x...@freenetproject.org:
> http://www.draketo.de/english/gnupg-attack
>
See evil32.com, someone uploaded this to the normal keyservers. Many people are
affected.
Easy workaround is to add "keyid-format long" to gpg.conf. Longer term
workaround is to pressure Werner Koch and the GPG guys to tot
t;> <https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/political-and-lobbying-activities>*,
>>> i.e.,* it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part
>>> of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for
>>&g
your website) are perfectly fine.
X
Michael Grube:
> I'm somewhat familiar with 501c3 rules. Ian's correct, it's not legal for
> the Freenet project to officially have a political agenda.
>
> Tor project is probably also in violation.
> On Jun 25, 2016 2:57 PM,
Ian Clarke:
> Even more seriously, it may put us in violation of US law because we are a
> 501c3
> non-profit, which are restricted in the political and lobbying activities they
> can participate in while claiming 501c3 status.
I don't see the banner now, but I would just like to point out that t
x...@freenetproject.org:
> I won't make any details public about who is involved, but for now I can say:
> - It sounds like the politician does indeed like Freenet and is serious in
> thinking about how we could acquire further funds.
> - This isn't some random local village politician, we're talk
On 15/01/16 01:54, x...@freenetproject.org wrote:
> Someone mentioned a related tool on IRC:
>
> This looks usefull for deb packaging and possibly for other
> distros as well:
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Debian-New-Tool-CME
>
It's useful in a very minor way that is n
On 01/12/15 22:59, salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> You picked the one thing agencies have boat loads of and made it a
> requirement for operating critical parts of the network and you alienate the
> honest users left. [..]
Please communicate more clearly. Nobody can understand wha
On 04/11/15 11:55, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:40 +0100, xor wrote:
>> we also haven't encountered any unsolvable
>> technical goals with how it is.
>
> Toad says there are fundamental problems with Freenet. Is that not the
> case?
Please stop posting unconstructive comments like
On 03/11/15 15:57, Ian wrote:
> It's interesting that you would point to the Hurd as an example of how a
> software project should be run, perhaps if they had spent more time on code
> and less on documentation, as Linux did, Linux wouldn't have utterly won
> that battle. The GNU Hurd is a caution
On 02/11/15 23:47, Bob Ham wrote:
>> Why do you think TCP still relies on packet loss to signal congestion,
>> rather than ECN? Because there are thousands of buggy TCP firewalls
>> which drop packets with the ECN bit set, or worse, home routers which
>> crash completely when they see it!
>
> You
On 29/10/15 09:10, dean wrote:
>> I've temporarily disabled the GWT requirement. This is easier to maintain
>> than bundling GWT, but in the long run (i.e. to meet Debian policy) we will
>> need to:
>>
>> - package GWT for debian again (very hard), or
>> - remove the relevant stuff that requires
On 28/10/15 10:51, Florent Daigniere wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 21:47 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015, 15:13:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
>>> I disagree. We should take reasonable steps to avoid breaking
>>> unofficial
>>> plugins, but we shouldn't let it cri
On 26/10/15 11:19, Florent Daigniere wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 16:09 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Steve Dougherty >>
>> wrote:
>>>
Ian, Toad and NextGens are the only current admins of the GitHub
org,
but none of them are very active on the projec
On 24/10/15 23:44, dean wrote:
> On 10/24/15 08:09, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 23/10/15 00:09, dean wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have been hacking on the freenet debian package for a little while and
>>> I think I have gotten it up to a usable stage. Id li
Hi, can I get git push access back on debian.git and contrib.git? I have some
updates to make.
Also note the teams (as in Github Teams) are now useless since they only
provide permissions to *-staging, but those repos have all be renamed away.
Ian, Toad and NextGens are the only current admins
On 25/10/15 00:46, dean wrote:
> On 10/25/15 04:08, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 23/10/15 08:54, dean wrote:
>>> On 10/23/15 13:50, Steve Dougherty wrote:
>>>> On 10/22/2015 06:09 PM, dean wrote:
>>>> * I don't think v29 is preferable to contrib master. ma
On 23/10/15 08:54, dean wrote:
> On 10/23/15 13:50, Steve Dougherty wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 06:09 PM, dean wrote:
>> * I don't think v29 is preferable to contrib master. master is split
>> into multiple jars, which is better and I'm hoping we can move to it.
