Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-26 Thread jo-wie
Community page in the main text the Newsletter sign up today link shows a page not found. Newsletter link on the right pane is okay. -- jo-wie SB Classic, SC 7.3.3 auf GigaByte STA/C mit VIA C7 1GHz, 1GB RAM, 250 GB 2,5 HD, Ubuntu Desktop 8.04 LTS, CD - FLAC = dbpoweramp last.fm/user/jo-wie

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-24 Thread lemmy999
I got a link sent to me by logitech support to http://slimdevices.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/slimdevices.cfg/php/enduser/acct_login.php?p_next_page=myprofile.php But I can't stay at that page, it immediately redirects to the worthless (to me) www.logitechsqueezebox.com site. Any ideas? --

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-21 Thread Nikhil
Dingostrategy;433341 Wrote: When I bought my first one, I got tea at the wholesaler's house, and it ws delivered later that day on a bicycle. I am familiar with tea being delivered by bicycle, but a SqueezeBox? -- Nikhil

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-19 Thread funkstar
gorman;433312 Wrote: Sure, there's still 60 millions of us, though. On par with UK and France and more than Spain. Less money maybe? Go figure... :) yeah, size of market does not correlate to the size of population :) -- funkstar my collection: *1*x boom *2*x controller, *1*x receiver *2*x

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-18 Thread SilverRS8
Hi Sam, Thx for the feedback and listening to some comments given here in the forum. I can see the plugins are now available through a link on the new website. Thx. Frank -- SilverRS8 Author of -'AlbumCatalogCreator' (http://acc.vanholt.nl)- for SqueezeCenter SlimServer. 2xSB3, 1xDuet,

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-18 Thread Dingostrategy
Hi there, I am sure you are onto it, but linking to and fro the secure area (purchasing) causes all kinds of weird things, obviously related to re-directions. I am sure it will settle down but just a heads up if that didn't yet make it to the whiteboard down in the web design dungeon. --

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-18 Thread gorman
Schindler;431653 Wrote: and why it is only in English? Logitech is international - the Squeeebox not? ChristianConsidering the level of Internet services offered in some European countries... sometimes I have doubts about what Logitech thinks in this regard. -- gorman

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-18 Thread funkstar
gorman;433114 Wrote: Edit: sorry for the above, it's just that US and UK are getting awesome services and in Italy there's pretty much nothing. I like the new website, all in all a good job. If you mean searives like Deezer, Napster and Rhapsody, thenthis is all down to the companies

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-18 Thread gorman
funkstar;433143 Wrote: As with everything, the larger markets will get serviced first.Sure, there's still 60 millions of us, though. On par with UK and France and more than Spain. Less money maybe? Go figure... :) -- gorman

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-18 Thread Dingostrategy
gorman;433312 Wrote: Sure, there's still 60 millions of us, though. On par with UK and France and more than Spain. Less money maybe? Go figure... :) Um, well I live in India. Only the SB3 is available. No boom, no Duet, forget TP! I think population is only part of the analysis. :) When I

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-17 Thread JJZolx
Heads up people: Like it or not, it should be obvious by now that this line of products is being aimed in totally new directions from that of just one or two years ago. Third party plugins and even the serving of local music are now secondary to the serving of paid Internet music services. I

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-17 Thread Pale Blue Ego
Yep, they're trying to de-emphasize the geekiness factor. No more focus on open-source community-driven. -- Pale Blue Ego Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-17 Thread peterw
Goodsounds;432712 Wrote: I think your criticism of the new site's photos is a bit harsh. I don't find it offensive, and I don't think you should either. I'm not offended, I just think it's sad that the marketing folk have decided to lean heavily on lifestyle imagery and downplay the actual

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-17 Thread Sam
Everyone, Thank you for your comments, just wanted to let you everyone know the Squeezebox marketing team IS following this thread and we be making appropriate changes. Your support is appreciated, Sam -- Sam Team Squeezebox Sales and Marketing

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread Apteryx
Small point - the Accessories link actually points to the Transporter page -- Apteryx Apteryx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread Goodsounds
peterw;432351 Wrote: It's difficult to prove which is better when two products do very similar things Very very true peterw;432351 Wrote: So it makes sense not to spend time talking about -90 dB noise vs -100 dB noise. Right, especially because perhaps 90% or more of the population

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread Pale Blue Ego
The Aerosmith thing is hokey. -- Pale Blue Ego Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64421

