On Friday, 2 February 2018 at 12:57:44 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 19:57:39 UTC, aberba wrote:
now it seem abandoned after such an effort.
Can you confirm it for Ubuntu 17?
I'm on 16.04.
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 19:57:39 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 18:30:56 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 09:38:26 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 07:40:10 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 19:57:39 UTC, aberba wrote:
now it seem abandoned after such an effort.
Can you confirm it for Ubuntu 17?
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 18:30:56 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 09:38:26 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 07:40:10 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 21:42:49 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...] Ubuntu 16.04
This is a
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 09:38:26 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 07:40:10 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 21:42:49 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...] Ubuntu 16.04
This is a long-term support distribution.
Don't expect those to have actual tip
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 11:44:11 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
I think they update only stuff for which security problems were
fixed and everything that depends on those, and that's it.
And by the way, for some people that is the reason to install
such a kind of distro:
to not
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 09:38:26 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 07:40:10 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 21:42:49 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...] Ubuntu 16.04
This is a long-term support distribution.
Don't expect those to have actual tip
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 07:40:10 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 21:42:49 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...] Ubuntu 16.04
This is a long-term support distribution.
Don't expect those to have actual tip versions of any SW
package!
They rely on stabe versions
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 21:42:49 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...] Ubuntu 16.04
This is a long-term support distribution.
Don't expect those to have actual tip versions of any SW package!
They rely on stabe versions that don't have the latest features
but only those very well tested.
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 21:37:08 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
* LLVM for prebuilt packages upgraded
On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 15:38:02 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 12:00:32 UTC, kinke wrote:
In the meantime, I started an LLVM 5.0.1 build in my qemu
emulator 12 hours ago; one third has been compiled so far, so
you may expect the armhf package to be available
On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 12:00:32 UTC, kinke wrote:
[...]
Please note that building a release package isn't identical to
just build from source; there are subtle diffs and additional
steps to be undertaken. I hope we get an ARM CI box soon and
can automate the armhf package generation
On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 05:31:28 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 04:45:49 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Saturday, 20 January 2018 at 15:19:13 UTC, Johannes Loher
wrote:
Hey, thanks for your great work! Would it be possible to add
a armhf build to the release? If you can
On Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 04:45:49 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 20 January 2018 at 15:19:13 UTC, Johannes Loher
wrote:
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
[...]
Hey, thanks for your great work! Would it be possible to add a
armhf build to the release?
On Saturday, 20 January 2018 at 15:19:13 UTC, Johannes Loher
wrote:
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
* LLVM for prebuilt packages upgraded
On Sunday, 7 January 2018 at 12:22:17 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 16:25:46 UTC, German Diago wrote:
- want no gc? Ok, at least there is BetterC, so if I invest
myself quite a bit on D (I am the kind of programmer that
likes to squeeze power out of machines, so this
On Monday, 8 January 2018 at 03:14:32 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 16:25:46 UTC, German Diago wrote:
negative points also as I use it :p. By the way, and a bit
off-topic for the post, but, if I want to port my code to run
on Android/iOS, what is the recommended way?
1.
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 16:25:46 UTC, German Diago wrote:
negative points also as I use it :p. By the way, and a bit
off-topic for the post, but, if I want to port my code to run
on Android/iOS, what is the recommended way?
1. create a shared library and consume it? Is that possible
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 16:25:46 UTC, German Diago wrote:
- want no gc? Ok, at least there is BetterC, so if I invest
myself quite a bit on D (I am the kind of programmer that likes
to squeeze power out of machines, so this always means that I
will not consider VM languages), I will
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
* LLVM for prebuilt packages upgraded
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
* LLVM for prebuilt packages upgraded
Great, thank you very much!
And does LDC has the plan for release an AArch64/Linux version?
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
*
On Saturday, 6 January 2018 at 01:19:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.7. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
* LLVM for prebuilt packages upgraded
On Monday, 18 December 2017 at 19:59:02 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
The archive at
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/download/v1.7.0-beta1/ldc-1.7.0-beta1-src.tar.gz
is broken. The
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/download/v1.7.0-beta1/ldc-1.7.0-beta1-src.zip
works
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 17:33:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.7. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
Full release log
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 18:11:46 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Is it's possible to produce x64 binaries on Windows x64 without
installing Visual Studio? DMD do not have linker for x64.
Beside linker you will need C startup code. Where do you plan to
get it?
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 08:42:40 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Is it's possible to produce x64 binaries on Windows x64
without installing Visual Studio? DMD do not have linker for
x64.
You could try using the llvm linker, lld, as noted in the
release notes for ldc 1.5:
Could you explain
On 2017-12-13 09:42, Suliman wrote:
Could you explain hot to do it? Install LLVM? And than how I could
specify what linker should be used?
with the "-linker=" flag.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Is it's possible to produce x64 binaries on Windows x64
without installing Visual Studio? DMD do not have linker for
x64.
You could try using the llvm linker, lld, as noted in the
release notes for ldc 1.5:
Could you explain hot to do it? Install LLVM? And than how I
could specify what
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 18:11:46 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 17:33:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.7. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 18:11:46 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 17:33:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.7. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 17:33:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.7. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
Full release log
could these releases be tied to 'homebrew/linuxbrew' upgrades as part
of release process?
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 17:33:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> on
On Sunday, 10 December 2017 at 17:33:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.7. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.077.1.
* Catching C++ exceptions supported on Linux and Windows.
Full release log
36 matches
Mail list logo