On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 18:46:50 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/24/18 7:00 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 04:41:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
[...]
Last week I saw a video showing how a forum was shutdown
because it was alledgedly full of racists. Th
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 07:33:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 19:30:52 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 18:46:50 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/24/18 7:00 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[...]
Wow, that's insane. I would be in
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 21:07:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
[...]
Not strictly true. My old C++98 project no longer compiled
with the latest g++, because it contained things allowed in
C++98 that a
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 18:09:21 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
wrote:
I wrote a blog post about working on Advent of Code in D. You
can read it here:
http://jordi.inversethought.com/blog/advent-of-d/
Really nice, thank you.
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 21:20:22 UTC, Henrik wrote:
Does anyone know if D is using the vtable implementation for
virtual functions just like most C++ compilers? If yes, can
someone explain the advantages of this strategy? A function
pointer in C is regarded as expensive because of missing
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 21:20:22 UTC, Henrik wrote:
I have worked with C in embedded systems for many years now,
and for our modern Linux systems we are using a combination of
C and Java today. Java for parts where memory safety is more
important than speed/determinism, and C for the crit
On Sunday, 1 May 2016 at 17:06:19 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 1 May 2016 at 14:31:10 UTC, Bauss wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 20:29:56 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3631
Apparently it was decided at DConf 2015 to remove std.stream
On Tuesday, 24 January 2017 at 06:51:40 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 January 2017 at 00:52:34 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
I have this program that used to compile with 72 but with 73
dmd is complaining that
"Error: escaping reference to local variable t"
auto ref f2(T)(auto ref
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 at 07:27:13 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2017 at 12:36:02 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
newCTFE is green now on all platforms!
I just found an interesting bug just now.
The following code would cause newCTFE to segfault.
char* initPtr()
{
return
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 at 00:02:03 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
Many times we pass compound types(non-primitives) as arguments
to functions.
e.g.,
void foo(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3, t3);
But to call foo with new variables we have to create the
arguments. This usually requires extra code to
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 12:59:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 11:16:09 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
It's funny (or sad) that C has compound types since C99 and
that they are good.
Your foo(|a,b,|c1,c2,3||,|e|,|f,g,c|) writes as
foo((T1){a,b,{c1,c2,c3}}, (T2){e}, (T3
On Saturday, 28 January 2017 at 01:55:10 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 11:16:09 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 at 00:02:03 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
[...]
It's funny (or sad) that C has compound types since C99 and
that they are good.
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 10:05:49 UTC, Richard Delorme
wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 23:30:04 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/31/2017 3:00 PM, Richard Delorme wrote:
The thing about memcpy is compilers build in a LOT of
information about it that simply is not there in the
declar
On Sunday, 19 February 2017 at 12:12:07 UTC, timmyjose wrote:
I do love C++11 and newer, but I'd rather not use it for any
new projects barring some weekend projects of my own. The type
system is horrendously outdated. If they could make a clean
break and make C++11 the basis, improve error che
On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 17:02:55 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 16:25:34 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
[...]
We're in good company: both clang and gcc also do not
devirtualize the call when the loopcount is too large (when the
loop count is 4, the indirect ca
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:53:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:41:46 UTC, rumbu wrote:
[...]
If you want a module with a lot less features, the low-level
core.checkedint might be interesting for you:
http://dlang.org/phobos/core_checkedint.html
[...]
It is no
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 at 07:09:17 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Just a thought for boosting D's street cred:
Perhaps...take a worthwhile C/C++ project with real potential,
fork it, and port it to D. And make a real commitment to
maintaining it. Obviously a bit of a gambit, granted
On Friday, 3 March 2017 at 19:49:06 UTC, Jared Jeffries wrote:
I think that the programming tutorial using D as the first
programming language is what is really need, and fortunately I
see that now it's on his way.
Ali Çehreli's book is really good in that regard. he explains
programming f
On Friday, 3 March 2017 at 18:45:50 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/03/2017 10:40 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
IDEs, vastly more supportive, useful software development
functionality
than editors, especially for debugging, yes.
