On Thursday, 17 April 2014 at 18:29:21 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
How is this different from my example?
b = new byte[StateImpl.sizeof + CellIndex.sizeof*cellCount];
this line creates heap indirection
On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 09:58:45 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
What should I add in the D program in GNU/Linux to throw
exception if I have segmentation fault error? I read somewhere
that it's possible, but I don't know how to do it.
etc.linux.memoryerror
Just remember that it is more of
On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 15:47:37 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 14:49:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 09:58:45 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
What should I add in the D program in GNU/Linux to throw
exception if I have segmentation fault error? I
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 09:08:50 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi, MrSmith !
Yes, i know that, but my question isn't about it.
I want to type `pure:` at module's beginning and have all
function(in classes, too) declared as pure.
I think `pure:` should do it. But it doesn't.
pure is not a
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 11:51:48 UTC, bearophile wrote:
They are not the same type:
void main() {
import std.typecons: Tuple;
alias T1 = const Tuple!(int, int);
alias T2 = Tuple!(const int, const int);
static assert(is(T1 == T2)); // Fails.
}
This type difference causes
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 12:17:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In general a tuple is a higher level data structure compared to
a struct. So it's not unreasonable to expect a Tuple to be more
flexible than a struct.
Well, wrong :) std.typecons.Tuple IS a struct -
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 12:42:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
Well, wrong :) std.typecons.Tuple IS a struct -
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/typecons.d#L388
Nope, that's just an implementation detail. They are two quite
different data structures.
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 12:54:25 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
std.typecons.Tuple is just a subset of all structs
implementing specific behavior. It still acts as struct
everywhere when applicable.
A subset is not the same as the whole set.
You are missing something important about
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 13:18:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
It would be weird exception of general type system rules with
no practical justification I can readily imagine.
I partially disagree. It could be useful to have structural
typing
On Sunday, 27 April 2014 at 13:09:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Lazy arguments in general allocate, but who is to blame for the
allocation?
Isn't the allocation at the calling point?
This code:
void foo(lazy int x) @nogc {
auto r = x(); // Error
}
void main() {
foo(1);
}
Gives:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 17:40:54 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
If you need to store the tuple as an array to some variable,
then you
would use that
http://dlang.org/class.html#constructors
If no call to constructors via this or super appear in a
constructor, and the base class has a constructor, a call to
super() is inserted at the beginning of the constructor.
The fact that call to base constructor is not inserted into
templated
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 18:51:15 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:59:28 +
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
Can someone explain why this can't/doesn't work? Thanks.
hm. why it should? there is no 'default'
On Sunday, 4 May 2014 at 21:40:04 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Mark Isaacson:
2) Create a wrapper struct that contains key and value and
whose comparison operator is defined only on the key. This
would essentially be doing what the C++ implementation does.
Until we have a tree-based associative
On Sunday, 4 May 2014 at 22:25:36 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
What benefits this gives over definining distinct struct?
Sounds like unnecessary complication for me.
See the code in my precedent post, what do you think about it?
Bye,
bearophile
Change
alias Two =
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:34:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
FWIW, for very long function signatures I write it this way:
const(T)[] myVeryLongFunction(T)(const(T)[] arr,
intx,
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 19:05:25 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Gary Willoughby via
Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
...
Then take a look at one of my projects in which i've ported C
headers to D.
On Monday, 19 May 2014 at 13:44:45 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Recently, a new function in druntime was added: _d_newarrayU.
This void allocates a new array *with* appendable information.
We can hope it will be given a more formal and public
interface, and it would then be useable by array
On Monday, 19 May 2014 at 21:01:52 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Huh, will it also make possible to call `realloc` if capacity
is exceeded?
AFAIK, using the GC.realloc (or GC.extent) function on it
directly would not work. This may or may not be an issue with
how GC.realloc is designed. The
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 20:51:08 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
malloc? There's no wrapper around it though, like there is for
uninitializedArray.
