7;s program which did
indeed do Pactor on a soundcard but only running under DOS. It is
quite doable, but probably not under Windows.
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the ne
one advocating busy frequency detection for all
users, only for automatic or semi-automatic ones, i.e. any station
capable of beginning a transmission without a human throwing the switch.
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Check out the new impr
e other W6WRT. I never said or hinted at
any of the above, and that goes for the rest of your post too.
I see a great future for expeditionradio as a political spin-meister.
The elections are coming up, so you'd better send out your resume.
I'll be glad to vouch for your abilities. :-)
Bonnie-
Thanks for the information plus the obfuscation. I didn't realize that you
were a qualified communication engineer.
Bill-W4BSG
At 01:31 PM 6/23/2006 +, you wrote:
> > Bill-W4BSG wrote:
> > Bonnie-
> > In an open band, that would be more properly designa
Bonnie-
In an open band, that would be more properly designated as a "frequency",
wouldn't it? A "channel is usually a frequency or limited range of
frequencies defined by a protocol, statute, or agreement.
Bill-W4BSG
At 03:06 AM 6/23/2006 +, you wrote:
Hey, Bonnie. Where are all these "channels" you keep mentioning?
Bill-W4BSG
At 02:34 AM 6/23/2006 +, you wrote:
> > Bill W6WRT wrote:
> > In a nutshell, I am saying that automatic or semi-automatic stations
> > should be capable of determining frequency use befo
aside the flyspecks in the pepper and get back to the real
discussion?
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.cl
does that seem like an effective solution to you?
>Becuase, in my real world, all of those things are present at one time
>or another.
>
>- Rich
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
Did you even read my post?
I said "non-white noise" would be detected. White noise like yo
oise, repeating signal, including
those that change frequencies within the channel.
Coherent signal detected = no transmit.
No jailhouse lawyers, please. We all know what the above means in the
real world.
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
elevant.
If you were operating phone and heard a language you could not
understand, would the frequency be "busy", or do you need to decode it first?
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.
Of course it is "busy". If software can find a signal, that channel
is busy. Whether you can hear it by ear is irrelevant.
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email d
omatic station should only
respond to an incoming request if the channel is free of other signals.
Bill, W6WRT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA
I'd guess two reasons:
1. 20 meters has better DX propagation.
2. A lot of hams have 20 meter beams which makes #1 even more
effective. Few have 30 meter beams.
Not taking anything away from 30, it's a great band for what it can
do, but 20 is usually more productive.
Bill, W6WRT
Where did you find a mono sound card? what brand and model is it?
Bill-W4BSG
At 02:48 AM 5/31/2006 +, you wrote:
>Maybe I should have clarified more...
>
>If I use a mono jack with a mono sound card, will I be able to decode
>RTTY, PSK and the other digital modes?
>
&
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
At 09:00 PM 5/16/2006, Kevin der Kinderen wrote:
>Bill:
>
>I don't have another power supply to swap with but I am using an
>Astron and have similar issues - though the problem does not exist
>when on the dummy load. I'll be real interested
s I can. In the meanwhile, keep this
in mind if you have an "RFI" problem which is not easily solved. It
may not be "RFI" at all.
Hope this helps someone, sometime. It was a real puzzler for me.
73, Bill W6WRT
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dy
FCC
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
Thanks, Dan. A much needed fix.
73, Bill W6WRT
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
At 04:46 PM 5/7/2006, Jerry W wrote:
>Bill,
>
>You might want to try Multipsk, it has DominoEX and is a lot easier to
>use;
><http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm>http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm
>
>HTH,
>
>Jerry - K
t is
ignored in a macro. Any suggestions?
I have just ordered one of the new MicroHam Digi Keyers and will get
serious about DominoEX and the other soundcard modes when it arrives,
probably next week.
73, Bill W6WRT
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other
.DominoEx (especially with FEC) is one of my
favorite modesnarrow and robust...just so few out there trying
it.
Be well,
Bill; N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> maybe had something to do with the crappi
n MixW. All the options are a bit confusing.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
Can't help with the other questions, but for pure RTTY software it's
hard to beat MMTTY.
Bill, W6WRT
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interes
to DominoEX/FEC if the other station has that capability and find the copy as good or better with a more narrow signal. Never played with it on 20/15/12/10 so no opinion there...