It's that last one, the one about ge
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 15:41:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 10, 2017 14:15:45 Nick Treleaven via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 01:10:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:07:33AM +, XavierAP via
>
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> The web re
On Saturday, 11 March 2017 at 10:32:02 UTC, meppl wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 11:25:11 UTC, Traktor TOni wrote:
I think the name is just misleading, the D developers should
at least be honest with themselves.
look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)#History
On Saturday, 1 April 2017 at 09:20:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/1/2017 12:39 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
This should be optional and controlled via a switch like
--fast-parse ?
Too many switches are a disease, and we already have an awful
lot.
The non-parsing of unittests have been there fo
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 at 05:36:55 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 at 05:18:26 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 at 02:43:26 UTC, evilrat wrote:
[...]
But if all you want is to construct some code in
interpreter-like way at compile time, string mixin does
precisely th
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 01:21:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/5/2017 1:50 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Who says you can't use a preprocessor with D code? ;-)
There are some issues with it. The C preprocessor is defined to
work on "preprocessor tokens", which are not quite th
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 13:04:08 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 12:03:47 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 11:59:51 UTC, Jonas Drewsen
wrote:
I can think of 3 reasons.
1. Requires GC.
NOTE: I believe that most applcations should use GC
On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 at 09:09:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 17:48:50 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
Oh, ok. AFAIK The decoding of indexing modes into micro-ops
(the real instructions used inside the CPU, not the actual
op-codes) has no effect on the cachi
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 02:13:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/08/2017 03:28 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Uncompressed? Seriously? I assume that really means FLAC or
something rather than truly uncompressed, but even
still...sounds more like a bullet-list
pandering^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 06:15:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:33:08PM +, Jerry via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
strncpy(buf, src, sizeof(buf));
Quick, without looking: what's wrong with the above line of
code?
Not so obvious, huh? The problem is that strncpy is,
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 06:15:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
int my_func(mytype_t *input, outbuf_t *output_buf,
char *buffer, int size)
{
/* Typical lazy way of null-checking (that will blow up
* later) */
myhandle
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 08:24:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/09/2017 02:10 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 02:13:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/08/2017 03:28 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Uncompressed? Seriously? I assume that really means
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 14:13:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/8/2017 1:55 PM, John Carter wrote:
On Saturday, 6 May 2017 at 06:26:29 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Walter: I believe memory safety will kill C.
C/C++ has been granted an extension of life by the likes of
valgrind and purify
and *-san
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 16:55:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 08:18:09AM +, Patrick Schluter via
[...]
Ouch. Haha, even I forgot about this particularly lovely
aspect of C. Hooray, freely call functions without declaring
them, and "obviously" they return int! Why not?
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 17:34:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Adam Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
I don't represent any company, but I have to also say that I
*appreciate* breaking changes that reveal latent bugs in my
code.
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 06:28:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky
[...]
Perhaps I'm just being cynical, but my current unfounded
hypothesis is that the majority of C/C++ programmers ...
Just a nitpick, could we also please stop conflating C
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 11:16:57 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
The likelihood of a randomly picked C/C++ programmer not even
knowing what a profiler is, much less having used one, is
extremely high in my experience. I worked with a lot of
embedded C programmers with several years of expe
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 19:06:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/10/2017 11:49 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 05:05:59 Ali Çehreli via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On 05/09/2017 10:34 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> > After upgrading the com
On Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 11:05:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 06:47:54 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
Atilla's library... but, as someone on Reddit said, at the
moment that is rather "unergonomic".
I'm sure that will get better over time, though. At least I
don't see why not. Most o
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 at 00:05:56 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
On Saturday, 6 May 2017 at 06:26:29 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Walter: I believe memory safety will kill C.
