Re: [Development] ChangeLogs

2013-01-29 Thread Knoll Lars
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Jason McDonald macadd...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: as some certainly noted, the completeness of dist/changes-*

Re: [Development] Missing documentation makes QML ListView unusable

2013-01-29 Thread Alan Alpert
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Rainer Keller rainer.kel...@digia.com wrote: Hi, Having a MouseArea by default would most likely lead to it being disabled in the majority of cases, on all platforms except desktop. I agree. But this doesn't this affect mobile touch devices too? Some mobile

Re: [Development] ChangeLogs

2013-01-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 08.10.17, Knoll Lars wrote: It had a checkbox, so you could mark a particular change as processed, and it would store this locally. This allowed you to do the work in chunks and you would at least always know what you've already processed. IIRC, you could

[Development] Qt5 does not build with Python 3.3 anymore

2013-01-29 Thread Дмитрий Волосных
It happens somewhere while building WebKit, when build script starts to use tools from gnuwin32\bin. Unfortunately, Windows cmd utility has no facility of saving the commands history, so I can't recall the full context. ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] Qt5 does not build with Python 3.3 anymore

2013-01-29 Thread Richard Moore
You can get cmd to tell you the command history with this: doskey /history Cheers Rich. On 29 January 2013 11:34, Дмитрий Волосных dmitry.volosn...@gmail.comwrote: It happens somewhere while building WebKit, when build script starts to use tools from gnuwin32\bin. Unfortunately, Windows cmd

Re: [Development] Repository is too open

2013-01-29 Thread Jason McDonald
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sergio Ahumada sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote: On 01/28/2013 03:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Seems currently everybody could merge to staging. I as non-approver have a merge button in gerrit. Or is this only a new feature to see if the request passes all

Re: [Development] Repository is too open

2013-01-29 Thread Sergio Ahumada
Hi, On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sergio Ahumada sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote: On 01/28/2013 03:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Seems currently everybody could merge to staging. I as non-approver have a merge button in gerrit. Or is this only

[Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
moin *, 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which haven't seen activity for a long time a honest look. please explicitly mark the ones you

Re: [Development] Repository is too open

2013-01-29 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 29 January 2013 20:00, Sergio Ahumada sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote: On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote: I think there is a problem here. The announcement in the link seems to indicate that the intention was only to present non-approvers with a Merge patchset x to Staging

Re: [Development] Repository is too open

2013-01-29 Thread Jason McDonald
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Sergio Ahumada sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote: On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote: I think there is a problem here. The announcement in the link seems to indicate that the intention was only to present non-approvers with a Merge patchset x to

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Sorvig Morten
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: moin *, 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Shaw Andy
5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which haven't seen activity for a long time a honest look. please explicitly mark the ones you still

[Development] registering vnd.qt.*qml types

2013-01-29 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
Hi, sorry for the noise, I had the wrong ML address. after some discussion on the development@qt-project.orgmailto:development@qt-project.org mailing list we http://qt-project.org/ decided to register some qml http://qt-project.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Qt_Quick types in the vendor tree. Before

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:41:13PM +, Sorvig Morten wrote: On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: please explicitly mark the ones you still want to work on by adding a comment. everything which has no indication of (planned) activity in a

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Shaw Andy wrote: everything which has no indication of (planned) activity in a few weeks will be abandoned by administrative action. Wouldn't it be best to put a specific date on when the administrative action will take place? Rather than leaving

Re: [Development] Qt5 does not build with Python 3.3 anymore

2013-01-29 Thread Дмитрий Волосных
doskey /history works only until the session is still alive. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Qt5 does not build with Python 3.3 anymore

2013-01-29 Thread Christian Kandeler
On 01/29/2013 12:34 PM, Дмитрий Волосных wrote: It happens somewhere while building WebKit, when build script starts to use tools from gnuwin32\bin. The failure I saw on my machine was due to some deprecated use of a print format string. I took the easy route and directed the build process to

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Sorvig Morten
On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:41:13PM +, Sorvig Morten wrote: On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: please explicitly mark the ones you still want to work on

Re: [Development] registering vnd.qt.*qml types

2013-01-29 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
the list has moved to the media-ty...@ietf.orgmailto:media-ty...@ietf.org mailing list. look there for the discussion. Fawzi On 29 Jan 2013, at 14:26, Mohamed Fawzi fawzi.moha...@digia.commailto:fawzi.moha...@digia.com wrote: Hi, sorry for the noise, I had the wrong ML address. after some

Re: [Development] Qt5 does not build with Python 3.3 anymore

2013-01-29 Thread Дмитрий Волосных
The failure I saw on my machine was due to some deprecated use of a print format string. I took the easy route and directed the build process to use python 2.7... So did I. But that was not obvious. ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:53:27PM +, Sorvig Morten wrote: On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: just stick to the request above. if we made an exception for everyone who wants a different procedure, we won't get anywhere - do you have any

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 16.21.17, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: Can you elaborate a bit on what practical issue this would solve? (beyond there are many changes in gerrit). apart from the above, it also skews the metrics (in case somebody ever decides to use the number of open

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Poenitz Andre
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: No, and that's my point : I don't really care how many changes others have. I'll deregister myself from those I'm not interested in. all changes i'm subscribed to are somehow interesting to me, obviously. that means that i don't want to unsubscribe, as i'd miss

[Development] Qt 5.0.0 - feedback on our ways of working

2013-01-29 Thread Tanilkan Sinan
Hi, We are trying to improve our ways of working, and hope you would be willing to give us your feedback on the release related work for Qt 5.0.0. Please help us by answering the 9 questions in the survey on: http://www.webropolsurveys.com/S/1FB38EA6200A637A.par Br, Sinan

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 15.57.18, Poenitz Andre wrote: My dashboard still fits a screen, even with a few old items in it. If yours doesn't and you don't like that (I wouldn't...) unsubscribe yourself. Destroying other people's work is not an option. There's no destroying. All

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.0 - feedback on our ways of working

2013-01-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 16.02.43, Tanilkan Sinan wrote: Hi, We are trying to improve our ways of working, and hope you would be willing to give us your feedback on the release related work for Qt 5.0.0. Please help us by answering the 9 questions in the survey on:

[Development] Predefined platform dependent constants in QtQuick components

2013-01-29 Thread Oleg Shparber
Hi all, During development of the QtQuick2 application for BlackBerry 10 I noticed that all lists scrolls very quite slow. Same thing with any move of Flickable's content. The reason is the high resolution of the device's display. The problem is that there are constants which predefine behaviour

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 29.01.2013 13:05, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: moin *, 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which haven't seen activity for a long time a

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Alan Alpert
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rutledge Shawn shawn.rutle...@digia.com wrote: On 29 Jan 2013, at 1:41 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote: On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: moin *, 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 19.47.11, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 29.01.2013 13:05, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: moin *, 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. therefore i'd like to urge everyone to

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:10:45AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 15.57.18, Poenitz Andre wrote: My dashboard still fits a screen, even with a few old items in it. If yours doesn't and you don't like that (I wouldn't...) unsubscribe yourself. Destroying

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:43:33PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 06:43:34PM +, Rutledge Shawn wrote: I do actually abandon stuff when it's quite clear that it's dead, but due to the review and CI processes, there's quite a large percentage of what I write that

Re: [Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

2013-01-29 Thread Jedrzej Nowacki
On Tuesday 29. January 2013 13.05.52 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: moin *, 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which haven't seen activity