On 13/12/2017 7:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 06:53:02 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
On 13/12/2017 6:46 AM, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 01:14:26 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 00:32:11 UTC, rikki catte
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 08:04:19 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 13/12/2017 7:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 06:53:02 rikki cattermole via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > announce wrote:
> >> On 13/12/2017 6:46 AM, bauss wrote:
> >>> On W
On 13/12/2017 8:11 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 08:04:19 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
On 13/12/2017 7:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 06:53:02 rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d->
announce wrote:
On 13/12/2017
Am 13.12.2017 um 01:24 schrieb Seb:
I think you should mention more prominently that for people who want to
use OpenSSL 1.1, they can now use:
dub --override-config="vibe-d:tls/openssl-1.1"
This allows to use OpenSSL 1.1 _without_ needing to set the
`VibeUseOpenSSL11` version in their dub.sd
Is it's possible to produce x64 binaries on Windows x64
without installing Visual Studio? DMD do not have linker for
x64.
You could try using the llvm linker, lld, as noted in the
release notes for ldc 1.5:
Could you explain hot to do it? Install LLVM? And than how I
could specify what link
Am 13.12.2017 um 00:49 schrieb Timothee Cour:
that's great... unfortunately
https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe.d/issues/1991 is a regression
preventing from updating to 0.8.X (has a reduced test case). Any help
on this would be very appreciated, thanks!
I'll have a look at this. Unfortunately seria
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 08:33:36 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 13/12/2017 8:11 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 08:04:19 rikki cattermole via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > announce wrote:
> >> On 13/12/2017 7:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2017-12-13 09:42, Suliman wrote:
Could you explain hot to do it? Install LLVM? And than how I could
specify what linker should be used?
with the "-linker=" flag.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2017-12-10 19:11, Suliman wrote:
Is it's possible to produce x64 binaries on Windows x64 without
installing Visual Studio? DMD do not have linker for x64.
There's a Docker image which contains cross-compilers [1]. The one
targeting Windows is using MinGW, not sure if that's usable.
[1] h
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 at 18:20:40 UTC, Seb wrote:
I am looking forward to hearing (1) what you think can be done
in three months by a student and (2) will have a huge impact on
the D ecosystem.
Of the projects in [2], I like the general purpose betterC
libraries most, and I think it's s
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:50:44PM +, bpr via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 at 18:20:40 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
> Of the projects in [2], I like the general purpose betterC libraries
> most, and I think it's something where students could make a real
> impact in that
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 08:42:40 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Is it's possible to produce x64 binaries on Windows x64
without installing Visual Studio? DMD do not have linker for
x64.
You could try using the llvm linker, lld, as noted in the
release notes for ldc 1.5:
Could you explain hot
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 00:54:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:50:40AM +, Meta via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 at 18:37:38 UTC, Seb wrote:
> After it has been in stealth mode for quite a while, I'm
> happy to announce that there's
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:22:15AM +, Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 00:54:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:50:40AM +, Meta via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 at 18:37:38 UTC, Seb wrote
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:59:00PM -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[...]
> Sadly, `dmd - -run` currently doesn't quite work just yet. I should look
> into fixing that. And *then* we wouldn't need to invent a temporary
> filename for the executable in our keybinding.
[...]
Tur
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 01:14:26 UTC, Seb wrote:
Also the storage on the machine is limited and we can't drop an
unlimited amount of Docker images there.
Shouldn't the overhead from that be fairly manageable? After all,
the last layer would only be as large as a single DMD/LDC
insta
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 02:57:42 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 01:14:26 UTC, Seb wrote:
Also the storage on the machine is limited and we can't drop
an unlimited amount of Docker images there.
Shouldn't the overhead from that be fairly manageable? After
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 06:26:16 UTC, Seb wrote:
It's interesting to see that no one complained about gdc not
being there - I thought that this would be the first comment.
Allow me to be the first.
But seriously, considering the use case for run.dlang.io, I don't
see the need for ho
18 matches
Mail list logo
