Sure, they're open to _severe_ abuse, but for the case when they are
used to generate source code (eg, from a DSL), they are absolutely
perfect, and not a hack at all. In that particular scenario, they are
much better than AST macros could ever be.
They're a replacement for creating a text
What's the rationale behind this? (I don't like this).
The flexibility comes in handy now and then.
but isn't that an abstract form of hijacking then?
or an sideeffect smelling like that?
I installed it, but it won't load the Visual D package. Too bad...
i've read the following on the http://www.jcxsoftware.com/ php-ide
plugin extension page
...
The express edition has limited functionality but one of its biggest
limitations is that you can not load third party plug-ins like
Am 03.05.2010 01:29, schrieb Bernard Helyer:
On 03/05/10 09:28, Walter Bright wrote:
Highlights are the improved gdb support, better error messages, better
json support, unittest changes, and a number of nuisance compiler bugs
fixed.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
Am 24.05.2010 16:08, schrieb Don:
4056 Template instantiation with bare parameter not documented
why don't remove this feature? it isn't syntactic sugar just an
alternative syntax (how many other alternative syntaxes needed?)
Yea, but I wonder how much longer it is going to be before 32-bit is dead as a
dodo except on things like netbooks.
it consumes (leaves holes useable by others) to much memory because of
the allocation strategie - that is also a problem under 64bit
Am 01.02.2011 09:37, schrieb Trass3r:
Speaking of newsgroup web interface, interestingly while the main D site points to
this crappy reader:
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/indexing.php?server=news.digitalmars.comgroup=digitalmars.D.announce
there still is a hidden one which is much better
Am 01.02.2011 14:42, schrieb Adam Ruppe:
Trass3r Wrote:
Speaking of newsgroup web interface, interestingly while the main D site points to
this crappy reader:
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/indexing.php?server=news.digitalmars.comgroup=digitalmars.D.announce
there still is a hidden one
Am 24.02.2011 18:57, schrieb Masahiro Nakagawa:
3 weeks ago, I discussed template engine with Goro Fuji(a.k.a Xslate
author).
In the process, I noticed D does not have template engine library.
So I wrote the D version of Mustache.
https://bitbucket.org/repeatedly/mustache4d/src
would be great
Am 25.02.2011 09:29, schrieb dennis luehring:
would be great to have this available at compiletime
better said - an at compiletime generated render-code - would be
blasting fast because of just combining the template-chunks inside of an
huge write - or every type of section
so something
In the old days, I implemented the compile-time template engine using
similar approch :)
the old days (of D)? - why the switch to pure runtime based?
Am 25.02.2011 15:26, schrieb Masahiro Nakagawa:
the old days (of D)?
A year and a half.
code available?
why the switch to pure runtime based?
When CMS using compile-time template exists, how does user update template
file?
ok but when used as (for example) debugging help is no need
http://hex-rays.com/idapro/61/index.html
+ FLIRT: added autodetection of the programs written in the D language
+ FLIRT: added Digital Mars FLIRT signatures
Am 09.05.2011 15:56, schrieb Michal Minich:
V Sun, 08 May 2011 11:31:29 +0200, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
as the newest version of Visual D includes some major improvements, I'd
like to announce its release here.
Many thanks for the great work you put into this IDE. Since I switched to
it from
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/D-templates-tutorial/blob/master/dtemplates.pdf
can't open the pdf with acrobat reader under win7 :(
(the file seems to be ok, contains the pdf header)
im using the latest acrobat reader x
Am 24.01.2012 10:40, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 1/23/2012 11:50 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
The Rust compiler 0.1 is unleashed
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/opgxd/mozilla_and_the_rust_community_release_rust_01_a/
looks nice - but rusts #fmt macro is nothing compared
or just use http://cdburnerxp.se/
Am 30.03.2012 10:30, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl3l0c$jn2$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 3/29/2012 7:05 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why people think it's ok for basic, basic shit
Am 05.04.2012 16:04, schrieb Jay Norwood:
I uploaded a parallel unzip here, and the main in the examples
folder. Testing on my ssd drive, unzips a 2GB directory
structure in 17.5 secs. 7zip took 55 secs on the same file.
