Am 19.08.2014 03:25, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
On 8/17/2014 5:57 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I though that this might be important enough to share on the announce
list:
A pull request [1] by Rainer Schuetze which adds COFF support for Win32
has recently been merged by Walter. It seems to be enable
I remember that it was planned to add functional future for
iteration throw elements. Something like:
().times
().do
But I can't find original post about it and nothing related in
changelogs...
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
> publication it's on LOR?
sorry, i mean DIY. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
> publication it's on LOR?
DYI.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 04:26:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067. What's the
advantage of doing this? Now we need to worry about master and
2.067 instead of just master. -- Andrei
Well, what you do at that point is just fix all of the
r
On 8/18/14, 5:23 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067. What's the advantage
of doing this? Now we need t
Hmm, list of bug fixes in dlang.org/changelog.html contains bugs
that have been fixed but yet pushed into 2.066 branch.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:22:08 -0400
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Well, people will invent *any* excuse to pass over anything they
> don't feel like bothering with. It sounds like that's probably what
> they were doing.
not exactly, 'cause they *are* interested in using D, es
On 8/17/2014 5:57 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I though that this might be important enough to share on the announce list:
A pull request [1] by Rainer Schuetze which adds COFF support for Win32
has recently been merged by Walter. It seems to be enabled using the
-m32mscoff flag.
[1] https://githu
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 00:23:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and
declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Regardless of whether we start another release going that quickly
or not, I
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
On 8/18/2014 7:07 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
I don't see how infrequent, stable releases are more likely to
provoke that reaction than frequent, unstable releases.
"stability" is somethin
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and
declare it yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
Why can't we have
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare
it yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 21:57:19 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite
the regressions.
There is an apparently endless stream of regressions, I have
found another today
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 ).
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:51:48 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Results:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
Seems like my vote
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqis...@forum.dlang.org)
went
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I don't see how infrequent, stable releases are more likely to
> provoke that reaction than frequent, unstable releases.
"stability" is something that cannot be achieved in living language.
and having offic
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 22:20:19 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:01:24 +
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
What's the advantage of this over maintaing packages for the RC
version until it's ready?
'cause not releasing periodically means "
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:01:24 +
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> What's the advantage of this over maintaing packages for the RC
> version until it's ready?
'cause not releasing periodically means "ah, it will never be ready!
let's look at another language, D is not worth using ye
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 21:57:19 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite
the regressions.
There is an apparently endless stream of regressions, I have
found another today
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 ).
Vladimir Panteleev:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite
the regressions.
There is an apparently endless stream of regressions, I have
found another today
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 ). I think D is
not yet at the stage of its development where it
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:43:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have a mixed feelings about this release. It has some really
cool features and is good to finally see live. But it has
taken ages and there are still many open regres
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I don't know if we can do anything better about it.
2.067
On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Results:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
Seems like my vote
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqis...@forum.dlang.org)
went missing – not that it would change anything, of course
(later in t
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have a mixed feelings about this release. It has some really
cool features and is good to finally see live. But it has taken
ages and there are still many open regressions
(http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing). And stuff like
https://i
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 12:36:42 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 07:24:28 UTC, francesco cattoglio
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 22:20:52 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
GitHub repo: https://github.com/idanarye/vim-dutyl
vim.org page:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Support for new flag -vcolumns in Emacs FlyCheck is soon about to
follow:
https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/issues/460
On 8/18/2014 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/905593426121006
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/50144
I have a mixed feelings about this release. It has some really
cool features and is good to finally see live. But it has taken
ages and there are still many open regressions
(http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing). And stuff like
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11946 is just small
disast
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/905593426121006
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/501443132115140609
Andrei
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 07:24:28 UTC, francesco cattoglio
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 22:20:52 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
GitHub repo: https://github.com/idanarye/vim-dutyl
vim.org page:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=5003
Very very nice... So... how does it work?
On 17 August 2014 19:57, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I though that this might be important enough to share on the announce list:
>
> A pull request [1] by Rainer Schuetze which adds COFF support for Win32
> has recently been merged by
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 22:20:52 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
GitHub repo: https://github.com/idanarye/vim-dutyl
vim.org page:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=5003
Very very nice... So... how does it work?
I added a Bundle "idanarye/vim-dutyl" to my $MTVIMRC.
I added the follo
34 matches
Mail list logo
