> Dependencies resolved.
> ===
> =
> Package Arch VersionRepository
> Size
> ===
> =
> Removing:
> esm
On 12/02/2016 10:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Right, that's what I thought. Still, completely blocking the upgrade
seems rude. Yum had an option --skip-broken that would just leave such
packages alone,
I don't think keeping an old version of the filesystem package (becau
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Right, that's what I thought. Still, completely blocking the upgrade
> seems rude. Yum had an option --skip-broken that would just leave such
> packages alone,
I don't think keeping an old version of the filesystem package (because the
conflict is between google-earth-
Rich Mattes wrote:
> Perhaps it's a side effect of DNF's "clean_requirements_on_remove"
> feature[1]?
>
> [1] http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/conf_ref.html#main-options
Yes, it's clearly that misfeature, and it's not a "side effect", it is
exactly what that "feature" is expected to do.
As yo
On 12/01/2016 05:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 17:03 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>This got me thinking if there's a common root cause that could be
>checked automatically? I didn't quite understand what exactly happened
>in the affected packages to cause it.
No, they'r
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 03:05 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I think you might be missing Google's key:
> https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
>
>
>
>
Thanks, got it.
Regards,
Les H___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:43:13 -0800
Howard Howell wrote:
> warning: /var/cache/dnf/google-earth-17f28a61f303b7a2/packages/google-
> earth-stable-6.0.3.2197-0.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature,
> key ID 7fac5991: NOKEY
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next success
I think you might be missing Google's key:
https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 17:03 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > This got me thinking if there's a common root cause that could be
> > checked automatically? I didn't quite understand what exactly
> > happened
> > in the affected packages
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 17:03 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> This got me thinking if there's a common root cause that could be
> checked automatically? I didn't quite understand what exactly happened
> in the affected packages to cause it.
No, they're usually all different little awkward packag
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:03:30 -0500
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 04:39 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > It looks like probably Dominik's suggestion of the -e cleared the
> > program. So somehow, rpm -e packagename seemed to be the magic
> > bullet. I will start overwith the update to make
On 12/01/2016 04:39 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
It looks like probably Dominik's suggestion of the -e cleared the
program. So somehow, rpm -e packagename seemed to be the magic bullet.
I will start overwith the update to make sure all the packages
downloaded, and let you know if success happens.
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 13:32 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 21:25 +, John Florian wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ?
So r
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:32 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:32:33 -0800
> Howard Howell wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi, everyone,
> > I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using
> > the cli in the terminal.
> >
> > 814 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25
> >
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 21:25 +, John Florian wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on
%{_bindir} ?
> > > > > > So removing it is tea
On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:32:33 -0800
Howard Howell wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
> I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using
> the cli in the terminal.
>
> 814 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25
> 815 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing
>
org>, Adam Williamson > ct.o
> > rg>
> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
> > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:37:04 -0800
> >
> > On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Now it gets really weird...
> &
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ?
So removing it is tearing the rug out from under all those others?
Well, I don't think so, as I'd expect that to
On 12/01/2016 12:40 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Stone
> To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson rg>
> Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
> Date: Thu
iscussions related to Fedora
> > > v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson > ct.o
> > rg>
> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
> > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:37:04 -0800
> >
> > >
> > > On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > >
-Original Message-
From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:54:13 +0100
On Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 21:40, Howard Ho
-Original Message-
From: Adam Williamson
To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Josh Stone , Development
discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:54:44 -0800
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:40 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>
> -Original M
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ?
>> So removing it is tearing the rug out from under all those others?
>
> Well, I don't think so, as I'd expect t
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
>
> Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ?
> So removing it is tearing the rug out from under all those others?
Well, I don't think so, as I'd expect that to rip out much *more*
stuff. I think it must be something
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:40 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Stone
> To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson rg>
> Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
>
On Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 21:40, Howard Howell wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Stone
> To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson rg>
> Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
-Original Message-
From: Josh Stone
To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora , Adam Williamson
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:37:04 -0800
On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
>
> Now it gets really weird...
&
On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> Now it gets really weird...
> # rpm -q --provides google-earth
> package google-earth is not installed
Should be google-earth-stable, no?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On 12/01/2016 12:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Adam Williamson
>> To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora > v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>&g
-Original Message-
From: Adam Williamson
To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:22:31 -0800
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
-Original Message-
From: Adam Williamson
To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:22:31 -0800
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williamson
> To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2
-Original Message-
From: Adam Williamson
To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:11:29 -0800
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:05 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>
>
> Since the dnf eras
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:05 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>
> Since the dnf erase command doesn't work, or tries to remove over 211M
> of files, do you mean just to remove the directory tree for the
> offending package using the rm command?
Sorry, I missed that part. I use 'dnf remove', but I don't
-Original Message-
From: Adam Williamson
To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:41:23 -0800
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:32 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone,
> I
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:32 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
> I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using
> the cli in the terminal.
>
> 814 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25
> 815 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing
> 81
Hi, everyone,
I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using
the cli in the terminal.
814 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25
815 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing
816 dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing --
nog
37 matches
Mail list logo
