Hi all,
Long time since I read/posted here but I saw this and thought it
might be good PR for D:
http://adventofcode.com/
Should also be fun.
Ciao,
Regan
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:09:12 -, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 10:21:34 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:30:25 -, Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com
wrote:
In D apps I work on I prefer all my classes in a single module, as is
common
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:30:25 -, Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com
wrote:
In D apps I work on I prefer all my classes in a single module, as is
common D way, or shall I call it modular way?
Sure, but that's not the point of partial. It's almost never used by the
programmer directly,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:54:39 -, Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org
wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 07:41:41 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hello,everyone,
I've written some projects in C#,find the 'partial' keyword is very
userful,which lets the auto codes in another single file,my
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:27:50 +0100, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
Regan Heath, el 22 de October a las 10:41 me escribiste:
NO, this is completely false, and why I think you are not entirely
familiar with env vars in posix. LD_PRELOAD and LD_LIBRARY_PATH affects
ALL, EACH and
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:52:22 +0100, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
The runtime is not platform independent AT ALL.
^ implementation
Why should you provide a platform agnostic way to configure it?
Because it makes life easier for developers and cross platform
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:49:20 +0100, eles e...@eles.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 15:45:02 UTC, eles wrote:
D version with structs:
{ //display ~C~B~A
A foo;
B bar;
C *caz = new C();
delete caz;
}
as expected.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:19:33 +0100, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org
wrote:
On Monday, 20 October 2014 at 10:39:28 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
Sure, but past/current env vars being used are used *privately* to a
single program. What you're suggesting here are env vars which will
affect
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:54:55 +0100, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
Regan Heath, el 17 de October a las 15:43 me escribiste:
I think you've mistook my tone. I am not religious about this. I
just think it's a bad idea for a program to alter behaviour based on
a largely invisible
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:06:31 +0100, eles eles...@gzk.dot wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 14:42:30 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:50:44 +0100, Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu wrote:
Would this affect your code?
Probably, but I have no D code of any size to care about.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:01:39 +0100, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
Regan Heath, el 14 de October a las 11:11 me escribiste:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
As mentioned this is not a very
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:10:38 +0100, Dylan Knutson tcdknut...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be more generally useful to have another function like
main() called init() which if present (optional) is called
before/during initialisation. It would be passed the command line
arguments.
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:47:55 +0100, Martin Nowak
code+news.digitalm...@dawg.eu wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4043#issuecomment-58748353
There has been a broad support for this on the newsgroup discussion
because this regularly confuses beginners.
There are also
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:50:44 +0100, Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu wrote:
Would this affect your code?
Probably, but I have no D code of any size to care about.
Do you think it makes your code better or worse?
Better.
Is this just a pointless style change?
Nope.
Anything else?
Only what
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 01:45:48 +0100, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
Walter Bright, el 9 de October a las 17:28 me escribiste:
On 10/9/2014 7:25 AM, Dicebot wrote:
At the same time I don't see what real benefit such runtime options
brings to
the table. This is why in my PR
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:39:06 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 10/7/14, 12:36 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
Hum... But arguably, that's just exception chaining happening. Do you
have any examples of someone actually dealing with all the exceptions
in a chain in a
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:48:31 +0100, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 06/10/14 15:45, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Knowledge doesn't have to be by type; just place data inside the
exception. About the only place where multiple catch statements are
used to make fine distinctions between
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:22:26 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
If you don't want to accept that equality and comparison are
fundamentally different operations, I can only repeat saying the same
things.
For the majority of use cases they are *not* in fact fundamentally
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:38:33 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 7/25/2014 4:10 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
Sure, Andrei makes a valid point .. for a minority of cases. The
majority case
will be that opEquals and opCmp==0 will agree. In those minority cases
where
they
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:39:11 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 7/25/2014 1:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
3. If opCmp is defined but no opEquals, lhs == rhs will be lowered to
lhs.opCmp(rhs) == 0
This is the sticking point. opCmp and opEquals are separate on purpose,
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:17:34 +0100, Joakim dl...@joakim.airpost.net
wrote:
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 10:19:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
See if stdio allows you to specify delete sharing when opening the file.
I don't know what delete sharing is exactly, but the File constructor
simply calls
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:18:51 +0100, Jesse Phillips
jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 12:00:48 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
But! I agree with Adam, leave it as a thin wrapper. Being a windows
programmer by trade I would expect the remove to fail, I would not
expect
On Tue, 27 May 2014 22:40:00 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at first.
Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
I could
On Thu, 29 May 2014 20:40:10 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/29/2014 11:25 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Agreed. The simple dream of automatically decoding UTF and staying
Unicode
correct is a failure.
Yes. Attempting to hide the fact that strings are UTF-8 is
Windows 7 x64
On Wed, 07 May 2014 19:41:16 +0100, Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert
maximechevali...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding it should be as simple as:
wchar[100] stackws; // alloca() if you need it to be dynamically sized.
A slice of this static array behaves just like a slice of a dynamic
On Tue, 06 May 2014 15:48:44 +0100, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:35:57 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
The problem is that you have a wide-character comma (，) there.
This works:
void main() {
writeln([一, 二]);
}
No,I mean the execute result is
On Fri, 02 May 2014 01:22:12 +0100, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 10:03:21 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:56:15 +0100, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
If this is a problem, I guess the most obvious alternatives are to:
1. Get rid of
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:56:15 +0100, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
If this is a problem, I guess the most obvious alternatives are to:
1. Get rid of namespace scopes. Require workarounds in the case of
conflicting definitions in different namespaces in the same file. (Eg.
use a mixin
On Thu, 01 May 2014 11:03:21 +0100, Regan Heath re...@netmail.co.nz
wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:56:15 +0100, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
If this is a problem, I guess the most obvious alternatives are to:
1. Get rid of namespace scopes. Require workarounds in the case of
On Thu, 01 May 2014 09:56:49 +0100, FrankLike 1150015...@qq.com wrote:
On Monday, 14 April 2014 at 17:13:56 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
My advice - use ODBC, it is the fastest way you may connect to the SQL
server, and you already have everything you need for that. :)
Regards
I have test the
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:03:58 +0100, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
Wrong KISS: compiler internals over specification
Indeed.
I've been a C/C++ developer for ~16 years and I was confused several times
reading this thread.
The mix of D modules and C++
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:20:22 +0100, Regan Heath re...@netmail.co.nz
wrote:
Something else to think about.
C# has the same problem and has solved it the following way..
[main.cs]
using ..
using CSTest_Test1;
using CSTest_Test2;
namespace CSTest
{
class Program
{
static void
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:32:31 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:29:47 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
On 4/17/2014 8:51 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Every time I open one of these messages I
get a huge
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:08:29 +0100, Orvid King via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I'm just going to put my 2-cents into this discussion, it's my
personal opinion that while _allocations_ should be removed from
phobos wherever possible, replacing GC usage with manual calls to
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:38:23 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/16/2014 8:01 AM, qznc wrote:
However, what is still an open issue is that @nogc can be stopped by
allocations
in another thread. We need threads which are not affected by
stop-the-world. As
far as I
36 matches
Mail list logo