Hi,
I think that comparing languages like D to C is not
appropriate. C is a high level assembler and has different
design goa
What does that snippet do ? What should it do?
int caca(void)
{
for(int i=0x; i!=0x8000; i++)
printf("coucou");
}
On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 19:25:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
1) Consistency with functions without contracts.
This only applies to the "naked" version which has ugly }{ in
it. The other options people are asking about are replacing
body with a keyword, which I think you agree would b
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/17/17 8:27 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:16:59PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/17/2017 1:46 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
It may not be the dev
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 06:36:55 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 05:07:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/17/17 8:27 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
What will cause a shift is a cont
On Friday, 19 May 2017 at 13:45:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/19/17 9:35 AM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
They do however say that the actual knowledge about Rust in
the D
community seems to be rather small, compared to the amount of
criticism
against it. And TBQH I have to agree. To criti
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 14:36:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 13:23:57 Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 10:42:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> Static libraries that are
> - compiled with dmd 2.074 (maybe previous versions too)
> - call format()
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 20:47:42 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
On Monday, 22 May 2017 at 14:49:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Conditional execution is not in the later models of ARM, I
believe.
Also does not really provide advantages over conditional
jumps, except in rare circumstances.
That m
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 21:15:57 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 20:47:42 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
On Monday, 22 May 2017 at 14:49:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Conditional execution is not in the later models of ARM, I
believe.
Also does not really provide advanta
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 06:15:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:41:10AM +, Jesse Phillips via
(Note that this is much less of a limitation than it seems; for
example you could use std.mmfile to memory-map the file into
your address space so that it doesn't actually have
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 06:54:46 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 06:15:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:41:10AM +, Jesse Phillips via
(Note that this is much less of a limitation than it seems;
for example you could use std.mmfile to memory-map t
Before even contemplating a big disrupting language split like
proposed by the OP, wouldn't it first more appropriate to write a
nice article, DIP, blog, whatever, listing the defects of the
current language that can not be solved by progressive evolution?
I haven't the impression that the *lang
On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 12:15:49 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 12:28 +0100, rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
Step back a moment. C++ and Java are trying to stop programmers
using these features, in favour of using higher level
abstractions. In C++ and
Funny. Someone replied to a post from 1988 concerning the D
language. The original thread (not read yet) from 1988 even has
messages from Walter.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/y0uGj6tHe2E%5B201-225%5D
original thread
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/y0u
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:00:17 UTC, Seb wrote:
Thanks a lot, but I was looking for small snippets (< 10 LoC)
than could be used to show the awesomeness of D at the roulette
enum E {IN = -1, V1, V2, V3, X1 }
mixin({
string code = "enum EBIT : ulong { "~
"init
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 22:12:57 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:56:29 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.06.2017 23:51, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:41:55 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there
any problem w
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:43:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/23/2017 08:49 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
"Systems programming" may scare users away who think they're
not good enough for that kind of programming.
True.
"General-purpose programming" is a better fit, in my opinion.
In mine to
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
I think it would be good for all which want to invest their
time in learning D to know more about the history and probably
the future of D.
D frontend written in
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 18:08:12 UTC, aberba wrote:
I wanted strip_tags() for sanitization in vibe.d and I set out
for algorithms on how to do it and came across this JavaScript
library at
string stripTags(string input, in string[] allowedTags = [])
{
import std.regex: Captures,
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 10:58:50 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 10:49:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 10:44:41 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 10:26:03 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 10:07:44 UTC, ixid wrote:
Are there a
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 21:52:10 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 21:40:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
What would be a nice tool to render this DAG online? Who'd
want to work on inserting this? Ideally it would be some
vector rendering.
Graphviz's "dot" tool can outp
On Saturday, 1 July 2017 at 15:58:04 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Dgame wrote:
On Saturday, 1 July 2017 at 14:40:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Dgame wrote:
Which impact would have D on the software-architecture, if
it would be choosen for a 2D game instead of C/C++?
i can actually finish 'em. most of the time
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 20:24:24 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote:
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 18:11:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 06:10:57PM +, FoxyBrown via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Create an auto pointer, handy in some cases and fits in the
language as a natural generalization.
