Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes the
same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it configured
in the new SysV SM will those bits actually run on other Linux systems
correctly? I think Jeff had hinted to this similarly when suggesting
this may
Ralph Castain wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes
the same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it
configured in the new SysV SM will those bits actually run on other
Linux systems
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Ashley Pittman wrote:
Point noted. But actually -- can you give specific reasons as to why a user should care?
Keep in mind that this would be a short-lived fork'ed process -- not "spawn"
in the MPI sense of the word.
You might be
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Just chatted with Ralph about this on the phone and he came up with a slightly
better compromise...
He points out that we really don't need *all* of the hwloc API (there's a
bajillion tiny little accessor functions). We could provide a steady,
OPAL/ORTE/OMPI-specific API
Graham, Richard L. wrote:
Why do we need an RFC for this sort of component ? Seems self contained.
Probably don't, just giving a heads up.
--td
Rich
On 8/3/10 6:59 AM, "Terry Dontje" <terry.don...@oracle.com> wrote:
WHAT: Add new Solaris sysinfo component
WHY
Terry,
On Aug 11, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
I've done some minor testing on Linux looking at resident and shared
memory sizes for np=4, 8 and 16 jobs. I could not see any
appreciable differences in sizes in the process between sysv, posix
or mmap usage in the SM btl.
So I am
Sorry Rich, I didn't realize there was a graph attached at the end of
message. In other words my comments are not applicable because I really
didn't know you were asking about the graph. I agree it would be nice
to know what the graph was plotting.
--td
Terry Dontje wrote:
Graham, Richard
On 10/11/2010 06:11 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Oct 10, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
At first glance this sounds like a sane approach but didn't we start with this
same approach with 1.5.0? I know it was kind of required to do it for 1.5.0
but we did go off track with delivery. I
In light of the push event changes upstream to libevent the changes to
libevent207.h probably should be modified to look like event.h. That is
wrap the include with some ifdef for C++. I did not do this
in the original fix because everything pulling it in was also pulling in
opal_config.h
Hmmm, it looks like you are right so my original change probably is the
right thing then.
--td
On 11/08/2010 08:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
It doesn't look like is needed at all in libevent207.h. Should it
just be removed?
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
In light
On 11/30/2010 09:00 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Joshua Hursey wrote:
Can you make a v1.7 milestone on Trac, so I can move some of my tickets?
Done.
I have a question about Josh's recent ticket moves. One of them
mentions 1.5 is stablizing quickly Josh can you
AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
On 11/30/2010 09:00 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Joshua Hursey wrote:
Can you make a v1.7 milestone on Trac, so I can move some of my tickets?
Done.
I have a question about Josh's recent ticket moves. One of them mentions 1.5
is stablizing quic
We're doing some testing with openib btl on a system with Solaris. It
looks like Solaris can return POLLIN|POLLRDNORM in revents from a poll
call. I looked at the manpages for Linux and it reads like Linux could
possibly do this too. However the code in btl_openib_async_thread that
checks
Could the issue have anything to do with the how OMPI implements lazy
connections with IBCM? Does setting the mca parameter
mpi_preconnect_all to 1 change things?
--td
On 01/16/2011 04:12 AM, Doron Shoham wrote:
Hi,
The gather hangs only in liner_sync algorithm but works with
basic_linear
On 01/18/2011 07:48 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> IBCM is broken and disabled (has been for a long time).
>
> Did you mean RDMACM?
>
>
No I think I meant OMPI oob.
sorry,
--
Oracle
Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
Developer Tools Engineering | +1.781.442.2631
Oracle *- Performance
Hopefully we'll find out tomorrow but I think I vaguely remember an
issue with the Studio compilers and this type of initialization style.
--td
On 01/19/2011 05:22 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
Done. I added the module orte/mca/debugger/dummy and I will remove it
tomorrow.
-Nathan
HPC-3, LANL
On
While compiling btl_openib_connect_oob.c I am getting identifier
redeclared: ib_gid_t. Looks like infiniband/mad.h defines this and then
iba/types.h tries to redefine it.
I am on Linux compiling with gcc. Is anyone else seeing the same issue
or am I possibly dealing with some old s/w?
--
It looks to me like r24507 is what changed in btl_openib_connect_oob.c
to include the two header files that are conflicting with each other.