Be well, Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
In pax2 mode on 3.610, 1000 Hz AF, USB. Alot of line noise (even on uhf) so not very optimistic..
73, Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> No luck thjis afternoon.> > Andy K3UK> > On 4/20/0
ither
Be well,
Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I live in SW Wisconsin which is a fairly rural area. We do have
>some
> RTTY in the evenings on 80 meters although I am not personally
> interested in RTTY anymore d
Thanks for the reply Andy, but this signal was almost 1,800 Hz wide. I
think that is a bit wide for 300 baud Packet.
Bill
Kc5GNB
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
>300 baud Packet, I think. Packet is an old digital mode that was the
>cat's meow in the Neanderthal age (1980's) . Lik
Ok guys, I am lost! What is the raspy sounding 1,500+ kHz sigs around
14.097.5 and on the 30m band all over the 10.138+ area?
Bill
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
with more detail..
73
Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone listen to the brief mp3 file at
>
> http://www.obriensweb.com/hell.mp3
>
>
> Something is very "odd" so
Agree,
500/8 seems to have become the default Olivia mode on most bands.
Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew J. O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Craig, the best Olivia frequency reference is at www.hflink.com just
go there and click o
alot of modes claim freq privs on 20 meter
sections, hence I rarely operate there. To be fair there was an hour
plus Hell qso going on and the pactor station keyed up right on top
of them
take care John,
Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Angle of Arrival seems to be April 1!
Bill - N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew J. O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Just received this and thought I would pass it along, looks like a new one> to play around with! Software is available from my
Much better- all- including the past ones, are larger.
Something changed.
Thanks
Bill
Andrew J. O'Brien wrote:
>I used a different email software program than usual, I am still using it
>...is this any better? Looks the same to me.
>
>
>
>- Original Message ---
Andy- . Your text is in a small type. yours is the only one at present
that is. Only the body, not the Sig or the stuff added by the list. What
you typed shows as an Arial font.
Check again.
Please
Bill
Andrew J. O'Brien wrote:
> I didn't
>
> - Original Messag
Andy- why did you switch to small type?
Not friendly
Bill-W4BSG
Andrew J. O'Brien wrote:
I am sure we have all seen PSK31
signals that produce harmonics , of sorts, at 1000 Hz intervals. I
usually see them 1000Hz up from the main signal but tonight I saw one
1000 Hz
like small type. It rarely improves communication.
Bill-W4BSG
Alan NV8A wrote:
>If some people would stop sending messages in HTML *and* other people
>would stop choosing to view messages as HTML, we wouldn't have this problem.
>
>Bill's message displays on my comput
Bill- This small type is hard to read. If you really want to
communicate- enlarge it. These old eyes tell me to reject anything this
small, and , really, I think it is a good idea to dump such junk,
unread. It's pointless.
So I usually do
Bill-W4BSG
bill.w7tvf wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
es the work) sets
the rules'. This program (DxLab) is one of the best supported assemblies
of complex procedures in existence. And the cost is Nada- Zilch- it's
free. You should adapt to it, with your BA, not insist on someone else
adapting it to archaic gadgets.
Have fun-Bill-W4BSG
it).
You might try playing with PAX or PAX2will remind you of the good and bad parts of packet on HF although it seems more robust under poorer conditions. Alot of modes to experiment with Jim, have fun!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "doajim" <[EMAIL PROT
I use an IC-735 for ALE on MARSWorks fine but it limit it to groups of
frequencies between relay clicks.
Bill
KB4IK
- Original Message -
From: "doc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 22:59
Subject: [digitalradio] Oldest Rigs That Handle ALE?
&g
...
73 Bill, n9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> will sit on 7075 USB for the next few hours. on repeater mode
>
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW R
Hi all.
in PAX2 mode, responder on3.610 -- af freq of 1000hz (at least
until dinner is over...15 watts out to a 280 foot loop.
Starting at 1:30 UTC.
Bill, N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> -Thanks. Anyone
Thanks, John. I think I now know more than I did earlier.
Bill-W4BSG
John Becker wrote:
>My comments should be on line by now or soon.
>I told them just what I posted here.
>
>Since 95% of my digital operation is RTTY the
>rest Amtor and Pactor it should be easy to see
>w
John-regarding your last sentence- It matters-People DO read what you send.
Else- why do you bother?