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread simbo
Pale Blue Ego;432569 Wrote: The Aerosmith thing is hokey. Because it's Aerosmith, or just the contest? -- simbo *bedroom:* squeezebox boom; *study:* squeezebox 3; *lounge:* squeezeslave; *conservatory/garden:* squeezebox receiver; *anywhere:* squeezebox controller 'last.fm'

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread peterw
peterw;431944 Wrote: Where is the download plug-in section? I'd guess that's what Partners - Add-Ons is supposed to link to, but as MeSue notes, those links trigger 404 errors. And I guessed wrong. The new design is up, the Partner links work, and Add-Ons does not highlight plugins,

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread erland
peterw;432684 Wrote: The Downloads section of the Developer Resources page is a real ghetto for 3rd party plugins; the vast majority of the people who use my plugins don't seem to be developers, so why in the world would they look at a Developer Resources page? Are you trying to downplay

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread erland
Some of the page headers on various pages like the forum and the online store contains the new logo but still contains the old menu. I suppose the plan is to change these to the new menu structure and layout ? -- erland Erland Isaksson 'My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info) (Install my

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread Pale Blue Ego
simbo;432574 Wrote: Because it's Aerosmith, or just the contest? Both. It's so prominent it invites confusion about what exactly is being marketed there. Then you also have the prominent Deezer and Slacker logos - more confusion. As for Aerosmith, they were a so-so band back in the 70s

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-16 Thread Goodsounds
peterw, Maybe it's just different perspectives at work here. The favorite display in our house, on just 2 SB classics, is the time. A weather report in every room would hardly seem to be necessary, but I guess not to you. I think your criticism of the new site's photos is a bit harsh. I don't

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-15 Thread simbo
Typo... on the overview page, in the product table against the Transporter... -You are an audiophile. You are happiest when listening to a high fidelity recording of *you* favorite artist through your high- end stereo system.- I'm also not keen on the bias towards the Duet as a first purchase,

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-15 Thread morris_minor
I have to agree that the Classic is the ideal intro-model. Pushing people towards a Duet is asking for trouble. Also - aren't Transporters branded Transporter now, not Slim Devices? The Gallery pics for the TP need updating . . . -- morris_minor Living Room: SB3/SBC Study: SBR Kitchen: Boom

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-15 Thread srasher
First of all: basic style is nice. One minor error on the starting page: in the animated main graphics, all three pictures (Boom, Transporter, Duet) show the tool tip text: Squeezebox Duet. Click to learn more. The links are correct but it might be confusing that the tool tip is the same for

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-15 Thread peterw
Goodsounds;432065 Wrote: the availability of 3rd party plugins, both music-related and not, is a key difference between Squeezebox and its closest competitors. I think it should be more prominently highlighted Let's think about the target market. I'd bet the vast majority - maybe 3

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-14 Thread SilverRS8
Looks very nice. Good to see a how it works section which may attract more potential buyers. Where is the download plug-in section? -- SilverRS8 Author of -'AlbumCatalogCreator' (http://acc.vanholt.nl)- for SqueezeCenter SlimServer

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-14 Thread peterw
SilverRS8;431873 Wrote: Where is the download plug-in section? I'd guess that's what Partners - Add-Ons is supposed to link to, but as MeSue notes, those links trigger 404 errors. Seems weird to me -- the availability of 3rd party plugins, both music-related and not, is a key difference

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-14 Thread MrSinatra
as someone said earlier, VIDEOS, lots of them, and embed them, (maybe even use utube) and imo, the very first thing to cover is that the device works via TCP/IP in a server/client relationship, NOT a driver model as many will assume. -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 sbc (my home)

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-14 Thread Goodsounds
peterw;431944 Wrote: - the availability of 3rd party plugins, both music-related and not, is a key difference between Squeezebox and its closest competitors. I think it should be more prominently highlighted Let's think about the target market. I'd bet the vast majority - maybe 3 of 4 -

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-14 Thread corbey
Seems harder to find the plugins page. Unless I missed it, you have to access one of the pages that still has the old menu system, like the wiki, before you can see the plugins menu. -- corbey My two-channel system: - SB-3 through a CIAudio VDA-2 DAC (and using Nokia N800 as a remote) - Sony

