On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 00:30:30 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrew Edwards:
When submitting bug reports associated with this review,
ensure they are earmarked [REG2.065-b1] or [BUG2.065-b1] for
easy identification, retrieval and merger.
So far I am not finding many bugs in this. But when
On 21 Jan 2014 08:00, "eles" wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 00:30:30 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Edwards:
>>
>>> When submitting bug reports associated with this review, ensure they
are earmarked [REG2.065-b1] or [BUG2.065-b1] for easy identification,
retrieval and merger.
>>
>>
P.S. I really recommend to stop naming relevant dub package
`phobosx` and give it own name. You only harm its discoverability
that way and spread confusion about its official state.
Quoting http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.signal :
==
=== Stats ===
Yes
* ilya-stromberg
* Damian Day
* Robert M. Münch
No
* Jakob Ovrum
* Andrei Alexandrescu *
* Denis Shelomovskij
People marked with asterisk belong to this list :
https://githu
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 23:18:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Too bad they banned me for the horrible crime of saying that
PHP scaled. Because, you know, it is used by Wikipedia and
Facebook. Not sure I want to contribute.
Also, they have a D part in the forum, that used to be alive.
Now it is
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:34:28 UTC, Olivier Pisano wrote:
Hi all,
The French programming website developpez.com announces the
opening soon of a section on the D programming language and
une très bonne nouvelle
Am 16.01.2014 09:42, schrieb Rory McGuire:
P.S. I think Programming English is pretty much American English. For
example is there any API that contains the English word Colour?
wxWidgets has one, but I think there was/is an additional alias with the
American spelling.
http://docs.wxwidgets
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:34:28 UTC, Olivier Pisano wrote:
Hi all,
The French programming website developpez.com announces the
opening soon of a section on the D programming language and
calls out for contributions[1]!
That's a good new !
On 2014-01-21 10:26, Dicebot wrote:
It sits in the very same niche as this proposal and has
even worse implementation with plenty of reported bugs.
If it has plenty of reported bugs someone is/was using it ;)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 16:51:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-01-21 10:26, Dicebot wrote:
It sits in the very same niche as this proposal and has
even worse implementation with plenty of reported bugs.
If it has plenty of reported bugs someone is/was using it ;)
Or tried to use
On 2014-01-21 18:48, Dicebot wrote:
Or tried to use it and ran away thinking that Phobos quality just
laughable. Or wrote a replacement for it which did not pass the review ;)
At least they filed a bug report.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Andrew Edwards wrote:
> Beta testing for dmd 2.065 is under way. You can access the associated
> zip at [1] and view the current list of regressions at [2]. Make every
> effort to provide a thorough review so we can get the best product out
> the door.
>
> Please refrain from discussing the revie
Le 21/01/2014 00:51, Adam Wilson a écrit :
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:16:42 -0800, Robert wrote:
Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to
be very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old
std.signals.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Robert
Which is a
On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you as frustrated as
me?
I was just in the process of addressing this. Based on recent issues
with using the packaging
On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 09:51:57 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 22:53:02 UTC, qznc wrote:
For the visitation API design: Your map approach (bool[Vertex]
m_visited) is probably the most generic one.
A variant, where the nodes store the flag internally is more
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 09:45:20 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 23:18:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Too bad they banned me for the horrible crime of saying that
PHP scaled. Because, you know, it is used by Wikipedia and
Facebook. Not sure I want to contribute.
Also, th
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 20:48:27 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme
for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you
as frustrated as
me?
I was just in the process
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address the
concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention for this and
all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
major.minor.qualifier
Examples follow:
#.###.b# ==> 2.065.b1 // beta
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address
the concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention
for this and all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
major.minor.q
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
> Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I need to get some free time to
> unify that with Jordi's windows installer in the linux folder).
Windows installer from Linux folder is out of the building process. The only
one windows installer is in w
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
> #.###.b# ==> 2.065.b1 // beta
> #.###.rc# ==> 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
> #.###.0 ==> 2.065.0 // initial release
> #.###.# ==> 2.065.1 // hotfix
On Debian, "2.065.rc1" is bigger than "2.065.0", so if
"dmd_2.065.rc1-0_amd
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
--
Jordi Sayol
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# ==> 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# ==> 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 ==> 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.# ==> 2.065.1 // hotfix
On Debian, "2.065.rc1" is bigger t
Jordi Sayol, el 22 de January a las 00:16 me escribiste:
> If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
>
> 2.65.b1
> 2.65.rc1
> 2.65.0
> 2.65.1
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
2.65.0-b1
2.65.0-rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
For Debian packages simply s/-/~/ and everything wo
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:06:31 -0500, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# ==> 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# ==> 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 ==> 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.#
On 1/21/14, 5:22 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
It is now added: ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.b1.exe
On 1/21/14, 5:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
Let me know if you need any guidance on getting the Windows installer
working. Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I need
"Andrew Edwards" wrote in message news:lbmru9$290b$1...@digitalmars.com...
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.zip
While you're at it, can we get per-platform zips? Just take the normal zip
and delete all but one platform.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Jordi Sayol, el 22 de January a las 00:16 me escribiste:
> > If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
> >
> > 2.65.b1
> > 2.65.rc1
> > 2.65.0
> > 2.65.1
>
> Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
+1
this is
On 2014-01-21 21:10, Xavier Bigand wrote:
We use std.signals on DQuick, signals are critical for a GUI system, but
there is no advanced GUI library written completely in D for the moment.
For the moment DQuick still have a long way to do before really needing
something better.
What does the cu
31 matches
Mail list logo