Regarding the question- You were asked what you DID support, and you had
said that you had mailed a comment; did you support parts of both sides
in that?
Bill-W4BSG
John Becker wrote:
>Ok B
John- This is NOT an answer to Daves' question. Did you support it or not?
Bill-W4BSG
John Becker wrote:
>I like some parts and dislike other parts.
>
>At 10:45 PM 2/28/06, you wrote:
>
>
>>972, not 927.
>>
>>Did you support or oppose RM-11306, John?
Bonnie- Keep it simple-
1. any link must have the active participation of a human at at least
one end.
2. that link can only be active as long as the human presses a spring
loaded switch.
3. the words "Robust" and "Luddite" are forbidden.
Only needed for Ham fre
Dave- let's face it, it's clear that johns' mind is made up about what
your mind is made up about.
(There- I said it, and I'm glad!)
Bill-W4BSG
Dave Bernstein wrote:
>Re: "But you and others already have you mind made up with this anti
>wide and pactor attit
plate
Bill-W4BSG
Bill Aycock W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion
did not add confusion to this thread...
Be well,
Bill
N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "N6CRR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" bmc@ wrote:> >> > > > I think (and that alone surprises
s in use, especially by ear alone if the CQ is of short duration. Multipsk (perhaps others?) can make that abit easier with the Hell CMT display of the mode in the video ID; although I recognize a few downsides here as well
Be well,
Bill
N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, T Herma
Andy and all
G R E A T ! !- it works again- as of 22:30z Saturday.
Puzzle- I am on port 23 but the header on the K3UK says something else (4?)
Good to see activity here again
Bill-W4BSG
--
Bill Aycock W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Andy- at 4:49z, exactly the same failure- 7 seconds-- then PHFT
Bill
obrienaj wrote:
>Hmm, no connects today. I will reboot the software and also reboot
>the router , please test.
>
>Andy K3UK
>
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill Aycock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
nection work fine on Logger32- 128.192.52.40
port 599. The same cluster connection works when I do it manually.
Bill-W4BSG
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> telnet://cluster.dynalias.org port should be 23
>
> On 2/3/06, *Bill Aycock* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I get NO response either.
Bill
billkc9iqu wrote:
>Same results as Kevin; hope this helps
>
>Bill
>
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Kevin der Kinderen
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Andy:
>>
>>More often than not, I do not connec
(search on commercial HF data systems) has realized
that often (usually?) wider is better and is developing hardware
and systems accordingly.
The ARRL proposal will lock us (U.S. amateurs) into using late
1990's technology.
73,
Bill - WA7NWP
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to T
d everything.
Narrow band, SSB voice grade and a jungle area for real modern
experimentation. Our true strength is in our diversity...
73
Bill - WA7NWP
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/gro
Andy- called in just before 4:50z- logged in fine- it even remembered be
as Bill, not William as the FCC has it.
Thanks- Bill-W4BSG
obrienaj wrote:
>If you have a chance to try connecting to
>
>Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
>
>I would appreciate it. I am not sure I fixed th
On 5.343 and 7.088 KHz, in California, I've seen on a MixW waterfall a two
tone signal with a shift of 850 Hz. Looks and sounds like RTTY but I've
worked through all the combinations of baud rates and character code sets
and come up unable to copy. Any ideas what this may be?
K
re was no attempt to give real
signal reports. All were domestic stations. Is this becoming a regular
thing?
Bill
--
Bill Aycock W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.co
I have a problem- I CANNOT find the route in the referenced URL to join
that group. One path neatly leads me in a loop; others give me
information (FAQS) but no real results.
H E L P
Bill-W4BSG
scottpa1960 wrote:
>Jay,
>
>Thanks for the information.
>
>This link shoul
Andy- I do not feel that we are being treated honestly, without knowing
who provided the "Constructive request". You are usually straighter than
that.
Bill-W4BSG
obrienaj wrote:
>Per constructive request, I have decided to extended the life of this
>thread. Please cont
Bonnie-
This extract from your reply to Craig illustrates the WHOLE problem.
1. NO ONE is forcing you to operate anywhere- It is only your desire.
2.I have seen no compelling reason for ANY operation on Ham frequencies
that is done without an active operator.
Bill-W4BSG
expeditionradio wrote
Sorry, Bill-
Bonnie, at expeditionradio, had the cure for an internal
"enable-disable" option, at 6:31. See her post.
