Re: [slim] I don't want to pay for trackstat !

2011-10-27 Thread reniera
briank;665541 Wrote: -1 I disagree. Erland's excellent plugins provide the tools to create the (IMHO) close-to-ultimate smart music selection system (short of actually determining your taste by reading your mind or using the if you liked X then you'll probably like Y because other people

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread HectorHughMunro
gruntwolla;665343 Wrote: Forgive me if I'm being naive here, but if paranoia becomes reality, couldn't a third party take over the running of mysqueezebox.com. If the new third party were seen to be committed to rd, then would people not be willing to pay a modest annual subscription?,

Re: [slim] Print out of CD list

2011-10-27 Thread HeadBanger
@ DK Dennis. Good stuff this is somesting I'd definitely use. Please keep us all posted on your progress! -- HeadBanger Duet Radio served by HP N36 running FreeNAS/SlimNAS HeadBanger's Profile:

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread gruntwolla
HectorHughMunro;665616 Wrote: If they could make it better, I'd pay for it. I agree, this is paranoia until it actually happens. I could live without Squeezebox Server being updated but I'd be far more concerned if support was withdrawn from Ipeng! I think all this stems ( for me anyway)

Re: [slim] I don't want to pay for trackstat !

2011-10-27 Thread briank
reniera;665615 Wrote: Briank, Did you try the excellent sugarcube plugin ? In the past, I used it together with trackstat to block unwanted (rated 1) tracks but I realize that removing trackstat doesn't change anything. Very few rated 1 goes thru anyhow. Sugarcube realy adds values and

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread gbcambridge
verypsb;664931 Wrote: Hi, Does anybody know a good Squeezebox alternative? I'm not really confident that the Logitech Squeezebox lineup will last much longer. Important features (to me): I have just started to look at the Duet, and I cannot find it on the Logitech US web page. It is

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread eganders
I think if Logitech were to decide to not produce Squeezeboxes anymore, they'd probably look to sell it, unless it's just too tied up with the Revue, etc. -- eganders eganders's Profile:

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox control app for Palm webOS devices

2011-10-27 Thread excalibur
wt0;626731 Wrote: As long as the pixi has a palm profile and that profile was created while the phone was in a country which can have paid apps in the App Catalog, you should be able to buy Squeeze Control even without registering the device with a carrier. Hi Angry Goat, I am very aware

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread aubuti
gbcambridge;665654 Wrote: Can anyone clarify what is going on with Duet.. and why Transporter now appears to be back? Logitech's seat-of-the-pants inventory management does make it hard to tell where things are going The Duet is discontinued, and so is the Transporter. So retailers are

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox control app for Palm webOS devices

2011-10-27 Thread wt0
excalibur;665662 Wrote: From our numbers you will never be rich anyway. We are a dying race... If never being able to get rich off of an item is enough of a reason for giving it away then probably the vast majority of all items you see in any store should be given away for free. Because of

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox control app for Palm webOS devices

2011-10-27 Thread pippin
I think his main point is distribution channels, not getting it for free... Is there any feasible alternative for WebOS' market when WebOS' market is not available in a lot of countries? -- pippin --- see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and *New: iPeng for iPad*, at penguinlovesmusic.com

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox control app for Palm webOS devices

2011-10-27 Thread wt0
No, there's only one marketplace for webOS. Currently, the only other alternative would be to sell it directly, but I never wanted to deal all the headaches that goes along with that. -- wt0 -- SqueezeControl for webOS, http://www.angrygoatapps.com

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread socistep
gruntwolla;665626 Wrote: I think all this stems ( for me anyway) in disappointment that whenever I go into a hifi shop ( something I'm doing quite frequently at the moment ) there is always a sonos system on display ready for a demo, whereas one can only buy Squeezeboxen online nowadays.

Re: [slim] I don't want to pay for trackstat !

2011-10-27 Thread mps
briank;665541 Wrote: -1 I disagree. Erland's excellent plugins provide the tools to create the (IMHO) close-to-ultimate smart music selection system (short of actually determining your taste by reading your mind or using the if you liked X then you'll probably like Y because other people

Re: [slim] I don't want to pay for trackstat !