--td
On 03/15/2011 01:39 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
While compiling btl_openib_connect_oob.c I am getting identifier
redeclared: ib_gid_t. Looks like
On 03/16/2011 06:21 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
I've seen this with the following:
RH 4.6 / OFED 1.3.6
Errr... did you look at
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/03/9068.php?
Yes I did, and I will be talking with my group about
AM, "Terry Dontje" <terry.don...@oracle.com
<mailto:terry.don...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On 03/16/2011 06:21 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
I've seen this with the following:
RH 4.6 / OFED 1.3.6
Errr... did you look
athttp://www.
On 03/16/2011 06:34 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
On 03/16/2011 06:21 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
I've seen this with the following:
RH 4.6 / OFED 1.3.6
Errr... did you look
athttp://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/03/9068.php?
Yes I did
wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:50 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
K. When Ralph and I removed that code, it was on he educated guess that no one
was using it (because it hasn't compiled right in a while). If we were wrong,
it can be put back, but someone will need to update it and Ralph and I don't
have
Trying to uplevel this a bit so I can figure out which of these paths
makes sense to me. Is the only reason we want to convert the symmetry
of init and finalize to being asymmetric is to support an abort case?
Forgive me Ralph, I know you had posted this in one of the emails but I
wanted to
I do but my machine room's power is down so I don't have access to it
right now. I will grope around once it comes up to see what it has. I
also have sent email to our IB team for some direction.
--td
On 7/14/2011 2:42 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM,
On 7/14/2011 9:30 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 4:21 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
people.
Other question is do Oracle folks care about IB QoS and torus/mesh
topologies w.r.t. OMPI, because otherwise the dynamic SL is irrelevant.
It is not an extreme priority of ours but we would like to support it.
--td
-- YK
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
I do but my
I am seeing the intel test suite tests MPI_Errhandler_fatal_c and
MPI_Errhandler_fatal_f fail with an oob failure quite a bit I have not
seen this test failing under MTT until the epoch code was added. So I
have a suspicion the epoch code might be at fault. Could someone
familiar with the
Just ran MPI_Errhandler_fatal_c with r25063 and it still fails.
Everything is the same except I don't see the "readv failed.." message.
Have your tried to run this code yourself? It is pretty simple and
fails with one node using np=4.
--td
On 8/18/2011 10:57 AM, Wesley Bland wrote:
I
george.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:29 , TERRY DONTJE wrote:
Just ran MPI_Errhandler_fatal_c with r25063 and it still fails. Everything is the same
except I don't see the "readv failed.." message.
Have your tried to run this code yourself? It is pretty simple and fails with
one node using
e all help / error messages
As you can see it is identical to the output in your test.
george.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:29 , TERRY DONTJE wrote:
Just ran MPI_Errhandler_fatal_c with r25063 and it still fails. Everything is the same
except I don't see the "readv failed.." message.
Ha
Terry -
Did #2887 fix this already?
No it broke it.
--td
Sent from my phone. No type good.
On Oct 18, 2011, at 6:19 AM, "Open MPI" wrote:
#2888: base.h inclusion breaks Solaris build
+
Reporter: tdd | Owner:
BTW, I am working on a patch for this. Just want to validate there are
no other loose ends. I remember there were a couple oddities about this
issue.
--td
Never mind; I just ready your text more carefully - 2887 caused the problem.
Sent from my phone. No type good.
On Oct 18, 2011, at
Strange - it ran fine for me on multiple tests. I'll check to see if something
strange got into the mix and recommit.
Not sure it is the same issue but it looks like all my MTT tests on the
trunk r25308 are timing out.
--td
On Oct 17, 2011, at 8:51 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
This commit
On 11/1/2011 7:48 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
So this was slightly different than the opinion that was discussed on the call
today, which was 2. The rationale for #2 was to punish developers, but if such
a bug did make it through to production, users wouldn't be annoyed with
show_help messages
On 11/15/2011 10:16 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
I tried building v1.5. r25469 builds for me, r25470 does not. This is
Friday's hwloc putback of CMR 2866. I'm on Solaris11/x86. The problem is
basically:
Doh!
Making all in tools/ompi_info
+1
Isn't there precedent with the other BTLs to name them based on the
messaging protocol they are supporting instead of some movie character
(tcp, openib, shmem, portals, ...).
