On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:38:53 +, Profile Anaysis wrote:
> Do you realize
>
> 1. That without change there can be no progress?
>
> ...
> If people with your mentality rules the world we would still be using
> sticks and stones. This is a fact... I won't argue whether it would be
> the best
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:04:28 +, ixid wrote:
> Why is it harmful (actually asking, not telling you you're wrong)? I
> thought we were going to use a pay for what you use philosophy, if a
> unit test is not run then why is it paid for?
A person that doesn't run `dmd -unittest` (or `dub test`)
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:15:10 +, Ervin Bosenbacher wrote:
> I have already accepted the fact that if
> I want to optimize my Python code in certain situations, not all because
> you can use better algos, data structures, etc then I have to drop down
> to C++ or C using say pybind11. Instead of
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:39:49 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Saturday, 1 April 2017 at 02:12:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 3/31/2017 6:33 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> I know. But it is worth it. It should enable D compilers to scale to
>> handling very large
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:43:40 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 4/10/2017 2:44 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
>> Another way to think of it is that this proposal makes "throw new" into
>> a special operator that is different than composing the "throw" and
>> "new" operations independently. Once you
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:04:13 +, jmh530 wrote:
>
> Well I knew that renamed imports were allowed, but I didn't realize you
> could do re-named selective imports (the " : writeln,
> write" part of it). I just double-checked and it worked. I don't recall
> it working in the past.
>
> I see that
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 21:36:05 +, FoxyBrown wrote:
> The goal is that, one day, we can effectively replace the phobos with
> .NET semantics if we want. It, being a nicer library, and all the source
> code available through reflection, makes it a nice target. While the
> source code cannot be
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:44:23 +, Mike Parker wrote:
> DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
1. I would like to see consistency; I'd rather see @nogc and @gc than @nogc
and @core.attributes.[whatever].gc, so all these attributes
On Fri, 12 May 2017 16:17:03 +, Mike Parker wrote:
> The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1003 [1], "Remove body as a
> Keyword", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on May 26 (3:59 AM
> GMT on May 27), the community has the opportunity to provide last-minute
> feedback. If
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:08:45 +, codephantom wrote:
> So yeah, you can change the language.. or you can change the way people
> think about their code. When they think differently, their code will
> change accordingly.
>
> My point about sophisticated IDE's and AI like compilers, is that they
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:04:06 +, Manuel Maier wrote:
> I didn't know about that tool yet, but I like the idea! However, when I
> played around with it just now, I ran into the "Cannot find
> dmd-2.0.x.x.bat file" issue [1]. And yes, I misread the installation
> instructions (thought it said
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 00:24:12 +, Ivan Trombley wrote:
> When DUB bulds the gtk-d library, it takes a long time. This is mostly
> because it's only using one processor. It hasn't been such a big deal on
> Linux but I'm building my app on Windows right now and it been building
> gtk-d for the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:15:11 +, IM wrote:
> Being new to D, I probably made many mistakes, or did things in a way
> where there's a more optimum one to do in D. I'm eager to know how to
> improve, and would like to know if there is any experienced D developer
> who is thankfully willing to
On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 09:51:12 +, codephantom wrote:
>> It might also make sense, that if a source code file does not contain a
>> module statement, then it should not be treated as a module, and the
>> compiler should look to the import statements instead of implicitly
>> making in a module.
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:04:21 +, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> I can hear him already, "Post it on buzzkill or it won't get fixed!"
He does have a point. At work, people often email me directly, or stop me
in the hallway, to report things that belong on the issue tracker. I
consistently tell
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:54:14 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 1:03 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
>> The point is that the presence of one @safe: line in the module can be
>> mechanically checked, over one million devs working on a codebase.
>>
>> The whole point of Walter argumentation
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:34:14 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 11:53 PM, IM wrote:
>> Simple things like these make a big difference. D Lang has been around
>> for a long while now, and hence signs of its maturity has to show
>> everywhere, especially in the compiler, as well as the
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:50:04 +, Mengu wrote:
> - d leadership is dusty and so are their tools. we are no js community
> and hope we never become anything like them but bugzilla is a hundred
> years old. i am on github, i am on this ml and i also need a bugzilla
> account?
