If chat is darknet-only and forums are Freetalk, neither of those will be
immediately available when starting up a node for the first time, at least
until there are darknet invites. There's not really a clear single solution.
Given that search is slow, I agree with those who suggest moving the
I think sites is better - it portrays the website-like properties.
Pages has a relative connotation of disconnectedness.
without fear in the first part seems overly emotional. It isn't clear from
this that a darknet is connecting only to one's friends. Do you mean running
darknet and opennet
Do I understand correctly that this problem is specific to Firefox? If we
can tell which browser the launcher will use, there could be a special case
for Firefox where the launcher opens a page asking for permission to switch
to private browsing mode, (I wouldn't expect this to be intelligent
I would be more than happy to do that. I have some ideas and
implementations from GSOC which might be helpful for realizing this.
However, I am not sure about the architecture (e.g. does every toadlet have
a view?). The engine which we all agreed upon is Apache Velocity.
I'm interested. How can
I've been working on adding default settings to the wizard as planned
here: http://piratepad.net/H3kOp3QXuV . The first page currently looks
like this: http://i.imgur.com/zyUSj.png , which is based on
http://draketo.de/proj/freenet-rabbit-hole/ .
The changes so far:
-Add pre-sets:
-Low
The project's current state is reflected in a dollar amount of remaining
project funds, along with an estimate of how much additional development time
it corresponds to. This amount will decrease suddenly and significantly when a
payment is made. It's not - at least supposed to be - a secret that
Welcome back!
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Tanya Pyatigorskaya
nekota...@gmail.com wrote:
May I ask you to let me know whether this task is still interesting for
Freenet?
Indeed it is! I introduced someone used to Vuze to Freenet, and the
lack of this kind of functionality was glaring.
Looks good. I wonder if perhaps the final group should be called File
Sharing instead of File Transfer? This would be really nice to have for
the plugins page indeed.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:13 AM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net
wrote:
Hey, everybody.
As a response to [1] I
Have you made progress on writing up your ideas? I'm eager to help.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Tanya Pyatigorskaya nekota...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks guys for your responses, it's really important for me!
I would determine more precisely what I want to create in a next few days
and would
Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
even if too busy, sorry - would be appreciated.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden
bo...@pterodactylus.net wrote:
**
Hi
I'd like to offer my assistance as a sysadmin.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Sunday 25 Dec 2011 08:17:15 Ian Clarke wrote:
I'm trying to edit the new wiki, but I get the following whenever I
attempt
to submit an edit:
Internal
It might be reasonable to do darknet invitations: a file which allows
someone to connect with another node over darknet without exchanging
noderefs. (I can't think of how this would work, though.) This could
also, perhaps more conveniently, come baked into a generated
installer. In a similar vein,
after the node
has been set up, starting out assuming low rates.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote:
It might be reasonable to do darknet invitations: a file which allows
someone to connect with another node over darknet without exchanging
noderefs. (I can't
Below I relay a message from Sone:
Hi!
Could you please put the CSS pseudo-class :target on the white-list
for the freenet content filter? I don't see a violation in privacy by
using it as it is just a way of targeting an element within the
document - but it would enable some nice CSS
Looks good! Hopefully we will be able to use localization on the website
by the end of the month. The website is deployed from its repository, so
I think it'd be possible to watch
https://github.com/freenet/website-staging for changes.
Thanks,
operhiem1
On 02/13/2012 07:35 AM, Flavio Heredia
Sorry, I fear I was unclear in my previous message. I meant that we hope
to have localization support enabled on the server by the end of the
month, not to impose time pressure.
On 02/13/2012 07:35 AM, Flavio Heredia wrote:
good morning list.
here i am boring with a couple of questions.
At
I'd be interested in doing this! It'd be good to get more people to
understand more of the codebase and document while we're at it. From my
experience Freenet does need cleanup for best practices quite badly and
I've been wanting to do an extensive cleanup run for quite some time.
I've already
Matthew has said he's unable to be the administrator of the project for
this year's Google Summer of Code, and that in order to apply we'd need a
volunteer administrator in addition to mentors. Is anyone willing to
volunteer?
Thanks,
Steve Dougherty
at 9:10 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 14 Feb 2012 13:22:08 Flavio Heredia wrote:
i get you right. i hope make a pull request by the end of _week_ ;-)
That would be awesome, good luck (both of you!).