it makes no sense to benchmark different algorithm zip-7zip
compare
Am 05.04.2012 19:04, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On 04/05/2012 06:37 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 05.04.2012 16:04, schrieb Jay Norwood:
I uploaded a parallel unzip here, and the main in the examples
folder. Testing on my ssd drive, unzips a 2GB directory
structure in 17.5 secs. 7zip took 55 secs
Am 06.04.2012 01:53, schrieb Jay Norwood:
I'm curious why win7 is such a dog when removing directories. I
see a lot of disk read activity going on which seems to dominate
the delete time.
try windows safe-mode (without network :} - your virus scanner is
disabled), press F8 before windows
Am 11.05.2012 11:02, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
For this to happen, for Walter to start using this, I think there would
be a greater change if the frontend was a port of the DMD frontend and
not changed too much.
or a pure D version of it with the features:
-very fast in parsing/lexing - there
Am 11.05.2012 11:23, schrieb Roman D. Boiko:
On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 09:19:07 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
does the parser/lexer allow half-finished syntax parsing? for
being useable in an IDE for syntax-highlighting while coding?
That's planned, but I would like to see your usage scenarios
Am 11.05.2012 11:33, schrieb Roman D. Boiko:
-very fast in parsing/lexing - there need to be a benchmark
enviroment from the very start
Will add that to May roadmap.
are using slices for prevent coping everything around?
the parser/lexer need to be as fast as the original one - maybe even
Am 11.05.2012 13:50, schrieb Ary Manzana:
On 5/11/12 4:22 PM, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
What about line and column information?
Indices of the first code unit of each line are stored inside lexer and
a function will compute Location (line number, column number, file
specification) for any
Am 01.07.2012 23:02, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/1/2012 11:53 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
That successfully compiles and prints Member. Same thing happens if
you move the UFCS func and Foo definition out into their own separate
modules. But I was expecting a conflict error at compile-time. Is
Am 02.07.2012 07:13, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Monday, July 02, 2012 07:00:23 dennis luehring wrote:
Am 01.07.2012 23:02, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/1/2012 11:53 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
That successfully compiles and prints Member. Same thing happens if
you move the UFCS func and Foo
Am 19.08.2012 06:12, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 17:03:13 Walter Bright wrote:
Our discussion on this in the last few days inspired me to write a blog post
about it:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/yehz4/nans_just_dont_get_no_res
pect/
Am 06.11.2012 09:49, schrieb Jakob Ovrum:
But, I yield until someone comes up with actual examples of how
these UDAs are useful, because I can't think of anything
interesting at the moment. I guess I should go read over the old
discussions you linked (I remember participating, but can't
Am 06.11.2012 10:04, schrieb Jakob Ovrum:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 09:03:49 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
you're just to deep catched in the
.Net-Everything-Is-Done-In-Runtime-Paradigm - thats all :)
No.
ok not you - but many others
Am 06.11.2012 14:14, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 07:55:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
User Defined Attributes (UDA) are compile time expressions that
can be attached to a declaration.
Hmmm, it didn't work on the most important place for my use case,
function
Am 06.11.2012 16:18, schrieb Walter Bright: On 11/6/2012 6:30 AM,
dennis luehring wrote:
Am 06.11.2012 14:14, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 07:55:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
User Defined Attributes (UDA) are compile time expressions that
can be attached
Am 06.11.2012 18:14, schrieb Walter Bright: On 11/6/2012 9:00 AM,
dennis luehring wrote:
1. what if my needs are beyond D?
for example my idl allows me to define a type based query source for
parameters
CalculateStuff( TypeX [source=\\placement\(typeA|typeB|typeC)]
my_usage
Am 06.11.2012 18:32, schrieb David Nadlinger:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 17:00:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, I ask again, what use case for a UDA is there for function
parameters? (Note that IDL isn't it, as D already has enough
parameter attributes to support IDL.)
What »IDL« are
Am 22.12.2012 11:31, schrieb Russel Winder:
On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 01:10 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[âŠ]
It sounds like no one even has a clue which project the bug is in. It's
clearly a major problem, but unless someone can figure out what's wrong, it's
obviously not going to be fixed.
