XSL is a pretty ugly and confusing way to do anything IMHO, I used it as
a web templating language for a while and it was a nightmare. In short
- its best avoided.
Ian.
Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
Can anyone familiar with xsl list the differences between filtering html
for anonimity-compromising
--- Zlatin Balevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone familiar with xsl list the differences between filtering html
for anonimity-compromising content and filtering xsl transformations?
If an xml file is filtered agains the current rules (no off-freenet
links, no actions) and its
--- Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
Was NGR tested as extensively as freenet's original routing? If not then why?
You could have reused some of the same code from the first freenet paper. Even
now this
might
still be a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The switch to a devel-network without really giving informations out
isn't the first big mistake we where able to see last weeks and one more
time I lost my routingtable. Cause I'm a developer too I don't have the
time to check daily the
What newsgroups? I don't know about any newsgroups.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/
Hey that's pretty nice looking!
__
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Logos und Klingeltöne fürs Handy bei
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:02:50PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
can't wait to check it out
-Martin
Done. :-)
Let me know if you're able to retrieve it or not.
--
Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas
___
Devl mailing list
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:02:50PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
can't wait to check it out
-Martin
Done. :-)
Let me know if you're able to retrieve it or not.
I got it hours ago, actually.
Site's not too shabby! Well, a little shabby ;)
Added it to my
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:51:58AM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:02:50PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
can't wait to check it out
-Martin
Done. :-)
Let me know if you're able to retrieve it or not.
I got it hours ago,
Yes, I'm still not sure why it ends up with all the CHECKED_HTTP stuff, as
the original files contain just straight http://127.0.0.1: links.
Ah... you shouldn't do this!
If linking to in-freenet content, you should just link like:
a href=[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a
rather than include the
I changed my port upon joining the unstable network and by mistake had forgotten
to enable forwarding on the NAT. The node didn't receive any inbound
connections, however it had more than 4 outgoing connections to each peer in the
routing table, was receiving and fulfilling queries (both
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:27:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm still not sure why it ends up with all the CHECKED_HTTP stuff, as
the original files contain just straight http://127.0.0.1: links.
Ah... you shouldn't do this!
If linking to in-freenet content, you should
Ian,
as a personal suggestion, take a long breath and try to
write and act as a primus inter pares and not as a
dictator.
This is only a problem of missing information.
Such a kind od changes *MUST* widely announced
*WELL BEFORE* they are done.
It is netiquette; it is mandatory !
Note that
Problem solved. listenport ~= listenPort. Doh. It
would be nice if there was a log entry for unknown
settings.
- Original Message -
From: pineapple [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:13 PM
Subject: [freenet-dev] Re: Unstable weirdness in node
Those users who upgraded to unstable while giving seednodes to the
seednode harvester will be publicly castrated on freenode at 18:00
sharp, in line with the new project policy of shamelessly assaulting its
users. Seriously, how are we supposed to stop this from happening again?
- Forwarded
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:34:50AM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
--- Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
Was NGR tested as extensively as freenet's original routing? If not then why?
You could have reused some of the same code from the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as a personal suggestion, take a long breath and try to
write and act as a primus inter pares and not as a
dictator.
Firstly, If you have a personal suggestion, send it to me
personally, not the mailing list.
Secondly, if Matthew has to get a consensus before every
Currently hawk's seednode harvester requests from the following URLs
(which are available only to hawk):
http://24.72.13.79:/servlet/nodestatus/noderefs.txt?minConnections=1
- Has been upgraded to the unstable network, therefore returns unstable
network nodes. Removed from list.
I don't see why testing it would be any harder than testing the old
routing as was done in the freenet paper(freenet.pdf 1999). For the
paper the simulated 1000 nodes. They didn't have move actual data
around. The NG 10 points seems like less state per node to simulate
than the old
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 17:56, Ian Clarke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as a personal suggestion, take a long breath and try to
write and act as a primus inter pares and not as a
dictator.
Firstly, If you have a personal suggestion, send it to me
personally, not the mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volunteers don't respond well to ultimatums from those that do little
else but whine when things aren't going well.
You didn't answer my point; a little communication to people
that (you worded it) do very little for Freenet (publishers,
users, evangelists, node
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 19:15, Ian Clarke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volunteers don't respond well to ultimatums from those that do little
else but whine when things aren't going well.
You didn't answer my point; a little communication to people
that (you worded it) do very little
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv19746/src/freenet
Modified Files:
Version.java
Log Message:
6277:
Disable outbound request based limiting by default.
Make requestDataNotFound a counting diagnostic process, not continuous.
Reject
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/states/announcing
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv19746/src/freenet/node/states/announcing
Modified Files:
SendAnnouncement.java
Log Message:
6277:
Disable outbound request based limiting by default.