>
> My thoughts on this were: The de
On 23/10/15 00:09, dean wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been hacking on the freenet debian package for a little while and
> I think I have gotten it up to a usable stage. Id like some feedback if
> someone would like to browse/test it please?
>
> https://github.com/RdrOfTheSt0rm/debian
>
> Here is t
On 19/09/15 21:25, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> Does anyone have benchmarks that demonstrate native acceleration having
> significant performance improvements? Keeping it around makes for
> maintenance, and anecdotes suggest native Java performance is
> sufficient. If it's no longer a clear benefit to
https://github.com/freenet/debian but it hasn't been updated for a few years.
Feel free to try to get it to work again.
As far as possible, this tries to follow all of Debian policy. Some things
still need to be fixed however.
I wish to veto any half-assed Debian package that doesn't follow pol
+devl@
On 29/07/14 23:03, xor wrote:
> (re-sent because mail bounced from infinity0's GMX address)
>
> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:10:17 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>> +nextgens
>>
>> Re-reading through the IRC logs from last night apparently there's this:
>
Come on man we all have these moments. The codebase is pretty frustrating to
work with tbh.
X
On 18/06/14 14:51, David Roden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the really depressing thing is that googling the error message has the
> solution in the first result. I sure as hell hope you’re not billing FPI for
On 18/06/14 13:00, xor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to know how to build the latest official version of freenet-ext.jar:
> This will allow me to add some debug-code to db4o which will greatly reduce
> the effort I need to invest in debugging a WOT issue.
>
> I suppose the repository is contrib-offici
On 04/01/14 18:48, Alexandre Minette wrote:
> On 4 January 2014 13:53, Ximin Luo wrote:
>
>> Not to stomp on your ideas, they are nice - but talk is cheap.
>>
>> No major work like what you described will end well, without first a
>> refactor
>> of the co
Not to stomp on your ideas, they are nice - but talk is cheap.
No major work like what you described will end well, without first a refactor
of the code. (And if you try to force it, the codebase will end up worse than
before.)
This is dirty business. See the thread "Freenet at the Circumvention
+devl@
+tom
On 14/12/13 22:32, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On 14/12/13 19:20, Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hi
>> I worked on the transport plugins framework during GSoC 2012 and continued
>> till March 2013.
>> The changes involved to the core structure of Fred was so much that I never
>> managed to get
On 30/10/13 22:18, xor wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 02:25:31 PM Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 26/10/13 04:43, xor wrote:
>>> On Friday, October 25, 2013 11:13:22 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>>>> On 25/10/13 00:45, xor wrote:
>>>>> I tried to edit the WO
On 26/10/13 04:43, xor wrote:
> On Friday, October 25, 2013 11:13:22 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 25/10/13 00:45, xor wrote:
>>> I tried to edit the WOT development section of the wiki. Some edits
>>> worked,
>>> but then suddenly I started to receive an empty p
On 25/10/13 00:45, xor wrote:
> I tried to edit the WOT development section of the wiki. Some edits worked,
> but then suddenly I started to receive an empty page when trying to store an
> edit.
> Who is responsible for the administration? Can you please check the server's
> error logs?
>
> UTC
Likely because other non-Tor-specific attacks (staining, pwning) that are
mentioned, are way easier.
They are probably working on it, though. Data centre in Utah, anyone?
On 05/10/13 07:20, Jack Singleton wrote:
> Interesting that there is no mention of timing attacks...
>
> You would think wit
On 15/07/13 23:16, leuchtkaefer wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> Those who are on IRC chat already now that today I had a lot of problems
> trying
> to compile freenet from fred-staging (Commit
> 100a8d9ebc2af7f3918d9e4c5297e0331597b6ae).
> I finally found what was the problem: the file build.properties is
Sept 29-30 is good for me, I will make it. Please keep us updated with details!
On 07/07/13 23:47, leuchtkaefer wrote:
>
> Hey, it will be very interesting to meet people from Freenet project. The
> proposed date is at the end of my GSoC period so it is also an opportunity to
> evaluate the benef
On 27/05/13 13:56, leuchtkaefer wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I want to simulate the Library functionality.
> How can I test the SkeletonBTreeMap?
> The documentation doesn't explain and I cannot see any test in the source
> code. I checked the tests on fred and Library source.