Is the fact that
malloc() can't be pure when new is
a limitiation in the type system?
Do we need a yet another code tag for this?
/Per
It is also
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 21:09:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
It is also because `malloc` can return null when out of memory
and `new` will throw an Error. Wrapper around `malloc` that
throws `OutOfMemoryError` on null can be considered of same
purity class as `new`.
One wrapper
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 21:31:41 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
It is also because `malloc` can return null when out of memory
and `new` will throw an Error. Wrapper around `malloc` that
throws `OutOfMemoryError` on null can be considered of same
purity class as `new`.
Does this mean that I should
class Test {}
class TestChild: Test {}
class TestChildChild: TestChild {}
alias Alias(alias Symbol) = Symbol; // this does the trick
void main()
{
foreach (item; __traits(allMembers, mixin(__MODULE__)))
{
alias sym = Alias!(__traits(getMember, mixin(__MODULE__),
item));
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 12:35:46 UTC, francesco cattoglio wrote:
Today I got the following compile error:
Cannot implicitly convert expression (blabla) of type
const(Type) to Type
and this is a reduced example ( also on
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f2f3bd921989):
module test;
import std.stdio;
private in D does not provide any strong guarantees, it only
controls direct access to the symbol. You effectively want some
sort of strict internal linkage attribute which does not exist in
D.
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 06:54:13 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 16:44 +, Andrew Brown via
Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
GDC version 4.8.2,i guess that's my problem. This is what
happens
when you let Ubuntu look after your packages.
Debian Sid
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 16:34:00 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a straightforward way to indicate that two modules
should not be used together in the same program? Preferably
one that does not require editing both of the modules?
The
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:42:56 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:41:03 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:33:45 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
vibe.d is root an open-source project ? on about page is wrote
is
licensed under MIT which are an open source license.
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 09:19:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Also, you're probably going to need to use DMD= to set dmd to
the one that you
built in order to use the one that you built when building
druntime and Phobos
instead of the one you installed normally and
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 16:10:09 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a way to iterate over the symbolic names of the data
members of a class instance?
I'm currently using .tupleof to get its values (and in turn
types) to implement pretty printing to multiple backends
(currently testing HTML)
confirmed and commmented in that issue
AFAIK you can _generate_ regex at compile-time but not actually
use it.
On Saturday, 14 June 2014 at 14:32:10 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
I get a failure on a test in format.d when I build my own
project with unittest. I though importing phobos header would
not regenerate their unittest modules.
Any idea of what can cause this issue? I already have
reinstalled dmd
On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 22:03:28 UTC, Mark Blume wrote:
Why exactly isn't a constructor without any parameters is not
allowed?
Why does
Struct() calls Struct.opCall(), which means Struct.init
initially,
while
Struct(params) calls Struct.this(params)?
Does Struct(params) also call
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 10:25:08 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
vibe.web.rest server/client combo is effectively RPC over
HTTP/json
This looks good. For what am I'm thinking of doing performance
is important. In that way rest makes me think a bit or is this
only a prejudice from the Java world?
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 13:54:01 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 12:13:12 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
However if you application design implies thousands of RPC
calls per second it is quite likely performance won't be good
with any RPC implementation :)
Backend people
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 08:05:01 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
What data load profile do you expect? Vibe is tuned to handle
thousands simultaneous incoming light requests (milliseconds),
while distributed computing works better with exclusive heavy
requests, at least minutes of work worth, BOINC
By D specification you are always required to compiled all
imported modules, it does not matter if those contain only
definitions. Some of implicitly generated symbols (like T.init)
will be in their object files.
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 12:17:22 UTC, Johann Lermer wrote:
Agreed, but I assumed, that since all definitions in cairo.d
are defined as
extern (System), (same happens with extern (C), btw.), I would
have expected,
that D does not implicitly generate initialisation functions.
D requires
On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 13:45:14 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Out of curiosity, why use a mixin template containing a string
mixin
instead of, well, directly injecting a string mixin in your
struct,
with a function?