That's probably not
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:19:22 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Yes, it would be a pain to switch away from github at this point, but if
> github went down permanently tomorrow, it would just be an annoying
> roadblock. We almost certainly wouldn't lose any code (at most, a few
> commits, if no one
On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:53:38 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/5/2018 7:39 AM, Seb wrote:
>> We should put things like this somewhere where it can easily be seen by
>> others.
>> The obvious candidates are the Wiki and Bugzilla, but both have
>> historically proven to yield poor results, e.g.
>
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 02:46:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> There's been some discussion about what to do with issues that propose
> enhancements like this. We want to make them available and searchable
> just in case someone working on a related proposal is looking for
> precedent and
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:52:40 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> version(DDoc) is very different. It's a command line option passed to
> the build, and affecting the build with command line options is
> expected.
>
> This proposal has comment *contents* affecting the build. The charter of
>
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 19:43:48 +, aberba wrote:
>
> When I raised this feature for D, suggestions on the use of () instead
> of {} got me concerned. All languages that I know to have this feature
> (known as destructuring) use curly braces. Thats what kotlin and
> JavaScript (that I know have
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:57:31 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 13.01.2018 21:39, rjframe wrote:
>> Python and Pony use (). C++17 uses [].
>
> Any idea why C++17 went with [] ?
I don't know; the paper[1] says it was due to "feedback from the EWG
session in Jacksonville".
>
> It would actually be
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:03:27 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/4/18 8:42 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>> I would *LOVE* to be able to use more D on a day to day basis, but
>> these 2 problems make it very hard. It is especially sad considering 1/
>> could be solved very easily. It literally took
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:20:37 +, aberba wrote:
> That's one big potential mistake. Enterprises care about making money
> with whatever will help them do that (impress investors). Its developers
> who care about languages that help them write code that suites their
> requirements. The focus
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:55:56 +, Benny wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 10:35:06 UTC, Benny wrote:
>> Let me say this again
>
> *uch* Never mind this rant. I am just fed up with the issues. I will not
> post anymore as its just a wast of time for everybody involved.
I wouldn't call
On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:11:20 +, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
> Idea: There should be some kind of news ticker for all enhancements and
> important decisions, maybe at first just via twitter with a special
> #tag beside #dlang where all updates are announced. And a place on the
> homepage,
As a followup to [0], I want to take a look at packaging DlangIDE with a
DMD compiler and tools, so we have an out-of-the box IDE for people giving
D a try. This would be independent of the rest of the system, so moving on
(either to Visual Studio, ldc, gdc, or whatever the programmer's
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 20:04:33 +, Seb wrote:
> Not could - it's now is:
> https://forum.dlang.org/post/tzyleprmwjmdnjhhp...@forum.dlang.org
Sometimes y'all get things done so quickly I'm surprised everybody's a
volunteer.
--Ryan
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:14:03 +, b4s1L3 b. wrote:
> Actually nowadays if DMD is already setup, Coedit doesn't require more
> configuration. Completion, all DCD features, and D-Scanner warnings just
> work out of the box since the tools are distributed with the IDE. In a
> way Coedit is already
On Sat, 03 Feb 2018 12:08:21 +, psychoticRabbit wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 10:49:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
>> And what we find is that when you allow such mixing with
>> permissively-licensed projects (that the GPL makes much more
>> difficult), .
>
> I've never been a fan of
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 00:32:21 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> ... Anyway, with Python 3.6 you get fairly good
> type annotation capabilities which allows static type checking that is
> closing on what you get with statically typed languages. Maybe that is
> a factor too.
If you use an IDE
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:59:17 +, Ola Fosheim Grostad wrote:
> On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 13:56:35 UTC, rjframe wrote:
>> If you use an IDE or analysis/lint tool, you'll get type checking. The
>> interpreter will happily ignore those annotations.
