On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 21:47:48 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
[snip]
Windows has been a bit of a pain, but mostly from the native
code library side. It should be easy to install google snappy
right? On Linux it is. On Windows, not so much... And that's
just one library.
vcpkg is making
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:17:54AM +, MysticZach via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 19:34:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > This is a sticky point about D's current DbC implementation that
> > myself and several others feel is a design flaw. In particular, that
> >
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 14:16:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 09:41:01 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
Hey, I'm trying to work on
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15708 so I decided it
might be interesting to find a way to (recursively) call all
postblits that belong
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
the gcc tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :)
I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now,
where commenters are asking questions about D.
This is really
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
- favorite code sample
- "only
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 19:34:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This is a sticky point about D's current DbC implementation
that myself and several others feel is a design flaw. In
particular, that in-contracts are executed as part of the
*callee*, when the intent of DbC is really that it is the
Lack of verbosity.
Clear concise code, thanks to the automatic initialization of
class members, native strings/arrays/maps/slices, UFCS,
declaration-order independence, etc.
class TOTO
{
bool IsCool;
int Age;
TUTU[] Tutus;
TOTO[string] Totos;
void Foo( TUTU tutu )
{
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 05:57:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:55:27 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 14:08:56 UTC, Patric Dexheimer
wrote:
Fresh install of GDC. (tried with 32x ad 32_64x)
Where did you get the GDC executable from? The GDC
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:15:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
In Java development there is almost no C or C++ and no Rust or
D at all. Memory is no problem. Some server needs 256 GB RAM or
maybe 512 GB?
That is just sloppy... There is this bad trend in the industry,
it has been going on for
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:32:51 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:15:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
In Java development there is almost no C or C++ and no Rust or
D at all. Memory is no problem. Some server needs 256 GB RAM
or maybe 512 GB?
That is just sloppy... There is
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
- favorite code sample
- "only
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 06:08:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
-
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 10:36:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1007 [1], "'future
symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. From now until
11:59 PM ET on June 21 (3:59 AM GMT on June 22), the community
has the opportunity to provide last-minute
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 01:00:42 UTC, Mike wrote:
Beginning with most favorite:
- CTFE
- static if - If you don't consider that part of CTFE
- Template Mixins
- Templates - Pretty much goes along with the top 2
- String Mixins
- Unit Tests
DIP1000 may make that list too, if I ever
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:10:14 UTC, Seb wrote:
Nice list, but I was actually looking for more concise,
actionable snippets or idea(s) for such.
There are some real gems in this DConf Talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMNMV9JlkcQ
I started enumerating them on the Wiki here
On 2017-06-22 00:19, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The code template says:
extern(C) double funcImpl(double x, double y)
But the function pointer type is declared as:
alias FuncImpl = double function(double, double);
Notice the lack of `extern(C)` in the latter. The
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:55:27 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 14:08:56 UTC, Patric Dexheimer wrote:
Fresh install of GDC. (tried with 32x ad 32_64x)
Where did you get the GDC executable from? The GDC project
doesn't currently offer any official builds that
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
the gcc tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :)
Congratulations! Great achievement.
- Johan
On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 01:51:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Is getting a whole lot better:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6918
You can now build D executables that do not link in anything
from Phobos - only from the standard C library.
Very cool - this plus Adam's changes.
The next
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:46:06AM +, MysticZach via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> As far as syntax subtrees not belonging to their parent, I can see
> where the cognitive dissonance comes from. But it just doesn't seem
> that bad to me, since contracts are always executed as if they are
>
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 06:27:11 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Absolutely no syntactic noise !!!
This is often overlooked, while D easily beats all its direct
competitors (C++, Java, C#, etc) on that point.
Just try to implement the same code as simply in C++ and you
will be convinced
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 06:02:54 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
-
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 05:59:05 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 21:47:48 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
[snip]
Windows has been a bit of a pain, but mostly from the native
code library side. It should be easy to install google snappy
right? On Linux it is. On Windows,
On 2017-06-21 09:28, Walter Bright wrote:
It does work with C on Windows, Linux, OSX, and FreeBSD, and so it works
with -betterC, too.
For example, in C there's "__thread" and in C++ there's "thread_local".
"__thread" doesn't work with all C++ types because it may contain a
non-trivial
I suspect though that like Go took Python more than C folk,
Kotlin Native will take more Java that C++, Go and Rust folks.
But speculation rarely turn out quite as speculated.
In Java development there is almost no C or C++ and no Rust or D
at all. Memory is no problem. Some server needs 256
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
the gcc tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :)
I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now,
where commenters are asking questions about D.
Congrats Iain!
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
- favorite code sample
- "only
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 09:45:09 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
I think the term "systems programming language" contains no
actual data, so needs to be retired. In this situation it
provides no reason for conservative garbage collection.