Hiding non-hygienic implementation behind a more
Apart from what Artur has mentioned template mixins also give you
opportunity to do qualified injection in case generated symbols
conflict with existing ones:
class A
{
void foo() {}
mixin(void foo() {}); // error, need to add manual
namespace wrapper
mixin func!foo Sub; // does
On Monday, 30 June 2014 at 11:56:27 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Is this possible? I find myself having to set breakpoints up
the callchain and step through every invocation till I find the
one that breaks. This is a really bad way to work, but when I
fail an assertion in GDB, it just reports
struct S
{
int opIn_r(int key)
{
return key*2;
}
}
void main()
{
assert((42 in S.init) == 84);
}
On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 15:36:23 UTC, Kozzi11 wrote:
Thanks! I wonder, why the _r and lack of documentation?
Maybe something from old days? But in current a
href=http://dlang.org/operatoroverloading.html#Binary;
target=_blankdoc/a there is a opBinary:
Yep, I think it is D1 legacy
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 20:52:29 UTC, Maxime
Chevalier-Boisvert wrote:
It's a bit of a hack, but it works. Is there any way to create
some sort of alias for __traits(getMember, ir.ops, memberName)
so that I don't have to write it out in full twice? Made some
attempts but only got the
On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 21:02:30 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
He is allocating an immutable(int)[] here. There is no reason
why it should allocate unless providing different addresses for
different runs of the code is considered a feature, as the
literal has a compile-time known value. It's just
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 19:01:56 UTC, Danyal Zia wrote:
Should I worry about it? Or is that's just a debatable style
that won't really matter if it's persistent throughout library?
Depends entirely on whenever you want to match style of standard
library - no one will blame you for having
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 13:38:34 UTC, Xiaoxi wrote:
If I want to build a d program which works on all dists, can i
build that from any linux machine since dmd links statically by
default or should I chose the oldest, i.e rhel5 to build on?
because of possible glibc issues?
Using machine
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 16:47:00 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 13/07/14 14:23, Danyal Zia via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm going with Andrei's style of preference on his talks ;)
Andrei can no doubt speak for himself about his preferences,
but I'd be
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 17:24:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
but separate-line opening braces definitely make it easier
to see where scopes begin and end.
This is the only argument I have heard in favour of doing this,
but it is not actually valid. This critique might apply to Lisp
style.
It
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.BlackHole
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.WhiteHole
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.AutoImplement
?
..and call it mixin interface :P
While `static if` false branch does not get compiled or
semantically evaluated it still should have a valid syntax.
__FUNCTION__ gets replaced with a fully qualified name of a
function which has dot inside - illegal identifier for a
variable. This causes parser to freak out.
On Monday, 21 July 2014 at 18:02:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
Probably most idiomatic D way is to use files _instead_ of
classes :)
It is a bit idealistic though and is not yet 100% feasible in
practice.
What's stopping it from being feasible?
Bye,
bearophile
Stuff like this :
Is shared Phobos library in /opt/dmd known do ldconfig? Can you
build a sample hello world program with -defaultlib=libphobos.so ?
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 14:44:29 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Adding a dlang.conf file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ which adds the
/opt/dmd/lib64 path solves things.
One of many reasons why you don't usually want to circumvent
package management system ;)
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 09:12:49 UTC, sclytrack wrote:
I can't seem to install mono-d. It always seems to want a newer
version of MonoDevelop.
I'm on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and it has version 4.0.12 of
MonoDevelop. Has anybody else got this to work with this
version?
I have this file called
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 13:35:52 UTC, Colin wrote:
Which is a pity, as it's otherwise a pretty nice IDE.
Still, vim with NERDTree + dub on the command line.
What more do you need?