> Is there any other pla
SSK - do you know what that is? The
same concept is in Tahoe-LAFS as well.
> Regarding what I am trying to achieve. I am looking somehow accelerate the
> speed of the search, share bookmarks (specialized in some terms) among a
> group of people probably by using PSK maybe some fri
On 20/05/13 22:36, leuchtkaefer wrote:
>
>
> Hi infinity0,
>
> My proposal to GSoC13 is highly related to your code (Library).
>
> First, do you have any extra documentation on the code that you think it
> could be useful for me to understand the most important parts, such the
> SkeletonBTre
On 18/04/13 13:08, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 18 Apr 2013 07:34:28 Florent Daigniere wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:59:16PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
>>> OCB mode[1] is a CCA-secure[2] mode of encryption which means that it's
>>> secure against act
OCB mode[1] is a CCA-secure[2] mode of encryption which means that it's secure
against active attackers, which pretty much applies to anything on the
internet. By contrast, non-authenticated encryption (anything without a MAC,
e.g. AES-CBC, AES-CTR) is only CPA-secure[3] and breaks under an acti
I would also like to quiz any student going for the crypto proposal and veto
anyone that doesn't meet the minimum theoretical requirements.
On 15/04/13 15:22, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 15 Apr 2013 06:23:35 Trung Hieu Nguyen wrote:
>> Dear FreeNet,
>>
>> My name is Nguyen Trung Hieu, 3rd
Hey, catch me on IRC some time and let's talk about it. I'll be around
Wednesday evening UTC time, probably.
I haven't looked at freenet code for ages, and my idea for "events framework
and API" was written before I found out about Twisted's Deferred[1]. It's
simple and powerful and after using it
On 14/02/13 12:42, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Organisations can apply from 18-29 of March.
>
> We have at least one very enthusiastic student (voxsim) who's been working
> with us with a view to participating. However he will need a mentor. I don't
> have time to be primary mentor to anyone this
On 17/02/13 04:58, xor wrote:
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 10:38:43 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Neither of these are mentioned in the Debian man page for git 1.7.10 but
>> this website describes its usage:
>> http://mikegerwitz.com/docs/git-horror-story.html
>
> Undocument
(bcc all so as to not spam everyone)
I missed this when it was first released, but git now supports signed commits:
$ git commit -S
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: "Ximin Luo "
4096-bit RSA key, ID 5FBBDBCE, created 2010-08-03
[master cb4164e] Test
1 file
Agreed; maven is better than our current build scripts in every other respect,
but we MUST NOT use it until secure downloads are implemented.
On 02/02/13 05:12, Travis Wellman wrote:
> How is maven different than ruby gems?
>
> http://venturebeat.com/2013/01/30/rubygems-org-hacked-interrupting-he
On 14/12/12 16:29, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 14 Dec 2012 15:42:16 xor wrote:
>> On Friday, December 14, 2012 11:03:45 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>>> We have debian packaging already, have a look to see how it works.
>>> debian-staging repo on github.
>>
>&
We have debian packaging already, have a look to see how it works.
debian-staging repo on github.
On 14/12/12 01:32, xor wrote:
> If I'm correct, there are no Linux package-management packages because
> 1) freenet-ext.jar is difficult to package
> 2) We release too many builds to continously updat
IMO the main problem has, for the longest while, been developer time and
code quality. It is a bit chicken-and-egg. If the code quality is poor
(which it is at the moment) then developers are less incline to work on
it (like me). If there are few developers with time to work, then code
quality
+devl at freenetproject.org
Thanks for the update. Does this mean you're working on a patch for fred? If
you send a pull request to fred-staging, I'll review it, but since I'm not
familiar with that part of fred, in order to make the review process easier,
you must structure the commits better tha
On 05/07/12 22:42, Pouyan Zaxar wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> this week I have been busy digging various possibilities of using
> WebSockets + Wicket to render progress bar while fetching Freenet URIs.
>
> * Why use websockets?
> To be able to push messages to the client without refreshing.
>
Why is pus
+devl@freenetproject.org
Thanks for the update. Does this mean you're working on a patch for fred? If
you send a pull request to fred-staging, I'll review it, but since I'm not
familiar with that part of fred, in order to make the review process easier,
you must structure the commits better than y
On 05/07/12 22:42, Pouyan Zaxar wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> this week I have been busy digging various possibilities of using
> WebSockets + Wicket to render progress bar while fetching Freenet URIs.