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 23:50:24 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 23:12:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:31:10PM +, Meta via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 21:58:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:42:22PM +, Meta
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 18:09:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 07/09/2017 06:51 AM, Daniel N wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 10:31:47 UTC, Mr.D wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 10:15:39 UTC, Wal
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 18:45:34 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 07/10/2017 02:16 PM, Joakim wrote:
I'm actually skeptical of cloud- I think mobile p2p will eat
most of the cloud-
I've been REALLY hoping p2p will
eat...cloud^H^H^H^H^Hcentralized internet services[1], but if I
we
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 15:39:30 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote:
On Sunday, 16 July 2017 at 20:44:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
An issue is that we already have typeof(null). typeof(null)
and typeof(assert(0))* are two ways to specify almost the
same thing. One question is whether typeof(asse
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 21:17:45 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Some time ago, I wrote about the X Macro in C:
https://digitalmars.com/articles/b51.html
I used it from time to time in C code. It's one of the things I
actually like about the C preprocessor. But in translating the
aged C code
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 01:09:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/25/17 8:45 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 26.07.2017 02:35, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/25/17 5:23 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 July 2017 at 20:16:41 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
The behavior is defin
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 03:16:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/25/2017 6:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Likewise, because D depends on hardware flagging of
dereferencing null as a segfault, any platforms that *don't*
have that for C also won't have it for D. And then @safe
doesn't e
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 17:12:00 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 26-07-17 16:40, Iakh wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 at 09:46:45 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
readln.split.fold!((stack,op){
switch(op){
static foreach(c;"+-*/") case [c]:
return stack[0..$-2]
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 11:46:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/27/17 2:48 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
And then the compiler runs the "Dead Code Elimination" pass
and we're left with:
void contains_null_check(int* p)
{
*p = 4;
}
So the result is that it will segfault. I don't
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 22:46:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 22:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Using 64 character random strings will make symbolic debugging
unpleasant.
Using 6.4 megabyte strings already makes symbolic debugging
unpleasant.
The one thing that
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 14:41:29 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 14:06:09 UTC, Chris wrote:
This outperforms both `manual_find` and the improved `std find`
string findStringS_Manual(string haystack, string needle)
{
if (needle.length > haystack.length)
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 19:17:44 UTC, Chris wrote:
Oops, I've been found out. :-) Thanks. You're right of course,
and I've already noticed that bug as it fails on not found. I
got the bounds wrong.
I had the same "bug" when I wrote my search function on the
project at work. I also found out
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 17:54:34 UTC, qznc wrote:
There is a special version of find for searching a single char
in a string. Using a one-letter needle string is more like a
user mistake than something to optimize for.
At compile time you may not know the length of the needle, like
in the
On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 12:41:19 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 12:14:07 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 17:54:34 UTC, qznc wrote:
There is a special version of find for searching a single
char in a string. Using a one-letter needle string is more
lik
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 12:42:23 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
There are 2 main issues with FILE *:
1) it does not provide buffer access, so you must rely on
things like getline if they exist. But these have their own
problems (i.e. do not support unicode, require C-malloc'd
buffer)
On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 15:02:33 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 13:57:27 UTC, Joakim wrote:
No, I explicitly said not the web in a subsequent post. The
ignorance here of what 2G speeds are like is mind-boggling.
It's not hard. I think a lot of us remember when a 14.4 m
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 20:20:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 06/02/2016 03:41 PM, Basile B. wrote:
Yesterday I've took the decision not to propose anymore PR for
Phobos
bugfixes, even if most of the time it's easy.
1)
It can take up to 2 or 3 weeks until a "phobos bugfix" get
merg
On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 11:24:40 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
This is mostly me trying to make sense of the discussion.
