On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 03:33:40 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:07, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Please throw your hat in the air with me to hail the new czar!
:o)
Huzzah! Or should I say... Huczar!
Vive le Dzar!
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 14:14:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 13:50:54 UTC, wobbles wrote:
the vet was able to treat it and it looks like she'll make a
full recovery over the next month as she puts the weight back
on.
Wow. She is a fighter. Glad to hea
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 09:08:07 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 05:53:30 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 04:57:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
A maybe useful link that quite clearly defines some concepts:
http://sanjaysainitech.blogspot.com/2007
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 05:53:30 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 04:57:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I've never liked the phrasing about destructors. Yes, they are
not guaranteed to run, but isn't that only during run time?
They are going to be called at the appl
On Sunday, 28 December 2014 at 21:59:17 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Sunday, 28 December 2014 at 21:13:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
I just noticed they temporarily reduced the price of my book:
Nice ! Time to finally get mine :)
One more client here :)
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 10:54:22 UTC, Robert M. Münch
wrote:
On 2014-12-09 00:45:41 +, deadalnix said:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 15:44:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Any link? I tried to google it but it's such a generic word
etc. no luck.
http://linux.die.net/man/1/cat
It was
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 08:20:27 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 02:29:39 UTC, Faux Amis wrote:
tries to differentiate between human wanting to learn D and one
not wanting.
the latter is just a myth...
On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 23:32:22 UTC, Alexander Bothe
wrote:
Cheers & thanks to everyone,
Alex
What a hardwork are you doing, Alex! Kudos!
On Wednesday, 8 October 2014 at 00:18:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/7/2014 3:27 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 7 de October a las 13:06 me escribiste:
On 10/6/2014 9:51 AM, Dicebot wrote:
That's a good idea, but I hate environment variables affecting
all D executables.
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:53:08 UTC, eles wrote:
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:13:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:25:59 UTC, eles wrote:
it) and a new-comer on the scene is Tranglu, that I just
*Tanglu
http://www.tanglu.org/en/
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:13:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:25:59 UTC, eles wrote:
Debian and Debian-based asks you to confirm file overwrite
(usually, the diff is displayed too).
Isn't it the same package manager? It should be able to do the
same on mint. Or may
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:12:12 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:43:54 UTC, eles wrote:
update-manager -d
It works.
Does it perform package upgrade? The comments are rather scary:
---
Hi, I have installed Linux mint 15 with Mint4Win as Dual boot
with Windows 7.
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:51:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:31:07 UTC, eles wrote:
The former attempt stability (because all packages are tested
together, along with their interactions), while the latter
attempt cutting-edge software (you update software as it gets
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 17:20:11 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 10/3/2014 3:25 AM, David Nadlinger via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
My oldest syste
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE should
be a one-time process (it's a rolling distribution).
Do rolling distributions guarantee to not overwrite fstab? How
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE should
be a one-time process (it's a rolling distribution).
Do rolling distributions guarantee to not overwrite fstab? How
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:06:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:40:31 UTC, eles wrote:
Well, it looked popular and easy.
Sorry. It's just that everything that glitters...
Can I upgrade my mint to lmde?
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:12:12 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:43:54 UTC, eles wrote:
update-manager -d
It works.
Does it perform package upgrade? The comments are rather scary:
---
Hi, I have installed Linux mint 15 with Mint4Win as Dual boot
with Windows 7.
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:00:38 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 20:03:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This a very unpleasant experience you get compared to sticking
to LTS or up to date distro
Erm, upgrading to the latest version is exactly what I want,
old version is of no
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 16:57:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:45:26 UTC, eles wrote:
Repositories of the not latest version of the OS. Because only
latest version receives development. That is, if the OS doesn't
have rolling updates.
What is the difference
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 16:57:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:45:26 UTC, eles wrote:
The first thing that I love in Linux is the centralized update.
The downside is it's taken down centrally too, while
distributed windows software continues to work independen
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:42:04 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:41:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:29:16 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
Isn't NASDAQ enough?
You might be right, after all. There are some Windows-specific
symptoms that support
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:44:06 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Does it affect dash?
No. It is a "bashism", ie an extension specific to Bash. Busybox
users are not concerned neither.
A pity, on windows one can roll new soft
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:41:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:29:16 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
Isn't NASDAQ enough?
You might be right, after all. There are some Windows-specific
symptoms that support that assertion:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-01
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 13:41:43 UTC, JN wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I find it ironic that it's another "big global" security hole
about which Windows users don't even have to be concerned about.
That's of course very true, since Window
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 07:01:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 9/7/14, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
I guess this is great news for virus writers. :P
A std.virus or core.virus module? ;;)
Nothing sweeter than having it as a standard.