Make requestDataNotFound a
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/http/infolets
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv19746/src/freenet/node/http/infolets
Modified Files:
GeneralInfolet.java
Log Message:
6277:
Disable outbound request based limiting by default.
Make requestDataNotFound a counting
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/states/request
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv19746/src/freenet/node/states/request
Modified Files:
DataPending.java Pending.java
Log Message:
6277:
Disable outbound request based limiting by default.
Make requestDataNotFound a
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv19746/src/freenet/node
Modified Files:
Main.java Node.java
Log Message:
6277:
Disable outbound request based limiting by default.
Make requestDataNotFound a counting diagnostic process, not
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:36:50AM +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alas, fred is just a reference implementation, and in progress, too, so I
don't mind either, as the future will bring much good to the situation.
Heh. Freenet cannot be run with free software (except maybe the non-nio
--- Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:34:50AM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
--- Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
Was NGR tested as extensively as freenet's original routing? If not then why?
You could
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 10:45:22PM +0200, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oct 24, 2003 10:47:38 PM (freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable, main, NORMAL): Rejecting
reference tcp/65.31.24.19:2115, sessions=1, presentations=1, ID=DSA(...) - too old
in loadEstimators
Well... that's live :)
Hi, just some very subjective thoughts by me, again. Feel free to ignore
me:)
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:56:28PM +0100, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to help us develop Freenet, then run unstable and report
bugs - but please don't expect it to work all the time, it is called
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:16:46AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Hi, just some very subjective thoughts by me, again. Feel free to ignore
me:)
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:56:28PM +0100, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to help us develop Freenet, then run unstable and report
Please update daily. Ideally please email me so that I know you are
running an unstable node, perhaps with its address, because I need to
I tried to set-up another node running unstable, but the parallel
removal problem seems to be there (it was gone for some time):
Oct 25, 2003 1:30:02 AM
I note that you have avoided virtually every crucial argument I made in
my response - I will try not to treat your reply with the same level of
evasiveness:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When did I ever say that the Freenet community had zero value?
You never said this, this is simply your attitude,
Just got the following error message:
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 6 in queue, 2897 millis since enqueued
last item, 376811 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug.
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
Running build #: 6276
JVM: Sun 1.4.2_01b06
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/crypt
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv9009/src/freenet/crypt
Modified Files:
DSAPublicKey.java
Log Message:
6278:
Make Identify a (more or less) regular message. We pull the ref off it when we receive
it, but later it gets executed by
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/states/FNP
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv9009/src/freenet/node/states/FNP
Modified Files:
NewVoid.java
Log Message:
6278:
Make Identify a (more or less) regular message. We pull the ref off it when we receive
it, but later it
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv9009/src/freenet
Modified Files:
ConnectionHandler.java Version.java
Log Message:
6278:
Make Identify a (more or less) regular message. We pull the ref off it when we receive
it, but later it gets
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/rt
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv9009/src/freenet/node/rt
Modified Files:
CPAlgoRoutingTable.java FilterRoutingTable.java
NGRoutingTable.java RoutingTable.java
Log Message:
6278:
Make Identify a (more or less) regular
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/states/FNP
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv10052/src/freenet/node/states/FNP
Added Files:
NewIdentify.java
Log Message:
d'oh 6278
--- NEW FILE: NewIdentify.java ---
package freenet.node.states.FNP;
import freenet.node.*;
import
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:27:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm still not sure why it ends up with all the CHECKED_HTTP stuff, as
the original files contain just straight http://127.0.0.1: links.
Ah... you shouldn't do this!
If linking to in-freenet content, you should
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/ds
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv13289/src/freenet/node/ds
Modified Files:
StoreIOException.java
Log Message:
fix NPE that was disguising ERROR...
Index: StoreIOException.java
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv13289/src/freenet
Modified Files:
Version.java
Log Message:
fix NPE that was disguising ERROR...
Index: Version.java
===
RCS file:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 08:54:12AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed my port upon joining the unstable network and by mistake had forgotten
to enable forwarding on the NAT. The node didn't receive any inbound
connections, however it had more than 4 outgoing connections to each peer
Attached is a firewall script which excludes nodes I suspect are
running protocol version 1.46.
Even with this firewall, I still see very high requests/hour, 150k
So I don't think it is the old nodes in the connection table, but
this gets rid of them just in case. Unfortunately if any of them
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 10:50:13PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
Attached is a firewall script which excludes nodes I suspect are
running protocol version 1.46.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but...
If you've done as suggested and changed your listenPort setting for the
unstable net, and
Edward J. Huff wrote:
Attached is a firewall script which excludes nodes I suspect are
running protocol version 1.46.
big snip
If you change your listenport before switching to the new network fork
(as was recommended), this isn't necessary, right?
-Martin
46 matches
Mail list logo