2011-10-27 Thread artintampa
To me it's simple. Everyone deserves to get paid for their craft. Be it art, technology, or ability to create. It's called capitalism. I paid for Mr Erland's products and I strongly feel it has enhanced my system. If one does not wish to contribute to someone's time and effort, then dont

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
when I opened the front page of the NY Times website this morning, there is a very prominent SONOS ad. When you click on it, you go to a site that does a very good job of simply explaining how an integrated sonos system works (with one player or many). sigh if only logitech could get their

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread gruntwolla
socistep;665679 Wrote: Hi Trev I went to the Manchester HiFi show last sunday, which I enjoyed, Logitech had no presence at all there - from a streaming perspective Sonos had a stand as did Simple Audio (although I managed to miss it!) - There was also the big hulk boxes of Naim, Cyrus

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread erland
socistep;665679 Wrote: I too have found nothing on display in HiFi shops also Thanks Ian PS - In a HiFi shop is where a potential 'Touch 2' - beefed up to run tinySB and support external HDDs better would, I believe, demo and sell very well - a pipe dream though... The question is

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread erland
garym;665700 Wrote: when I opened the front page of the NY Times website this morning, there is a very prominent SONOS ad. When you click on it, you go to a site that does a very good job of simply explaining how an integrated sonos system works (with one player or many). sigh if only

Re: [slim] I don't want to pay for trackstat !

2011-10-27 Thread Phil Leigh
briank;665541 Wrote: -1 I disagree. Erland's excellent plugins provide the tools to create the (IMHO) close-to-ultimate smart music selection system (short of actually determining your taste by reading your mind or using the if you liked X then you'll probably like Y because other people

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread paul.raulerson
erland;665704 Wrote: My feeling is that Logitech is mostly used to be able to sell most of their other products without any advertising. This is easy for mices, web cams and similar stuff but it's a lot harder for products that need advertising, like Squeezebox, Harmony remotes and Revue.

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
paul.raulerson;665722 Wrote: In any case, none of this says to me that they are automatically going to shut down the Squeezebox stuff. Is there something I don't know about that is generating this concern? -Paul not at all. about once a year or so, our general paranoia pops up and

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread nicolas75
erland;665703 Wrote: ... My local HiFi shop were selling Sonos, Teac and Logitech, their message was that Logitech's devices (including Transporter) was bad in comparison to Teac and Sonos, primarily from an audio quality perspective. We all know this isn't the case, at least it's not a

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread verypsb
nicolas75;665731 Wrote: But it is simply not possible with SBS nor TinySBS. Browse Music Folder? -- verypsb 1x Boom, 1x Classic, 2x Controller, 2x Receiver, 1x Touch Please vote for bug 1330: new music should work on creation date http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330 Please

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Lambchop
Thans Garym When I connect to mysqueezebox.com, Last.fm is not in the list of apps available. I also checked My Apps to see if I had already had it there but I didn't. Is Last.fm App no longer available? -- Lambchop

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread nicolas75
verypsb;665733 Wrote: Browse Music Folder? No this is not possible. -- nicolas75 nicolas75's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15823 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread Mnyb
paul.raulerson;665722 Wrote: LOL! I think Logitech accidentally create a high-end audio product with the Squeezebox Touch, when they were trying to compete with Bose. After not having gangbusters success with the Transporter. Now they have little idea how to move forward with such a

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Mnyb
Last fm is not avaible in all countries on a squeezebox . -- Mnyb Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub.

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Lambchop
But is the Scrobbling part of Last.fm not freely available? I can already use this on my other squeezeboxes including the Touch when it is connected to my pc library. I am not looking to set up a Last.fm subscription but to scrobble my played tracks to Last.fm when I use the Touch server (USB)

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Mnyb
i also used last fm from the wrong country :-/ the server onboard Touch does run any plugins, so you can't use the third party scrobbling either. or the server plugin from logitech ? they started to use geo ip a while back , so playing is not possible I used the old trick of setting my

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Lambchop
Thanks MyNb. I am beginning to feel that I will have to go back to using my pc for longer periods. One last question before I begin to sound like I am obsessed with this!! In the settings advanced Squeezebox information Plugin Modules there is a Last.fm Audiscrobbler v1.0 listed. What is

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
Yes you should definitely install this plugin. Sorry, I assumed you had this. Not sure why you don't see last.fm in your app gallery but it could be your country. Ps. I'm a big fan of using SbS on a computer, NAS, etc that is on 24/7. Too many low power use options for this now not to be a good

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
In the settings you mention, make sure your lastfm credentials are entered. -- garym Location 1: Vortexbox Appliance 6TB (1.10) SbS 7.6.2 Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio) Location 2: Win7(64) laptop SbS 7.6.2 TouchBenchmark DAC I, Boom, Radio w/Battery

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Lambchop
No luck When I go to applet installer, audiscrobbler is not listed as one of the plug-in's I can install. I've tried the reinstall-all option in that menu but nothing changed when it restarted. In the menu, settingsadvancedLast.fm audiscrobbler is still visible but not editable When you say to

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
Lambchop;665765 Wrote: No luck When I go to applet installer, audiscrobbler is not listed as one of the plug-in's I can install. I've tried the reinstall-all option in that menu but nothing changed when it restarted. In the menu, settingsadvancedLast.fm audiscrobbler is still visible but