DCD vim plugin ;) https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 05:14:22 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I have another question: it seems I can spawn hundreds of
threads
(Heck, even 10_000 is accepted), even when I have 4-8 cores. Is
there:
is there a limit to the number of threads? I tried a threadpool
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 12:05:31 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
IIRC, there are fibers somewhere in core, I'll have a look. I
also
heard the vibe.d has them.
http://dlang.org/phobos/core_thread.html#.Fiber
vibe.d adds some own abstraction on top, for example Task
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 14:56:36 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Most likely those threads either do nothing or are short
living so you don't
get actually 10 000
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 16:38:24 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Modern default approach is to have amount of worker threads
identical or close to amount of CPU cores and handle internal
scheduling manually via fibers or some similar solution.
I have no current data, but
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 18:22:47 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Actually with CSP / actor model one can simply consider
long-running CPU computation as form of I/O an apply same
asynchronous design techniques. For example, have separate
dedicated thread running the
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 21:19:14 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Has anyone used (the fiber/taks of) vibe.d for something other
than
powering websites?
Atila has implemented MQRR broker with it :
https://github.com/atilaneves/mqtt
It it still networking application
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 06:50:59 UTC, Alexandr Druzhinin
wrote:
This dlang.org/cpp_interface.html says I can do the following
// c++
namespace N {
void someCppFunction();
}
// d
extern (C++, N) void someCppFunction();
but this http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e2242263e1dc says I can't
Is
Most voted DMD bug : https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 19:31:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 18:33:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Most voted DMD bug :
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
Yeah, it's why I'd suggest that folks not use selective imports
right now. But people seem to
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 22:24:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
My guess is that it requires knowledge of dmd internals that
only few
people have, and those few people have other fires to put out
right now.
Kenji has a PR with new symbol overload resolution system that
On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 17:14:39 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
We've got some.
Photo processing app:
http://www.infognition.com/blogsort/
Disk space visualizer and redundancy searcher:
http://www.infognition.com/undup/
A tool for watching some folders and processing video files
there:
On Monday, 11 August 2014 at 13:00:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
alias Parent = TypeTuple!(__traits(parent, foo!float))[0];
Say hello to optional parens - you are trying to call foo!float()
here and apply result to trait.
On Tuesday, 12 August 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, Maxime
Chevalier-Boisvert wrote:
In my JavaScript VM, I have a function whose purpose is to
expose D/host constants to the JavaScript runtime code running
inside the VM. This makes for somewhat redundant code, as
follows:
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 17:16:42 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
From time to time, I try to speed up some array-heavy code by
using std.array.Appender, reserving some capacity and so on.
It never works. Never. It gives me executables that are maybe
30-50% slower than bog-standard array
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 18:55:55 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
btw, I saw your Dconf talk yesterday, nice content! And thanks
for
talking about Pegged!
It might interest you to know that the code I'm trying to use
Appender
on is a new engine for Pegged, based on
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 19:29:28 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
There is a misunderstanding there: I'm using clear only to
flush the
state at the beginning of the computation. The Appender is a
class
field, used by the class methods to calculate. If I do not
clear
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 20:42:08 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
You mean by using the shrinkTo method? (Appender does not have a
length, that's a bit of a bother btw).
I just did, it does not change anything. Too bad.
Heck, my code is simpler to read and use *and*
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 20:50:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Oh crap I had std.array.Array in mind which does have `length`
exposes. And Appender seems to indeed clear / shrink data in a
horrible way:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/array.d#L2597
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 18:52:00 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On 64 bit, reserve a huge chunk of memory, set a SEGV handler
and commit more as needed. Basically how kernel thread stacks
work. I've been meaning to do this but haven't gotten around to
it yet.
I think using some sort of
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 21:34:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 21:11:51 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
IIRC it manages the capacity information manually instead of
calling the runtime which reduces appending overhead.
That would make some sense, though it must be
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 08:35:41 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I wonder if using plain `Array` instead may be result in
better performance
where immutability is not needed.
Hmm, no:
...