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-13 Thread Dingostrategy
Labarum;431654 Wrote: The Logitech Boom is well and appropriately named. Would the renaming of the SB be too radical a step? Logitech Muse? I'd be calling these things transporter slim, transporter classic and transporter professional, but that's just me. They're all transporters,

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-13 Thread Nonreality
Dingostrategy;431658 Wrote: I'd be calling these things transporter slim, transporter classic, transporter boom and transporter professional, but that's just me. They're all transporters, arent they? The name has been hijacked by the high end unit. I would normally be against renaming

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-13 Thread epoch1970
Hi, I have read how it works, and I would still improve on it a little bit. - There is a lot of text, perhaps you could rewrite portions or more probably use some way (eg bold text) to make the essence appear more easily. - The first 2 pages are littered with buzz words and promises. Then comes

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-13 Thread heidtheba
First impressions - very appealing to the eye, and better explained the novice. However- I am in the UK. And once again, I see prices in dollars, and no obvious prospect that I can actually buy this line of products in the UK, which is sad. Sorry, but if I didn't know better (I own classic, duet

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-13 Thread MeSue
Most of my thoughts have already been commented on. Except this one... The overview page states: Squeezebox players also work great with powered speakers, like the Logitech Z-5. Why not have these speakers in the accessory page of the online store? Also, all the links under Partners at the

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Dingostrategy
I think it looks good. I was just wondering if you could get the number of the nice lady in the Transporter image. She looks like she's humoring the guy in the picture, and he appears to be a knob. I am much nicer. But seriously. It takes a few clicks to get down into the 'what is squeezebox'

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Labarum
Does look good. -- Labarum Brian Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box Beresford DAC TC-7510 MK6/4 - Quad 405-2 refurbished by 405man Quart 980s Speakers Boom in kitchen. Labarum's Profile:

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Siduhe
You may want to clarify this statement: It doesn't matter if your library includes 100 tracks or 100,000. Or if you rip your own CDs or buy your music from services like iTunes, Amazon MP3, and eMusic. People will own historic iTunes tracks with DRM on them and these do not work in SC AFAIK

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread jo-wie
Overall design is OK. To many different font sizes and styles in the community page. I do not know if I like the line spacing. Visited with Firefox. -- jo-wie SB Classic, SC 7.3.3 auf GigaByte STA/C mit VIA C7 1GHz, 1GB RAM, 250 GB 2,5 HD, Ubuntu Desktop 8.04 last.fm/user/jo-wie

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread iPhone
Mark Miksis;431575 Wrote: On Monday, we will be relaunching the public website with a new look and feel. You can see it now at www.logitechsqueezebox.com and on Monday all www.slimdevices.com traffic will be redirected there. We expect the new design to: - Make it easier for new users

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Mark Miksis
iPhone;431608 Wrote: OK Mark, here is a thought. How are the tons of links in the Forum going to be handled? Often times when we help somebody, we will direct them right to where the Answer, Manual, or Document is on Slim Devices dot Com. Are these links still going to resolve? At least for

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread davep
I'm really not sure if I stumbled upon this site and the first thing I saw was the huge word Aerosmith at the top in a size, prominence and colour which ensure that it draws the eye (several point sizes lager than the name of the company or the product) I wouldn't be somewhat confused about where

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Nonreality
I haven't looked at the site yet but I think it's a great idea. When I was first looking into the SB3 it took a while before I could figure out exactly what it did. I think other sites finally let me figure it out. Might be because I'm slow but I don't think the original site really laid out

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread davep
One more thing... Did anybody else notice how many of the illustrative pics of folks having fun with their SBs featured one or more beverages? I think this is excellent and continues the connection between the two pleasures set way back at the start of the SB story when Sean famously soldered

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Goodsounds
I think it's a good thing to refresh the home page and refocus the message. I agree with nonreality's comments and have a few others: 1. Any chance of getting a domain name with fewer characters? Shorter names are more inviting - longer ones can be a put-off. 2. I find the graphic under How

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Schindler
and why it is only in English? Logitech is international - the Squeeebox not? Christian -- Schindler Schindler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8461 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Relaunching the public website as www.logitechsqueezebox.com

2009-06-12 Thread Labarum
Goodsounds;431651 Wrote: 1. Any chance of getting a domain name with fewer characters? Shorter names are more inviting - longer ones can be a put-off. The problem arises from the name Squeezebox. I have observed before that I love the product but the name has, for me, all the wrong