All,
problem has been fixed with SS ver 6.5.2 and related Squeeze FW 81. For
the moment I would stay with that. Hope the 6.5.2 will come out as an
official release soon, I don't like to go with BETAs...
Anyway I bought this new toy yesterday and.. HEY I'm so happy with
that! I'm impressed it's v
Well you are making my point exactly. I would not know how to do neither
1 or 2 unless I use few hours digging in these forums to see what other
people suggests or look into the directories myself to find out where
those files are.
Why not then just make it a "sticky" note at the top of this foru
But, as pointed out before in this thread and others, there is no need
for a full install of nightly 6.5.2.
It is only necessary to either:
1) update the firmware via SqueezeNetwork and adjust the version file
manually, or
2) grab the firmware & version file from the latest nightly upload.
The la
lucas72;197310 Wrote:
> I have checked onto bugzilla, here is the bug already noticed:
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4920 ;)
Uhm, that doesn't seem to be exactly the same issue. As far as I know
our problem here is "just" that you need to install a beta release to
get out of the
I have checked onto bugzilla, here is the bug already noticed:
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4920 ;)
--
lucas72
lucas72's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11288
View this thread: http:
Aguida;197173 Wrote:
> I must admit that I am impressed by how loyal this community is to the
> products and the company behind it. You guys even beat Apple's fans
> :-)
>
> However, the facts are that many people have paid for two products:
> Squeezebox, and Pandora (or other Sqeezenetworks ser
valeite;196876 Wrote:
> With me using the nightly updates to cure the firmware update loop
> caused freezing of the Transporter for which Slim Devices Support could
> not provide a solution I had to resort back to 6.5.1. The nightly 6.5.2
> is regarded by my supplier as Beta software and is not
How much in the firmware changes between releases (e.g. 6.5.1 -> 6.5.2)
that is incompatible with the older version? We know in this case that
there are fixes for SqueezeNetwork which probably don't impact
SlimServer. Can the firmware have a variable that tells SlimServer the
oldest version of S
Aguida;197173 Wrote:
>
> We are all passionate about this product, but please remember that this
> is a commercial product sold off-the-shelf for which official warranty
> and support obbligations exists.
Which is exactly why they have the equivalent of what Microsoft calls
"Hotfixes" for peopl
Slim/Logitech had a choice: keep Pandora/Rhapsody broken for all, or
check in a firmware fix that would mean the official release is out of
synch with the SqueezeNetwork firmware.
On one hand, Pandora and Rhapsody wouldn't work for anybody. Fatal
error. No more Pandora or Rhapsody.
On the othe
I must admit that I am impressed by how loyal this community is to the
products and the company behind it. You guys even beat Apple's fans
:-)
However, the facts are that many people have paid for two products:
Squeezebox, and Pandora (or other Sqeezenetworks serivces). Somebody
screw-up the firm
But you don't need a full install of 6.5.2 to cure this 'problem'
The only files required are from the slimserver/Firmware folder.
Maybe the developers could make this available as a seperate download,
until the official 6.5.2 release??
--
bonze
QNAP TS-101 (version 2.0.1 build 0302T)
SlimSer
valeite;196900 Wrote:
> Precisely Adam
There will always be bugs in software. Nightly, beta, triple stamped
gold releases. Doesn't matter.
The official SlimServer releases tend to get rushed out the door due to
some other cicrumstances. Shipment of the new Squeezebox2, the
Transporter, etc.
adamslim;196894 Wrote:
> If there are so many bugs found after 'release', what does that say
> about SD's testing?!?
Internal testing and bug reports from beta testers can only go so far.
This is why every sorfware vendor has to release updates and patches,
no matter how careful they are or how m
adamslim;196894 Wrote:
> Is that not slightly mad? If SD are providing 'release' versions, these
> should be the most bug-free and stable versions available, surely?
>
> If there are so many bugs found after 'release', what does that say
> about SD's testing?!?
Precisely Adam
I note from your
JJZolx;196862 Wrote:
> The nightly versions tend to be much _less_ buggy than the releases, as
> they incorporate fixes for bugs that were released.
Is that not slightly mad? If SD are providing 'release' versions,
these should be the most bug-free and stable versions available,
surely?
If the
I agree but that does not solve the problem.
I do not want to start invoking the UKs Sale of Goods Act which I will
if I do not get a satisfactory outcome by the end of next week, I just
want a solution.
Quote from Slim Devices. Note statement on support in my Quotation
marks.
Nightly Releases
E
valeite;196876 Wrote:
> The nightly 6.5.2 is regarded by my supplier as Beta software and is not
> covered by the warranty.
Back to your warranty fiasco. Tell your supplier he's an idiot.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile
With me using the nightly updates to cure the firmware update loop
caused freezing of the Transporter for which Slim Devices Support could
not provide a solution I had to resort back to 6.5.1. The nightly 6.5.2
is regarded by my supplier as Beta software and is not covered by the
warranty.
Not s
nRaecheR;196860 Wrote:
> Thanks for the answer, sorry, I searched the forum but I missed the
> previous posts.
>
> For me it isn't an option to update to a (incomplete/buggy etc.)
> nightly version and I can't understand why I need to downgrade the
> *player* firmware to use the current released
Thanks for the answer, sorry, I searched the forum but I missed the
previous posts.
For me it isn't an option to update to a (incomplete/buggy etc.)
nightly version and I can't understand why I need to downgrade the
*player* firmware to use the current released version of the slimserver
when the
There have been several recent threads about this. Try the link below
to understand the reasons, or just upgrade to 6.5.2 which seems to be
the preferred solution...
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34572&highlight=update+pandora
--
Siduhe
---
Hi,
I've got a really annoying problem when I switch from SqueezeNetwork to
my SlimServer and vice versa. Each time I switch the source I need to
"update" the firmware of my SqueezeBox V3. I'm using the latest
released SlimServer 6.5.1, which updates my SB3 to V72, SqueezeNetwork
updates it back
23 matches
Mail list logo