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Steve Dougherty st
The Spanish translation is now deployed. When a request for / is made,
Apache checks the browser's language preferences, redirecting it to /es/
for Spanish and /en/ otherwise.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Sunday 04 Mar 2012 16:11:36
Should we get rid of more of the steps in the first-run setup? Asking
about datastore size is a must, but perhaps we can get away with
something like what I2P does where it assumes a very low bandwidth limit
and encourages users to raise it afterwards. This could work well
alongside requiring a
As far as perspectives, there is also Moxie Marlinspike's
http://convergence.io/
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Luke R. gaming4...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would tend to side with the ones who said we need both. HTTPS default,
HTTP still available for those in need of it. The reason is because
As far as Perspectives, there is also http://convergence.io/ by Moxie
Marlinspike.
On 03/10/2012 01:39 PM, Daxter wrote:
On Mar 10, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Luke R. wrote:
I would tend to side with the ones who said we need both. HTTPS default,
HTTP still available for those in need of it. The
months.
- -operhiem1
On 03/11/2012 08:53 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Freitag, 9. März 2012, 21:52:22 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
Should we get rid of more of the steps in the first-run setup?
I think yes - if people choose the default installation, they
should not be forced to take
in freenet.
enjoy and kind regards. merlin
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Flavio Heredia
merli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Steve Dougherty
st...@asksteved.com
wrote:
Looks great! I'm in the process of deploying it.
Is Convesar in Compartir, Convesar, Navegar
modify the site's contents.
On 03/17/2012 10:10 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
Hi all,
infinity0, nextgens and I completed some work on the
freenetproject.org webserver today. We made progress on a more
robust backup system, set up separation between the vhosts, and
deployed the updated Spanish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is this what you're looking for?
http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Coding_standards
On 03/18/2012 02:04 PM, Marco Schulze wrote:
I believe I read one email regarding this, but I can't find it nor
anything else about it. What are fred's coding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good point; I've amended the README as such.
On 03/18/2012 09:14 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Sunday 18 Mar 2012 02:10:09 Steve Dougherty wrote:
Hi all,
infinity0, nextgens and I completed some work on the
freenetproject.org webserver today
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leah is correct - Florent added Javascript to set cookies for
determining the language served by Apache.
On 03/18/2012 10:04 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
I wasn't aware any previous method used javascript, but we
implemented a non-javascript method quite
and more user-friendly in that language preferences can
be saved instead of re-set each time / is requested.
On 19/03/12 02:13, Steve Dougherty wrote:
Leah is correct - Florent added Javascript to set cookies for
determining the language served by Apache.
On 03/18/2012 10:04 PM, Ximin Luo wrote
Toseland wrote:
On Monday 19 Mar 2012 07:42:00 David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
On 18.03.2012, at 19:37, Steve Dougherty wrote:
Is this what you're looking for?
http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Coding_standards
In light of 3ef15c7701d666f7661cd9b58b41ae525ef32569, does toad
know about these?
Fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hope to investigate that this summer as part of Google Summer of
Code! Are there metrics to focus on?
Would you be willing to contribute analysis, or perhaps even be a mentor?
Steve Dougherty
On 03/26/2012 01:04 PM, Robert Hailey wrote
], so I'm not sure what
it involves or if it's within the scope of a summer. I'd appreciate
anyone's thoughts on this.
Is anyone willing to mentor me on this project?
Thanks,
Steve Dougherty
[0] http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/FCPv2#Messages
[1] https://github.com/Thynix/fred-staging/tree
deadline
All student proposals must be matched with a mentor
April 23rd, 2012 - 19:00 UTC:
Accepted student proposals announced
Thanks,
Steve Dougherty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPe01sAAoJECLJP19KqmFuHLAP/jpt8f0AtnHS/Bu3FcS9+LJi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The CSS changes for theming are as follows:
* The id navlist-selected is now a class.
* Fred navlist entries have an id based on the localization key.
* Plugin navlist entries have an id based on the localization key
appended to the class name,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been accepted to work on a network probing and statistics project.
We know very little about Freenet's network health and how to improve
it, and I hope to fill those gaps in knowledge with both simulation and
measurement. Specifically, I plan to:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
first week:
The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes: at each
hop they choose a random peer to pass the request to - this is a random
walk. However, because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2012 05:25 AM, Pouyan Zaxar wrote:
Since a complete make-over is going to be done, this would also be
a good chance new features/functionalities to improve UI
functionality: suggestions more than welcome.
