+1!
On 22/12/2022 12:21 am, Morten Sørvig via Development wrote:
Hi,
I’d like to nominate Mikołaj Boć as an approver for the Qt project.
Mikołaj joined the Qt Company earlier this year and hit the ground
running. He has contributed features and many bug fixes for the Qt for
WebAssembly
Hi,
I believe that would be a bug, as I checked on Linux and Wave is listed
in supported codecs.
It would have a better chance of being fixed If you could report it here:
https://bugreports.qt.io
On 20/12/2022 5:56 pm, rynn.chen wrote:
Hello,
I created an application with Qt6.2.4 on win
+1 !!
On 29/11/2022 11:55 pm, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
Hi,
Kurt Pattyn is currently listed as the Maintainer fo Qt WebSocket. However, he
has not responded to emails I sent him over the last few months. In the middle
of October I informed him that I will remove him as
On 27/9/2022 9:28 pm, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
Please stop announcing this kind of updates through the development
mailing list!
Please do *not* stop sending releasing information emails on this list.
I kinda like knowing about them.
Release information, regardless of open source or
Governance of Qt going forward.
+1
--
Lorn Potter
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
unbelievable products now!
Congrats on the new digs! I am sure we will be hearing more about it in
the future.
Thanks again!
--
Lorn Potter
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
+1
On 21/4/2022 10:00 PM, Morten Sørvig wrote:
I'd like to nominate David Skoland as approver for the Qt Project.
David is employed by the Qt company has been contributing to Qt since
late 2020, with patches and reviews to several modules. He has recently
shifted focus to work on Qt for
On 19/1/2022 1:01 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
For Qt 6.4, I'd like to propose we change the way we detect and enable SIMD
support. TL;DR:
[snip]
On a side track. Not knowing too much regarding simd, what would be the
best benchmarks to get a comparison of Qt WebAssembly simd support vs.
On 21/1/2022 6:10 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday, 20 January 2022 11:22:19 PST Lorn Potter wrote:
It's like Jean-Michael says, 32 bit, but it's complicated.
Yeah, I can get that :)
From what I've understood so far, WASM is not __x86_64__ but it might be
__i386__. So far, that's
On 20/1/2022 1:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 20:56:10 PST Lorn Potter wrote:
wasm is a special case, as we turn it off by default, regardless of
detection. We cannot allow detection by default (specified by some
configure argument which is currently -sse2) because
it is
compiled in.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt
way to
discover if the system has been gamed or hacked in some way. 3rd party
overseers or somesuch thing?
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
s the main() function to a thread to leave
the main browser thread to do other things so it never blocks.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development
Thanks for simplifying that API!
On 26/5/21 10:09 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
NX support is missing right now, and is planned after 6.2.
As well, a webassembly backend is being contributed based on openAL, for
6.3...
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtmultimedia/+/349515
--
Lorn Potter
!
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo
is.
Technically, I would say a set of diff patches is a fork. After all, git
is just a glorified set of patches.
I see nothing wrong with a fork. Unless it's a spork, then it's
completely wrong.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author
On 13/5/21 8:00 PM, Kevin Kofler via Development wrote:
KDE is maintaining their own 5.15 branches, e.g.:
https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qtbase/-/commits/kde/5.15
I'm not kde developer, but I am sure kde has almost always had their own
fork of Qt.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer
open source and free.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt
picture is that if it furthers/funds the development
of the open source product, then I am ok with
helping the closed source side.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development
what was done to qmake to get it to build qtopia. :)
We have a huge elephant in the room which nobody want to see it...
I guess it's a choice of an elephant or a whale.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt
Hi *,
On the road to Qt 6, we must remember our past:
What better way than to have a short break to listen to this worldwide
hit - The Qt 4 Dance!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbTEVbQLC8s
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
cmake call.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Gabriel (aka sunweaver at debian.org <http://debian.org>)
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
iling list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development ma
basic functionality. On par for the serialnmea plugin.
Thanks in advance,
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development
g bugs that need review.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://li
to go back and start over, I'll also want to be
able to go back to the "In Progress" state from it.
