On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:05:08 +0100, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 18:34:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/29/2013 5:28 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Seriously... Walter wouldn't have got his mechanical engineering
degree if he
didn't know how to
DMC is ugly compiler.
It will be much nicer if you'll use mingw for that purpose on
Windows. GCC usually generates more faster code that VC does.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 10:08:22 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
JS, el 29 de July a las 22:32 me escribiste:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:38:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/29/2013 12:08 PM, JS wrote:
Trying to use distance and speed as a measure of performance
of
a program is
just
Dear Dees,
Here is the article. I've set up a (temporary?) blog for it. The
article deals with the usability of D and how it helped to
solve certain problems. It's not about benchmarking, concurrency,
unit tests and the like. Just about how practical it is.
Here it is, warts and all:
It's a good why should I care about D article. I frequent
Hacker News, and one thing that seems to get people really hyped
about a language is Getting Things Done, as well as all the
functional programming hype.
One thing that caught my eye:
I also recommend the book The D Programming
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 13:53:24 UTC, Chris wrote:
Dear Dees,
Here is the article. I've set up a (temporary?) blog for it.
The article deals with the usability of D and how it helped
to solve certain problems. It's not about benchmarking,
concurrency, unit tests and the like. Just about
On 7/30/13 4:10 AM, JS wrote:
It depends on the audience, but to write an article that is informal
then use a very formal definition of speed is just begging for problems.
It's hard for me to really imagine that lines is a measurement of
distance and speed is lines per second... but even if I
On 7/30/13 2:59 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I just want to point out that being so much people getting this wrong
(and even fighting to convince other people that the wrong
interpretation is right) might be an indication that the message you
wanted to give in that blog is not extremely clear :)
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 09:04:10 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
DMC is ugly compiler.
It will be much nicer if you'll use mingw for that purpose on
Windows. GCC usually generates more faster code that VC does.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/
I'm willing to bet Walter would accept pull
On 7/30/2013 11:02 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
26-Jul-2013 23:17, Walter Bright пишет:
How about a pull request so we can try it out?
Preliminary pull is here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2436
So far it looses a bit.
:-) That's often been my experience.
I'm still
On 7/30/13 11:13 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/30/2013 2:59 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I just want to point out that being so much people getting this wrong
(and even fighting to convince other people that the wrong
interpretation is right) might be an indication that the message you
wanted
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 19:04:12 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/30/13 8:47 AM, Meta wrote:
It's a good why should I care about D article. I frequent
Hacker News,
and one thing that seems to get people really hyped about a
language is
Getting Things Done, as well as all the functional
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 14:21:06 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Chris:
http://wendlerchristoph.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/probably-d/
[Python] copyright issues (easily decompilable byte code)
Is that true?
For small D examples I suggest the Rosettacode site (when its
site isn't down).
Bye,
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 15:47:29 UTC, Meta wrote:
It's a good why should I care about D article. I frequent
Hacker News, and one thing that seems to get people really
hyped about a language is Getting Things Done, as well as all
the functional programming hype.
That was the reason why
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 17:23:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Good one, worth sharing. As a D user I'd probably love to see
more technical details but for a wider public it is a solid
match.
The technical details are rather boring. Good old OOP and I made
use of D's structs and some other nice
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 7/30/13 11:13 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/30/2013 2:59 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I just want to point out that being so much people getting this wrong
(and even fighting to convince other
On 7/30/2013 11:16 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
Sidenote: Insulting Walter's work isn't a great way to get him to do your a
favor.
I'm sad that I never got the opportunity to be insulted by Jobs.
On 7/30/2013 1:14 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Since I've never been before, I would like to know if there is a place that I
can setup a laptop in the lecture hall. I *really* want to go to this, but I
have product launch two weeks prior at VSLive (also at MSFT) and it may need
emergency support.
On 7/30/13 1:14 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:12:39 -0700, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013
The last one was a lot of fun, so I signed up for this one, too. Note
that Andrei is a speaker! Recommended. See y'all
19 matches
Mail list logo