--td
On 11/17/2011 8:11 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
After having to explain to someone at SC for the umpteenth time
vote that counts is Nathan's - it's his btl, and we
have never forcibly made someone rename their component. I would
suggest we not set that precedent. I'm comfortable with whatever he
decides to call it.
On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:00 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
+1
Isn't there precedent
On 11/17/2011 9:54 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:45 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I could possibly buy your argument Ralph if this was a one off BTL
that only Nathan (and his employer) is going to use. I am assuming
though this is a more general protocol for a vendor specific
On 11/22/2011 5:49 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
The error you are seeing is usually indicative of some code operating
on memory that isn't aligned properly for a SPARC instruction being
used. The address that is causing the failure is odd aligned which is
more than likely the culprit. If you
So with the aliasing scheme the code for openib would still under
ompi/mca/btl/openib but you could access it with -mca btl ofrc? Ok, so
when an error happens in the openib btl how does it identify itself?
Does it use openib or ofrc? This seems like there could be some user
confusion by
On 11/22/2011 6:59 PM, Lukas Razik wrote:
Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Lukas Razik wrote:
#0 0xf8010229ba9c in mca_pml_ob1_send_request_start_copy
(sendreq=0xb23200, bml_btl=0xb29050, size=0) at pml_ob1_sendreq.c:551
On 11/23/2011 9:57 AM, Lukas Razik wrote:
TERRY DONTJE<terry.don...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 11/22/2011 6:59 PM, Lukas Razik wrote:
Roland Dreier<rol...@purestorage.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Lukas Razik<li...@razik.name>
wrote:
#0
On 11/23/2011 10:11 AM, Lukas Razik wrote:
TERRY DONTJE<terry.don...@oracle.com> wrote:
Can you try running the benchmark with coalescing off? To do that
add the following option to your mpirun line "-mca
btl_openib_use_message_coalescing 0".
I've tried this:
On 11/23/2011 11:05 AM, Lukas Razik wrote:
TERRY DONTJE<terry.don...@oracle.com> wrote:
Nuts!!! Ok I am going to have to think about this a little more. Do you have
the ability to configure and remake your ompi install? I might want to have you
add some stuff to help me track thi
On 11/23/2011 1:45 PM, Lukas Razik wrote:
TERRY DONTJE<terry.don...@oracle.com> wrote
Can you build OMPI as a 32 bit library and see if that works any better?
So you mean I shall leave the whole OFED stack as 64 bit and build only openmpi
as 32 bit?
I believe the OFED user lib
Last night MTT test results for 1.7a1r25652 from IU and Oracle is
showing failures during some of the spawn tests see
http://www.open-mpi.org/mtt/index.php?do_redir=2036.
Essentially, the test are failing with the message:
All nodes which are allocated for this job are already filled.
I
, we changed the default for RM-given
allocations to be no-oversubscribe. So your MTTs may well fail if they
weren't updated as all those tests oversubscribe the nodes, and are
running in RM environments.
On Dec 15, 2011, at 8:37 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
Last night MTT test results
Paul's probably more than likely right. The nightly runs Oracle does
using MTT and tarballs do not do autogen.sh (which I believe is not
expected anyways, right). All other builds we do using autogen.* are
from an svn workspace.
--td
On 12/20/2011 8:21 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Not too
On 1/19/2012 5:22 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Minor documentation nit, which might apply to the 1.5 branch as well
(didn't check).
README says:
- Open MPI does not support the Sparc v8 CPU target, which is the
default on Sun Solaris. The v8plus (32 bit) or v9 (64 bit)
targets must be
On 1/29/2012 7:40 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
I can additionally report success w/ ILP32 builds with both SS12.2 and
12.3 compilers on x86-64 and sun4v systems running Solaris and
x86-64/Linux:
solaris-10 Generic_137111-07/sun4v (*FLAGS="-m32 -xarch=sparc" for
v8plus ABI)
solaris-11
On 2/7/2012 4:25 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 2/7/2012 8:59 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
This fixes all known issues.
Well, not quite...
I've SUCCESSFULLY retested 44 out of the 55 cpu/os/compiler/abi
combinations currently on my list.