+1
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded D
WebAssembly platform into a more
viable option for Qt multi platform applications.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
for an interesting job as both software engineer and technical writer.
Good luck to ya! Thanks for great docs! It was a pleasure working
alongside you in the Brissie office.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
recommend aiming for full threading.
Actually, QtWebAssembly platform is a supported platform and default is
nothread. :) What is not tested is nothread on a different platform like
desktop.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
e.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-63925
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
to be
statically linked as Qt WebAssembly is statically linked. dlopen is
dependent upon main and side module support for dynamic linking.
See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-63925?filter=19272
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
21:49:
note: expanded
from macro 'Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X'
# define Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X(Condition, Message) static_assert(bool(Condition),
Message)
^ ~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Develop
+1
On 17/5/19 12:45 AM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
I’d like to nominate Mikhail Svetkin for Approver status.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https
On 2/4/19 11:14 pm, Laszlo Agocs wrote:
As discussed at https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Graphics_Vision_2020 Qt 6
will do away with the hard OpenGL dependency in most, if not all, of its
modules. This is achieved via a small abstraction layer, currently
called the Qt Rendering Hardware
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt
On 25/10/18 9:19 am, Konstantin Shegunov wrote:
Addendum: There's too much vague phrasing. When I was reading through
the text I read things of the sort:
"Showing empathy towards other community members"
and
"Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
professional
On 03/14/2018 07:54 PM, Morten Sørvig wrote:
>
>> On 9 Mar 2018, at 13:57, Morten Sørvig wrote:
>>
>> * (No) thread support
>>
>> Wasm and Emscripten do have pthreads support. However this requires
>> SharedArrayBuffer,
>> which has been disabled in all major browser
On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote:
> 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js less
> so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and asm.js
> though, given asm.js's previous performance claims.
In my experience WebAssembly is much more
Hi, I would like to add...
One of the guys over at https://qtmob.slack.com keeps a demonstration of
the Qt examples for Qt Webassembly (thanks David!):
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/wasm-qt-examples/last/index.html
Not all of the examples work, and not all of them work correctly.
Firefox
Purpose is for the development of Qt for WebAssembly
>> (http://webassembly.org)
>>
> how does this relate to this effort? https://codereview.qt-project.org/178543
>
It is continuing and refining that code line.
-
Lorn Potter
Developer, Maintainer QtSensors/QtSystemInfo
_
up with technical reasons the new c++11 member
initialization is better than what is there now, I’d rather keep it the same as
it is now.
-
Lorn Potter
Developer, Maintainer QtSensors/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 08/25/2017 02:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> [ "First there was Linux / and then there was Mac / now with Windows / on
> the
> Open Source track" anyone?]
ahh yes. The all time dance mega hit: Qt 4 Dance!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbTEVbQLC8s
> On 25 Aug 2017, at 7:00 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> My criticism is what I *don't* see in this: local communication. Cloud
> communication *should* be secondary in IoT. In fact, few devices should
> communicate with the Cloud, hopefully only those that have
> On 1 Aug 2017, at 10:44 pm, Kai Koehne wrote:
>
> I'd like to remind everyone about our commit policy:
> https://wiki.qt.io/Review_Policy . In particular, it says 'Give reviewers
> ample time to respond', which is assumed to be a full working day minimum
> (preferably two
On 23/7/17 3:43 am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote:
over C++ ??
No it's much faster than the Javascript -> JIT flow.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
On 07/22/2017 05:52 AM, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>
>
> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ ->
> WebAssembly) is a good plan.
What does this have to do with Qt?
___
Development mailing list
On 06/06/2017 12:20 AM, Jason H wrote:
>
>
>> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 12:34 AM
>> From: "Lorn Potter" <lorn.pot...@gmail.com>
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?
>>
>>
>>
>
On 06/05/2017 07:00 AM, Jason H wrote:
> While Qt is not a web framework, over time there have been efforts to use it
> on the web (outlined below).