So everyone hates autodecoding. But Andrei seems to hate it a
good bit less than everyone else. As far as I could follow, he
has one reason for that, which might not be clear to ev
On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 18:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The real problem here is that char implicitly casts to dchar.
That should not be allowed.
Indeed.
On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 20:53:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Even the Greek sigma has two forms depending on whether it's at
the end of a word or not -- so should it be two code points or
one? If you say two, then you'd have a problem with how to
search for sigma in Greek text, and you'd have to
One has also to take into consideration that Unicode is the way
it is because it was not invented in an empty space. It had to
take consideration of the existing and find compromisses allowing
its adoption. Even if they had invented the perfect encoding, NO
ONE WOULD HAVE USED IT, as it would h
On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 20:18:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/3/16 3:52 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/03/2016 09:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Except many chars *do* properly convert. This should work:
char c = 'a';
dchar d = c;
assert(d == 'a');
Yeah, that's what I meant by "sta
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:45:43 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
Today, I'm working on a private GUI tool which must be run at
linux and windows. It's awful that I compile a little 64bit
program(or -m32mscoff) in windows must have visual studi
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 20:01:26 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 19:24:54 UTC, via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:11:26PM +, deadalnix via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
| is bitwize or. || is binary or.
& is bitwize and. && is binary and.
^ is bitwize xor. ^^
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 10:11:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 08:40:26 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 20:01:26 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 19:24:54 UTC, via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:11:26PM +, de
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 20:34:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 10:33:43 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 10:11:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 08:40:26 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 20:01:26 UTC, deada
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 06:52:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 03:09:46 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 22:32:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/26/2016 10:18 AM, Enamex wrote:
- template arguments that accept constant values of any
type whatsoever
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 06:52:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 03:09:46 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 22:32:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/26/2016 10:18 AM, Enamex wrote:
- template arguments that accept constant values of any
type whatsoever
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 16:30:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16224 -- Andrei
That
do {
} while(0)
construct is ridiculous. It's cargo cult at its worst. It is NOT
more readable than an honest to god goto. It's an obfuscated way
to write
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 20:09:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/1/16 3:43 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 16:30:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16224 -- Andrei
That
do {
} while(0)
construct is ridiculous. It'
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 20:30:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/1/16 4:08 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/1/16 2:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/1/16 2:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/1/16 2:05 PM, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 16:30:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandr
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 06:45:37 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 20:09:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/1/16 3:43 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 16:30:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16224 -- A
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 01:20:35 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
public struct Foo
{
public void Create(T)(uint delegate(T) c, T param)
{
}
}
Foo f;
f.Create((x) { }, "asdf");
I'm a D noob so take it with a very big grain of salt, but I
think that expressio
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 07:04:28 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 20:30:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/1/16 4:08 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/1/16 2:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/1/16 2:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/1/16 2:05 PM, C
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 02:44:14 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 08:39:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Seems that in order to make it useful, users had to extend it.
This doesn't fit the criteria.
Scheme is a simple functional language which is easy to extend.
Why
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 12:21:04 UTC, Sergey Podobry wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 11:23:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:49:11 UTC, Sergey Podobry wrote:
Remember that virtual address space is limited on 32-bit
platforms. Thus spawning 2000 threads 1 MB stack each
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 00:16:58 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 23:31:40 UTC, Danika wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 23:04:00 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
LDC recently changed the evaluation order of "+=" (I think
unintentionally, some other eval order problems were fixed).
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 05:46:58 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 00:16:58 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 23:31:40 UTC, Danika wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 23:04:00 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
LDC recently changed the evaluation order of "+=" (I
On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 10:25:16 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I think the one that hurts the most is fixing "C++ fault" #3.
It means there are many scenarios in which I could put const in
C++, and I simply can't in D, because something somewhere needs
to be mutable.
Then it is not const a
On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 04:54:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 05:02:55PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/15/2016 3:43 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> One of the many reasons I gave up on Windows many years ago,
> and never looked back. ;-)
I
101 - 200 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