Am 22.12.2012 13:15, schrieb Russel Winder:
After New Year/Hogmanay, or earlier if possible, I will reinvestigate
all the factors and update the issue appropriately.
sound for me like an bug in the dmd code generation - ldc frontend code
should be nearly the same (or better: i don't think
dlang samples should be run by DPaste - maybe with an cache for not
calling the compiler for each visit :)
also bugzilla sample should be DPasted per default
anyone got plans for this
Am 22.02.2013 21:22, schrieb Walter Bright:
First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive.
but they still missing a wireless microphone for the questioners :)
good talk - but i think you should be more clear about the target of
your presentation, its started with
Am 13.05.2013 14:01, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Watch, discuss, vote up!
http://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1e8mwq/dconf_2013_day_1_talk_3_distributed_caching/
Andrei
it seems that the http://www.phoronix.com/ guys miss the dconf
completely - they write about rust, go, D in gcc,
Am 14.05.2013 08:18, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 5/13/2013 10:19 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 14:01, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Watch, discuss, vote up!
http://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1e8mwq/dconf_2013_day_1_talk_3_distributed_caching/
Andrei
it seems that the http
Am 23.07.2013 21:23, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 7/23/13 8:27 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
You don't need push access to the blessed repository to contribute,
THAT's why git exists! Only people merging stuff needs push access and
is good to keep that team as small as possible (and if there
Am 25.07.2013 20:03, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1j1i30/increasing_the_d_compiler_speed_by_over_75/
do you compare dmc based and visualc based dmd builds?
the vc dmd build seems to be always two times faster - how does that
look with your optimization?
Am 28.07.2013 00:27, schrieb Brian Schott:
DScanner is a tool for analyzing D source code. It has the
following features:
* Prints out a complete AST of a source file in XML format.
* Syntax checks code and prints warning/error messages
* Prints a listing of modules imported by a source file
*
Am 31.07.2013 09:00, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/30/2013 11:40 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
currently the vc builded dmd is about 2 times faster in compiling
That's an old number now. Someone want to try it with the current HEAD?
tried to but failed
downloaded dmd-master.zip (from github
Am 31.07.2013 23:24, schrieb Rainer Schuetze:
On 31.07.2013 09:00, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/30/2013 11:40 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
currently the vc builded dmd is about 2 times faster in compiling
That's an old number now. Someone want to try it with the current HEAD?
I have just
Am 01.08.2013 08:16, schrieb Rainer Schuetze:
On 01.08.2013 07:33, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 31.07.2013 23:24, schrieb Rainer Schuetze:
On 31.07.2013 09:00, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/30/2013 11:40 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
currently the vc builded dmd is about 2 times faster
Am 03.08.2013 23:55, schrieb Walter Bright:
The execrable existing implementation was scrapped, and the new one uses Windows
HeapAlloc().
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/snn.lib
This is for testing porpoises, and of course for those that Feel Da Need For
Speed.
ever tested nedmalloc
Am 04.08.2013 09:35, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 8/4/2013 12:19 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Sunday, 4 August 2013 at 06:07:54 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
ever tested nedmalloc (http://www.nedprod.com/programs/portable/nedmalloc/) or
other malloc allocators?
Windows 7, Linux 3.x
your're right it was RtlAllocateHeap
Am 04.08.2013 11:25, schrieb Denis Shelomovskij:
04.08.2013 11:53, dennis luehring пОÑеÑ:
Am 04.08.2013 09:35, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 8/4/2013 12:19 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Sunday, 4 August 2013 at 06:07:54 UTC, dennis luehring wrote
Am 04.08.2013 11:28, schrieb Denis Shelomovskij:
04.08.2013 1:55, Walter Bright пОÑеÑ:
The execrable existing implementation was scrapped, and the new one uses
Windows HeapAlloc().
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/snn.lib
This is for testing porpoises, and of course for those that Feel Da Need
Am 05.08.2013 19:52, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 8/5/2013 4:01 AM, Richard Webb wrote:
Using the latest DMD and this snn.lib, i'm seeing it take about 11.5 seconds to
compile the algorithm unit tests (when i tried it last week, it was taking
closer to 17 seconds).
For comparison, the MSVC build
Am 07.10.2013 11:18, schrieb Elvis Zhou:
ArtemisD: A D port of Artemis Entity System Framework
About Artemis
Artemis is a high performance Entity System framework for
games, written in Java,
and is a framework to manage entities in a game world. It is
inspired by
Entity Systems are the
Am 07.10.2013 11:57, schrieb Elvis Zhou:
seem nice - BUT it seems too java oop like and very ungeneric,
is there a real need to derive from component?