>
> * Why use websockets?
> To be able to push messages to the client without refreshing.
>
Why is pus
On 09/04/12 17:51, Ximin Luo wrote:
> - verify $TMPDIR using signatures and checksums hard-coded into the updater
Er, mis-edit here. I meant the certificate / key should be hard-coded into the
updater. The signatures and checksums would obviously be part of the
distribution, probably with
On 09/04/12 17:51, Ximin Luo wrote:
> (Of course, there needs to be
complete sentence:
of course, there needs to be additional code to ensure robust behaviour in case
the process is interrupted and restarted.
--
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0
https://bitbucket.org/infini
This is one way to allow us to deploy the new split freenet-ext.jar. It's not
the simplest way, but it has certain other advantages, described below.
## Rationale
Unify existing platform-specific and distribution-specific installers and
freenet.jar's updater functionality into a single platform-i
On 09/04/12 17:51, Ximin Luo wrote:
> - verify $TMPDIR using signatures and checksums hard-coded into the updater
Er, mis-edit here. I meant the certificate / key should be hard-coded into the
updater. The signatures and checksums would obviously be part of the
distribution, probably with
On 09/04/12 17:51, Ximin Luo wrote:
> (Of course, there needs to be
complete sentence:
of course, there needs to be additional code to ensure robust behaviour in case
the process is interrupted and restarted.
--
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0
https://bitbucket.org/infini
This is one way to allow us to deploy the new split freenet-ext.jar. It's not
the simplest way, but it has certain other advantages, described below.
## Rationale
Unify existing platform-specific and distribution-specific installers and
freenet.jar's updater functionality into a single platform-i
OK, but this information should NOT be
inside freenet-ext.jar itself, it should be a separate file that gets
distributed to the update directory, that the updater code reads first.
I can add such code to contrib-staging soon. A new target in build.xml that
creates e.g. freenet-default-install.mf wi
On 07/04/12 13:35, Ximin Luo wrote:
> To summarise, the main data we need to store are
>
> - files currently used by freenet, to be updated
> - bin : /proc/pidof(wrapper)/exe and something similar on windows probably
> - lib : lib in wrapper.conf
> - jars in wrapper.conf
&
To summarise, the main data we need to store are
- files currently used by freenet, to be updated
- bin : /proc/pidof(wrapper)/exe and something similar on windows probably
- lib : lib in wrapper.conf
- jars in wrapper.conf
- files needed by new-freenet[1], to be downloaded and added to wrap
OK, but this information should NOT be
inside freenet-ext.jar itself, it should be a separate file that gets
distributed to the update directory, that the updater code reads first.
I can add such code to contrib-staging soon. A new target in build.xml that
creates e.g. freenet-default-install.mf wi
On 07/04/12 13:35, Ximin Luo wrote:
> To summarise, the main data we need to store are
>
> - files currently used by freenet, to be updated
> - bin : /proc/pidof(wrapper)/exe and something similar on windows probably
> - lib : lib in wrapper.conf
> - jars in wrapper.conf
&
To summarise, the main data we need to store are
- files currently used by freenet, to be updated
- bin : /proc/pidof(wrapper)/exe and something similar on windows probably
- lib : lib in wrapper.conf
- jars in wrapper.conf
- files needed by new-freenet[1], to be downloaded and added to wrap
On 05/04/12 19:32, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I haven't looked at them for a while, but if I remember right:
>
> bigint7: benchmark the performance of java 7 biginteger
> bigint-gnu-gmp: benchmark the performance of gmp-java's biginteger
>
> gmp-java is my take on
I haven't looked at them for a while, but if I remember right:
bigint7: benchmark the performance of java 7 biginteger
bigint-gnu-gmp: benchmark the performance of gmp-java's biginteger
gmp-java is my take on NativeBigInteger:
https://github.com/infinity0/mozilla-gnome-keyring
it performs bette
On 05/04/12 19:32, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I haven't looked at them for a while, but if I remember right:
>
> bigint7: benchmark the performance of java 7 biginteger
> bigint-gnu-gmp: benchmark the performance of gmp-java's biginteger
>
> gmp-java is my take on
I haven't looked at them for a while, but if I remember right:
bigint7: benchmark the performance of java 7 biginteger
bigint-gnu-gmp: benchmark the performance of gmp-java's biginteger
gmp-java is my take on NativeBigInteger:
https://github.com/infinity0/mozilla-gnome-keyring
it performs bette
On 03/04/12 19:57, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Nextgens is convinced that many of the problems users have installing on
