Awesome mir/glas package

Just a word to say that I find the glas benchmark results and design awesome! https://github.com/libmir/mir I am new to D but I think this kind of developments has the potential to attract a lot of people doing numerical computations. I also would like to mention the "libFlame" approach

Re: static array internal & dangling reference

On Monday, November 14, 2016 06:19:25 Picaud Vincent via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 06:10:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > I would have hoped that it would have complained about the > > first one. I don't know why it isn't. It definitely results in > >

Nov 16 - Memory Safety and the D Programming Language

This is a copy of the announcement. See y'all there! --- Folks please welcome Walter Bright as our presenter this month! Also please thank KForce for sponsoring our pizza this month!! Date/Time/Location: November 16th, 2016 at 7:00 PM Microsoft Eastside Campus, Bldg. 40, Steptoe

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

Adam Wilson wrote: rikki cattermole wrote: On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote: Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote: I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those

Re: static array internal & dangling reference

On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 06:10:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: I would have hoped that it would have complained about the first one. I don't know why it isn't. It definitely results in having a pointer to memory that should no longer be referenced. Yes I would have hoped too, because

Re: static array internal & dangling reference

On Monday, November 14, 2016 05:53:04 Picaud Vincent via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Sunday, 13 November 2016 at 23:39:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer > > wrote: > > Note that he is declaring an int[10] inside the function and > > then returning it. The compiler must see that the int[10] will >

Re: static array internal & dangling reference

On Sunday, 13 November 2016 at 23:39:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: Note that he is declaring an int[10] inside the function and then returning it. The compiler must see that the int[10] will be returned, and so it reuses the pre-allocated buffer for returning as the same address to

Re: CTFE Status

Assignment to Array.length works now :) the following code : uint[] makeArr() { uint[] arr; arr.length = 5; return arr; } pragma(msg, makeArr()); results in : CTFE_DEBUG_MESSAGE : building Array of Length 5 [0u, 0u, 0u, 0u, 0u]

Re: Third attempt for SUM

On Sunday, 13 November 2016 at 16:56:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Yes, KBN should be used instead Kahan when possible (for example Quaternions can not be summed using default KBN implementation). BTW, i have implemented sumOfLogs [1], it is more precise then everything else. [1]

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

rikki cattermole wrote: On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote: Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote: I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those are not primary

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 11/12/16 8:15 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: Hello DLang, I wanted to announce that I have completed the bulk of the work on my Cryptography library for D, SecureD. I was inspired to do this project by Stan Drapkin and his Inferno.NET project, however, the two projects

Re: Boston D Language Meetup in Back Bay

On 11/4/16 12:02 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: Just announced: https://www.meetup.com/Boston-area-D-Programming-Language-Meetup/events/235353279/ We are going to try a freely available conference room to have a presentation. No details on the presentation yet (I will figure that out soon),

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

On 11/12/16 8:15 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: Hello DLang, I wanted to announce that I have completed the bulk of the work on my Cryptography library for D, SecureD. I was inspired to do this project by Stan Drapkin and his Inferno.NET project, however, the two projects NOT compatible. [snip] Let

Re: static array internal & dangling reference

On 11/13/16 12:52 PM, cym13 wrote: On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 12:16:02 UTC, Andrew wrote: On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 11:03:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: [...] I thought that if you changed the function signature to int[10] f() to return a static array, this should be returned by

Re: Appender bug, or impossible?

On 11/13/16 11:29 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote: It looks like an Appender field of a struct doesn't work when its element type is the containing struct, i.e. struct Foo { Appender!(Foo[]) fooAppender; } My guess is the problem is that the Appender needs to know how big "Foo" is since it would

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote: Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote: I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those are not primary concerns when dealing with

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote: I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those are not primary concerns when dealing with Cryptograpy libraries. Well, Apple

[Issue 1761] TypeInfo.toString for function types always indicates no-parameter function

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/druntime https://github.com/dlang/druntime/commit/ff4adf65b16cefc4caa831e9a6983970d831396e fix issue 1761

[Issue 1761] TypeInfo.toString for function types always indicates no-parameter function

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Trailing catch on function?