I expect 9 more by the end of the day (the
On 2/7/2012 9:57 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 2/7/2012 2:37 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
+ "make check" fails atomics tests using GCCFSS-4.0.4 compilers on
Solaris10/SPARC
Originally reported in:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10234.php
This is a matter of the
On 2/10/2012 11:50 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
This is an open question to OMPI developers...
It looks like RHEL (and maybe others?) adds the "virbr0" IP interface when Xen
is activated. This IP interface is only used to communicate with the local Xen
instance(s); it is not used to communicate
On 2/21/2012 5:55 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
That is truly bizarre "make" behavior.
Heads up that in the upcoming fortran revamp, we *only* use FC. I.E.,
there's only mpifort wrapper compiler (mpif77 and mpif90 still exist,
but only as sym links to mpifort, signifying that mpifort
I actually think the systems tested line for Solaris should read:
- Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 32 and 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64), with
Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3
--td
On 2/22/2012 8:55 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Folks at Oracle should decide, but I suspect "Solaris 10" should be
On 2/22/2012 8:53 PM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote:
Terry / Eugene --
Can you comment?
Sorry I cannot.
--td
On Feb 22, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
I think I have the beginning of a fix for this issue.
I had not even noticed earlier that the error in event.h is from the C++
I ran into a problem on a Suse 10.1 system and was wondering if anyone
has a version of Suse newer than 10.1 that can try the following test
and send me the results.
-testpci
cat
Sorry the below cc line if for Solaris Studio compilers if you have gcc
replace "-G" with "-shared".
thanks,
--td
On 3/21/2012 11:32 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I ran into a problem on a Suse 10.1 system and was wondering if anyone
has a version of Suse newer than 10.1 that c
I noticed both IU and Oracle are seeing failures on the trunk with Intel
test MPI_Keyval3_f. This was with r26237 and the last successful MTT
run of this test was r26232. I looked at the log and nothing popped out
at me. I'll try and narrow this down a little further but that won't be
until
bindings will be replaced in about 2 weeks, and the problem
doesn't occur on my mpi3-fortran bitbucket.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:03 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I noticed both IU and Oracle are seeing failures on the trunk with Intel test
MPI_Keyval3_f. This was with r26237 and the last successful MTT
Have you tried to compile and run a simple MPI program with your
installed Open MPI? If that works then you need to figure out what is
being done by the Makefile when it is "testing if installed package can
be loaded" and try and reproduce the issue manually.
BTW, I normally configure my
+1 here too.
--td
On 4/6/2012 11:19 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
Agreed.
Brian
On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
+1 for SJ - much easier to be someplace with a major airport.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Gutierrez, Samuel K wrote:
My vote is for San Jose.
Sam
After looking at Oracles MTT results there seem to be a (some??)
regressions between r26240 and 26249 detected by the ibm and intel tests
suites. An example of this is the failures in the comm_join, final and
loop_spawn tests of the ibm test suite as seen in
r26255 is forcing the use of __malloc_hook which is implemented in
opal/mca/memory/linux however that is not compiled in the library when
built on Solaris thus causing a referenced symbol not found when libmpi
tries to load the openib btl.
I am looking how to fix this now but if someone has a
there be other OSes that could run into the same problem? Or what
happens if PTMALLOC2 is not used (does that happen)?
--td
On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
r26255 is forcing the use of __malloc_hook which is implemented in
opal/mca/memory/linux however that is not compiled in the library
I could see if less then N processes exit with non-zero exit code that
the ORTE may choose not to abort the job. However, if all N processes
have exited or aborted I expect everything to clean up and mpirun to
exit. It does not do that at the moment which I think is what is
causing most of
't believe we are setting the env-var which is why I think we have
a regression. It also seems very suspicious to me that both Oracle and
IU are seeing the same condition in MTT. I'll look into this more on
Monday.