> Windows are due to firewalls blocking the localhost connection between the
> wrapper binary and the JVM running Freenet. The usual solution proposed is
> to split up freenet-ext.j
On 03/04/12 19:57, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Nextgens is convinced that many of the problems users have installing on
> Windows are due to firewalls blocking the localhost connection between the
> wrapper binary and the JVM running Freenet. The usual solution proposed is
> to split up freenet-ext.j
One word of advice: if you find the code hard to understand, it is not
necessarily your fault. IMO the codebase is messy atm. If you have trouble with
any file, use "git log " to find the previous people that worked
on it and go bug them to explain it to you in more human terms. They deserve it
:p
One word of advice: if you find the code hard to understand, it is not
necessarily your fault. IMO the codebase is messy atm. If you have trouble with
any file, use "git log " to find the previous people that worked
on it and go bug them to explain it to you in more human terms. They deserve it
:p
therCode(z);
> -printSummary("log only", res[0], "log+work", res[1]);
> -printSummary("log only", res[2], "log+work", res[3]);
> -printSummary("log only", res[4], "log+work", res[5]);
> +
> +System.out.printl
On 24/03/12 02:44, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> Wrong. Extracting the log statement into its own method and calling
> that method inside the while loop still creates garbage. Stack frames
> are different.
>
How do you explain the results obtained from running my test code, then? Turn
on -verbose:gc
could agree to restrict logging calls to be of the form
| if (log_level) log.level(
|args ... );
which would at least force the complex calculations to be factored out into
another method.
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> That is because in your example you're al
Sorry, bad typing. "inside its own" not "inside its only".
On 24/03/12 01:33, Ximin Luo wrote:
> That is because in your example you're allocating all those new Object()s in
> the same stack frame, so the allocator runs out of space on the stack.
>
> If
}
> }
> }
> ==
>
> As far as garbage collection times go, they are a function of the
> count of live objects and on how easy it is to scan them in parallel
> and a whole bunch of other factors. Others can answer better what
> values are common for Fred.
>
therCode(z);
> -printSummary("log only", res[0], "log+work", res[1]);
> -printSummary("log only", res[2], "log+work", res[3]);
> -printSummary("log only", res[4], "log+work", res[5]);
> +
> +System.out.printl
On 24/03/12 02:44, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> Wrong. Extracting the log statement into its own method and calling
> that method inside the while loop still creates garbage. Stack frames
> are different.
>
How do you explain the results obtained from running my test code, then? Turn
on -verbose:gc
could agree to restrict logging calls to be of the form
| if (log_level) log.level(
|args ... );
which would at least force the complex calculations to be factored out into
another method.
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> That is because in your example you're al
Sorry, bad typing. "inside its own" not "inside its only".
On 24/03/12 01:33, Ximin Luo wrote:
> That is because in your example you're allocating all those new Object()s in
> the same stack frame, so the allocator runs out of space on the stack.
>
> If
}
> }
> }
> ==
>
> As far as garbage collection times go, they are a function of the
> count of live objects and on how easy it is to scan them in parallel
> and a whole bunch of other factors. Others can answer better what
> values are common for Fred.
>
efactoring work: ignore them.
On 23/03/12 07:58, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Yes, kids, both your penisses are incredibly long. Now shut up and let the
> grown-ups do some refactoring.
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> David
>
> On 23.03.2012, at 04:47, Ximin Luo
efactoring work: ignore them.
On 23/03/12 07:58, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> Yes, kids, both your penisses are incredibly long. Now shut up and let the
> grown-ups do some refactoring.
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> David
>
> On 23.03.2012, at 04:47, Ximin Luo
that, take your attitude elsewhere.
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Ximin Luo <mailto:infinity0 at gmx.com>> wrote:
>
> The "drastically cleaner syntax" is a red herring. Most of the time when
> you
> are doing a complex calculation, you are
lisecond pauses are not nothing. They may be acceptable right
> now but unless you can offer a drastically cleaner syntax Fred should stick
> with predicates as they are handled much better by the hotspot jit.