It's simple enough without over design IMO.
yes - if the need of beeing part of the hierachy is not a problem :)
most D libraries try to be
Must always use script_no1 or script_no1.d?
And maybe one day I have a lot of .py files that I intend to
replace with D scripts TRANSPARENTLY for their user.
Will D bow at me why I use the .py extension?
Is D trying to shoot his own foot? It really seems to succeed
quite well.
My boss is
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious -
maybe, maybe not - but not because of your stupid file
extension comments
It adds. Tell to my boss about that extensions and he
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
better try to find
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
better try to find
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC
Am 31.10.2013 17:44, schrieb Leandro Lucarella:
dennis luehring, el 31 de October a las 15:28 me escribiste:
Must always use script_no1 or script_no1.d?
And maybe one day I have a lot of .py files that I intend to
replace with D scripts TRANSPARENTLY for their user.
Will D bow at me why I use
Am 18.01.2014 15:13, schrieb Andrew Edwards:
On 1/18/14, 8:42 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbdumk$2oki$1...@digitalmars.com...
[1] ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.beta.1.zip
Windows bin folder is empty. I'd post on the list but I'm not sure it's
working
Am 28.01.2014 04:00, schrieb Sarath Kodali:
I'm also
planning to add a JSON or CSV output format so that it will be
easy to parse the output when integrating with IDEs. So I would
recommend that you wait till I release 1.0 version - sometime
before Dconf 2014 - hopefully!
why don't ease the
Am 28.01.2014 17:24, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 28.01.2014 17:16, schrieb Sarath Kodali:
I expect this is how it will be even with dbg and IDEs. The IDE
will have a plugin that sits between the debugger and IDE. The
communication between the IDE plugin and debugger will be over a
socket
Am 28.01.2014 17:16, schrieb Sarath Kodali:
I expect this is how it will be even with dbg and IDEs. The IDE
will have a plugin that sits between the debugger and IDE. The
communication between the IDE plugin and debugger will be over a
socket and the dbg output will be in JSON format so that IDE
Am 28.01.2014 18:23, schrieb Sarath Kodali:
the question is - debuggers needs to throw masses
of information around - why put a slow JSON parser between,
every single step command gets JSONed, parsed, singlestep,
result gets JSOned etc... millions of times - why?
I'm not fixated on JSON:) I
woudl be nice to have some sort of example by example comparison
or as an extension to the page http://dlang.org/cpptod.html
Am 28.05.2014 07:40, schrieb Jesse Phillips:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 05:30:18 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I did a translation of most of
Am 04.06.2014 19:57, schrieb Meta:
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 17:55:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:
How many good usages of D Variant do you know?
Bye,
bearophile
It depends on what you mean by a good usage. I rarely ever use
Variant, but you *can* use it if you need weak and/or dynamic
typing.
Am 05.06.2014 11:42, schrieb Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce:
if(cond)
var = hello world;
else
var = 42;
The fact that an if statement could change the type of a variable is just
atrocious IMHO. Maybe I've just spent too much of my time in statically typed
languages, but I
Am 12.06.2014 11:17, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky:
This one thing I'm loosing sleep over - what precisely is so good in
CTFE code generation in_practical_ context (DSL that is quite stable,
not just tiny helpers)?
By the end of day it's just about having to write a trivial line in your
favorite
Am 15.07.2014 18:20, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2aruaf/dconf_2014_keynote_high_performance_code_using_d/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/885322668148082
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/489081312297635840
Andrei
@Walter
can
Am 18.07.2014 04:52, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/16/2014 7:21 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
can you give an short (working) example code to show the different resulting
assembler for your for-rewrite example - and what compilers your using for
testing - only dmd or gdc?
I used dmd.
i
Am 18.07.2014 07:54, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/17/2014 9:40 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
i understand your focus on dmd - but talking about fast code and optimizing
WITHOUT even trying to compare with other compiler results is just a little bit
strange for someone who stated speed = money
Am 11.10.2014 06:25, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/10/14, 7:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/10/2014 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
Because using environment
72 matches
Mail list logo