>
> You need to use a type checker to get
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 11:44:05 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> The reference interpreter doesn't make much use of static type
> information. I think it makes sense to have separate type checkers until
> this new aspect of Python has reached maturity. That doesn't prevent
> third parties to
On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 22:38:51 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2018-02-01 13:21, rjframe wrote:
>
>> CONS:
>> - Working outside the IDE requires installing D again, from the
>> official
>>installer. If this pack isn't immediately abandoned, multiple D
>>versions are in use that could
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 01:23:46 +, Seb wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about the compiler being duplicated as (1) it's pretty
> small (~30 MB with docs and all) and (2) I have seen so many NodeJS
> projects doing simple things with multiple gigabytes of dependencies.
> And if that really turns out to
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 01:42:08 +, Meta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 11:42:14 UTC, Seb wrote:
>
>> Yes, obviously the current situation isn't ideal, but it's not too bad
>> either and we have found one good, but probably not so well-known yet
>> way to tackle this: the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:59:16 +, aberba wrote:
> Is the foundation allowed to publicise its financial status as an NGO
> based on US laws?
It's required to file with the IRS, and those filings are public.
The 2016 990-EZ filing:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:34:48 +, Benny wrote:
> https://crates.io/categories
Thanks. I wish that was easier to find though. I still don't see how to
get there without knowing it already exists.
> The issue is that a lot of D's packages are even less maintained then
> Rust, mostly because
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:38:31 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 17:18 +, Mafi via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
> […]
>> What would you say are the most important differences between dub and
>> Cargo? What does Cargo do better than dub (or worse for that matter)?
>> Superficially,
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:08:41 +, bachmeier wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 15:55:09 UTC, JN wrote:
>
>> Python was also a smashing success, but it doesn't use a garbage
>> collector in it's default implementation (CPython).
>
> I'm pretty sure CPython uses a mark-and-sweep GC
On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 22:36:19 +, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> Frankly, I think it is doomed to be a niche-use language. While many
> more things were done right compared to C++, too many things were done
> wrong and there doesn't seem to be interest in breaking backward
> compatibility to excise
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:41:48 +, psychoticRabbit wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and classes and
>> other stuff. Then you can just filter that.
>
> do you know why the first and last
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:34:21 +, user1234 wrote:
> On Friday, 22 December 2017 at 05:50:15 UTC, drug wrote:
>> 22.12.2017 01:11, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
>>> On 12/21/17 4:55 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> [...]
>> We should also consider provider's name - github, bitbucket,
>> gitlab etc.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:36:13 +, codephantom wrote:
> btw. I'd like to see D 3.x introduce a breaking change and make @safe
> the default, instead of @system. I think that would be huge boost for D
> going forward.
>
> How practical that is, I would have no idea.
>
> But as an 'end user' of
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 23:28:27 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> On Sunday, 24 December 2017 at 05:21:44 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
>
> I guess I will just not get an answer to this, seems like just some
> weirdness of D that will just stick there. The typeinfo system seems
> really half baked and really
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:57:41 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 27.12.2017 16:37, rjframe wrote:
>> If the programmer opts-in to those checks... it's a +1 for pragmatism
>> but does make marketing the language a bit weird -- one-liners spawn
>> objections to the integrity of the claim (such as a
On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:34:05 +, Mike Franklin wrote:
> This is in response to some of the frustrations offered in the thread
> staring with
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/oeigdutfphxhenexc...@forum.dlang.org
>
> I share some of those frustrations, and I've been vocal about such
> things
On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 06:16:45 +, codephantom wrote:
> This is not my area of experise, but, if I were a manager evaluating the
> merits of D for use in a corporate software project, and then I went off
> to bugzilla and looked at the items for D.. I'd pause and think.wtf
> is going on
On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:04:01 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/1/2018 10:24 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> Not to say that that can't work, but I have to say that it seems pretty
>> ugly if using extern(C++, NS) requires a bunch of aliases just to use
>> symbols normally.
>
> What is normal is
On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 14:13:02 +, Timoses wrote:
> Thanks Windows, not!
