On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 at 09:52:23 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
By the way, back in the 80's, I wrote my own pointer checker
for my own use developing C code. It was immensely useful in
flushing bugs out of my code. There are vestiges of it still in
the dmd source code.
But it ran very
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 20:07:01 UTC, areYouSureAboutThat
wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 11:04:24 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 09:08:59 UTC, areYouSureAboutThat
wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 03:54:32 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Yes, as long as you
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 07:23:48 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 06:34:23 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 04:31:48 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
ASAN, Valgrind, Clang Static Analyzer and plenty of other
tools are the practical mechanisms to prevent
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 04:31:48 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2023 at 03:54:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Buffer overflows are trivial to have in C, and C has no
mechanism to prevent them.
ASAN, Valgrind, Clang Static Analyzer and plenty of other tools
are the
On Wednesday, 6 July 2022 at 15:43:25 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 July 2022 at 14:30:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 12:34:57 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2022 at 05:30:10 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
[...]
GC is one of D's strength because it is
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 12:34:57 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2022 at 05:30:10 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Sunday, 3 July 2022 at 08:46:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
You can find the final draft of the high-level goals for the
D programming language at the following link:
On Sunday, 5 June 2022 at 22:41:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/4/2022 10:54 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
That paper had a real implementation to follow along,
I didn't see it.
while Lucid and IBM products were real things one could buy.
That are *C* compilers doing imports for *C* code?
On Sunday, 5 June 2022 at 04:42:44 UTC, claptrap wrote:
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 12:29:59 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 07:40:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/29/2022 11:13 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Precompiled headers for C and C++ were certainly a
module-like system
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 19:26:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/4/2022 5:29 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I guess going around the horn is a synonym for lets pretend
there wasn't prior art and keep arguing D did it first, as
usual.
Writing a paper is not doing it first.
That paper had a real
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 07:40:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/29/2022 11:13 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
Not the same as C doing the importing of C code.
[...]
Going around the horn, really doing it the hard way. Besides,
writing a paper is not the same thing as implementing a
On Tuesday, 3 May 2022 at 01:54:16 UTC, forkit wrote:
On Friday, 22 April 2022 at 19:54:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/17/2022 1:12 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
https://nwcpp.org/
An online presentation.
Monday at 7PM PST.
Slides:
https://nwcpp.org/talks/2022/modules_in_c.pdf
Video:
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 12:53:50 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 08:14:32 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
The University of Queensland's Centre for Hypersonics has [a
gas dynamics toolkit](https://gdtk.uqcloud.net/) that, since
1994, has evolved from C, to C++, and
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 08:14:32 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The University of Queensland's Centre for Hypersonics has [a
gas dynamics toolkit](https://gdtk.uqcloud.net/) that, since
1994, has evolved from C, to C++, and now to D. Peter Jacobs,
Rowan Gallon, and Kyle Damm wrote a little
On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 02:13:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 01:19:01AM +, forkit via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
How is using D "losing autonomy"? Unlike Java, D does not
force you to use anything. You can write all-out GC code, you
On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 15:44:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 10:21:12 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
TLDR: it's pointless to lament on irrelevant trivia. Time it!
Any counter-arguments from either side are pointless without
that.
"Time it" isn't
On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 10:21:12 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 16:17:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
Oh there is a psychological barrier for sure. On both sides of
the, uh, "argument". I've said this before but I can repeat it
again: time it. 4
On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 02:37:47 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
"Why I like D" is on the front page of HackerNews at the moment
at number 11.
https://news.ycombinator.com/news
I enjoyed reading the article.
On Friday, 18 June 2021 at 06:14:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 08:51:52 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
I am having issues as well, but I don't think the installer is
at fault: I see the `C:\D\dmd2` directory get filled as the
installer progresses, then files just disappear.