Bill
Bill Archer wrote:
>Nice idea, but that is what I triedFirefox system refused to "do the
>work" Error message said to uncheck someth
Nice idea, but that is what I triedFirefox system refused to "do the
work" Error message said to uncheck something that couldn't be found.
Bill Aycock wrote:
>Instead of going to his site, I let Firefox do the work. On the menu-
>goto TOOLS, then EXTENSION, the
Instead of going to his site, I let Firefox do the work. On the menu-
goto TOOLS, then EXTENSION, then click the 'get more--- link- You will
find many more there, and can let the Firefox system do the work, their way.
Bill-W4BSG
PS- Thanks to the Author for a handy option.
Bill Archer
I am having the same problem, if you find a cure please post it!
Jerry wrote:
>Have been a long time user of Mozilla and Firefox browsers. Firefox
>released version 1.5 the other day: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/
>Loads pages very fast! One extension that is neat is "Propfire - HF
>Radio
Howard-
The material below does not reflect "THE REST OF THE WORLD" as you claim.
Smoke and mirrors?
Bill
Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> Bill
>
> As I have long said my ideal model is Canada...where for once the
> government got it right..
>
> http://www
Howard-
I have seen you crying "wolf" a lot, but have seen NO SPECIFICS. What
agencies in what countries have these regulations, and exactly how is
the requirement stated?
Specifics, please.
Bill-W4BSG
Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> Actually the truth is exactly opposite of what y
Rick Williams wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> For Windows there is the QuickMix program from ... the UK, no less, at:
>
> http://www.ptpart.co.uk/quickmix/
>
> I have found it to be immensely helpful as I am often switching between
> different uses for the computer and have several settings such as:
>
> P
Tnx for the info!
Bill
KA0VXK
- Original Message -
From:
n3wtus
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 12:09
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Fw: USB/SDR
Radio Kit
Yes, The SoftRock 40 is an excellent learning tool
and
Tnx for the comment. It appears to be a great learning tool
for SDR.
73
Bill
KA0VXK
- Original Message -
From:
RussellHltn
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 2:45
AM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Fw: USB/SDR
Radio Kit
Just as
Thanks Andy & John!
I put it in my favorites before I even thanked you
guys!
Hope they make more.
73
Bill
KA0VXK
- Original Message -
From:
N3WT
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 21:35
PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Fw: USB
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Duffy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 21:09 PM
Subject: USB/SDR Radio Kit
> Last night( Wednesday) I saw a post on this reflector about a kit by a QRP
> group for a USB
Thanks for the reference. I am glad it already exists. It is logical.
With all the arguing going on about human ability vs machine, I was not
sure.
Thanks-Bill
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
>Hello Bill,
>
>I have no opinion about "issue" (which is a "way out" in Frenc
some problem
.
Try evening the playing field this way, in some of the comparisons.
Bill-W4BSG
PS- why is every problem now called an "issue"? Has Microsoft overcome
our language that much?
--
Bill Aycock W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Do I understand it will only be in kit form(s)?
Bill
KA0VXK
- Original Message -
From:
Danny
Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 15:24
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Interesting
USB Interface
Thanks for the heads up
Do you have an address for older desktop Compaqs?
Tnx es 73
Bill
KA0VXK
- Original Message -
From:
KB6YNO
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 17:27
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Can a Compaq
Deskpro user help me please ?
Mel
1210 utc.
I am going to be on 14110 listening/calling CQ for the next 45m-1 hour.
QTH is Omaha Ne.
Beaming East
Bill
KA0VXK
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
h
Thanks Andy..And thank you very much for the
"unofficial" help file.
I just printed the latest one and read it.
I hope to have chance to get on the air and try it this
weekend as soon as we return from a short trip.
73
Bill
KA0VXK
- Original Message ---
different PCs locally.
bill K6ACJ
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB
can remain attached but is MUTED during digi transmission.
Bill K6ACJ
>
>
> Why don't you just set the transceiver up to use VOX ?
> No need for the rs232 at all that way.
>
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obr
s now.
The audio derived PTT eliminates the need for a COM port or USB/serial
interface and connection.
Bill K6ACJ
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the
So-- why did you repeat it?
