 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Which burnin package are you referring to? olpc-runin-tests-0.9.15-1.noarch? I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give you the answer. The runin scripts are all bash. Not sure why

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Carlos Nazareno object...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, how is this Flash's fault? I didn't say it was its fault -- I did point out the same cultural issue you mention. And shiny distracts. You are writing very long emails and not pointing to compelling deep and rich

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Richard A. Smith
On 04/12/2010 02:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: perl? I created them on the XO so anything that I used should have already been installed. Except for where I specified extra stuff I needed. :) like lm_sensors which requires perl. So I need to find a way to read the CPU temp without lm_sensors

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: On 04/12/2010 02:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: perl?  I created them on the XO so anything that I used should have already been installed. Except for where I specified extra stuff I needed. :) like lm_sensors which

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Daniel Drake
On 12 April 2010 15:45, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: Except for where I specified extra stuff I needed. :) like lm_sensors which requires perl. So I need to find a way to read the CPU temp without lm_sensors or we somehow need to break lm_sensors use of perl. It's really easy

Fwd: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
-- Forwarded message -- From: Stanley Sokolow overb...@earthlink.net Date: Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:02 PM Subject: Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC To: Paul Fox p...@laptop.org Sorry, Paul, I just can't accept the idea that the target audience of the OLPC projects must necessarily include

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Jon Nettleton
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 12 April 2010 14:51, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I've got some more time and have finally had a chance to look at these further.

Re: [Server-devel] XS: Lanbond0 and eth0 problem

2010-04-12 Thread Sameer Verma
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:40 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Juan G. Narvaez gnrvz...@gmail.com wrote: I made some changes on the ks.cfg file like keyboard layout, timezone, etc... Can an

Re: Fwd: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Paul Fox
stanley wrote: Sorry, Paul, I just can't accept the idea that the target audience of the OLPC projects must necessarily include kids who are capable and interested in re-programming the software activities they're using.Moreover, would you want to modify and re-compile your

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Richard A. Smith
On 04/12/2010 02:51 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: find /sys -name '*cputemp*' /sys/devices/platform/via_cputemp.0 Awesome! I'll change my scripts and remove that dependency. Thanks. -- Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org One Laptop per Child ___ Devel

Re: [Server-devel] XS: Lanbond0 and eth0 problem

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Speaking of the network, do we have a logical diagram of the network on the XS (interface, bond memberships, etc) ? Not that I know of. I posted here explaining my plan right before implementing it, and it did have some

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119 To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Cc: Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Fedora OLPC fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com Date: Monday, April 12,

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
'yum remove perl' will give you the answer. Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my permanent SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By doing so, I've saved about 33 MB of space in jffs2. Is that a large enough savings (given a 4000 MB XO-1.5) to be worth spending

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: 'yum remove perl' will give you the answer. Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my permanent SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2.  By doing so, I've saved about 33 MB of space in jffs2. Is

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my permanent SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By doing so, I've saved about 33 MB of space in jffs2. Is that a large enough savings (given a 4000 MB XO-1.5) to be worth spending this much discussion

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Mon, 4/12/10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119 To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Cc: Devel

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
There's been all this discussion of AIR. I am unfamiliar with AIR. My question : Why would I (as an user) __need__ AIR ? I do not mind using a browser, nor do I mind installing a special-purpose plugin into my browser in order to access particular material. But what does AIR provide that for

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my permanent SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By doing so, I've saved about 33 MB of space in jffs2. Is that a large enough savings (given a 4000 MB XO-1.5) to be worth spending this much discussion on ? Yes,

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119 To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org, Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Fedora OLPC

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: In the longer term its likely that it will be. The libraries in CentOS 5 are too old. The problem is that RHEL-6 isn't out yet, nor is there At least this XS guy is hopefuly that RHEL-6 will appear soon and XS 0.7 or

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
It will then be OK for a while until Sugar needs a newer version of a library I think there is an elephant in the living room to which too little attention is being paid. Consider Peru - they have a lot of XO-1 systems, on which it is unlikely that the newest version of Sugar will ever be

tool elitism

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
And shiny distracts. Then write an app that's not shiny. Can you please get over your gut revulsion? I have the same reaction to Macs. has a free-open-source IDE (FlashDevelop) from a community, does this run on the XO? Nope. We're to believe that Flash is appropriate for

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: It will then be OK for a while until Sugar needs a newer version of a library I think there is an elephant in the living room to which too little attention is being paid.  Consider Peru - they have a lot of XO-1 systems,

Re: AIR + other Linux Flavors

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
There's been all this discussion of AIR. I am unfamiliar with AIR. My question : Why would I (as an user) __need__ AIR ? I do not mind using a browser, nor do I mind installing a special-purpose plugin into my browser in order to access particular material. But what does AIR provide that