>
> Since our department switched to Windows 10 I'm now unable to install
> DMD.
>
> To make it even worse, there's no way I see to install a virtual machine
> any more (VirtualBox or VMWare) since they collide with
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:34:34 +, Matheus wrote:
> Well, I'm D hobbyist and of course it's not a perfect language and you
> have some valid points, but on the other hand I think it's very
> disrespectful to come into a community and say the product that people
> are working mainly as volunteers
On Sat, 01 Sep 2018 11:25:31 +, rjframe wrote:
> Should you have to fix the bugs you run into? No. But if they keep you
> from doing your work, it seems like the economics of fixing D's bugs can
> make sense. If Weka were to assign its own priorities to D's bugs*, and
> have one person, once
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:35:45 +, Joakim wrote:
>> * Language complexity
>>
>> Raise your hand if you know how a class with both opApply and the
>> get/next/end functions behaves when you pass it to foreach.
>> How about a struct? Does it matter if it allows copying or not?
>>
>> The language
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 19:34:46 +, Abdulhaq wrote:
> There is a class of developers who expect things to Just Work TM,
> especially if they are told that it Just Works. Each time that they
> discover some combination of features that doesn't work they have to
> refactor their code and remember
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:29:23 +, bachmeier wrote:
> Weka is an awesome project, but I don't know that most people
> considering D should use your experience as the basis of their decision.
> At least in my areas, I expect considerable growth in the usage of D
> over the next 10 years. Maybe it
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:04:36 +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 23/08/18 20:52, bachmeier wrote:
>> On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 17:19:41 UTC, Ali wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 16:22:54 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 23/08/18 17:01, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My main job
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 04:02:37 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/23/2018 2:09 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> * The community
>>
>> Oh boy.
>>
>> Someone who carries weight needs to step in when the forum is trying to
>> squash down on criticism. For Mecca, I'm able to do that [2], but for
>> D,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:27:56 +, JN wrote:
> I think a large part is defining what kind of users D wants to attract.
I've begun wondering whether "pragmatism" is sometimes used as a code word
for indecision.
> Is it possible to make a language that both groups would be happy to
> use?
On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:56:54 +, ShadoLight wrote:
> I know the "we use Vim/Emacs, why don't you pitch in and help on VisualD
> if you want to use it" view is valid opinion, but it will not bring the
> masses since it will never happen - the critical mass is composed of
> devs that want to
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:43:46 +, Joakim wrote:
> Despite all this, D may never do very well on mobile or AArch64,
> even though I think it's well-suited for that market. But at the very
> least, you should be looking at mobile and AArch64, as they're taking
> over the computing market.
I was
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 09:35:29 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> ([*] I was going to suggest including dmd-nightly as well, but that
> poses the problem of load: running it every night will cause a lot of CI
> churn, which also generates a lot of mostly-useless information -- no
> one will care about
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 22:10:39 +, rjframe wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:57:31 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
>
>> On 13.01.2018 21:39, rjframe wrote:
>>> Python and Pony use (). C++17 uses [].
>>
>> Any idea why C++17 went with [] ?
>
> I don't know; the paper[1] says it was due to "feedback
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:51:49 +, bauss wrote:
> Clearly it's written by someone who has never used D and just googled D
> real quick.
It looks like the article was written by someone that doesn't know much
about most of those languages.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2018 20:30:31 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> The default is that they're all on. So to just have one on, first turn
> them all off then turn on the desired ones.
Would I be correct to interpret this as "turn them all off with -release"?
E.g., "dmd -check=in a.d" is unnecessary;
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 01:07:25 -0500, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
> Another sample point of discussion: One possible approach is to have a
> bot generate PRs to update project's compiler lists. But that leads to
> other questions: How/when is the bot triggered? On what machine does it
> run?
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 23:35:19 +, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>>> Precisely where in memory your data is, how it got there and how it's
>>> laid out should be bread and butter of any D programmer.
>>
>> Of any D programmer writing code that's performance sensitive.
>
> All code is performance
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:22:29 +, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 October 2018 at 12:15:07 UTC, rjframe wrote:
>
>> ...I didn't even keep the script; I'll never need it again. There are
>> times when the easy or simple solution really is the best one for the
>> task at hand.
>
>
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:49:31 +, bachmeier wrote:
> I think this is something that could be done *in addition to* DConf. I
> honestly don't think DConf is very effective at promoting D, except
> perhaps to a small sliver of the overall population of programmers, due
> to the content of most of
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 06:51:10 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> It turns out there are a number problems with the SCons tests running on
> Windows, many of them associated with the D support.
>
> https://github.com/SCons/scons/issues/3205
>
> As you will see I am choosing not to get involved in
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:00:33 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> The procedure is:
> ...
> 4. translate the code with as few edits as practical. Do not
> reformat the code. Do not refactor it. Do not fix anything, no matter
> how tempting. Reproduce the behavior of the original as much as
> possible.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:27:46 +, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
> I've got this coded up and can submit a PR, but I thought I'd get
> feedback here first.
>
> Does anyone see any horrible potential problems here?
>
> Or is there an interestingly better option?
>
> Does this need a DIP?
I just want
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:02:09 +, Andrey wrote:
> Hello, can I using namespaces like in C++, for example: ui::Widget or
> ui::Manager? I created ui/widget.d and ui/manager.d for implementation
> classes Widget and Manager, bun I can't import their correctly for using
> ui.Manager uiManager;
>
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 22:09:49 +, Ryan wrote:
> I have a C library I want to link against that was compiled with VS
> 2013. I have VS2013 and VS2015 installed. I want DMD to use the 2013
> version, since the C-runtime in 2015 is not backwards compatible.
>
> Looking at sc.ini I see several
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:14:16 +, FoxyBrown wrote:
>
> You can make any claim you want like: "The end user should install in to
> a clean dir so that DMD doesn't get confused and load a module that
> doesn't actually have any implementation" but that's just your opinion.
I have never seen
Bluejay is an application test runner, allowing easy writing of cross-
platform tests.
Bluejay uses Lua (via LuaD) with a small test library and is on the dub
registry at http://code.dlang.org/packages/bluejay
I also converted the first 37 test cases of DCD[1] to try it out - so
those tests
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 21:33:15 +, bachmeier wrote:
> The answer (assuming things are still run the way they
> were back then) is that you're not able to do anything about it. You
> won't see anything done with the official package and you won't be able
> to put anything in AUR because there is
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:08:56 +, Patric Dexheimer wrote:
> Fresh install of GDC. (tried with 32x ad 32_64x)
>
> GDC: 6.3.0 DUB: 1.3.0
>
> dub run --build=release --arch=x86 --compiler=gdc
>
> (...)
> Running .\main Failed to spawn new process (%1 is not a valid win32
> application)
If you
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:55:36 +, Chirs Forest wrote:
> It wouldn't be so bad if I didn't have to use the word cast before each
> cast, bust since I have to specify both the word cast and the cast type
> and then wrap both the cast type and the value in brackets... it just
> explodes my code
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +, Vino wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have small D program which run's perfectly when i run it
> manually, but when I schedule the same via windows task scheduler and
> choose the option "Run whether user is logged on or not" the program
> does not execute, the task
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:02:47 +, doc wrote:
> I'm trying recursively find files, and have some trouble to catch
> exceptions if have no permission to read directory.
>
...
>
> std.file.FileException@std/file.d(3798):
> /tmp/systemd-private-8338348a306b4d589e3f6ba2bfd0c8fe-systemd-
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 16:42:46 +, vino wrote:
> Question:
> Is there a way to map network drive in windows using D code, similar to
> the windows command such as "net use" or "pushd" or powershell command
> New-PSDrive.?
>
> From,
> Vino.B
There's WNetAddConnection2[1] and
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:16:17 +, Vino wrote:
> Hi,
>
>The script is schedule using a domain user id(domain\user id),
> and the windows share are mapped using the same user id /password and
> ran the scheduled task by login with the same domain user(Not
> Administrator) , the script
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 07:48:14 +, Vino wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 05:08:27 UTC, Vino wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Request your help, I have samll program which validates the
>> file path, the script run perfectly when i run it manually, but if i
>> run it via windows task scheduler i
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 02:34:29 +, codephantom wrote:
> Anyone got ideas on how to get sort() working in the *return*
> statement?
>
> //
>
> ushort[] draw8Numbers()
> {
> import std.meta : aliasSeqOf;
> import std.range : iota;
> ushort[] numbers = [
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:14:29 +, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
> I recommend to add a "donate for button", and to evaluate and visualize
> how many people are donating, for a certain package. This might give
> strong evidence where to invest more time - man power.
> In the first step the D
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 07:32:42 +, Seb wrote:
>
> Use .release to obtain the underlying array. No need to do another
> allocation!
>
> ```
> numbers.take(8).sort.release;
> ```
I did not realize that was there; thanks.
On Tue, 08 May 2018 13:23:07 +, BoQsc wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 at 13:04:12 UTC, Seb wrote:
>>
>> Did you try the newer MSCOFF format
>>
>> dub --arch=x86_mscoff start_minimum_server.d
>>
>> or
>>
>> dub --arch=x64 start_minimum_server.d
>
> C:\Users\Vaidas\Desktop>dub
Hi
I'm making an API for a web service, and have a small collection of
endpoints where I'd basically be creating copy+paste functions (a small
enough number that this isn't really that important for this project). I
thought I'd generate them via a mixin, but haven't seen that I can
generate
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 03:15:56 +, crimaniak wrote:
> I started to work with Travis-CI, building packages using all three main
> compilers, and noticed that I have problems with gdc every time and need
> to tweak code because of many things missing.
> For example:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:48:41 -0600, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> It's currently possible to put ddoc on template mixins but not string
> mixins:
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
>
> It was fix for template mixins with
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648
>
> but
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:43:09 +, Mr.Bingo wrote:
> let is(CTFE == x) mean that x is a compile time constant. CTFE(x)
> converts a x to this compile time constant. Passing any compile time
> constant essentially turns the variable in to a compile time
> constant(effectively turns it in to a
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 13:07:49 +, Marc wrote:
> how do I take a symbol as parameter?
>
> for example:
>
>> template nameof(alias S) {
>> import std.array : split;
>> enum nameof = S.stringof.split(".")[$-1];
>>}
>
> Works fine for say a enum member such nameof!(myEnum.X) but this:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:39:25 +, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 12:03:59 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
>
> The problem is that interfaces are a runtime thing (e.g. you can cast a
> class to an interface)
> structs implement compile time interfaces via template duck typing
On Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:08:06 +, Mike Parker wrote:
> My annual retrospective on the D Blog is up. Managing the blog really is
> a lot of fun for me. Every time I click the publish button I stay glued
> to reddit and the stats page to see how it's being received, with a
> glance now and again
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:53:22 +, Dechcaudron wrote:
> I guess it would not hurt
> to change the license to MIT. Would that encourage use by the community?
Choosing the license really comes down to what you want to see with the
code; if you want to maintain control and ensure that people
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:25:34 +, Evan Burkey wrote:
> Hi there, I have a problem that is eluding me, hoping someone can help
> me see the light. I'm on Windows 10 using the latest version of dmd. I
> have a directory with 2 files: "version.txt" and "versioncheck.d".
> version.txt contains a
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 05:56:51 +, DanielG wrote:
> Then there's all the modern Microsoft stuff (WPF/XAML/WinRT/etc),
> but you pretty much have to use either .NET or C++ for that.
VS release builds compile to native now by default; for easy Windows
programming, you really can't beat C# and
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:52:47 +, kdevel wrote:
> https://dlang.org/phobos/std_exception.html#enforce states:
>
> | Also, do not use enforce inside of contracts (i.e. inside of in and
> out blocks | and invariants), because they will be compiled out when
> compiling with -release.
> | Use
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
