On Friday, 18 September 2015 at 14:24:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 18 September 2015 at 06:13:24 UTC, Rory McGuire
wrote:
I will open/source the of FancyPars.
Great! Looking forward to that.
Bastiaan.
On Friday, 18 September 2015 at 06:13:24 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
I for one will have to delete everything I have on FancyPars
and avoid, because I mix work and pleasure all the time, and I
have no time in my life for lawyers, life is too short.
No worries!
I will not sue anyone! of any
On Friday, 18 September 2015 at 00:30:25 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 23:40:49 +, Bastiaan Veelo via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 20:32:59 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
> Hmm reading this. No license, is best for now.
Take your time, but with
t; > and local clone...
>
> By using public repos, you explicitly allow anyone to view and fork your
> project. There are no implicit rights of *use* of that clone though.
>
> --Ben
>
There is also no implicit rights if you provide pull requests for said repo.
I for one will
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 23:40:49 +, Bastiaan Veelo via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 20:32:59 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> > Hmm reading this. No license, is best for now.
>
> Take your time, but without a license anyone cloning or forking
> your repo is in f
and local clone...
@Bastiaan
The FancyPars Grammar for pascal will look very very
different from what you wrote.
In FancyPars Grammars I worked very hard to avoid repetitions.
FGPs do not just describe the language grammar. They are
describing the AST-Structure.
So just by reading the
reading this. No license, is best for now.
@Bastian
The FancyPars Grammar for pascal will look very very different
from what you wrote.
In FancyPars Grammars I worked very hard to avoid repetitions.
FGPs do not just describe the language grammar. They are
describing the AST-Structure.
So just
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 16:33:12 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 16:02:14 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
Yikes. Are you sure? Are you familiar with open source
licensing?
I would be open to open-source the "base" of fp.
but keeping certin extentions for grammar an
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 15:47:41 +, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I am not sure.
> The source should not be used in any product without my explicit
> permission.
FYI, that's not FOSS. Please consider using a LICENSE file which
explicitly states that as the case. Github is a
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 16:02:14 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Yikes. Are you sure? Are you familiar with open source
licensing?
I would be open to open-source the "base" of fp.
but keeping certin extentions for grammar analysis closed.
What license would you suggest for that.
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 15:47:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 12:16:03 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
Sounds like you want to share this, but I can't find a
licence. In case this turns out to be useful, we would need
one :-)
If you want I can prepare a PR
On Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 12:16:03 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
Sounds like you want to share this, but I can't find a licence.
In case this turns out to be useful, we would need one :-)
If you want I can prepare a PR for that, just let me know which
licence to pick.
Best,
Bastiaan.
way around: that the example grammar in vibe describes its own
input format, and that the similarity in the produced output to
said files is an illustration that it works the way it should.
Am I close?
fancyPars has gone through a few iterations.
I used fancyPars to generate a parser for itself
On Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 20:17:15 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 08:50:48 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
Understanding the source of FancyPars is challenging because
the core source, example vibe.d application source and
supporting code, as well as generated
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 08:50:48 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
Understanding the source of FancyPars is challenging because
the core source, example vibe.d application source and
supporting code, as well as generated lexer/parser code are all
contained in the same directory and
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 at 14:25:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I hope that it will be suitable to beginners.
Sounds like you want to share this, but I can't find a licence.
In case this turns out to be useful, we would need one :-)
If you want I can prepare a PR for that, just let me know whi
nce
wrote:
> On Monday, 6 July 2015 at 09:22:51 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
>
>>
>> How does its design and use differ from Pegged?
>>
>
> FWIW, this is what I learned from my first acquaintance with FancyPars
> (the OP having signalled not to be available for quest
On Monday, 6 July 2015 at 09:22:51 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
How does its design and use differ from Pegged?
FWIW, this is what I learned from my first acquaintance with
FancyPars (the OP having signalled not to be available for
questions). My conclusions may be wrong though.
Running dub
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 20:23:40 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
However, 2.0.66.2 does not seem to exist [1,2]. Am I
overlooking something?
Ahh yeah it should be 2.066.1
Thanks for catching that
On Saturday, 5 September 2015 at 19:45:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 at 14:25:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I addded simplistic Left Recursion handling...
Interesting.
From the readme:
it only compiles with dmd 2.0.66.2 because it exploits a bug in
the const-ness type-syst
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 at 14:25:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I cannot continue working on it anymore.
Nontheless an unexpected update that makes FancyPars more
Feature-complete than than Pegged.
I addded simplistic Left Recursion handling...
but the code is a mess :(
On Monday, 6 July 2015 at 09:22:51 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 at 14:25:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Small announcement.
I uploaded my parser-generator onto github.
It is work in progress and unfinished!
How does its design and use differ from Pegged?
The use does not rea
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 at 14:25:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Small announcement.
I uploaded my parser-generator onto github.
It is work in progress and unfinished!
How does its design and use differ from Pegged?
.
Repo-Location : https://github.com/UplinkCoder/fancypars-lite
24 matches
Mail list logo