Re: tool elitism

2010-04-12 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, Okay. My question is, aside from the fact that you need to shell out cash to do iPhone dev and that both apple and developers are doing it for the money, what now differentiates OLPC/Sugar from the iPhone? Isn't that also a form of walled-garden lock-in? .. seriously? I

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Jon Nettleton
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 12 April 2010 15:10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give you the answer. On XO-1.5 running something very close to 10.2.0 build 119, it wants to

Re: AIR + other Linux Flavors

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
There's been all this discussion of AIR. I am unfamiliar with AIR. My question : Why would I (as an user) __need__ AIR ? I do not mind using a browser, nor do I mind installing a special-purpose plugin into my browser in order to access particular material. But what does AIR provide that

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Jon Nettleton
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: It will then be OK for a while until Sugar needs a newer version of a library I think there is an elephant in the living room to which too little

Long-term development strategy (Was: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119)

2010-04-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 13:29 -0700, Jon Nettleton wrote: Has there been any discussion on whether CentOS was an option as a base for the distro? With RHEL/CentOS 6 hopefully within sight, that would give a nice target to provide both the combination of stability and long term support. This

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 12 April 2010 15:10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give you the answer. On XO-1.5 running something very close to 10.2.0 build 119, it wants to

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
AIR (Adobe Integrated Runtime) is a desktop application that runs the FlashPlayer virtual machine outside of a browser. You know that Flash is usually thought of as a plug-in to run Flash content inside of a web page being displayed on a browser. To maintain web security, the Flash plug-in

Re: tool elitism

2010-04-12 Thread Bert Freudenberg
I know I shouldn't feed the troll but ... On 12.04.2010, at 22:59, Carlos Nazareno wrote: What I'm saying is that there's an army of us out there who can be willing to volunteer and dev for the XO. However, a lot of us don't have the luxury to learn Python/Sugarization or maybe just work best

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
Believe me I'll be one of the first poeple adding the sugar packages to EL-6 branches and testing them but its not necessarily the golden path that some people think. In the short term of the first 12 months it will be fine, 18 months to 2.5 years it won't seem as good. I am not seeing where

Re: tool elitism

2010-04-12 Thread Sameer Verma
snipped Uh... I'm also very fond of Processing. It runs okay for me on the XO-1, just a bit slow and the obvious problem with Sugar since processing is generally multi-window. Okay, kidding aside, what's the point of developing hardware and software for OLPC anyway? Aren't these just

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119

2010-04-12 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, There's not much point discussing it at the moment as RHEL-6 isn't out yet This is my feeling too -- I agree that RHEL and CentOS 6 will be a more attractive base than any of their previous releases have been, and we'll want to consider them then. Not much more to say until we know

Re: [IAEP] Long-term development strategy (Was: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119)

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 13:29 -0700, Jon Nettleton wrote: Has there been any discussion on whether CentOS was an option as a base for the distro?  With RHEL/CentOS 6 hopefully within sight, that would give a nice

Re: Long-term development strategy (Was: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119)

2010-04-12 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:12:46PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: In the past, Sugar and OLPC development was much hurt by its disconnection from the rest of the free software ecosystem on which it was built. We need to get much closer to our upstream projects, both in time (by using current

Fwd: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
Sorry, I keep forgetting to put the list manager in my addresses. Here's my latest message: -- Forwarded message -- From: Stanley Sokolow overb...@earthlink.net Date: Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:05 PM Subject: Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC To: mi...@bga.com I forgot to answer your

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
The AIR application is given more freedom -- for example, it can access local files. Back when Netscape first came out, I was bitten when a selfish plugin changed my system's defaults without me realizing it. Ever since, I do NOT want a remotely acquired program to be able to access the local

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
So, I guess you don't install any software that you download and run, like Firefox or OpenOffice.org or Google Earth? An AIR program doesn't just sneak itself onto your system -- the user decides to buy it, or trust the source of it, downloads it, and runs the installer. The point about AIR is

Re: using XO for Internet Math Tutoring

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
Martin, Sonya wanted me to reply on her behalf. I have written a brief explanation of our attempts to just install Flash on the XO with the ex-factory, that is, the factory installed, operating system. I just sent it to the developers' list.What someone like Sonya needs is an OS on the XO

Updating my prior comments about FlashPlayer on the XO-1

2010-04-12 Thread Stanley Sokolow
After writing my explanation of why I turned to a Xubuntu system last year to get FlashPlayer going on my XO for my wife's Internet Math Tutoring project, I thought I ought to see what improvements have been made since that decision.I see on the Wiki that there are Sugarized activities now for

re: iPhone comparison

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
Yes, it's a hyperbole. I'm sorry for insulting everyone with the comparison to Evil Steve but can put your emotions aside, look at this objectively, and see my frustration? I want to help, but I can't. This is the skillset that I have, and thousands of others have the same problem. I'm not a

