Why?
What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:35 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more.
>
> Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the
> package
I'm guessing most of you here probably observed this behaviour with dnf when FF
is upgraded. Even after FF restarted, dnf needs-restarting reports that it
needs restarting. Does that sound like a bug or is this somehow intentional?
I'm seeing this in f29 and previous releases are the same. Once
OLD: Fedora-30-20190415.n.2
NEW: Fedora-30-20190416.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.77 MiB
Size of dropped packages:245.61 MiB
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/146 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Hi,
I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more.
Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the
package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on
the list.
# module, the module stream name (module/foo's branch), the package
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more.
>
> Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the
> package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on
> the list.
>
> #
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:14 PM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify
> > rpm macros.
> >
> > Here is the documentation:
> >
> >
>
'rawhide' without any version
information, it will find the latest successful pre-mirroring compose
location for you, e.g. right now it would find:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190416.n.0/
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-30-2019
Hi libiptcdata-maintainers,
libiptcdata FTBFS for a long time. Please either fix it or oprhan the package if
you don't have time to do it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604602
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:58 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I already basically wrote this:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind
Wow, very cool, looks comprehensive, thanks.
I see it even downloads composed images from Koji.
Jens
___
devel mailing
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:11 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > You can do something like:
> >
> > rpms:
> > foo-bootstrap:
> > name: foo
> > bar:
> > buildafter:
> > - foo-bootstrap
> > foo:
> > buildafter:
> > - bar
> >
>
> How does
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:38 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Why?
>
> What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such?
It's no problem.
Rather it might be better in the point of view of "minimal necessary
package branches for now".
I thought it again.
I considered below
I don't think we particularly need autostarting vms on the workstation. It
would be very nice to get libvirtd activated. I know we've asked for this
before...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 04:40:22 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my
> requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch
> already exists". I reopened the tickets with a request for more
> information, but they just got
Le 2019-04-16 15:06, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote:
Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can
specify
rpm macros.
Here is the documentation:
https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting
access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at
https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up
running on hardware at Marist brothers college. there is also some
info on how to use Jenkins for
Hi,
from this bug :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574222#c35
I have my locale all set to en_US.UTF-8 but LANGUAGE=en_US:pt ,
where LANGUAGE is set ?
I can't find it
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190413.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190416.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 194
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 41.32 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi all,
Today, April 16th 2019, is an important day on the Fedora 30
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages
which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be
marked as 'stable' and included in the Final
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote:
>
> Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify
> rpm macros.
>
> Here is the documentation:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modu
> les/#_build_macros_optional
>
>
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:14, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify
> > rpm macros.
> >
> > Here is the documentation:
> >
> >
On Sunday, 14 April 2019 08:55:32 CEST Hirotaka Wakabayashi wrote:
> Hello
>
> I tested upgrades from F29 to F30. I use the following images:
> https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64
> /images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-29-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
>
Hello,
I updated 2 systems today to F30 using dnf system-upgrade. Ran into a
few issues, but nothing major. I worked around them by removing the
offending packages and then proceeding with the upgrade. Here are the
bugs I filed:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700307:
package
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:37:55 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting
> access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at
> https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up
> running on hardware at Marist
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya,
>
> today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new
> laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?)
> crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda
> again, just because
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 11:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> > Heya,
> >
> > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new
> > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?)
> > crashed five
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 19:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide
> > > are
>
Le mardi 16 avril 2019 à 14:57 +, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> I don't think we particularly need autostarting vms on the
> workstation. It would be very nice to get libvirtd activated. I know
> we've asked for this before...
I have autostarted vms on my other_os workstation and it is very
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are
> > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included
> >
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 384350 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384350
ID: 384354 Test: x86_64
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 29.20190414.0
Commit(x86_64): 3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639
Commit(aarch64):
4bf47dda2c658c4392fad85ed78cf563123dc7bd7a86dd644b2dfd252016d535
Commit(ppc64le):
Also, pertinent to the main topic... Any chance of getting a EL 8 test
instance?
I'm working on getting some preliminary builds done in COPR but having some
issues which are difficult to troubleshoot just with logs.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing
Hi Mikolaj
> I thought of using names in format "stream-${name}-${stream}" (eg.
stream-scala-2.10), but I can use "${name}-${stream}" (scala-2.10)
format too - consistency between modules is more important than
maintainer personal preferences.
I just checked current modules' situation in f29
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:35 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:00 PM Antonio Trande
> wrote:
> > On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote
> > > Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon? I
> packaged
> > > it because I thought I was going to use it, but I
Hi everybody,
Tomorrow we'll have the first meeting of the Stewardship SIG.
Non-SIG-members are of course welcome to participate, as well.
I considered both the final whenisgood survey results and the fedora
meeting calendar to find a good spot for this week (which is a bit of
a weird one due to
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:07 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are
> now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included executables
> and shared libraries.
>
> I'm not sure which change might
On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are
> now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included
> executables and shared libraries.
>
> I'm not sure which change might be
My first thought is accountsservice, check that first.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc.
> >
> > It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation
> > Live etc), and
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > > Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc.
> > >
> > > It can download
I am running in a reproducible traceback which happens during `dnf
system-upgrade download` as reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700551. Does anyone know whether
this will let me run into upgrade issues?
___
devel mailing list
This was fallout from an older bug in rtkit's rpm scripts:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637496. Thanks for the help!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:21 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 04:40:22 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> > I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my
> > requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch
> > already exists". I reopened
An example of the diff between this and the previous released version (for
x86_64) is:
rpm-ostree db diff
a39e99a72c80c9c4a8fce8a2092b2856f742a5c3ba5c9bedd59a9e76aa3e9924
3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639
ostree diff commit old:
On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 20:40 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my
> requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch
> already exists". I reopened the tickets with a request for more
> information, but they just got closed
On 15. 04. 19 18:52, Christopher wrote:
If nobody picks up the ones by my name (nodejs-path-exists,
nodejs-bluebird, nodejs-grunt-known-options), then I will probably
have to orphan js-jquery, because it probably needs those for its
build (I can't think of any other reason my name would be
On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> You can do something like:
>
> rpms:
> foo-bootstrap:
> name: foo
> bar:
> buildafter:
> - foo-bootstrap
> foo:
> buildafter:
> - bar
>
How does foo.spec get to know that it should enable bootstrapping in
foo-bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700352
Bug ID: 1700352
Summary: perl-LDAP-0.66 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-LDAP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi all,
Today, April 16th 2019, is an important day on the Fedora 30
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages
which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be
marked as 'stable' and included in the Final
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700352
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2019-04-17 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50333
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/04/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190416gitaf97382.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700644
Bug ID: 1700644
Summary: perl-Net-CIDR-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-CIDR
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3e6b570104
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-4.007-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0a61d982af
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4709e34f6f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3f9683e01f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700135
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 10.04.15 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 04. 19 19:11, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit):
> >
> > "setuptools is required at runtime"
> >
On 15. 04. 19 19:11, José Abílio Matos wrote:
Hi,
recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit):
"setuptools is required at runtime"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695045
The obvious fix is to add python3-setuptools as a BR for python3-doit.
I suppose
On 16. 04. 19 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 04. 19 19:11, José Abílio Matos wrote:
Hi,
recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit):
"setuptools is required at runtime"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695045
The obvious fix is to add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700138
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
66 matches
Mail list logo