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 20:05:21 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 19:46:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
That would indeed make install even easier.
And, especially, updates.
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 19:46:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I just released a new version of DVM, 0.4.3. The biggest news
for this release is that both 32 and 64bit libraries are
supported simultaneously. Now DVM will just copy the platform
specific directory without messing with the di
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 11:27:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:44:18 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
>
There is no question that failing to capitalize the letter i
when it's us
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 00:01:50 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:54:18 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 09:43:03 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm judging by both the responses in this thread a
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 21:20:48 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 28/08/2014 22:03, eles wrote:
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but in the future let me post the
release announcements myself.
Yes. Sorry. I was to happy that the Eclipse signalled "found new
version" :)
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 21:07:00 UTC, Olivier Henley wrote:
Super!
Huge thx for all the nice work btw.
Questions:
1. Does the book have been entirely translated then..?
Here, the answer is "Yes"
Ali's work is impressive.
This release is really amazing. Among the main changes:
- Updated to CDT 8.4, thus fully compatible with Eclipse Luna
release series and takes many advantages of it (for example,
added Dynamic printf action to DDT editor ruler)
- Very much improved integration with DUB, allowing code
navigatio
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:16:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I made some additions and corrections. The following are the
major ones:
* The 'User Defined Attributes (UDA)' chapter
* @nogc
* foreach_reverse
* Formatted element output with %( and %)
* static this, static ~this, shared sta
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/26/2014 5:32 PM, Mike wrote:
Moving it back in an endless search for taxonomical perfection
Well, keeping things in limbo for such many years (@property,
anyone?) is not going to help neither.
I agree it is a fine bal
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 07:52:18 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"eles" wrote in message
news:ybcxmuwwpsiyupwer...@forum.dlang.org...
Requiring full c/OS bindings in druntime is so useful, and it
costs us so little.
But the request is simply to split the current druntime in a
language-ru
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 00:32:20 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 18:28:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
No. We currently have std.c and core.stdc.
Let's not even say this is confusing.
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 19:22:22 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"eles" wrote in message
news:qrfucjdbmydvoqgey...@forum.dlang.org...
Apart from the fact that it's too late to change of course.
Well, that separation is just a detail of the implementation, not
of the specification. You coul
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 18:33:07 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
news:bkkdiikafdsraqssj...@forum.dlang.org...
> I really don't see a practical problem with having them in
> druntime, only a philosophical one.
It give the impression that D requires the C standard libr
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 17:09:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/26/2014 8:30 AM, Mike wrote:
There's never going to be a clear distinction between druntime
and phobos. The original reason for the split anyway was >
druntime would be a
Well, in C there is and I like that distinction: t
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 17:09:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/26/2014 8:30 AM, Mike wrote:
Regardless of where stdcpp goes, one issue is that the stuff in
it goes into the namespace "std", which conflicts with Phobos'
"std" higher level package name.
wow. I remember the hot debate a
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 18:13:01 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 17:09:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/26/2014 8:30 AM, Mike wrote:
wow. I remember the hot debate about the name o the standard
library back then.
well, namesace name
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 15:30:35 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 14:48:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/26/14, 3:06 AM, Mike wrote:
The same goes for core.stdc and core.sys.linux and friends, as
these are not part of D's language implementation.
Am I correct to d
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 07:56:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 07:06:57 UTC, eles wrote:
convenient inlining and operator overloading. So people use it
For me, what it would be really nice to have in C from C++ would
be templates.
And from D, that scop
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 06:12:54 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 05:03:01 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
news:sdrjfagsayomsngme...@forum.dlang.org...
line between the language and the platform. Make it a more of
a language, and less of a framework.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 22:02:31 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 21:43:26 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/20/2014 2:33 PM, anonymous wrote:
Dlang Dlang Über Alles
as a German, O_O
I'm not surprised that the German programming community has
taken to D. After all
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 01:30:52 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:18:09 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
What is it that we could help with? -- Andrei
he's drama queen, he doesn't need any help, only attention.
Just let's
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 21:43:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/20/2014 2:33 PM, anonymous wrote:
Dlang Dlang Über Alles
as a German, O_O
I'm not surprised that the German programming community has
taken to D. After all, German cars all have those "D" stickers
on them :-)
French
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 09:15:54 UTC, disapointed user
wrote:
the the syntax getting ever weirder, less mainstream and a
While I agree with some of your remarks (particularily, the fact
that it becomes too "scripting" language) ... where to go?
I don't like Go (syntax, mainly). The
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I don't know if we can do anything better about it.
2.067
50 matches
Mail list logo