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
froth;665768 Wrote: Even if the whole SB line is tossed out by logitech, as long as you dont use mysqueeze.com and your SB hardware works, you can keep using it. More than likly for years after. true, for your own music, and internet radio streams where you can enter the URL. But one needs

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread jcowling
froth;665768 Wrote: Even if the whole SB line is tossed out by logitech, as long as you dont use mysqueeze.com and your SB hardware works, you can keep using it. More than likly for years after. I plan to do just that. By the time I need to replace my kit or expand it there may other good

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread paul.raulerson
froth;665768 Wrote: Even if the whole SB line is tossed out by logitech, as long as you dont use mysqueeze.com and your SB hardware works, you can keep using it. More than likly for years after. I plan to do just that. By the time I need to replace my kit or expand it there may other good

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread garym
In my paranoid moments, I worry about the loss of this very useful community of experienced users if you logged on to this forum one day to find it gone (which is likely how it would happenpull the plug with no notice). I've often thought that we should create a google group or something that

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread castalla
A similar 'sudden event' happened at Reciva - they closed the official users' forum without any notice. Fortunately, somebody had already set up a 'Reciva Refuge' forum elsewhere ... and many users simply just transferred to the new independent forum. Even Reciva have now joined as a 'helpful'

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread froth
Even if the whole SB line is tossed out by logitech, as long as you dont use mysqueeze.com and your SB hardware works, you can keep using it. More than likly for years after. I plan to do just that. By the time I need to replace my kit or expand it there may other good options out there. If I

Re: [slim] Scrobbling from Squeezebox Touch server ?

2011-10-27 Thread Lambchop
Apologies for the confusion, I am doing a great job confusing myself too. I found this on the Mysqueezebox.com website under What's new Player menus have changed If you’re an existing Squeezebox user you may have noticed that some of your player menus have changed. We’ve eliminated the Music

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread erland
garym;665773 Wrote: In my paranoid moments, I worry about the loss of this very useful community of experienced users if you logged on to this forum one day to find it gone (which is likely how it would happenpull the plug with no notice). I've often thought that we should create a

[slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread bjs
Interesting news: http://www.tuaw.com/2011/10/27/apples-alac-codec-is-now-open-source/ Personally I think this is great news. I currently keep my music library in FLAC format. But we're an Apple house, and lately I've been considering converting it to ALAC so that everything works better with

Re: [slim] I don't want to pay for trackstat !

2011-10-27 Thread GeeJay
Phil Leigh;665705 Wrote: Or you could simply enjoy MIP or random mixes of your entire collection having deleted/archived any 1 or 2 star stuff... I bet once you have rated something 1 or 2 you never listen to it again - so it might as well be removed from the collection. So the 1-5 scheme

Re: [slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread wazza
I believe ALAC has been supported by squeezebox for a while, but without the ability to seek within the track. This is great news, and hopefully the seek feature will finally be available in the next release. I too was wanting to convert my flac library to ALAC, simply due to the fact there's

Re: [slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread andyg
ALAC seeking is supported. But yes this is great news, we can finally implement the official decoder. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread:

Re: [slim] clear channel radio station not playing again

2011-10-27 Thread nyceyes
Hi Again Friends: :) Since my last post earlier in the thread, I noticed now that station KPOJ doesn't play on my SB Touch either, when I attempt to start that stream using my display remote as opposed to starting it via the touch screen (which does work). I can and do start/play other

Re: [slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread paulster
This is great news. Even better would be Apple adding support for FLAC to their products but this is a great step forward for lossless audio! -- paulster Receiver stuck at blue LED state after reboot? Please vote for bug '17462' (http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17462) Web

Re: [slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread Grumpy Bob
wazza;665791 Wrote: I believe ALAC has been supported by squeezebox for a while, but without the ability to seek within the track. This is great news, and hopefully the seek feature will finally be available in the next release. I too was wanting to convert my flac library to ALAC,

Re: [slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread erland
Are there any advantages of using FLAC now when ALAC is open sourced ? Is FLAC still better supported in Squeezeboxes ? Is FLAC still better supported in other software/hardware players ? The big advantage with ALAC from my perspective would be that suddenly I can use the same files both in

Re: [slim] Good Squeezebox alternative?

2011-10-27 Thread Mnyb
They also need the comunity we are the white mice in mr hergers and mr grundmans labyrinth ;) Have you seen the bug reports by the some outsourced testers they finaly are using for 7.7 ? Admittetly 90% bug reports from the forum is noise. But some here find a file real bugs very well

Re: [slim] Apple's ALAC now open source!

2011-10-27 Thread paulster
erland;665802 Wrote: Are there any advantages of using FLAC now when ALAC is open sourced ? Well, it may have been open sourced but the likes of Logitech still have to develop decoders for it allowing full use of the specification (seek, etc.) so FLAC still has the advantage for the time being.