It means the intent of language designer to let you
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:23:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:00 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
They were all about Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#.
Those are also the major players in the market. C# Microsoft,
Swift Apple, Java Oracle... so there is more
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
I would love to hear about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Arrays include length along with the pointer.
Very easy built-in array support with foreach
Ranges, that don't treat their input types as 'pointers' and get
all levels of
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 07:15 +, Bienlein via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >
[…]
> In Java development there is almost no C or C++ and no Rust or D
> at all. Memory is no problem. Some server needs 256 GB RAM or
> maybe 512 GB? That's not an issue anywhere. As long as you get
> the performance
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 10:23 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> […]
>
> The reason the GC must be conservative is because (1) D is a systems
> programming language, and also because (2) D interfaces directly with
> C.
I think the term "systems programming language" contains no
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 14:11 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> I'm not the best at documentation. Funnily enough, I made an
> effort with reggae, which might just show how bad I am at this.
Hopefully the era of programmers boasting how crap they are at
documentation is over.
It is also worth noting for deployment purposes in package management
systems, that it is important that all the build tools necessary have
to be in the distribution in order for something to be accepted into
the distribution.
So for example Make is acceptable, but Reggae (at least currently)
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote:
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
I'm sorry to say that, but I have to quit the post of DirectX
bindings maintainer. I haven't yet decided on what to do with dub
package[1], but I'm in favor of completely deleting it so the
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
- favorite code sample
- "only
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 15:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> I'm convinced a big part of that is because DUB is ubiquitous and
> incredibly helpful in the D world for package management, but plays
> very
> poorly with any build system that isn't DUB's
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
I think "alias this" is a good
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:00 +, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> They were all about Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#.
>
Isn't Swift a native code language?
>
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585
On 6/22/2017 1:21 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-21 09:28, Walter Bright wrote:
It does work with C on Windows, Linux, OSX, and FreeBSD, and so it works with
-betterC, too.
For example, in C there's "__thread" and in C++ there's "thread_local".
"__thread" doesn't work with all C++
Hi,
I created a custom type which enables me to have enums which have
in their initial state, the init value of their base type.
Something similiar to Nullable...
enum Reason : string {CO = "Co", FU = "Fu", CA = "Ca"}
struct TestStruct {InitialEnum!Reason reason;}
This line raises the
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:15:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
I suspect though that like Go took Python more than C folk,
Kotlin Native will take more Java that C++, Go and Rust folks.
But speculation rarely turn out quite as speculated.
In Java development there is almost no C or C++ and no
After a last minute path type redesign, the state of the new vibe-core
package now finally feels ready for the first official release. The
library is in a pretty good shape, with the notable exception that
sockets are not yet implemented on Windows in the new eventcore
abstraction layer. This
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 08:52:27 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
H. S. Teoh calendar:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Component_programming_with_ranges
[...]
Yes that's a great example, but sadly not standalone - we can
only use Phobos for the
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 14:48 +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
[…]
> This is what I was thinking: start with a simple project, show
> how you can build it with dub or with reggae, then show a
> slightly more complicated project that dub cannot handle well and
> show how you can use
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 05:46:06 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:27:38 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
But it still has a sticking point, which I want to resolve,
namely that it elevates the existing `assert` functionality
beyond the current requirement that one must
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:23:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:00 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
They were all about Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#.
Isn't Swift a native code language?
Just like Java when one uses any commercial JDK or C# when
targeting
The first preliminary review round of DIP 1010, "Static foreach",
has begun.
http://forum.dlang.org/post/uvefmcbbbidvjdioq...@forum.dlang.org
Also, don't forget that the first preliminary review round for
DIP 1009, "Improve Contract Usability", is also under way.
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 13:11:12 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
As long as one is doing this, maybe a proposal for user-defined
`assert` should be provided too? It'd be interesting to have a
dedicated file for user-defined assert and contract
configuration. The core idea is to allow *everyone*,
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 11:11:01 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:23:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:00 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
They were all about Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#.
Those are also the major players in the
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 12:54:00 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:59:18 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
Again, that's not what H.S. Teoh's proposal would do. All it
does is install an *implementation agnostic*, *abtract* way to
specify contracts into the grammar. Whether
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 06:43:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:46:06AM +, MysticZach via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
As far as syntax subtrees not belonging to their parent, I can
see where the cognitive dissonance comes from. But it just
doesn't seem that bad to
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 12:21:29 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
I start to get the nagging feeling that your point about the
limitation in D's DbC implementation is actually the fatal flaw
here. It's currently _illegal_ (outside of interface
declarations) to expose the signature separately from
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:59:18 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Again, that's not what H.S. Teoh's proposal would do. All it
does is install an *implementation agnostic*, *abtract* way to
specify contracts into the grammar. Whether that is lowered to
assert, or anything else is an
Thanks a lot, but I was looking for small snippets (< 10 LoC)
than could be used to show the awesomeness of D at the roulette
on https://dlang.org
Any chance you could make your point a bit conciser? :)
I agree with you, indeed it is much too long for a carousel ;)
And it should be made even
DIP 1010 is titled "Static foreach".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET
on July 6 (3:59 AM GMT July 7), or when I make a post declaring
it
How do I properly implement object destruction of extern(C++) classes (with
virtual destructors)?