Excellent! I'm glad to see this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea to keep an eye for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've completed an initial run of simulation work on probes. The code is
available, [1] as well as the simulation results from which the plots
were generated. [2] The point of immediate interest though is the plots
themselves, [3] which show the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2012 07:27 PM, Michael Grube wrote:
Right. Funnily enough, the swapping algorithm is most concisely
described in the Pitch Black paper. I'd suggest that as a
reference for quick implementation.
Thanks for the suggestion; will do.
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm still working on the initial implementation of MH-corrected probes
in Fred. I'm pretty close to having minimal functionality working, and
next week I plan to finish up the initial implementation. However, I'm
not happy with the current design, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2012 12:29 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
Lantern is a great example of how good a Java desktop app *can*
look, to try it:
$ git clone git://github.com/getlantern/lantern.git $ cd lantern $
./run.bash
Imagine if Freenet looked that good...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/2012 07:46 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
Are these rate-limited in any way?
In what ways could I do effective rate-limiting? Would it work to keep
track of when the last request was received from each peer, and send a
rate limiting error when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/2012 10:47 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
On a global scale, the if the rate of new probe requests is higher
than the rate at which existing ones expire the number of active
probes at any moment will not reach balance. Higher HTL makes a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/2012 12:48 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
The way we dealt with this problem in Gnutella was to cap the max
htl at each hop. Even if an attacker sent a message with very high
htl each node on the path would reduce it to a small value before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/2012 12:48 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
We should discuss this in more detail and have more people involved
before releasing these changes. I can see evanbd's point but the
side effects of very high htl must be taken into account as well.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 04:29 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
toad_ and I have scheduled a review session in #freenet (on
Freenode) for 2 PM UTC on June 16th.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. This is an invitation - if anyone would like to
participate in discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 04:10 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
However, DoS protection should be a little stronger than has been
discussed: You should limit the average number of probes on a
given link per unit time, like we do with swapping. This should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/2012 06:56 AM, Fernando Paladini wrote:
I only want credits about translation.
This along with I only want credits by translation leads me to
believe that Fernando is asking for Fernando Paladini to show up in
the credits for the Brazilian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2012 01:01 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
This appears to be the same as the first one, which I have applied.
Is that correct?
It appears so: the RARs are identical.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/27/2012 08:47 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
--
network size | smal | smal | norm | norm | norm | norm | larg | larg |
degree | norm | conf | high | norm | low | conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2012 05:42 PM, Pouyan Zaxar wrote:
* What are the options? ** Wicket Native websocket (doesnt have
fallback support) ** Wicket atmosphere integration (has fallback
modes but is not the latest version of atmosphere integrated)
Are there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Excellent! I've opened a pull request with your translation here:
https://github.com/freenet/wininstaller-staging/pull/2
Sorry for the incredible delay - your post went into a moderation
queue which is flooded with spam.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Inspired by ArneBab [1] I had an idea for the first run setup. Here's
an attempt at drawing it in text:
|
| Setup |
| - |
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 02:48 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
Inspired by ArneBab [1] I had an idea for the first run setup.
I neglected to mention: this draft is for a browser interface which
replaces the current first run setup / wizard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been making great progress on the network simulator, and the
probes are due to be deployed in the next build. (1409) I'd like to
give another shot at explaining what this project is doing. I'll start
from the basics.
Freenet is a medium for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2012 03:51 PM, irfan mir wrote:
The more I think about it, I like having the arrows because they
info on the user of the setting before they turn it on.
I say we should keep the arrows.
What do you all think?
I agree having the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2012 12:56 PM, Me wrote:
Hello, This is Irfan again and as I promised, I am emailing the
Freenet developers the second version of the redesign for the
Freenet Security setup before the weekend is over.
As requested, I removed the arrows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/20/2012 02:31 PM, irfan mir wrote:
Hello all, This is Irfan and I am here with the 3rd and hopefully
final version of the Freenet Security Setup design.
The main change that I made in this version of the redesign is that
I replaced the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/22/2012 08:36 AM, Chetan Hosmani wrote:
Hi Ian
I am willing to contribute to writing content for any of these
sections.
Though I am not the right person to decide what content should go
in, I can help organise and rewrite them better.
It occurs to me that it could be easier to contribute seed nodes and new
translations. The UI could offer to send the requisite materials to project
devs via Freemail.