>
> Given that Chrome is dropping NaCL
> (http://www.tomshardware.com/news/chrome-deprecates-pnacl-embraces-webassembly,34583.html)
> and the
On 18/10/16 13:03, Fredrik de Vibe wrote:
> As by now 15 days (and more) have passed since the announcement, it is
> now final. Timur is now the maintainer of Qt Network and Jesús is the
> maintainer of Qt NetworkAuth. The wiki has been updated.
Congrats guys! :)
Looking forward to working with
Thanks for that.
On Wednesday, 10 August 2016 11:35:06 PM AEST Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> yours has 41 lines and the reference only 38
> http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/header.LGPL?h=dev
Ok, so how to deal with files that have multiple copyright holders?
--
Software Engineer
System
Hello,
Is there someone who has a script for updating license headers that can
release this, or make it known? Or, alternatively, update the license
headers or make the license test not run on non supported modules for
integrations?
Trying to upstream some stuff:
Module "qt/qtsystems"
On 08/03/16 01:13, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I'd like to propose Shawn Rutledge as maintainer for Qt Quick.
+1
--
Software Engineer
Hardware Enablement
Canonical Ltd
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On 22/01/16 18:52, Hausmann Simon wrote:
I'm of the opinion that our mission should be to make life easier for
programmers.
I think this has always been the main mission for Qt.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On 23/01/16 04:37, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
As I said, exceptions are like*a life vest*, they should be used *only in
>critical situations* not everywhere.
>
Using them anywhere, can break code everywhere as the number of return points
and code paths immediately becomes near infinite.
On 15/07/15 00:37, Robin Burchell wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate plfiorini for Approver status.
He's been quite helpful in working on Wayland (client compositor) side
things in conjunction with the Hawaii desktop (http://hawaiios.org/),
and offering review on related patches. He
On 16/06/2015 6:49 pm, Koehne Kai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt-
[...]
If you ask my opinion, 'errorOccurred' sounds like a sensible name.
I concur that errorOccurred() is the most sensible choice.
+1
--
Lorn 'ljp' Potter
On 14/06/2015 1:01 pm, Alan Alpert wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.
Also
On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.
Also, errored is just wrong, error is also past tense.
--
Lorn 'ljp' Potter
Software Engineer, llornkcor technologies / Jolla
On 25 Feb 2015, at 7:20 am, Robin Burchell robin...@viroteck.net wrote:
Hi,
Since nobody else has replied to this yet, my understanding of what
happened with license checks is roughly as follows. I was not
involved, so YMMV - this is all just gained from observation of what's
happened -
Hi,
I just noticed that the Qt Submodule Update Bot emails still have a reply-to
email of: qt_submodule_update_...@ovi.com
Seeing as ovi.com was Nokia's thing, I just wanted to make sure this was the
correct and current email address for that.
___
This change removes the QtSystemInfo QStorage
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/95730/
On 3 Oct 2014, at 8:46 pm, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I just pulled Qt and then it wouldn't build. After investigating a bit, I
found this:
~/qt5 (5.4)$ find . -name qstorageinfo.h
On 24 Sep 2014, at 3:57 pm, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
I wonder if theint interface indexed API is tedious to use. Say you do
manage to get a QNetworkInterface object from QtNetwork, then before you can
call for example
QString imsi(int interface) const;
you
Hi *,
While looking into a bug https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-41283
It reminded me that I am not happy with NetworkInfo since it got ported from
QtMobility to Qt 5.
*Note* QSystemInfo is not officially supported API.
Since I am maintainer for it and it's not released, I am
On 18/09/14 06:25, Knoll Lars wrote:
On 17/09/14 22:17, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
Adding to myself: But I agree that downloading to a phone doesn't make too
much sense, and we should probably detect that you look at the site from a
mobile device. That part sounds like a plain
On 18/09/14 05:09, Kuba Ober wrote:
One of the reasons I loath to recommend to the management to go back to
paying for Qt licenses is that we’d have been sponsoring what amounts to 2 or
3 major rebrandings and “revamps”, and it seems like throwing money down the
drain. As a user, I want
On 27/08/2014 9:56 pm, Bo Thorsen wrote:
Den 27-08-2014 10:40, Knoll Lars skrev:
On 26/08/14 21:00, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:58:41 Kuba Ober wrote:
Unless we want to make this a tri-state: definitely local, definitely
remote, could be
On 27/06/2014 11:14 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I've just counted: I have 203 pending reviews for me. At least half of them
haven't been updated in six months. Some of them are for the old master and
api_changes branches and will never, ever be accepted unless resubmitted.