On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 12:17:35 UTC, Anonymouse wrote: On Wednesday, 9 November 2016 at 09:49:08 UTC, Daniel N wrote: On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 16:02:25 UTC, Manu wrote: scope(failure) doesn't catch... how is that function nothrow? Seems like you overlooked Anonymouse's

Re: pipeProcess: read stdout and stderror simultaneously

I have found! The magic word is Redirect.stderrToStdout. So the right code: == auto rsync_pipes = pipeProcess(["rsync", archieve_option, "-vu", "--delete", path, copy_to], Redirect.stdout | Redirect.stderrToStdout); scope(exit) wait(df_pipes.pid); foreach (df_line;

Re: Earthquakes - New Zealand

On Sunday, 13 November 2016 at 12:17:22 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: Hello everyone! So to summarize New Zealand right now is being hit with some major earthquakes. But don't fret, I'm ok. There is a couple of other members in NZ, so please do let us know that you're safe! Now, for W, is

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote: I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those are not primary concerns when dealing with Cryptograpy libraries. Well, Apple abandoned it years ago because

Re: static array internal & dangling reference

On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 12:16:02 UTC, Andrew wrote: On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 11:03:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: [...] I thought that if you changed the function signature to int[10] f() to return a static array, this should be returned by value, and so should be safe to use,

Re: pipeProcess: read stdout and stderror simultaneously

2) Some magic function which join stderr with stdout together: foreach (df_line; df_pipes.stdout_joined_with_stderr.notBlockingByLine) { //Handle progress } Thank you in advance.

pipeProcess: read stdout and stderror simultaneously

Hello! I'm trying to run rsync and handle errors and operation progress at the same time: auto rsync_pipes = pipeProcess(["rsync", "-avu", "--delete", path, copy_to], Redirect.stdout | Redirect.stderr); scope(exit) wait(df_pipes.pid); foreach (df_line;

Re: Third attempt for SUM

On Sunday, 13 November 2016 at 16:04:51 UTC, safety0ff wrote: On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 15:37:29 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Hi all, Advanced summation algorithms [3] from Mir project [1] are ready to be merged to Phobos. Hi, Do you have any thoughts at to when Kahan should be used

Appender bug, or impossible?

It looks like an Appender field of a struct doesn't work when its element type is the containing struct, i.e. struct Foo { Appender!(Foo[]) fooAppender; } My guess is the problem is that the Appender needs to know how big "Foo" is since it would be storing each element by value, but since

Re: Third attempt for SUM

On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 15:37:29 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Hi all, Advanced summation algorithms [3] from Mir project [1] are ready to be merged to Phobos. Hi, Do you have any thoughts at to when Kahan should be used over KBN? I was testing summation for a program (summing

Re: Variable-Length Bit-Level Encoding

On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 19:19:58 UTC, James Buren wrote: On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 19:13:13 UTC, Nordlöw wrote: Does anybody have a suggestion for an encoder that is more suitable for real-world values that are, for instance, normally distributed? I don't recall the name, but

Re: Earthquakes - New Zealand

On 11/13/2016 04:17 AM, rikki cattermole wrote: > Hello everyone! > So to summarize New Zealand right now is being hit with some major > earthquakes. > > But don't fret, I'm ok. > There is a couple of other members in NZ, so please do let us know that > you're safe! > > Now, for W, is there a

Re: PDF generation in D?

On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 23:42:46 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Dne 10.11.2016 v 23:30 Karabuta via Digitalmars-d napsal(a): Hello community, does anyone have on something for PDF generation in D? I may need a PDF generation library in a vibe.d project I'm working on. :) It depends what

Earthquakes - New Zealand

Hello everyone! So to summarize New Zealand right now is being hit with some major earthquakes. But don't fret, I'm ok. There is a couple of other members in NZ, so please do let us know that you're safe! Now, for W, is there a plan for core members to report in to check that everyone is

[Issue 16666] core.sys.posix.sys.types uses c_long without importing its definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1 Nemanja Boric <4bur...@gmail.com> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||4bur...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 16683] New: Lower typeid expression to .typeidImpl!(T)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16683 Issue ID: 16683 Summary: Lower typeid expression to .typeidImpl!(T) Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 1761] TypeInfo.toString for function types always indicates no-parameter function

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761 --- Comment #2 from Lucia Cojocaru --- PR: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1692 --

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

Suliman wrote: It would take some research, but the native Botan library makes heavy use of C++ templates There is native lib https://github.com/etcimon/botan Some people with whom I talked said that botan is too low level for them and it's hard for them to use it. So your lib maybe very good

Re: SecureD - A simple cryptography library for D

It would take some research, but the native Botan library makes heavy use of C++ templates There is native lib https://github.com/etcimon/botan Some people with whom I talked said that botan is too low level for them and it's hard for them to use it. So your lib maybe very good wrap on top of

Re: {DMD-AST-Tool} For beginning DDMD hackers

On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 10:26:53 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: Hi Guys, I have written a small utility called dmd-ast-tool. It can be used to quickly generate boilerplate code for dmd-ast-visitors. Originally it was only written for my personal use, it used to work with a handwritten

Re: Unum II announcement

On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 05:32:55 UTC, Nick B wrote: On Saturday, 8 October 2016 at 00:35:31 UTC, Nick B wrote: On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 02:22:01 UTC, Nick B wrote: I suggest that now, programmers would/may have a choice: be slow and correct, or fast and incorrect, and that would