Thoughts?
-operhiem1
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Because of all the crypto annoyances with Java 6 not having JCA,
nextgens, p0s, and I were discussing upgrade paths to Java 7.
We established that:
* Oracle will begin auto-updating some Windows users from 32-bit Java
6 to 32-bit Java 7 in December
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2012 02:16 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 13 Oct 2012 00:20:02 Steve Dougherty wrote:
So we're opting not to decouple the network version and build
number on official releases? Not doing so certainly simplifies
patches to another Freenet
developer.
Thanks in advance, Simon
I hope that's helpful! Please ask if anything is unclear or I didn't
mention something you wanted to know.
Feel free to join us in #freenet on Freenode!
Thanks,
Steve Dougherty
[0] https://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/
[1] http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2012 11:21 AM, Simon Vocella wrote:
Hi Steve,
thanks for the answer. I already know how to use github (infact i
have an account: https://github.com/voxsim) and I'm good with java
and ant (I'm good in maven too btw).
Is there any todo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2012 05:25 PM, Simon Vocella wrote:
I confirm what Robert say, in my last works I used slf4j!
Btw, now fred-staging pass from 300 warnings to 142 :) Can I pull
request? For pull request I need to implement some features? I
already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2012 09:41 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
On 11/23/2012 05:25 PM, Simon Vocella wrote:
I confirm what Robert say, in my last works I used slf4j!
Btw, now fred-staging pass from 300 warnings to 142 :) Can I pull
request? For pull request I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/05/2012 01:55 AM, Robert Hailey wrote:
On 2012/12/04 (Dec), at 8:10 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2012, 21:30:35 schrieb Matthew
Toseland:
- More work on making darknet easy.
Yes, please!
How about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2012 06:05 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 08 Dec 2012 03:11:28 Steve Dougherty wrote:
On 12/05/2012 01:55 AM, Robert Hailey wrote:
On 2012/12/04 (Dec), at 8:10 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2012 06:03 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Dec 2012 06:55:13 Robert Hailey wrote:
On 2012/12/04 (Dec), at 8:10 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2012, 21:30:35 schrieb Matthew
Toseland:
- More
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/24/2012 12:26 PM, Simon Vocella wrote:
Hi All,
I see that Freenet don't use a continuos integration system (ci),
for who don't know what's a ci, it permits an automatic build and
notification after every push (for git) or commit (for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/24/2012 12:26 PM, Simon Vocella wrote:
Hi All,
I see that Freenet don't use a continuos integration system (ci),
for who don't know what's a ci, it permits an automatic build and
notification after every push (for git) or commit (for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2013 10:16 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 12 Jan 2013 02:18:37 Steve Dougherty wrote:
The website does not have any indication of when the latest
version was released, nor what its release notes are, unless it
was manually
this year. I
guess I can do the organisation admin, provided that I don't have to
mentor as well. Who wants to be involved in GSoC this year?
I hope to work with ArneBab on the Infocalypse project as proposed last
year. [0]
Steve Dougherty
[0]
https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Google_Summer_of_Code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2013 04:29 PM, irfan mir wrote:
[snip]
This time, I made quick mock-ups that get the idea across as it
was brought to my attention that in the past others have provided
shiny designs, but not development. That made me feel sad and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2013 03:24 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
[snip]
3) I prefer extreme network security at the expense of even more
speed.
Freenet shares network information with other computers it
connects with to improve performance. Even though this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 04:08 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 12 Mar 2013 19:42:28 irfan mir wrote:
[snip]
So, I am confused on which implementation Freenet is looking for:
1.) Questions that result in options or 2.) Questions that
result in only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/16/2013 12:38 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
I don't know how important it is that it is all on one page. But
IMHO we should not ask/show the dependant questions until we've
asked the basic ones. So:
Do you know someone who runs Freenet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2013 07:42 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Yes, if we're just talking about autodetecting via UPnP, that's
fine.
Yes, that's what I mean.
* Omit the list of common Internet connection speeds for the
reasons mentioned above.
You omit it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2013 07:42 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Fortunately we can autodetect the limits from the router much of
the time. Which is later on in the process, since we used to ask
users whether or not to allow UPnP; I think it's always on unless
you
The t-test part of the results I linked in IRC is not valid. I forgot about
the condition that the population be normally distributed, and the reject
percentage distribution plot on the stats page shows that it is not. The
means are still valid. If there were an equivalent probe with an
On Mar 24, 2013 1:31 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
However we won't see the full story until it's mandatory anyway?
