On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 16:10:31 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Here is the 'official' style that is followed by most people
including me.
http://dlang.org/dstyle.html
Unrelated to my original question. I already read that before
asking.
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 17:24:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
but separate-line opening braces definitely make it easier
to see where scopes begin and end.
This is the only argument I have heard in favour of doing this,
but it is not actually valid. This critique might apply to Lisp
style.
It
On 12/07/14 21:01, Danyal Zia via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces on the same line
of delcaration, however Phobos and other D libraries I know use braces on their
own line. Now I'm in a position where I need to take decision on coding
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 10:18:23 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
However, I do think there's value in deliberately matching the
code style of the standard library, as it extends the volume of
public D code with a common style.
So unless you have a strong personal
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:32:23AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 12/07/14 21:01, Danyal Zia via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces on the
same line of delcaration, however Phobos and other D libraries I
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 19:01:56 UTC, Danyal Zia wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces
on the same line of delcaration, however Phobos and other D
libraries I know use braces on their own line. Now I'm in a
position where I need to take decision on
On 13/07/14 16:52, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I had my own style before, but after I started contributing to Phobos, I
found it a pain to keep switching back and forth between styles (and to
convert styles before submitting PR's), so eventually I decided to just
adopt Phobos style
On 13/07/14 14:23, Danyal Zia via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm going with Andrei's style of preference on his talks ;)
Andrei can no doubt speak for himself about his preferences, but I'd be wary of
assuming that the style he uses in his talks necessarily reflects his actual
stylistic
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 16:47:00 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 13/07/14 14:23, Danyal Zia via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm going with Andrei's style of preference on his talks ;)
Andrei can no doubt speak for himself about his preferences,
but I'd be
Danyal Zia:
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces
on the same line of delcaration, however Phobos and other D
libraries I know use braces on their own line.
Rosettacode D examples always use the Egyptian style. For my code
I use the same style, but Phobos
On 07/13/2014 06:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Two consequences of adapting myself to Phobos style were that I realized
(i)how little most of these things really matter, and (ii) pretty much
any stylistic choice carries both benefits and drawbacks.
...
Wrong.
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 17:24:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/13/2014 06:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Wrong. There are things which are simply bad ideas.
E.g. in this case, Egyptian-style braces definitely make
your code
more compact,
I.e. you see where
On 13/07/14 19:24, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Wrong. There are things which are simply bad ideas.
I think that we can take it as read that I meant, Any reasonable stylistic
choice. Of course, YMMV about what counts as reasonable, but most of the
things that people fuss over
On 07/13/2014 07:51 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 17:24:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/13/2014 06:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Wrong. There are things which are simply bad ideas.
E.g. in this case, Egyptian-style braces definitely make
On 13/07/14 19:51, Brian Rogoff via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Yes, the same argument for books and slides is also applicable to all other
media.
Not really. In a book or a slide you have an unavoidable constraint on how much
vertical space you can take up. On a screen, you are unavoidably
Hi,
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces on
the same line of delcaration, however Phobos and other D
libraries I know use braces on their own line. Now I'm in a
position where I need to take decision on coding style of my
library and I get accustomed to use braces on
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 19:01:56 UTC, Danyal Zia wrote:
Should I worry about it? Or is that's just a debatable style
that won't really matter if it's persistent throughout library?
Depends entirely on whenever you want to match style of standard
library - no one will blame you for having
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 19:01:56 UTC, Danyal Zia wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces
on the same line of delcaration, however Phobos and other D
libraries I know use braces on their own line. Now I'm in a
position where I need to take decision on
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 19:35:11 UTC, anonymous wrote:
There is another stylistic choice which I do find confusing:
capitalized identifiers for non-types, e.g. variables and
functions. Please don't do that.
Agreed about variables and functions. However I personally prefer
to use
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 19:01:56 UTC, Danyal Zia wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that in Andrei's talks and his book, he used braces
on the same line of delcaration, however Phobos and other D
libraries I know use braces on their own line. Now I'm in a
position where I need to take decision on
20 matches
Mail list logo