--td
On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:32 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I could see if l
I am seeing several Cart Fortran tests (like MPI_Cart_coords_f) segv in
opal_memory_ptmalloc2_int_free when OMPI trunk is compiled with icc
12.1.0 for 64 bit on linux. Just wondering if anyone has seen anything
similar to this with a different version of icc. Other non-Intel
compilers seem
timization_level 1
+#endif
+#endif
+
Void_t*
_int_malloc(mstate av, size_t bytes)
{
-- End of Patch --
On 24 May 2012, at 6:54 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I am seeing several Cart Fortran tests (like MPI_Cart_coords_f) segv
in opal_memory_ptmalloc2_int_free when OMPI trunk is compil
#endif
+
Void_t*
_int_malloc(mstate av, size_t bytes)
{
-- End of Patch --
On 24 May 2012, at 6:54 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I am seeing several Cart Fortran tests (like MPI_Cart_coords_f) segv
in opal_memory_ptmalloc2_int_free when OMPI trunk is compiled with
icc 12.1.0 for
I've ran into an issue compiling openib's Dynamic SL support on a RH
6.2 based system with the Oracle Studio compilers.
Turns out if I compile btl_openib_connect_sl.c with the Oracle Studio
compilers with the "-g" option the compiler compiles some static inline
functions in ib_types.h
On 6/20/2012 5:02 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
I hate it ...
As far as I understand it is not reason to rename it. The OFED-lovin components
should look at $with_openib.
I agree with Pasha that the reason you give for renaming openib btl seem
On 6/21/2012 6:38 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:11 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
As far as I understand it is not reason to rename it. The OFED-lovin components
should look at $with_openib.
I agree with Pasha that the reason you give for renaming openib btl seem
orthogonal
It looks like compilation of 32 bit platforms is failing due to a
missing field. It looks to me that for some reason r26626 deleted
hdr_segkey in ompi/mca/osc/rdma/osc_rdma_header.h which is used in the
macro OMPI_OSC_RDMA_RDMA_INFO_HDR_NTOH and HTON. Is there a reason that
hdr_segkey was
On 6/22/2012 3:36 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
To update everyone: there was much more discussion about this off-list. :-)
We decided to do the following:
1. The name --with-verbs seems better than --with-openfabrics, if for no other reason
than the name "openfabrics" encompasses more things
On 6/23/2012 6:32 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 11:26 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
4. The behavior of --with[out]-verbs is as was described in a prior mail:
- if --with-verbs is specified, all 3 verbs-based components must succeed
- if --without-verbs is specified, all 4 verbs
On 6/25/2012 10:12 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 25, 2012, at 5:44 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
Hmmm, I guess I could see the thinking of tying ofud and openib btls
configuring together. However it seems inconsistent to me that one btl doesn't
allow you to control configuring
So is ofacm another replacement for ibcm and rdmacm?
--td
On 7/2/2012 11:20 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
Nice! Are we moving this to 1.7 as well?
-Nathan
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:20:12AM -0400, svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org wrote:
Author: pasha (Pavel Shamis)
Date: 2012-07-02 11:20:12 EDT
With Jeff's latest changes to how we set up the cq_size I am now seeing
error messages saying that my machine's memlocked limits are too low. I
am concerned that it might be something else because my max'd locked
memory is unlimited on my machine.
So if I do a run of -np 2 across two
On 7/10/2012 12:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I'm getting these compiler warnings on the SVN trunk HEAD (r26776):
btl_openib.c: In function 'mca_btl_openib_put':
btl_openib.c:1652: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast
btl_openib.c: In function 'mca_btl_openib_get':
On 7/10/2012 1:57 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
On 7/10/2012 12:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I'm getting these compiler warnings on the SVN trunk HEAD (r26776):
btl_openib.c: In function 'mca_btl_openib_put':
btl_openib.c:1652: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast
Interestingly enough it worked for me for a while and then after many
runs I started seeing the below too.
--td
On 7/26/2012 11:07 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Hmmm...it was working for me, but I'll recheck. Thanks!
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:04 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
r26868 seems to have some
IIRC, the first 16 or so messages over the openib btl uses the send/recv
API as opposed to rdma which is significantly faster. I am not sure as
to how 1.5.3 and multi-rail affects this but the preconnected I believe
short circuits when one cuts over to use rdma for eager messages.
--td
On
I've been seeing an intermittent (once every 4 hours looping on a quick
initialization program) segv with the following stack trace.
=>[1] mca_btl_sm_add_procs(btl = 0xfd7ffdb67ef0, nprocs = 2U, procs
= 0x591560, peers = 0x591580, reachability = 0xfd7fffdff000), line
519 in "btl_sm.c"
rge.