>
> On Mar 22, 2012 5:36 PM, "Ximin Luo" <mailto:infinity0
Lazy evaluation is trivial.
Log.info("{1} did {2}",
new Object(){ public String toString() { return ITEM_1; } },
new Object(){ public String toString() { return ITEM_2; } }
);
Garbage collection with short-lived objects costs next to nothing.
On 22/03/12 21:15, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> Const
that, take your attitude elsewhere.
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Ximin Luo <mailto:infini...@gmx.com>> wrote:
>
> The "drastically cleaner syntax" is a red herring. Most of the time when
> you
> are doing a complex calculation, you are not going
On 22/03/12 12:00, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 Mar 2012 00:30:42 Ximin Luo wrote:
>> "Implicit dependency" means that changing some code in one area results in a
>> logical error in the other, that is not immediately apparent in the
>> documentatio
lisecond pauses are not nothing. They may be acceptable right
> now but unless you can offer a drastically cleaner syntax Fred should stick
> with predicates as they are handled much better by the hotspot jit.
>
> On Mar 22, 2012 5:36 PM, "Ximin Luo" <mailto:infini...@gmx.
Lazy evaluation is trivial.
Log.info("{1} did {2}",
new Object(){ public String toString() { return ITEM_1; } },
new Object(){ public String toString() { return ITEM_2; } }
);
Garbage collection with short-lived objects costs next to nothing.
On 22/03/12 21:15, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> Const
On 22/03/12 12:00, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 Mar 2012 00:30:42 Ximin Luo wrote:
>> "Implicit dependency" means that changing some code in one area results in a
>> logical error in the other, that is not immediately apparent in the
>> documentatio
s a
mechanism to read this information, and probably update that as well.
X
On 20/03/12 23:18, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 19 Mar 2012 01:52:19 Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 16/03/12 18:13, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>> On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 21:02:26 Ximin Luo wrote:
>>>
s a
mechanism to read this information, and probably update that as well.
X
On 20/03/12 23:18, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 19 Mar 2012 01:52:19 Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 16/03/12 18:13, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>> On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 21:02:26 Ximin Luo wrote:
>>>
Hi guys, I've added some of my ideas to the GSoC page.
I think someone should take some time to add more information to the other
ideas. ATM they are walls of text that don't have much structure, which new
students will probably have trouble parsing into a project plan.
I suggest each "project id
Hi guys, I've added some of my ideas to the GSoC page.
I think someone should take some time to add more information to the other
ideas. ATM they are walls of text that don't have much structure, which new
students will probably have trouble parsing into a project plan.
I suggest each "project id
d by Apache.
>
> On 03/18/2012 10:04 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> I wasn't aware any previous method used javascript, but we
>> implemented a non-javascript method quite recently that checks the
>> client browser's Accept-Language HTTP headers. Have a look at
>>
I wasn't aware any previous method used javascript, but we implemented a
non-javascript method quite recently that checks the client browser's
Accept-Language HTTP headers. Have a look at Steve's thread (in this same
mailing list) titled "Spanish Translation Deployment Complete".
There is JS on th
On 16/03/12 18:13, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 21:02:26 Ximin Luo wrote:
>> (Top-posting because previous post is too long to reply to in-line.)
>>
>> ## refactoring
>>
>> Refactoring the code helps to make it more understandable for other
On 19/03/12 01:09, Ximin Luo wrote:
> On 16/03/12 23:09, Marco Schulze wrote:
>> Well, the obvious question is 'why?'. Using /opt + /usr/bin scripts + service
>> scripts seems to be good enough. Either way, fred .jar paths are
>> configurable,
>> the jars t
e locked on specific build numbers. Why?
>
I haven't had time to update the submodule pointers to the latest commits and
verify that the package still works. Does this answer your question?
> On 16-03-2012 17:51, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> We already have a layout that adheres to the FHS,
On 19/03/12 00:41, Leah Hicks wrote:
> As far as I'm aware wordpress is the most secure content management system
> there is, ie there's no way really for anybody to successfully use an SQL
> injection. There are vulnerabilities in certain plugins, but as far as I know
> not wordpress itself. I was
1 - 100 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