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:55:50 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 09:14:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
The current GC strategy is a dead end. No GC makes the
language too much of a C++ with no real edge. D needs to offer
something other languages do not, to offset the
On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 23:04:12 UTC, Norm wrote:
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 08:58:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 21:35:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:56:06 UTC, sighoya wrote:
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 21:35:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:56:06 UTC, sighoya wrote:
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people think that, but it's simply not true. malloc/free is
incompatible to garbage collection.
This is true and even
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 14:28:25 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Github: https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR
DUB: https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr
Hi, all!
This is LWDR (Light Weight D Runtime) It is a ground-up
implementation of a D runtime targeting the ARM Cortex-M
microcontrollers and other
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 12:27:56 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 09:21:27 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
Just implementation deficiency. I think it is fixable with some
refactoring of the GC pipeline. One approach would be, (similar
to other language
On Monday, 15 March 2021 at 17:04:56 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Monday, 15 March 2021 at 16:41:08 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
Could D be used with WinUI 3?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/winui/winui3/
Would the win32metadata help? 樂
I've seen some slides about WinUI 3 future
On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 11:33:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm very, very happy that I can finally announce the news. Some
of you may recall the job announcements I put out on the blog
back in September [1]. Symmetry Investments offered to fund one
full-time, or two part-time, Pull
On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 07:17:45 UTC, RSY wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 21:03:36 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 08:36:54 UTC, RSY wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 19:00:14 UTC, evilrat wrote:
[...]
C++ you need to write duplicate code
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 08:36:54 UTC, RSY wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 19:00:14 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 18:03:56 UTC, frame wrote:
It's not the problem mentioned but I had to struggle with
DLLs and D's Variant-type. The problem is that
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 02:31:36 UTC, Murilo wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official".
That is a deliberate attempt to fracture.
I'm sorry you see it like this but my intention when I
On Sunday, 6 December 2020 at 08:12:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
On Sunday, 6 December 2020 at 07:45:17 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
GCs scan memory, sure. Lots of variations. Not germane. Not
a rationale.
We need to freeze the threads when collecting stacks/globals.
D is employed at
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 18:29:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:41 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
Concepts, coroutines, and modules are already in ISO C++20.
Only once the standard is voted in. :-)
Also ranges are in I believe.
And co
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
C++20 a success, or even C++17? Does anyone know this? Modern
C++ isn't a programming
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 10:31:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Saturday, 27 June 2020 at 15:48:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How to answer "why will yours succeed, when X, Y, and Z have
failed?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIHfaH9Kffs
Very insightful talk.
Back to C++20 and beyond
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 19:49:33 UTC, welkam wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 15:04:35 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Hi everyone,
as the subject states, you can find it here,
https://codefence.io/
The current version is 2.092.0 with dmd.
Regards,
Why such thing is free? Who pays for the
Hi everyone,
as the subject states, you can find it here, https://codefence.io/
The current version is 2.092.0 with dmd.
Regards,
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 at 09:09:04 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 09:30:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 18:52:55 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
Just curious, how do you handle the whole RC> story
in Gtk-rs?
For me it made the point that
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 18:52:55 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 15:50 +, Phrozen via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[…]
@Basile B., thanks for the suggestion. I'll try this library
too.
Just a bit of confirmation: I am a fan of D and GtkD for
desktop UI work.
GTK+
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 06:58:52 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 06:13:09 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Great work! What is the status of WebAssembly support beyond
betterC?
Almost there.
I originally planned to complete it last February. It turned
out to be a bit
On Thursday, 23 April 2020 at 17:53:05 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce an exciting LDC 1.21 release - some highlights:
* Based on D 2.091.1+; LLVM upgraded to v10.0.0.
* Experimental iOS/arm64 support - all druntime/Phobos
unittests pass, thanks Jacob! The prebuilt macOS package
supports
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 03:41:38 UTC, Brian wrote:
On Monday, 14 January 2019 at 20:21:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Of possible interest:
https://www.technotification.com/2019/01/most-underrated-programming-languages.html
Because no software can use it.
examples:
1. Docker use
On Saturday, 1 September 2018 at 08:19:49 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/31/2018 11:59 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
For example, in any CS program, are there any courses at all
about this?