I'm not going to embarrass myself by pasting some of my attempts to achieve
this goal to date.
I've asked before, but I've never yet seen a sufficiently solution to this
problem.
Situation:
I have
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 13:11:12 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 12:54:00 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 10:59:18 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
Again, that's not what H.S. Teoh's proposal would do. All it
does is install an *implementation agnostic*,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17510
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/2116b1f58463c5aba351eeb84e82009f8a40f0db
Fix Issue 17510 - How could 509 be a byte value?
On 06/22/2017 12:34 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote:
Everything the language allows to compile is allowed by it's type
system, or is a bug in the compiler.
No. D is not supposed to be completely verifiable by the compiler.
For example, the type system guarantees that immutable data never
changes.
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 14:30:31 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I was looking through the C++ standard library headers and
noticed that has a typeid also. One difference with
D is that it is opt-in as there is some cost using it.
C++ also leaves most the properties for typeinfo to be
On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 15:16:01 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
This is probably why Nim's author was once paid to wrap an open
source game engine (Urho3D), and improve the language's native
compatibility with C++ libraries.
https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/870
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 16:13:51 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
D Language accepted for inclusion in GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Well done Iain Buclaw!
Reddit thread:
Hi,
i often need to check whether an array(string) ends with a
specific text and if not I need to add this text.
For example I have a variable url and / has to be added to the
end in case it is missing.
I want to write:
...new RegistryPackageSupplier(URL(url.enforceSuffix("/"))...
Of
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 14:08:32 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
My recollection is that the most significant reason to use
contracts in D is because of contract inheritance. There's a
lot of focus in this discussion on normal functions, when I
would say that contracts really aren't even needed.
So
On 06/22/2017 12:06 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0def4e286564
>
> Is there a cleaner way to go than the one on the line 26? And why is the
> constructor
>
> /d475/f781.d(37): f781.UniquePtr!(A).UniquePtr.__ctor(DT)(ref scope
> UniquePtr!DT rhs)
>
> unfit for line 51?
On 22.06.2017 16:08, jmh530 wrote:
My recollection is that the most significant reason to use contracts in
D is because of contract inheritance. There's a lot of focus in this
discussion on normal functions, when I would say that contracts really
aren't even needed.
They are needed if you
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:18:22PM +, Andre Pany via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i often need to check whether an array(string) ends with a specific
> text and if not I need to add this text.
>
> For example I have a variable url and / has to be added to the end in
> case it is
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 08:55:06 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
After a last minute path type redesign, the state of the new
vibe-core package now finally feels ready for the first
official release. The library is in a pretty good shape, with
the notable exception that sockets are not yet
UDA snippet:
class MyView : View {
@ViewWidget Button okButton;
@ViewWidget("cancelButton") Button myButton;
@GroupViewWidgets Button[3] buttons;
@OnClickListener("okButton")
void onOkButtonClick(Widget widget) {
...
}
@Shortcut("TestGroup.cancel")
void
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 09:09:40 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote:
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
I'm sorry to say that, but I have to quit the post of DirectX
bindings maintainer. I haven't yet decided on what to do with
dub
Following my previous post about showing to first-time visitors
of dlang.org some code example that shows how simpler the D code
looks like compared to mainstream scripting and programming
languages, is there any plan to change the design of the landing
page any time soon ?
The current
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette
on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear
about your favorite feature(s) in D.
Ideas:
- favorite language construct
- favorite code sample
- "only
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 18:38:59 UTC, Boris-Barboris wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 13:56:29 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
For example, the type system guarantees that immutable data
never changes. But the compiler allows you to cast from
immutable to mutable and change the data. It's an
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 19:19:20 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Following my previous post about showing to first-time visitors
of dlang.org some code example that shows how simpler the D
code looks like compared to mainstream scripting and
programming languages, is there any plan to change
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 19:11:19 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
Here it's the programmer's fault really. You should never use
casts in normal code, cast is the ultimate switch to say "Look,
I know what I'm doing, so disable all safety, don't try to make
sense of it, and let me do my thing. If I'm
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:08:32PM +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> My recollection is that the most significant reason to use contracts
> in D is because of contract inheritance. There's a lot of focus in
> this discussion on normal functions, when I would say that contracts
>
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 13:56:29 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
For example, the type system guarantees that immutable data
never changes. But the compiler allows you to cast from
immutable to mutable and change the data. It's an invalid
operation, but the compiler is not expected to catch that for
D Language accepted for inclusion in GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Well done Iain Buclaw!
Reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6im1yo/david_edelsohn_d_language_accepted_for_inclusion/
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:16:51AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2017-06-22 00:19, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> > The code template says:
> >
> > extern(C) double funcImpl(double x, double y)
> >
> > But the function pointer type is declared as:
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:33:17PM +, Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
> Regarding the location of contract checking: Yes, though I agree with
> him that a fix for that need not be part of this DIP. If this DIP
> cleanly separates contract specification from contract
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 05:57:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:55:27 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 14:08:56 UTC, Patric Dexheimer
wrote:
Fresh install of GDC. (tried with 32x ad 32_64x)
Where did you get the GDC executable from? The GDC
Hi
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0def4e286564
Is there a cleaner way to go than the one on the line 26? And why
is the constructor
/d475/f781.d(37): f781.UniquePtr!(A).UniquePtr.__ctor(DT)(ref
scope UniquePtr!DT rhs)
unfit for line 51?
Is it because the expression " = UniquePtr!B.make()" cannot
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 19:17:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
No time to think about the rest of the design but just to get
the code compiled, replace 'ref' with 'auto ref' like so:
this(DT)(scope auto ref UniquePtr!DT rhs)
{
// ...
}
Ali
i added this static variable:
On 22.06.2017 22:02, jmh530 wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any problem with
out(return > 0)
out(a => {
void foo()out(b => a == b){ return a; }
return foo()>0;
}());
On 06/22/2017 12:57 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 19:17:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> No time to think about the rest of the design but just to get the code
>> compiled, replace 'ref' with 'auto ref' like so:
>
> Ok, looks like this indeed passes rhs by reference, thank
On 06/22/2017 08:38 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote:
Casts are part of the type system. Yes, D type system allows invalid
operations. It's not the compiler's fault, it's type system's fault.
unittest
{
immutable int a = 4;
int* b = cast(int*)
*b = 5;
assert(*() == 5);
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 19:17:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
No time to think about the rest of the design but just to get
the code compiled, replace 'ref' with 'auto ref' like so:
Ok, looks like this indeed passes rhs by reference, thank you.
destcalls - number of times UniquePtr destructor
On 22.06.2017 23:51, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:41:55 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any
problem with
out(return > 0)
instead of
out(r) (r > 0)
I'm sorry, I didn't read closely. I think that's just asking for
trouble,
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:56:29 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.06.2017 23:51, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:41:55 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there
any problem with
out(return > 0)
instead of
out(r) (r > 0)
I'm sorry, I
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 18:57:40 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
[snip]
I don't mind that so much, but you made a good point earlier on
how out would work with it.
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any
problem with
out(return > 0)
instead of
out(r) (r > 0)
Also, I
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 20:19:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.06.2017 22:02, jmh530 wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any
problem with
out(return > 0)
out(a => {
void foo()out(b => a == b){ return a; }
return foo()>0;
}());
I'm confused. The
On 06/22/2017 09:19 PM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
The current design may be fine to convincing C++ experts to switch to D,
but I don't think it's that effective for less experienced programmers,
looking for an alternative to JavaScript, Python or Ruby.
I'm a big fan of the python.org website,
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 20:05:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
To be complete, 'auto ref' passes lvalues by reference and
rvalues by value, which you can detect with __traits(isRef):
struct S{
}
void foo()(auto ref S s) {
static if (__traits(isRef, s)) {
pragma(msg, "lvalue");
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:16:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
And yes, there should be one destructor, which may be a no-op
if you grab its resource and set it to null.
On all compilers...
That's a relief, thank you for your help.
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:41:55 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any
problem with
out(return > 0)
instead of
out(r) (r > 0)
I'm sorry, I didn't read closely. I think that's just asking for
trouble, wanting to use `return` as an
On 23.06.2017 00:12, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:56:29 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.06.2017 23:51, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:41:55 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any
problem with
out(return > 0)
Am 22.06.2017 um 20:52 schrieb aberba:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 08:55:06 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
After a last minute path type redesign, the state of the new vibe-core
package now finally feels ready for the first official release. The
library is in a pretty good shape, with the notable
On 22.06.2017 22:43, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 20:19:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.06.2017 22:02, jmh530 wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there any
problem with
out(return > 0)
out(a => {
void foo()out(b => a == b){ return a; }
return
On 06/22/2017 02:08 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 20:05:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
To be complete, 'auto ref' passes lvalues by reference and rvalues by
value, which you can detect with __traits(isRef):
struct S{
}
void foo()(auto ref S s) {
static if
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