I'm not sure whether that's relevant. At some point I can start gathering
build number probes for a source of information on update propagation in
4th, 2013 are
candidates, though I'd prefer something in the US.
What are the reasons for preferring something close in time and space
to an existing conference? Depending on how many people are coming,
maybe I could look into reserving space on my university campus.
Steve Dougherty
[0] http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2013 08:43 PM, irfan mir wrote:
Hello all, I just wanted to update you on that I got the
opportunity to make some major progress on the interactions of the
new security setup.
Currently all the interactions work in Chrome, Firefox,
On 04/03/2013 08:43 PM, irfan mir wrote:
What is the exact wording of the questions that are to be asked in the
first step?
And how many questions are there to be?
I recommend 3 or less. And no more than 5 if more than 3 are necessary.
To be clear, the way I'm thinking of this it would be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2013 12:23 AM, irfan mir wrote:
So, I suggest a change in the workflow.
1st panel with first 2 questions--2nd panel with second 2
questions--then completion.
This seems much easier to use as it doesn't overload them with too
many
On May 25, 2013 5:45 AM, Masayuki Hatta mha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to resume my Japanese translation work for Freenet (after 2
years hiatus ;-), please find attached an updated Japanese translation.
Welcome back! :)
BTW, I have two questions:
0)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been accepted to work on distributed version control software
over Freenet. [0] While some tools - such as Infocalypse [1] - exist
to allow distributed version control over Freenet, I aim to add
features and improve usability with the overall
On 06/01/2013 08:39 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
SomeDude mentions that the Fossil SCM has things like a wiki and
bug tracking already, and asks that the Fred plugin be
VCS-agnostic. [2] This is a good thing to do - it would mean adding
a layer of semantic abstraction, though it introduces a
I've completed named repository pull support. This means a list of
WoT-enabled repositories is inserted under the identity whenever such a
repository is created or pushed. For instance, my repo listing is: [0]
vcs version=0
repository
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/2013 08:06 PM, Thomas Morgan wrote:
Thank you, but please understand that I was unable to add the
contents of the mykey.gpg file to my keyring. You may want to
consider extracting your key to a ASCII-compliant file format.
Thomas
On 07/10/2013 08:57 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 10 Jul 2013 01:56:29 Steve Dougherty wrote:
On 07/09/2013 08:42 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
On 07/09/2013 08:09 PM, Nat Tuck wrote:
The nav menus on the website don't work on my android device,
because I don't have a mouse pointer
At p0s' request here's some information about how Infocalypse currently
uses WoT.
Infocalypse sets a vcs context on identities when they create a
repository, and inserts a list of repositories under the identity's
subspace at /vcs/. To do this it uses the insert URI from
GetOwnIdentities. It also
On 07/30/2013 02:58 PM, Robert Hailey wrote:
On 2013/07/30 (Jul), at 1:21 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Too long? Too honest? IMHO we need to err on the side of honesty.
IMO it is missing a few Tor downers.
Good points.
(1) people can have run exit nodes to collect passwords
Could be
On 07/30/2013 05:05 PM, Robert Hailey wrote:
On 2013/07/30 (Jul), at 3:40 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
...
I'm sure Tor does something similar, it would be interesting to know
how Tor nodes bootstrap.
As far as I understand it tor bootstrapping is also centralized. I don't
know any specifics
On 07/30/2013 05:45 PM, xor wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 02:38:28 PM Steve Dougherty wrote:
At p0s' request here's some information about how Infocalypse currently
uses WoT.
Infocalypse sets a vcs context on identities when they create a
repository, and inserts a list of repositories
On 07/30/2013 06:58 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Hi,
If you want to make the redesign a bit less relialt on Javascript,
you could use the wonderful clickable CSS example from the Trojita
Mail client:
-
On 07/31/2013 10:50 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 31 Jul 2013 00:01:05 Steve Dougherty wrote:
On 07/30/2013 05:45 PM, xor wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 02:38:28 PM Steve Dougherty wrote:
[snip]
How do you obtain the list of identities which you offer
the user to chose from
On 08/01/2013 06:56 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 31 Jul 2013 17:00:50 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 15:50:17 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Okay. The difficulty here is that there might be more than one
p0s. We should always use the p0s we used last time, for
1 - 100 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