Bill
At 05:28 PM 8/5/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>It would seem to me that the "trash" is being posted here. Sure glad my
>grand son was not setting next to me when I opened your post. Is that kind
>of language really necessary in this forum?
5:30 PM 7/20/05, you
wrote:>I'm a real novice at Amtor.>Does one use the freqs as in
the MultiPsk Help?>Does anyone have a screen shot they can
send?>Tnx>Bill>KA0VXK>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196
I'm a real novice at Amtor.
Does one use the freqs as in the MultiPsk Help?
Does anyone have a screen shot they can send?
Tnx
Bill
KA0VXK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
JACK TAWN
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005
r efforts - it would be worth their time to make
more efforts and do more. It's a positive cycle.
Relying on "subsidized" development (no software is really free...) is limiting
what we do. We need a better software model that encourages and rewards
achievement.
73,
Bill - WA7NW
the
newer system features so it's more likely to run in this foreign
environments.
Bill - WA7NWP
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*&g
seem to get reliability by repetition, which is in the
procedure, not the modulation scheme.
I am sure the FEC and similar schemes are fine, but the cost in bandwidth
and co-existence with other users is high.
Bill
At 05:23 AM 6/17/2005 +, you wrote:
>Hi Bill,
>
>--- In digitalr
ter sharing, this is where I am stuck.
> S N I P
Bill Aycock - W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*>
o be less careful in the use of
the term.
Thanks- Bill
At 08:23 PM 6/16/2005 +, you wrote:
>S N I P
>
>To answer the person's question about "robust" in less technical way -
>it has to do with the objects ability to preform in adverse or
>unexpected conditions.
&g
dio. It's a good first step regardless
where
you end up going. Note that it'll also work peer-to-peer so you don't need
the Winlink infrastructure if you're experimenting with some friends.
http://www.airmail2000.com/
73,
Bill - WA7NWP
PS. For the JNOS discussion folk
me!
The basic JNOS discussion and announcements are on the NOS-BBS list which
was taken over by TAPR last year:
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
The latest work being done by Maiko is documented on his site at:
http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2
73
Bill - WA7
. Can you give me a definition relating only to your use of the word?
Help complete my education.
Bill
Bill Aycock - W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http:/
I see the word "robust" used with regard to digital modes quite frequently,
but I do not know what is meant.
Is anyone able (And willing) to define "robust" as it applies to
RF digital modes?
Thanks- Bill
At 08:50 AM 6/16/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>I have a couip
oing that for many years with JNOS and Linux... It's
certainly nothing new. Setting it up is a bit of a battle but it's not hard,
just
takes some time to work through all the little challenges.
The new support in JNOS2 for HF pactor is fills a big hole..
Bill - WA7NWP
The K3UK D
>Andy- I like the "stand-alone" feature of your Spotter. There are many
>"all-band" DX listings around, and one more will be relatively a small
>help, whereas, a listing limited to a special interest group, like
>Digital, is almost unique. \
If it aint broke,
Worked fine for me. I clicked on the URL in your post and-voila!, I was there.
Bill
At 06:38 PM 5/31/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Has anybody been able to connect to the Digital Spotter reflector
>lately? I keep trying but cannot get a telnet connection.
>
>Mike/K1EG
>
>
>
It would appear that this reflector has been QRMed by WinLink.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email t
Howard-you speak as if your "traffic" meant something.
Bill-4BSG
At 12:43 AM 4/8/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>Dave:
>
>Thanks for finally making my point..
>
>The sword cuts both ways...
>
>I have been reading reams of bogus statistics from the anti-Winlink crowd
&g
I think I see some of what Rick was describing.
-Bill--W4BSG
At 02:40 AM 4/8/2005 +, you wrote:
>No Skip, there were no virus's, just attempts. Read the message,
>please. Now I understand that you would like that to happen so you
>can spread your vendetta further. What are
here, and can identify
some of the more abrasive characters, I think.
However- thanks again, and I hope you are heard.
Bill- W4BSG
At 09:37 AM 4/7/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Ken had some good points but perhaps a few things to clarify. I a more
>middle of road type ham, I can see pros and c
lable "waterfall" displays show what is happening there. When a clean,
narrow "twin track" of a PSK31 signal is wiped out by some of the wide
modes, it is apparent that someone is not listening before sending, or does
not know how, or does not care. We need to do better.
Bill, W4BSG
A
301 - 400 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