It is very different with better compiler though :
$ ldmd2 -release -O a.d
$
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 08:41:30 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 07:46:29 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
The default size of the runtime stack for a Fiber is
4*PAGESIZE which is very small, and a quick test shows that a
Fiber suffers a stack overflow that doesn't lead to a
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 14:45:02 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 14:28:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Won't that kind of kill the purpose of Fiber as low-cost
context abstraction? Stack size does add up for thousands of
fibers.
As long as allocation speed is fast for large
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 15:40:35 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 15:25:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
No, I was referring to the proposal to supply bigger stack
size to Fiber constructor - AFAIR it currently does allocate
that memory eagerly (and does not use any OS CoW
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 16:04:15 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
This kind of makes sense for `dup` because that could be
applied across types but what about rehash, byKey, byValue,
keys, values, etc of AA's? Surely these will only be used by
AA's? Is this more about speed optimisation?
I
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 15:34:30 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
And why historical? Is that not necessary anymore? What better
solution is there today?
Historical in a sense that distinct can be anything template
parameter is probably a better approach but it is too late to
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 20:01:05 UTC, Colin wrote:
I see 3 distinct parts playing a role in my confusion:
A) The 'is' keyword. What does it do when you have
is(expression);
http://dlang.org/expression.html#IsExpression
It is a tool for type checking. It has many options but plain
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.RefCounted
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 15:50:30 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 15:40:35 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 15:25:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
No, I was referring to the proposal to supply bigger stack
size to Fiber constructor - AFAIR it currently does
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 09:37:30 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 09:33:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Compile and run the tests with different version options.
that is not an option
This is how version feature is intentionally designed to work
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 01:32:13 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 01:24:10 UTC, Meta wrote:
What is happening here? Are these two extra ulongs the offsets
of the fields in the struct?
And I just realized that that's obviously not the case. It's
just an iteration
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
standard library. It is the same for std and core.
Please, point us directly
On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 20:37:16 UTC, Ryan wrote:
Then I thought I'd learn dub. Well, this is NOT going well...
I did a git clone of gtk-d, then tried to build with dub
(renamed the package.json to dub.json), and it told me
Conflicting package multi-reference I have no clue and
I've
May be dub issue not taken updated compiler into consideration
and not rebuilding the deps. Try forcing it.
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:10:56 UTC, Vasileios
Anagnostopoulos via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hi,
in the 2.066 changelog I saw something for supporting c++
namespaces. I
thought this was not possible.
Which implementation does this refer? (compiler/architecture)
thank you very
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/2a17662ce5b0
Doing completely separate implementation based on sharedness may
be a bit more tricky. std.typecons.Proxy comes to my mind
immediately but it does not allow proxying two objects with same
method names.
At the same time it does not sound like a good idea to
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 14:16:51 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-08-29 9:39 AM, Dicebot wrote:
based on shared qualified I'd call it a smart ass one and
never accepted
it through code review :) Such things really need to be
explicit, magic
is worst enemy of multi-threading
The other option
I had similar issues. Thing is D compiler places runtime cleanup
initialization code into binary constructor sections
(fini_array) which is needed to support shared libraries
properly. But the same code gets triggered when you run `exit` in
a fork resulting in attempt to terminate other
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 19:52:24 UTC, JD wrote:
I tested it again, and it works fine in both 2.065 and 2.066.
Be aware that you should comment out:
// close(STDOUT_FILENO);
// close(STDERR_FILENO);
A daemon normally detaches itself from the terminal by closing
the STD*
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 02:53:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/30/2014 06:05 PM, jicman wrote:
Really is or how one can fix it? This is the only time that
I have
found myself without answers with D. Strange. Maybe folks
are not that
into D1, but D1 was before D2. Any thoughts would
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 12:01:43 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 11:43:03 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:26:47 +
evilrat via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
alias myint = mixin(int); // - basic type
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 14:46:00 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
It is basically just an annoying grammar limitation that does
not allow to
use mixin / __traits as an identifier.
The usual helper template:
```
alias helper(alias a) = a;
```
helps for aliasing
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