Re: iPhone comparison

2010-04-12 Thread James Cameron
Yes, it seems that you have a skill you can't yet use, because someone else is needed first to prepare something you can build on. If there's any way we're stopping that someone else from working, let us know. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/

Re: tool elitism

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Carlos Nazareno object...@gmail.com wrote: And shiny distracts. Then write an app that's not shiny. Can you please get over your gut revulsion? I have the same reaction to Macs. Ok gentlemen. Let's put things this way -- we are cluttering the development list

Adobe Flash vs. Gnash - very important bug

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
There's been so many changes and additions ever since Flash 9 and AS3 was introduced. Among them is byte-level manipulation which allows us to do really funky creative stuff, especially if combo-ed with AIR which allows you to read write to the local filesystem. More importantly is the 2-100x

Re: [IAEP] Long-term development strategy (Was: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119)

2010-04-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Bernie, I'm not sure the point of this point at this point in time. To copy and paste part of the response I did to the other thread on fedora-olpc for others benefit. I personally don't see the point discussing it because from where I

open source vs. constructionist learning

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
Questions: A) Syntax vs. Algorithms Scenario 1: complex XO game is built in C, binary, complete C sourcecode + all source files + minimal documentation are included. Kid only understands Python. Sourcecode is complete gibberish. Kid enjoys game anyway learns from content. Scenario 2: complex

Re: Flash + AIR on OLPC

2010-04-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
So, I guess you don't install any software that you download and run, like Firefox or OpenOffice.org or Google Earth? I've installed and am running applications such as Firefox 3.6.3 (plus Flash 10.1), Google Chrome 5.0.342.9, Adobe Reader 9.3.1, mplayer, FBReader, etc. -- because I trust the

Re: [IAEP] Long-term development strategy (Was: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119)

2010-04-12 Thread Yamandu Ploskonka
IMHO I not only agree 120%, but also OLE Bolivia has budgeted support for upstreaming development. The idea being, if we are going to benefit, as an institution/country/project from work done professionally, if we are going to depend on it and expect it keeps up with improvements, then we have

errata

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Nazareno
sorry to bother you guys again. Sorry for the mixup, the game Snow Farm plagiarized by the Beijing Olympic Committee dev team is by The Pencil Farm, not Ferry Halim. Pencil Farm is one of the other guys plagiarized too. I was in a rush, lack sleep and just quick-copy pasted from

Re: using XO for Internet Math Tutoring

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi, sorry I'm brief (to the unfortunate point of rudeness) -- I am working 30hr days in a 60K deployment. Which happens to want to use Flash. In fact I just helped the local team find adobe.com and we are adding the relevant rpm to the build. I find it puzzling that there is so much over the top

Re: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Tim Moody timmo...@sympatico.ca wrote: What are the main advantages of wwwoffle over apache's built in proxy and cache modules? I concur with all of Wad's points. The problems with have with Squid are well known (search this list archive for sad stories about

Re: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent Internet - WWWOFFLE installation Guide on 0.6 XS Server

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Andra Fantastic! Thanks! Couple questions: - Can we remove the need to set proxy on every XO by either... - using a transparent proxy, same as we do with SQUID (maybe make a TURN_ON_WWWOFFLE script)? - serving a proxy autoconfig file via dhcp/apache? - Is it viable to automate the go

Re: [Server-devel] PDF resources in public folders not opening in Reader

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:22 AM, David Leeming da...@leeming-consulting.com wrote: Having established that there is a bug in the PDF plug in for Browse 102, with filenames having spaces, we can assume when that is fixed it will be fine. Do file the bug on dev.laptop.org ! You cannot assume that

Re: [Server-devel] XS: Lanbond0 and eth0 problem

2010-04-12 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:40 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Juan G. Narvaez gnrvz...@gmail.com wrote: I made some changes on the ks.cfg file like keyboard layout, timezone, etc... Can an alteration of ks.cfg be part of the problem? Obviously, an different

Re: [Server-devel] XS: Lanbond0 and eth0 problem

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Martin, what is the usage of having the XS in server role other than 1? None - get got to get rid of that crud. I should have simplified that in 0.6 but at the time I took a first port, then simplify approach and ran out of time

Re: [Server-devel] PDF resources in public folders not opening in Reader

2010-04-12 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:43:40AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:22 AM, David Leeming da...@leeming-consulting.com wrote: Having established that there is a bug in the PDF plug in for Browse 102, with filenames having spaces, we can assume when that is fixed it will