If you think that the vote cannot succeed you should VETO, canceling
votes is not part of our rules.
As the vote manager I am responsible for a correct running of the vote,
and if the code cannot be placed in the core it should be recast.
I am going by the advise given to me by the license manage
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
I did not read that the code had to be stored in the core. I don't see
why the vote should be canceled
I prefer to not have too much confusion. The current vote is confusing
and doe snot specoify the controibutions module, and as such should be
recast. It is a bit of a de
Pierre van Rooden wrote:
Due to possible confusion on the license issues with Jgroup jars, we can
currently not allow the code in the core (though this may change in the
future, if more clarity can be achieve with the exact requirements of
the license). A such I cancel the vote in its current form.
On 4/18/05, Pierre van Rooden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Due to possible confusion on the license issues with Jgroup jars, we can
> currently not allow the code in the core (though this may change in the
> future, if more clarity can be achieve with the exact requirements of
> the license). A suc
Daniel Ockeloen wrote:
So no new action from kennisnet is needed, we just need a name right ?
and the vote count will continue (no new votes needed on
the +1) ?
I will summarize the votes once the vote is recast.
--
Pierre van Rooden
Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815
"Anything worth doing is
On Apr 18, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Pierre van Rooden wrote:
Due to possible confusion on the license issues with Jgroup jars, we
can currently not allow the code in the core (though this may change
in the future, if more clarity can be achieve with the exact
requirements of the license). A such I can
Due to possible confusion on the license issues with Jgroup jars, we can
currently not allow the code in the core (though this may change in the
future, if more clarity can be achieve with the exact requirements of
the license). A such I cancel the vote in its current form.
Since most of us see