On Aug 21, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
I've been seeing an intermittent (once every 4 hours looping on a
quick initialization program) segv with the following stack trace.
=>[1] mca_btl_sm_add_procs(btl = 0xfd7ffdb67ef0, nprocs = 2U,
procs = 0x591560, peers
Jeff Squyres wrote:
I think the point is that as a group, we consciously, deliberately,
and painfully decided not to support multi-cluster. And as a result,
we ripped out a lot of supporting code. Starting down this path again
will likely result in a) re-opening all the discussions, b)
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Per the call today, I was supposed to find out the release schedule
for OFED v1.4 (to know what the gate deadline is for v1.2.8). OFED
v1.4 RC3 is due out early next week. So getting OMPI 1.2.8 out *this
week* would be best.
Thanks!
I would like to get an RC for 1.2.8
I do not see the real value in doing this name change. The name "OMPI
Run Time Environment" and libopen_rte.so are not that far from each
other. Changing a bunch of Makefile.am's at this point in the game for
what I consider a minor cosmetic difference just makes little sense to me.
On the
for the error messages even before that, it just
exposes it more frequently...
Thanks
Edgar
Terry Dontje wrote:
I am seeing the message "Dropped message for the non-existing
communicator" when running hpcc with np=124 against r19845. This
seems to be pretty reproducible at np=124. Wh
Ethan Mallove wrote:
I'm still running into the Cstd/stlport4 issue with 2.2.6. That is,
this line appears in the libtool script:
postdeps="-library=Cstd -library=Crun"
Do you have the string " -library=stlport4 " in $CXX $CXXFLAGS?
If not, then how can Libtool detect that you use
I don't have any *strong* objections. However, I know that Eugene and
George B have been working on some Fastpath code changes that we should
make sure neither project obliterates the other.
--td
Richard Graham wrote:
Now that 1.3 will be released, we would like to go ahead with the plan
to
Ahh, and then I woke up
This might not be an issue (or a big one), but I have some code I am
working on that replaces memcpy with an opal memcpy routine. Does your
change below remove the ability of the BTLs to call opal routines?
--td
Richard Graham wrote:
Now that 1.3 will be
Richard Graham wrote:
Let me start the e-mail conversation, and see how far we get.
Goal: The goal several of us have is to be able to use the btl’s
outside of the MPI layer in Open MPI. The layer itself is generic, w/o
specific knowledge of Upper Level Protocols, so is well suited for
this
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
It sounds reasonable to me. I agree with Ralf W about having mpirun
send a STOP to itself - that would seem to solve the problem about
stopping everything.
It would seem, however, that you cannot similarly STOP the
Richard Graham wrote:
Terry,
Is there any way you can quantify the cost ? This seems reasonable, but
would be nice to get an idea what the performance cost is (and not within a
tight loop where everything stays in cache).
Rich
Ok, I guess that would eliminate any of the simple perf
Terry Dontje wrote:
Richard Graham wrote:
Terry,
Is there any way you can quantify the cost ? This seems
reasonable, but
would be nice to get an idea what the performance cost is (and not
within a
tight loop where everything stays in cache).
Rich
Ok, I guess that would eliminate any
Jim Langston wrote:
Hi Rolf,
Thanks for the pointers, they are very clear and concise. I followed
the general
flow of what was done to fix the issue in 1.3 and did something
similar for 1.2.9.
In mpicxx.cc, I did this change:
#include
#ifdef LOCK_SHARED
static const int
Just wanted to give an update. On a workspace with just the predefined
communicators converted to opaque pointers I've ran netpipe and hpcc
performance tests and compared the results before and after the
changes. The differences in performance with 10 sample run was
undetectable.
I've also
Richard Graham wrote:
> First, the performance improvements look really nice.
> A few questions:
> - How much of an abstraction violation does this introduce ? This
> looks like the btl needs to start “knowing” about MPI level semantics.
> Currently, the btl purposefully is ulp agnostic. I ask for
to
not overrun the bss section.
I would like to discuss any objections to this solution on tomorrow's
OMPI concall.
thanks,
--td
Terry Dontje wrote:
Just wanted to give an update. On a workspace with just the
predefined communicators converted to opaque pointers I've ran netpipe
and hpcc performance
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo