On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 16:06:21 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
You are replacing runtime typeinfo with compiletime templates.
Unless you can guarantee that the type information won't change
during runtime, you are going to have a hard time.
Read this thread for context
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 14:44:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET
on August
On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 23:47:33 UTC, sarn wrote:
That std.signals code that Steven filed a bug report for is
example of why we can't just fix the behaviour, though. If we
just fixed __dtor/__xdtor, any code that used std.signals would
start having ugly bugs at run time.
I think that
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 09:23:09 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
C[] c;
@property C[] get() { return c; }
get ~= something;
errors out, yet
auto q = get;
q ~= something;
is fine.
Why is D thinking that ~= is being applied to get, the
function, rather than what it returns?
Also
When
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 19:05:38 UTC, Manu wrote:
For my money it would be:
destroy() <- just destroy
reset() <- destroy and re-init
Or something like that.
Maybe:
class.destruct(); <- destroy without init?
Yeah that. I'll make a PR!
I had an in-depth discussion with Andrei about this
On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 20:08:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/120
Feedback would be very appreciated.
I was under the impression that Andrei's ProtoObject was supposed
to remedy that:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/pa1lg6$1lud$1...@digitalmars.com
Mike
On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 12:23:35 UTC, Seb wrote:
I just gave converting the DMD Make build script to D a quick
shot and it doesn't look too complicated:
Very Nice! Many thumbs up! And, welcome back!
Mike
I'm trying to find a way to declare a block of code `nothrow:`
when compiling with -betterC, but not `nothrow` when not
compiling with -betterC.
The solution is needed for this PR:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2184/files#r188627707
Attempt #1
--
void test() { }
On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 18:08:35 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
As a contrived illustration, take a look at the code in
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/blob/master/src/core/internal/string.d Those same features are also in Phobos.
OT, numberDigits enters an infinite loop if radix == 1.
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 14:25:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
How do I know I'm in a function?
I don't think you're ever actually "in a function". The code is
just data passing through the compiler. I think what your may be
asking is "How do I know I'm working on a function?".
On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 01:52:24 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
"C++, now powered by D" :)
:) +1
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 13:12:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Hm.. that should be fixed. I don't see why we can't just do =
T.init, we should at least be optimizing to this for small
enough structs.
The problem I ran into with this is that if you use T.init
directly you end up
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 14:25:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Common questions I have when looking at dmd code:
Where is this in the source?
How do I know I'm in a function?
How do I know I'm in a template?
What module am I in?
How do I know what has been run?
What is the proper way
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 22:33:05 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
Large code is produced for assmly and others and it would be
nice if it had it's own window to scroll rather than scrolling
the entire window.
Also it would be nice if clicking on a line in the src scrolled
to the proper
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 03:43:16 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
An LDC or GDC cross-compiler generator for the Raspberry Pi.
There are already some instructions out there (e.g.
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
I've often wondered if D has the right features to implement a
borrow-checker in the library. Something similar to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lj1GppqNr8c
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 04:58:17 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
In essence a -betterC libc with wrapper functions for extern(D).
I'd prefer to not even need to link in libc. I mean rewrite
memcpy, memcmp, malloc, free, and realloc in D. Once those
building blocks exist in D, everything
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 04:17:19 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Try to replace some of the basic software building blocks
(memcpy, memcmp, malloc, free, realloc) that are currently
leveraged from
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Try to replace some of the basic software building blocks
(memcpy, memcmp, malloc, free, realloc) that are currently
leveraged from the platform's C library with counterparts, and
provide a D API
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Building and running the DMD test suite on vanilla Windows is a
pain. I never succeeded but it appears to require the user to
first set up a posix environment and then battle environment
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
An LDC or GDC cross-compiler generator for the Raspberry Pi.
There are already some instructions out there (e.g.
http://d-land.sepany.de/einstieg-in-die-raspberry-pi-entwicklung-mit-ldc.html), but
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
I haven't looked into this myself, but I vaguely remember an
ongoing problem with DMDs performance (especially memory usage)
gradually degrading with time. I think it would be a nice
exercise for
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Fork newCTFE and bring it to completion:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/04/10/the-new-ctfe-engine/
Mike
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Find a way to improve the performance of our CIs. See
https://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.1018.1526887297.29801.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
The more time a PR is "green" the higher the
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Get some help allocated to GDC.
It seems progress on GDC has stalled for reasons I'm not quite
sure of. I'm trying to help, but it's becoming more apparent
that I'm not the right person for the
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
An apprentice for Walter.
I think Walter needs an apprentice (or 10). Too much knowledge
about D's design decisions, present, and future are locked up in
his mind. He needs to be disseminating
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
Make WebAssembly a thing in D.
See
https://forum.dlang.org/post/ejplfelcqsvjmdvxt...@forum.dlang.org
Currently C++ and Rust dominate that domain. D could kick some
web asm there too.
Mike
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
It might be useful for measuring D's progress if we had some kind
of stats about D updated on a daily basis.
This is the most useful page I know of at the moment:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
I would like to see a dependency-less Phobos-like library that
can be used by the DMD compiler, druntime, -betterC, and other
runtime-less/phobos-less use cases. It would have no
dependencies
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 07:21:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
A few of those machines can build AND run the tests in 5-6
mintues. A
lot under 10 minutes...
Then there's a few that take 45+ minutes. Why are they in the
pool? Is
it really worth having 20 machines build the thing, especially
when a
few
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 10:28:37 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 04:27:20 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
My suspicion about the switch to glibc 2.27 being the problem
was wrong.
I did a very timeconsuming bisection and found the problem
commit to be the one which bumped binutils
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 09:35:28 UTC, Majestio wrote:
Also, I believe this is __lambda1:
m_queue = () @trusted { return kqueue(); } ();
Is `kqueue()` nothrow? You probably need to decorate that
lambda with `nothrow`. (i.e. put a `nothrow` right after
`@trusted`.
Mike
`kqueue()` is
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 05:44:12 UTC, Majestio wrote:
this()
@safe nothrow {
m_queue = () @trusted { return kqueue(); } ();
m_events.length = 100;
assert(m_queue >= 0, "Failed to create kqueue.");
}
Also, I believe this is __lambda1:
m_queue = ()
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 05:44:12 UTC, Majestio wrote:
==
log:
==
[majestio@freebsd ~/Projects/webapp]$ dub
Performing "debug" build using /usr/local/bin/dmd for x86_64.
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 05:28:10 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote:
Has this been implemented in DMD master?
So I was looking at the changelog[1] and tried to build the
example, but it erred.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/changelog/expression-based_contract_syntax.dd
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 08:48:26 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Is D wthout Phobos useful for IoT or should one stick with
C,Lua, and MicroPython? Is IoT an opportunity for D or is it a
false direction given D is an x86/x86_64 oriented programming
language?
Using D for programming ARM
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 22:26:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I _think_ that it only works if the function isn't templated.
A PR to remove that limitation has been submitted at
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8195, but once again, we're
waiting on someone from the top to give it their
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 07:20:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
There are obviously pros and cons to each pace, and this has
been debated internally before, with one of the ldc devs again
posting to the Internals mailing list today questioning the
current speed.
The post is here:
On Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 21:16:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
IIRC, there's a DIP for trying to make += work with just
getters and setters, but I don't know if we're ever going to
see anything like it in the language.
Yes, the DIP is here: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/97
It's
On Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 06:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Structs don't have that.
Should they?
Consider the following code:
---
struct S
{
// intentionally not `static`
struct SS
{
int y() { return x; } // Error: need `this` for `x` of
type `int`
}
int x;
SS ss;
}
void main()
{
S s;
s.ss.y();
}
---
If I change `return x;` to `return this.x;`
On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 at 18:48:15 UTC, Seb wrote:
What do you guys think about having a dedicated "Bugzilla & PR
sprint" at the first weekend of very month?
We could organize this a bit by posting the currently "hot"
bugs a few days ahead and also make sure that there are plenty
of
On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 at 08:53:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I heard there was a bit of general interest on the subject, so
would be interesting to hear about more potential use cases.
I've been recently assigned the task of building a web-based
Ladder Logic editor/compiler
On Thursday, 26 April 2018 at 09:24:19 UTC, A. Nicholi wrote:
So in a way, the D runtime is similar to libstdc++, providing
implementations of runtime language features.
I would argue that Phobos is more analogous to libstc++, but
there are some language features in C++ that are implemented
On Thursday, 26 April 2018 at 03:04:55 UTC, A. Nicholi wrote:
I am working on a large cross-platform project, which will be
written primarily in D, interfacing to C as necessary. To get
finer control over memory safety, binary size, and use of the
GC, we would like to disclude libphobos as a
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 at 01:20:13 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
It appears a bug has already been filed
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11970). I'll see if
I can fix it.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8208
We'll see what happens.
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 at 01:08:46 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
So I was telling my colleague that D would warn on self
assignment, but found that I was wrong.
https://run.dlang.io/is/HLhtek
```
module a;
import std.stdio;
void main() {
string a;
a = a; // Can the
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 at 01:08:46 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
So I was telling my colleague that D would warn on self
assignment, but found that I was wrong.
https://run.dlang.io/is/HLhtek
```
module a;
import std.stdio;
void main() {
string a;
a = a; // Can the
On Sunday, 22 April 2018 at 00:41:34 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
You're not using the C library version of it, the compiler does
the stack space reservation inline for you. There is no way
around this.
I'm not convinced. I did some no-runtime testing and eventually
found the implementation
On Saturday, 21 April 2018 at 19:06:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
alloca is an intrinsic, and part of the language technically --
it has to be.
From what I can tell `alloca` is only available in the platform's
C standard library (actually for Linux it appears be part of
libgcc as
On Saturday, 21 April 2018 at 07:37:50 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Does D have some way to dynamically allocate on the stack? I'm
looking for something roughly equivalent to the following C
code.
int doSomething(size_t len)
{
char stackBuffer[len + 1];
doSomethingElse(stackBuffer);
}
Does D have some way to dynamically allocate on the stack? I'm
looking for something roughly equivalent to the following C code.
int doSomething(size_t len)
{
char stackBuffer[len + 1];
doSomethingElse(stackBuffer);
}
Thanks,
Mike
On Friday, 20 April 2018 at 10:36:25 UTC, drug wrote:
20.04.2018 13:03, Joakim пишет:
You are aware that gdb has built-in support for demangling D
for 3-4 years now?
But how to enable it? It doesn't work out of box at least for
me.
I believe you enable it with `-demangle=dlang`
The
On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 at 12:28:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> In order to facilitate on schedule deprecations, a comment
> of the format @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ should be added to
> the top of the code to be removed/disabled.
Is `[version]` the version in which the deprecation
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 07:05:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1013 is titled "The Deprecation Process".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/d8f6bfa1810c9774bd7d3b3dc6a7a6776ed5e17e/DIPs/DIP1013.md
I've been thinking about the deprecation schedule being measure
in terms of releases, and I
On Tuesday, 17 April 2018 at 12:13:06 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 April 2018 at 05:33:53 UTC, Radu wrote:
This is very odd, as the following compiles:
---
struct S
{
this(this)
{
}
~this()
{
}
}
struct C
{
S s1;
}
---
If the scope failure would cause
On Tuesday, 17 April 2018 at 05:33:53 UTC, Radu wrote:
This is very odd, as the following compiles:
---
struct S
{
this(this)
{
}
~this()
{
}
}
struct C
{
S s1;
}
---
If the scope failure would cause this then I assume it would
not work at all in any case.
On Tuesday, 17 April 2018 at 00:27:07 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
It is odd though since
void foo (){}
extern(C) void main()
{
scope(exit) foo();
}
compiles and runs with -betterC
I believe `scope(exit)` is fine because it is basically
try-finally, but `scope(failure)` won't work
On Monday, 16 April 2018 at 13:40:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 16 April 2018 at 13:01:44 UTC, Radu wrote:
A blocker for more advanced 'betterC' usage.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18493
From what I can gather this appears to be caused by a
`scope(failure)` statement
On Thursday, 5 April 2018 at 15:58:28 UTC, Cora Dias wrote:
Hi...i am a new user here.
Welcome!
As per my observation as suggested above you need a minimal
runtime implementation that implements the features of D that
your code is using, some that your code is not using but is
required by
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 07:05:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1013 is titled "The Deprecation Process".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/d8f6bfa1810c9774bd7d3b3dc6a7a6776ed5e17e/DIPs/DIP1013.md
I think there should be some clarification on the stages of
deprecation. For example,
On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 at 23:50:24 UTC, Arredondo wrote:
I could not get this to work for me in the past (I'm using
Windows 10). I saw this announcement so I decided to try again.
I have a little more experience to share...
std.process.ProcessException@std\process.d(753): Failed to
spawn
On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 at 23:50:24 UTC, Arredondo wrote:
I could not get this to work for me in the past (I'm using
Windows 10). I saw this announcement so I decided to try again.
I'm using it in Windows 10 right now, but I did have trouble
trying to upgrade an existing installation. To
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 18:54:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Interesting that they are going the "No classes allowed"
approach. It looks like the bullet points can be done in better
c mode of D.
I think you'll find Sarn's work on Xanthe quite interesting:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 22:02:17 UTC, sarn wrote:
When I wrote Xanthe a year ago, I rolled my own classes using
alias this and explicit vtables:
https://gitlab.com/sarneaud/xanthe/blob/master/src/game/rigid_body.d#L15
(I did this because normal D classes use the druntime library,
and
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 07:02:07 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:07:24 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 04:37:08 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Nice! I was thinking about something almost exactly like
this recently since 2.079.0 has features to further decouple
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 04:12:00 UTC, John Belmonte wrote:
I'm still rather puzzled. My pull request remains with 8 tests
pending after several hours. I can't find any confirmation on
the pulls display
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/pulls.ghtml?projectid=1 that
it intends to run
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 04:17:52 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Let's see what happens after the auto-tester starts testing it
again.
Note that it could be a while, as there are PRs that will be
getting merged in the next 24 hours that will restart the test
queue.
Mike
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 01:46:08 UTC, John Belmonte wrote:
I'm trying to understand why my pull request was queued in D2
Auto-Test for only 2 of 8 tests, with the remaining left in
pending state.
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/pull-history.ghtml?projectid=1=1=8051
Since there
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 21:27:53 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
This is very important to me as I am very interested in using
the language for game development.
Yes I know that it's marked as "Duplicated", but I strongly
disagree as it is different enough to consider is own issue.
Alex
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 14:44:39 UTC, Alexandru Jercaianu
wrote:
If there is anything on your wish list which matches the
criteria above, feel free to share.
There's also a lot of low-barrier-to-entry stuff in this project
I created a while ago:
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 14:44:39 UTC, Alexandru Jercaianu
wrote:
Hello,
At the Polytechnic University of Bucharest we are organizing a
special program called CDL[1], where Bachelor students are
mentored to make their first open source contributions.
I think it's a great idea to involve
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 02:45:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
IMHO, it would be _huge_ if this issue could be fixed.
Mike Parker, I think that means +1.
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 02:28:21 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 19 March 2018 at 17:17, Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 00:00:22 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
Digging out and old yet important issue.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_b
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 00:00:22 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
Digging out and old yet important issue.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5710
+1
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 01:10:41 UTC, Richard wrote:
There's a couple of outstanding things at the moment though
The first is the use of BetterC, although from what I can tell
DMD now has support for a minimal runtime feature as part of
2.079.0
This works:
```
class S {
int n, m;
int sum() { return n + m; }
Inner!(sum) a;
class Inner(alias f){
auto get() {
return f();
}
}
}
```
This doesn't:
```
struct S {
int n, m;
int sum() { return n + m; }
Inner!(sum) a;
struct
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 02:25:38 UTC, Richard wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to see if I can get an mbed project to work
with Dlang
basically compiling D code for use on a Cortex-M Proccessor
You might be interested in the following, if you're not already
aware:
*
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 14:46:04 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
This is the best I've come up with in the current language:
struct S {
int n;
mixin property!("field", "get => this.n", "set => this.n =
set");
}
Not bad. Not good, but not bad either.
Sadly, there are issues:
1) Wrong
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 01:22:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I would like to know if this can be improved to support the
following:
* binary assignment operators (e.g. +=)
* unary assignment operators (e.g. ++)
* @safe, @nogc, and -betterC compatible
* at least as good code generation as
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 14:34:53 UTC, bauss wrote:
Would there be a reason why this wouldn't be a good
implementation?
If so what and how could it be improved?
Are there flaws in an implementation like this?
[... snip ...]
I am very interested in this as a potential alternative to
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 21:39:09 UTC, Apocalypto wrote:
Are there any tutorials about D in vscode?
No that I know of.
Which are the minimal plugins to install to have code
completion, syntax highlighting and code formatting?
I've been getting by with
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 22:02:17 UTC, sarn wrote:
When I wrote Xanthe a year ago, I rolled my own classes using
alias this and explicit vtables:
https://gitlab.com/sarneaud/xanthe/blob/master/src/game/rigid_body.d#L15
(I did this because normal D classes use the druntime library,
and
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 13:43:37 UTC, SimonN wrote:
Hi,
Andrei said in 2014 that not-null-references should be the
priority of 2014's language design, with consideration to make
not-null the default. In case the code breakage is too high,
this can be an opt-in compiler flag.
You
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 15:52:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://isocpp.org/blog/2018/02/new-cpp-foundation-developer-survey-lite-2018-02
Andrei
"If you could wave a magic wand and change one thing about any
part of C++, what would it be, and how would that change help
your
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 08:43:32 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
see rationale in https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18529
It looks like the actual deprecation was made with this PR:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5860 Meaning it's been
deprecated for more than a year and a
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 09:18:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-02-19 11:49, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.079.0 release, ♥ to
the 77
contributors for this release.
The following is a regression that breaks DWT:
extern (C) void foo(int) { }
extern
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 01:54:07 UTC, Leonardo wrote:
Hi, I'm new to language and games.
Many people say that GC is bad and can slow down your project
in some moments.
What can happen if I create a game using D without worrying
with memory management?
(using full GC)
Don't let the GC
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Are there any tutorials or articles out there for "getting
started with converting a C++ codebase to D one module at a
time?" Or at the very least: tips, tricks, lessions learned,
from those who have come before.
On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 at 17:49:33 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
What do people think of adding an argument to DMD to add
library search paths? Currently the only way I know how to do
this would be via linker-specific flags, i.e.
GCC: -L-L/usr/lib
MSVC: -L-libpath:C:\mylibs
OPTLINK:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 08:46:02 UTC, meppl wrote:
@"16.": https://dlang.org/changelog/2.079.0.html#minimal_runtime
So, now someone could "easily" write his own memory managment
for allocations who would be usually done by the default GC -
e.g. classes?
Easily? unlikely, but it's
On Monday, 19 February 2018 at 18:50:47 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Huh? Did I understand right? Just add an empty object.d into
your project and --BetterC is now basically needless, plus the
executable is most likely even smaller?
Kindof, but not exactly. The -betterC switch still adds some
nuance
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 12:18:28 UTC, Peter Campbell
wrote:
I was checking the 2017 vision pages and was wondering why
there hasn't been a 2018H1 vision page but also what the
current status of being able to use D without a garbage
collector is?
There are a number of ways to use D
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 01:11:33 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:09:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
David (aka klickverbot) is a longtime D contributor […]
… who is slightly surprised at the amount of media interest
this has attracted. ;)
David, this is
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 14:17:00 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/12/18 11:29 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
A bunch of stuff I 100% agree with.
Me too. So refreshing to read.
Mike
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18068
I tried to fix this one myself, but it beat me. It's also
currently causing me friction when working on DMD. I would love
to see it fixed.
Interestingly, however, it works fine in the auto-tester. But,
problem can be reproduced at
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 01:31:41 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 17:10:00 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
What are D's limitations on do-it-yourself reference counting?
* Types that are built into the language like dynamic arrays,
associative arrays, and exceptions
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 17:10:00 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
What are D's limitations on do-it-yourself reference counting?
* Types that are built into the language like dynamic arrays,
associative arrays, and exceptions won't benefit from DIY
reference counting.
* Much of Phobos
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 11:06:15 UTC, ixid wrote:
How difficult would it be for D at this point to move towards a
pay for what you use system that out of the box is betterC and
requires the garbage collector to be explicitly imported?
I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for,
201 - 300 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