Yes, we had them on my degree,
I'm curious how the courses you took compared with the articles
I wrote about
On Saturday, 1 September 2018 at 05:57:06 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
It all comes down to, not enough time to cover the material.
Programming is the largest scientific field in existence. It
has merged material from Physics, Chemistry, Psychology (in a
BIG WAY), Biology, you name it and
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 22:23:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/31/2018 1:42 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Some countries do have engineering certifications and
professional permits for software engineering, but its still a
minority.
That won't fix anything, because there is NO conventional
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 19:50:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17880722
Typical comments:
"`assertAndContinue` crashes in dev and logs an error and keeps
going in prod. Each time we want to verify a runtime
assumption, we decide which type of assert to
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:16:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/24/2018 4:53 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
str = str1 + " " + str2;
But you have to be careful how it is written:
str = "hello" + "world";
str = "hello" + "world" + str1;
don't work, etc.
Well, like everything
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 09:54:37 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
[...]
+1
IMO, D in its current state, and with its current ecosystem,
even after more than a decade of existence, is still NOT the
best alternative to C/C++ where they HAVE
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 18:31:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-04-10 08:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Regardless, I think that it's clear that in order to do
anything with
thread-local pools, we'd have to lock down the type system
even further to
disallow casts to or from shared or
On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 at 07:29:11 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 17:30:20 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
- No code that would trigger GC is allowed
Impressive! It definitely won't be anyhing like D or Rust in
systems field anyway, but C# usually feels to be so reliant in
GC that
A bit off topic, yet still relevant given the ongoing attempts
for D to be usable on the games industry.
At this year's GDC Unity had a few talks of the new subsystems
being transitioning from internal engine code in C++ into upper
layers written in C#.
For that purpose they are introducing
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD language
requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steelman_language_requirements
On Friday, 16 March 2018 at 11:44:59 UTC, Chris wrote:
Would it be possible to find out at DConf in Munich why exactly
D is so popular in Germany (my impression) and in other
countries of Europe (and that general post code) like France,
Italy, GB, Romania and Russia etc.? I've always been
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 11:16:51 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 10:21:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
...continue with C in the face of overwhelming evidence
it is the wrong thing to do.
yeah, the health fanatics who promote their crap to goverments
and insurance
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 10:21:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
[…]
There are those who use C because the only other option is
assembly language, so they make the right decision. This is an
indicator that high-level language toolchain manufacturers have
failed to port to their platform. I'll
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 04:38:24 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 03:57:25 UTC, barry.harris wrote:
Sorry little rabbit, your are misguided in this belief. Back
in day we all used C and this is the reason most "safer"
languages exist today.
You can write pretty
On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 15:10:17 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Hey!
Are there any other Portuguese D programmers in here? Raise
your hand and say hi!
Don't tell me I'm the only one... ;_;
Cheers,
Luís
Well, I still occasionally hang around and hope D will find its
place, but given
On Saturday, 10 February 2018 at 19:22:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 14:06:09 Timon Gehr via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 08.02.2018 16:55, JN wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 14:54:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
> wrote:
>> Garbage collection has proved to be a
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 03:36:17 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 21:02:11 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 20:45:44 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
https://www.quora.com/Why-hasnt-D-started-to-replace-C++
Andrei
[...]
But really
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 18:06:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/8/2018 9:03 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
If D had a decent garbage collector it might be a more
convincing argument.
'Decent' GC systems rely on the compiler emitting "write gates"
around every assignment to a pointer. These
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 22:43:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 21:49:39 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
"extremely eefficient native code". I don't argue that C++
has extremely efficient native code. But so has D. So the
claim that C++ has an "enormous
On Sunday, 28 January 2018 at 13:50:03 UTC, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 09:02:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
While this analysis of language popularity on Github is
enlightening:
http://www.benfrederickson.com/ranking-programming-languages-by-github-users/
I found the
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 18:46:12 UTC, John Gabriele wrote:
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 17:24:54 UTC, Benny wrote:
What i found interesting is the comparison between the "newer"
languages and D ( see the reddit thread ).
9 Go 4.1022
15 Kotlin 1.2798
18 Rust0.7317
35
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 16:20:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 11:43:35 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 11:13:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 10:29:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 11:13:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 10:29:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 at 09:56:48 UTC, Pjotr Prins
wrote:
[...]
Good programmers aren't stuck on any single language and will
pick the tool best suited
On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 16:43:41 UTC, John Gabriele
wrote:
On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 15:57:18 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 11:27:29 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 18:41 +, Laeeth Isharc via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
However the
On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 11:27:29 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 18:41 +, Laeeth Isharc via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
However the GStreamer folk are backing Rust (for memory safety
issues noted earlier) so even though D has a GStreamer binding
(thanks to Mike and
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 04:16:32 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 12/20/17 10:28, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/20/2017 01:14 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
from developers that learned it before C++98 and
can't care less what is being discussed on Reddit and HN.
I don't blame them one bit because
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 at 18:28:20 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/20/2017 01:14 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> from developers that learned it before C++98 and
> can't care less what is being discussed on Reddit and HN.
I don't blame them one bit because keeping up with C++ and
learning C++
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 at 08:49:18 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 19/12/17 11:54, Walter Bright wrote:
"C, Python, Go, and the Generalized Greenspun Law"
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7804
I have two takeaways from that article:
1. ESR doesn't understand C++ one bit.
2. I feel exactly
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 at 11:03:37 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 at 10:54:12 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 at 09:54:05 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
"C, Python, Go, and the Generalized Greenspun Law"
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7804
I think D and the GC are
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 at 09:54:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
"C, Python, Go, and the Generalized Greenspun Law"
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7804
That is what I keep saying thanks to my experience using Oberon
systems during
the 90's, and following everything that was done with
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 12:05:06 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grostad wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 10:47:31 UTC, aberba wrote:
to death learning these stuff in lectures. I learnt them
beyond the syllables years back on my own at a much quicker
pase.
CS isnt about the languages
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 10:47:31 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 11:10:09 UTC, Johanna Burgos
wrote:
Your Mission
Your Track Record
Degree in Computer Science, or closely-related
It baffles me that recruitment still works using this as a
requirement. A CS
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 06:24:38 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 06:12:19 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/27/2017 9:11 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 28/11/2017 5:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/27/2017 6:55 PM, John wrote:
Should add optlink to that
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 02:05:27 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 16:38:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grostad wrote:
It [C]is flawed... ESR got that right, not sure how anyone can
disagree.
Well I 'can' disagree ;-)
Is a scalpel flawed because someone tried to use it
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 00:09:32 UTC, Joakim wrote:
...
I think you greatly overestimate what was needed to compete in
this mobile market at that time. I'm not saying it was easy,
but the PC and mobile giants before iOS/Android clearly didn't
have the vision or ability to execute
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 06:27:15 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 01:13:00 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[...]
Redhat have demonstrated that it can be done. GPL is not the
obstacle. The
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 16:50:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Do those Python/Numpy users have the level of VS or other
Windows IDE support that D currently doesn't? Either way, math
modeling is such a small niche that I'm not sure it makes a
difference, though I'm glad Ilya and others are
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 03:00:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 02:48:00 evilrat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 02:30:50 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 01:42:52 UTC, evilrat wrote:
>> Since you already on
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 16:02:56 UTC, flamencofantasy
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 05:40:06 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 04:26:42 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
[...]
I’ll throw in my 2 rubbles.
I actually worked on a VM that has async/await feature
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 16:11:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 14:24:57 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 14:14:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 13:49:50 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
A std::shared_ptr going
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 14:14:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 13:49:50 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
A std::shared_ptr going out of scope can pause the program for
just as long as a GC mark-and-sweep.
I don't use shared_ptr much, but why would a single
On Sunday, 10 September 2017 at 08:56:11 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 10/09/2017 9:40 AM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I was experimenting with -betterC and found out that C++
classes doesn't work. Because the resulting object file needs
a symbol "_D14TypeInfo_Class6__vtblZ" which is in druntime. I
Hi everyone,
Videos of Rust Conf 2017 are now available, and Joe Duffy did the
closing keynote telling his experience developing Midori.
Specially relevant are the parts where he explains the internal
resistance from classical C devs at Microsoft, adopting a more
safe systems programming.
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 15:43:46 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 15:32:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 14:16:20 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
[...]
According to Google on their Android Developers Backstage
podcast, the majority of Android
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 14:16:20 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 12:14:16 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
[...]
A developer who mostly targets Windows wouldn't. But if you
look at the statistics [1] you'd see that in the category of
systems accessing the web mobile systems
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 21:31:00 UTC, Araq wrote:
...
That's just "I looked at the websites, never used these tools
in practice but found them convincing" phrased differently to
pretend you have an argument.
The success of Go strongly indicates people generally don't
connect Java/C# to
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:25:10 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 16:49:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 06:41:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
Java, Kotlin, C# are still Jit compiled languages, with the
memory footprint to prove it :)
The memory footprint doesn't
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 19:27:56 UTC, Araq wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 11:27:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Java is AOT compiled to native code via Excelsior JET, IBM J9,
IBM Websphere RealTime, JamaicaVM, SubstrateVM, Android ART
and eventually Java 10.
Have you used one of these
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:23:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:00 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
They were all about Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#.
Isn't Swift a native code language?
Just like Java when one uses any commercial JDK or C# when
targeting
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 11:11:01 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:23:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:00 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
They were all about Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#.
Those are also the major players in the market
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:15:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
I suspect though that like Go took Python more than C folk,
Kotlin Native will take more Java that C++, Go and Rust folks.
But speculation rarely turn out quite as speculated.
In Java development there is almost no C or C++ and no
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
- favorite code sample
- "only
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
the gcc tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :)
I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now,
where commenters are asking questions about D.
As already
On Sunday, 28 May 2017 at 16:58:53 UTC, aberba wrote:
https://lwn.net/Articles/708196/
From the look of things and feedbacks from several security
analysts and system developers, [exposed] I/O needs to be
memory safe.
GStreamer multimedia library developed in C has safety issues
[see
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 17:04:10 UTC, Jason King wrote:
And how many of those are claiming to be a systems programming
language?
I have no problems with an unstable ABI, what I have a problem
is with
claiming to be a systems programming language AND not having a
stable ABI.
You
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 15:36:38 UTC, Jason King wrote:
Yes it is a lot of work, which I strongly suspect is a big
reason why C still reigns supreme at the systems level —
because it does have a stable ABI which solves a lot of
headaches from a systems point of view (obviously momentum and
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 05:07:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/17/17 8:27 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
What will cause a shift is a continuous business loss.
If business A and B are competing in
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:12:46 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 11:52:42 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 20:00:54 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...]
This is mostly a psychological effect of C++ folks having
aversion to any GC.
It is interesting to have
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 11:52:42 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 20:00:54 UTC, aberba wrote:
From a technical and experience point of view (those with
experience in large D code-base), how is only D's GC &
optional MMM a significant production-use blocker?
This is
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 13:12:12 UTC, Minty Fresh wrote:
On Sunday, 5 March 2017 at 11:48:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-03-03 16:23, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
That would be a good next step from an engineering
standpoint, I agree,
to proceed to minimize the amount of trust in
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some
1 - 100 of 715 matches
Mail list logo