Last we discussed
On 12/06/2014 8:49 am, Richard Moore wrote:
The notes from the network session are online at
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCS14QtNetwork
for those who couldn't attend (or those who did but can't remember what
we said). Thanks to Danimo for minuting this.
Hi Kurt,
On 22/03/2014 9:36 pm, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
Hi,
is there any reason why math3d is in the QtGUI module on not in the QtCore
module?
I agree it should have been moved to QtCore.
As I remember the discussions, they involved use cases, and more people
thought the strongest use case
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Lorn Potter
QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
llornkcor technologies
to proceed with these
modules within a few weeks from now, and when and how we can bring these
modules back as an integral part of Qt 5.x.
Good news here.
As maintainer of qsysteminfo, please try and include me in any
discussions regarding this. As I have a few ideas.
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software
meant as guidelines not hard rules.
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt
Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer
module.
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
without getting it too expensive?
Thanks for your efforts so far!
André
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors
On 02/03/13 07:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On sábado, 2 de março de 2013 07.51.04, Lorn Potter wrote:
Wasn't there already similar functionality in QtMobility?
QSystemStorageInfo seems to provide similar functionality?
Yes it does.
Or did all
that get scrapped in Qt 5?
It's
On 18/02/13 16:01, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On Monday, February 18, 2013 05:07:42 Lorn Potter wrote:
On 15/02/13 20:43, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I don't know why you're packaging those.
You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right?
They are part of Qt, as in Qt Project.
Being hosted
in any way and their API will
likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be part
of a Qt release?
They are stable. Some of them even have active maintainers.
Thanks,
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
agree here too.
Making the unloved modules invisible is not a good thing. Lots of people
put lots of work into them, and IMHO that shouldn't be wasted.
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org
-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed all the QtMobility bugs list satu makela as the lead for
all components.
Since when did this happen? I saw no email announcing this change. As
far as I know, I did not abdicate my standing/maintainership of my
components there.
I
On 11/12/2012, at 1:25 PM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
APIs likely to come in later. So if we had an import QtAddons 5.0 it
could look like this:
import Qt3d 2.0
import QtSensors 5.0
import QtMobility.sensors 1.3
FYI QtMobility.sensors has been removed.
Lorn Potter
Senior
On 29/11/2012, at 6:05 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/11/2012, at 5:47 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
If maintainers for other repositories would like to get the same branches
setup
the CI
system and a big thanks goes to them already now.
Why not just do this as default, so all modules workflow are similar?
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
?
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 20/11/2012, at 6:20 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
Hi Lorn,
On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/11/2012, at 6:09 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
The beta2 is a very good milestone towards Qt 5. We now have packages
, but
please, there are a few modules that got removed that _do_ have active
maintainers, just not Digia ones. QConnectivity, QSensors and QSystems for
example.
Isn't BB10 supposed to become a Tier 1 platform? QSensors are a part of BB10.
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors
Hi,
So how is one supposed to build submodules that got removed by change
41c3f2cb5f633f0e540482ca01b2c2caa2475e57 ?
certainly make module-qtsensors is now broken.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Lorn
Potter [lorn.pot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:14 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] building modules removed
Hi,
So how is one supposed to build submodules that got removed by change
On 17/11/2012, at 6:02 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On sábado, 17 de novembro de 2012, às 05.35.18, you wrote:
On 17/11/2012, at 5:27 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On sábado, 17 de novembro de 2012 05.14.39, Lorn Potter wrote:
Hi,
So how
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing
as a test, you can review this minor change
https://codereview.qt-project.org/38589
Happy hacking !
Cheers,
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo