On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 06:08:35 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
(Caveat: last one needs 5-ish compiler patches to work.)
Which, please specify?
I'd really like Emphasize vibe.d to be replaced with Emphasize
dub. Get the latter and you get the former essentially for free
(and it is WIP already).
Other than that - list makes perfect sense.
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 10:07:42 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 07:56:53 UTC, data man wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 06:08:35 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
(Caveat: last one needs 5-ish compiler patches to work.)
Which, please specify?
It should
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 14:10:58 UTC, data man wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 13:43:19 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
By 5-ish compiler patches I meant patches that are not in
the official compiler. I would be very, very surprised if it
worked out of the box for you.
Yes, I
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 07:56:53 UTC, data man wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 06:08:35 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
(Caveat: last one needs 5-ish compiler patches to work.)
Which, please specify?
It should tell you nicely when you try to compile without them:
I think I can mostly agree with the plan, but:
Improve language stability
Define appropriately fuzzily-defined areas of the language
(e.g. shared semantics, @property).
This is either a contradiction in itself, or stability actually
means change.
Foster library additions over language
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 01:17:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello,
Walter and I have been mulling for a while on a vision for the
first six months of 2015.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
This is stuff we consider important for D going forward and
plan to work actively on.
I've finally dusted off and finished up the new Allegro 5
binding I started on over a year ago. SeigeLord already maintains
a static binding at [1]. It has support for the WIP 5.1 branch of
Allegro. DerelictAllegro5 is, like all Derelict packages, a
dynamic binding and only supports 5.0 for
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 13:43:19 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
By 5-ish compiler patches I meant patches that are not in the
official compiler. I would be very, very surprised if it worked
out of the box for you.
Yes, I understand.
You do not plan to modify their for current state of
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 10:20:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I'd really like Emphasize vibe.d to be replaced with
Emphasize dub. Get the latter and you get the former
essentially for free (and it is WIP already).
I wish inclusions like this would go through a code review, the
sort we put new
Atleast on chrome win7 the font is absolutely awful.
Could you post a screenshot? I mostly just use the default sans
which can result in any font being used based on the OS,
Also any chance that it could output json to represent modules
instead of html?
Very unlikely in near future,
On 2015-02-01 08:12, Joakim wrote:
I wish there had been some mention of mobile. Recent news was that 1
billion Android smartphones were sold last year: that dwarfs the 316
million PCs sold, a number that keeps declining. That doesn't even
include the two hundred million tablets sold last
On 2/02/2015 2:36 a.m., Kiith-Sa wrote:
Atleast on chrome win7 the font is absolutely awful.
Could you post a screenshot? I mostly just use the default sans which
can result in any font being used based on the OS,
http://imgur.com/JvbjN9o
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 11:12:11 UTC, data man wrote:
Alas, but...
void main()
{
pragma(msg, is(typeof({ struct S { int i; } S s;
__traits(child, s, S.i) = 0; })));
}
output false
By 5-ish compiler patches I meant patches that are not in the
official compiler. I would be very,
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 14:00:37 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I think I can mostly agree with the plan, but:
Improve language stability
Define appropriately fuzzily-defined areas of the language
(e.g. shared semantics, @property).
This is either a contradiction in itself, or stability
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 01:17:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello,
Walter and I have been mulling for a while on a vision for the
first six months of 2015.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
This is stuff we consider important for D going forward and
plan to work actively on.
Hi
Just a reminder that the first London D Programmers meet up is
happening on Tuesday February 3rd at Skills Matter. Looking
forward to seeing you there :)
http://www.meetup.com/London-D-Programmers/
--Kingsley
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 18:26:52 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
Hi,
I've
On 2/1/15 7:48 AM, Mathias LANG wrote:
This is arguably the most well-defined goal here, but at the same time,
it sounds strange to judge the contributions by the numbers of pull
request. We could top that number -and I'm afraid we'll be tempted to do
so- by submitting a streamline of pull
I think if a concrete number inspires people to commit loads of
small fixes to docs, unittests, etc., then this is a good thing.
It's not like anyone is going to give up on committing when the
target's reached.
Hello,everyone!
Now,dco can be used in vs.net and MonoD as other build tool or
custom build tool.
you can config a local.ini quickly(by dco -ini),better than use
dub.
It can build any projects on Windows.
https://github.com/FrankLIKE/dco
Thank you.
Frank
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 13:40:29 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 2/02/2015 2:36 a.m., Kiith-Sa wrote:
Atleast on chrome win7 the font is absolutely awful.
Could you post a screenshot? I mostly just use the default
sans which
can result in any font being used based on the OS,
Could you add to DCO resolving dependents like DUB have?
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 01:17:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello,
Walter and I have been mulling for a while on a vision for the
first six months of 2015.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
This is stuff we consider important for D going forward and
plan to work actively on.
On 2/1/15, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
- Create the D Language Foundation
What exactly is this idea about, can you elaborate a bit?
On Sunday, February 01, 2015 08:41:54 Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 2/1/15 7:48 AM, Mathias LANG wrote:
This is arguably the most well-defined goal here, but at the same time,
it sounds strange to judge the contributions by the numbers of pull
request. We could
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 11:04:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Mandatory reddit link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2tdy5z/interfacing_d_to_legacy_c_code_by_walter_bright/
There's been a lot of interest in this topic.
Interesting...
I wonder if two things could happen:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:12:41 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/1/15, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
- Create the D Language Foundation
What exactly is this idea about, can you elaborate a
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:31:47 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:12:41 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 2/1/15, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
- Create the D Language
On 2/1/15 11:02 AM, Phil wrote:
I think if a concrete number inspires people to commit loads of small
fixes to docs, unittests, etc., then this is a good thing. It's not like
anyone is going to give up on committing when the target's reached.
Nicely we already have 484 created in January:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:40:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
- Create the D Language Foundation
btw I personally think this is single most important point in
the list that is necessary to actually moved forward with
others in focused manner. But it really depends on how it is
defined.
Yes,
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 19:25:15 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Could you add to DCO resolving dependents like DUB have?
Add it，after some time.
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 06:08:35 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 20:04:51 UTC, Pierre Krafft
wrote:
It's fun to see that there are so many different solutions to
working with JSON in D. jsvar seems to be for keeping your
variables in JavaScript-land,
On 2/1/15 1:46 PM, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 2/1/15, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
- Create the D Language Foundation
What exactly is this idea about, can you elaborate
On 2/1/15 2:40 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:31:47 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:12:41 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/1/15, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
*answered
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 00:23:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/1/15 2:40 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:31:47 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:12:41 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 2/1/15, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 22:32:36 +, Sativa via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
What I mean is, Do we really need to know the default arguments
or are we just having to explicitly use them to make the name
mangling work?
If it is the latter, then surely couldn't the D compiler sort of
On 2/1/15 3:52 PM, Jerry Morrison wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:40:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
- Create the D Language Foundation
btw I personally think this is single most important point in the list
that is necessary to actually moved forward with others in focused
manner. But it
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 01:43:02 UTC, Jerry Morrison wrote:
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 00:58:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/1/15 3:52 PM, Jerry Morrison wrote:
The other big thing missing from the Vision doc is picking a
niche,
That may as well come later - or not at all.
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 00:58:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/1/15 3:52 PM, Jerry Morrison wrote:
The other big thing missing from the Vision doc is picking a
niche,
That may as well come later - or not at all. We don't think it
is now time to commit to a particular niche.
s/pragmatics/pragmatists/
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 23:46:24 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
All work is hosted on Github[3], and we are planning on moving
it to part of the D-Programming-Language repositories.
I really wish we would eat our own dog food and use D for these
projects. Nazriel's dpaste is in friggin PHP and
On 2015-02-02 06:57, ketmar wrote:
dub is good, but only in limited use cases. so it's almost no sense in
using dub if some use cases are not suitable for it: it's way better to
adapt build tool that one already using (or write his own) instead of use
TWO build tools for different projects.
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 05:57:27 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:24:00 +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote in message
news:viqwfixznbdbdwvha...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't use Dub
You really should! I put it off for months and months but I'm
quite
happy
Great news!
I've been using Allegro 5 for a long time, but not in Mac OS -
where I'm more interested in using it.
I can't believe it, but yet another week has already passed, so
up late to release this again!
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/feb-01.html
Early bird registration open for DConf, 2015 Vision released, GUI
and Windows development on the forums.
Today's tip is about class destructors, and
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 03:50:10 UTC, Joakim wrote:
C and C++ are very general-purpose, but they can still be
considered as a niche of performance languages. What's wrong
with D aiming for that niche?
Most uses of C C++ that haven't migrated to well-supported
garbage-collected
Vladimir Panteleev wrote in message
news:viqwfixznbdbdwvha...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't use Dub
You really should! I put it off for months and months but I'm quite happy
with it now.
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:24:00 +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote in message
news:viqwfixznbdbdwvha...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't use Dub
You really should! I put it off for months and months but I'm quite
happy with it now.
dub is very limited tool. first: it can't do
49 matches
Mail list logo
